<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Freedom&#8217;s Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/freedoms-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>NBC Reverses Course, Allows Conservative Ad</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/12/nbc-reverses-course-allows-conservative-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:42:44 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/12/nbc-reverses-course-allows-conservative-ad/</link>
			<dc:creator>Zachary Roth</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/12/nbc-reverses-course-allows-conservative-ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That was quick!  On Friday, <a href="/2007/nbc-rejects-ad-conservative-advocacy-group">we noted</a> that NBC had rejected an ad from the conservative group Freedom's Watch that asked viewers to think of U.S. soldiers in Iraq over the holidays.  The network had said its decision was based on the fact that the ad contained a link to the group's Web site, which has explicitly political content, and therefore violaterd the network's prohibition on controversial issue ads.</p>
<p>But over the weekend -- after Newt Gingrich had taken to Fox News to urge conservatives to boycott NBC -- came word that the network had changed its mind.   In <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hTMokDMiXMd0XcDrQi83NoM18K4QD8TDIR6G4">a statement released Saturday evening and reported by the Associated Press</a>, NBC declared: &quot;&quot;We have reviewed and changed our ad standards guidelines and made the decision that our policy will apply to content only and not to a referenced Web site.&quot;</p>
<p>The original ban on controversial issue ads doesn't make a whole lot of sense to us, but this modification makes even less. If an ad sends viewers directly to a Web site, why shouldn't the content of that site have to meet whatever standards are required of the ad? Would NBC allow an anodyne ad that gave out a link to the homepage of the American Nazi party?  </p>
<p>Still, at least NBC got Newt Gingrich off its back. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was quick!  On Friday, <a href="/2007/nbc-rejects-ad-conservative-advocacy-group">we noted</a> that NBC had rejected an ad from the conservative group Freedom's Watch that asked viewers to think of U.S. soldiers in Iraq over the holidays.  The network had said its decision was based on the fact that the ad contained a link to the group's Web site, which has explicitly political content, and therefore violaterd the network's prohibition on controversial issue ads.</p>
<p>But over the weekend -- after Newt Gingrich had taken to Fox News to urge conservatives to boycott NBC -- came word that the network had changed its mind.   In <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hTMokDMiXMd0XcDrQi83NoM18K4QD8TDIR6G4">a statement released Saturday evening and reported by the Associated Press</a>, NBC declared: &quot;&quot;We have reviewed and changed our ad standards guidelines and made the decision that our policy will apply to content only and not to a referenced Web site.&quot;</p>
<p>The original ban on controversial issue ads doesn't make a whole lot of sense to us, but this modification makes even less. If an ad sends viewers directly to a Web site, why shouldn't the content of that site have to meet whatever standards are required of the ad? Would NBC allow an anodyne ad that gave out a link to the homepage of the American Nazi party?  </p>
<p>Still, at least NBC got Newt Gingrich off its back. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/12/nbc-reverses-course-allows-conservative-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>NBC Rejects Ad From Conservative Group</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/12/nbc-rejects-ad-from-conservative-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:08:41 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/12/nbc-rejects-ad-from-conservative-group/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/12/nbc-rejects-ad-from-conservative-group/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NBC has turned down an ad from the conservative advocacy group, Freedom's Watch, that encouraged viewers to think of the U.S. soldiers in Iraq over the holidays, the Associated Press <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8TCPEPG0&amp;show_article=1">reported</a> today.
<p>&quot;NBC said it declined to air the ad because it refers to the group's Web site, which the network said was too political,&quot; reports the AP, &quot;not because of the ad's message.&quot;</p>
<p>NBC implied that generating publicity by having the ad turned down may have been the group's goal all along.  <span class="lingo_region"> &quot;Candidly, some folks have found that you get more attention when an ad is not accepted,&quot; said an NBC official. </span></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC has turned down an ad from the conservative advocacy group, Freedom's Watch, that encouraged viewers to think of the U.S. soldiers in Iraq over the holidays, the Associated Press <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8TCPEPG0&amp;show_article=1">reported</a> today.
<p>&quot;NBC said it declined to air the ad because it refers to the group's Web site, which the network said was too political,&quot; reports the AP, &quot;not because of the ad's message.&quot;</p>
<p>NBC implied that generating publicity by having the ad turned down may have been the group's goal all along.  <span class="lingo_region"> &quot;Candidly, some folks have found that you get more attention when an ad is not accepted,&quot; said an NBC official. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/12/nbc-rejects-ad-from-conservative-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
