<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; House and Garden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/house-and-garden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Hoarders: Conde Nast Edition</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/03/hoarders-conde-nast-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:45:58 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/03/hoarders-conde-nast-edition/</link>
			<dc:creator>Molly Fischer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/03/hoarders-conde-nast-edition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/browning.jpg?w=300&h=200" />In this week's <em>Times Magazine</em>, Dominique Browning <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/magazine/28fasttrack-t.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">looks back</a> on her final days as editor at <em>House &amp; Garden</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the four days we were given to pack up our belongings, I was overwhelmed with an urge to hoard and began stuffing every <em>House &amp; Garden</em> paper bag, pencil and notepad I could get my hands on into a box, so that I would never run out of office supplies. I salvaged enough to run a small corporation from my kitchen. I didn't think of this as stealing. I thought of it as a twisted sort of recycling--part of the strange new economy of severance into which I had been thrown.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can take her job, but you can't take her can-do spirit.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/browning.jpg?w=300&h=200" />In this week's <em>Times Magazine</em>, Dominique Browning <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/magazine/28fasttrack-t.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">looks back</a> on her final days as editor at <em>House &amp; Garden</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the four days we were given to pack up our belongings, I was overwhelmed with an urge to hoard and began stuffing every <em>House &amp; Garden</em> paper bag, pencil and notepad I could get my hands on into a box, so that I would never run out of office supplies. I salvaged enough to run a small corporation from my kitchen. I didn't think of this as stealing. I thought of it as a twisted sort of recycling--part of the strange new economy of severance into which I had been thrown.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can take her job, but you can't take her can-do spirit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/03/hoarders-conde-nast-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/browning.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>January Groans: Mags&#8217; Lean Month Gets Downright Gaunt</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/12/january-groans-mags-lean-month-gets-downright-gaunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:31:45 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/12/january-groans-mags-lean-month-gets-downright-gaunt/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/12/january-groans-mags-lean-month-gets-downright-gaunt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/otr2_5.jpg?w=221&h=300" />Over the next week or two, the January issues of monthly magazines will start hitting newsstands—or perhaps “lightly floating onto newstands like little snowflakes” would be a better way of putting it.
<p class="text">“A lot of people are really, really down in the dumps about what January looks like,” said Jay Lauf, the publisher of the recently revamped <em>Atlantic</em><em>. </em></p>
<p class="text">Layoffs, hiring freezes and canceled Christmas parties have cast a general chill over the magazine world. But with budget season finally wrapped up, it looked like the industry could finally take a much-needed breather right before the New Year.</p>
<p class="text">Then suddenly more bad news emerged from the business side: bleaker-than-usual ad-page numbers for January.<span>  </span></p>
<p class="text">“I think they’re dramatically, dramatically off,” said one Condé Nast insider. “The issues are much thinner than I expected.”</p>
<p class="text">January is a historically anemic month for magazines ad pages. (Who wants to buy an ad after everyone is finished with their Christmas shopping?) But the gauntness of January 2009 is drawing extra scrutiny, since this is the first round of books that closed post-crash, at some point in mid- or late-October, a full month after Lehman Brothers went down on Sept. 15.</p>
<p class="text">Now some are wondering if this could be a harbinger of even grimmer times ahead. “Rightly or wrongly, people are looking at this as a sign of a really, really, really tough year,” Mr. Lauf said.</p>
<p class="text">Word started spreading at magazine palaces like 4 Times Square and Hearst Tower as soon as ad-sales staffers returned from Thanksgiving break: their waistlines expanded; their bottom lines, not so much.</p>
<p class="text">Early copies of <em>Bon Appetit</em>, Condé Nast’s B food magazine (after <em>Gourmet</em>), especially raised eyebrows. A source who got a peek at the January issue told Off the Record that it’s only 108 pages altogether—practically a leaflet—and its table of contents page appears on the magazine’s second page, a discomfortingly early placement at the front of the book. The space inside its back cover is an advertisement for a <em>Bon Appetit </em>cooking volume: a house ad rather than the traditional big outside corporate purchase. </p>
<p class="text">“It’s barely perfect-bound,” said our source, referring to the glued spine that is the modern standard for monthly glossies of a certain length.</p>
<p class="text"><em>Wired </em>is also expected to have a very rough month after getting hit hard due to a slump with consumer electronic ads. A more modest loss is projected for the Tina Fey cover of <em>Vanity Fair, </em>which will fall back about 7 percent this January, down to 43.48 pages from 46.75 last year.</p>
<p class="text">Over at Hearst, meanwhile, spokeswoman Alexandra Carlin conceded that <em>Harper’s Bazaar</em> is off by one or two pages. “But January is traditionally a lighter month for magazines,” she reminded Off the Record.</p>
<p class="text">“January issues will never be a litmus test,” said one optimistic publisher who nonetheless requested anonymity, given the skittish climate. “All it takes is four or five advertisers for most magazines to go in either direction”—good or bad.</p>
<p class="text">“The year always ends with kind of a whimper,” the publisher continued. “You can’t derive great importance from it.”</p>
<p class="text">Mr. Lauf also refused to think bad thoughts—out loud, at least.</p>
<p class="text">“It’s about not letting a negative prognosis become a self-fulfilling prophecy,” he said. “I don’t think we should read too, too much into it.”</p>
<p class="text">But Mr. Lauf is in a better position than most. Ever since <em>The Atlantic</em> cut back its publishing schedule to 10 issues per year from 12, it’s free from the burden of having to sell a stand-alone January issue. He got to squish the ugly month in with February!</p>
<p class="text">Mr. Lauf said that <em>The Atlantic</em>’s ad-page count might remain flat for their first 2009 issue, but there are still a few more weeks till close. </p>
<p class="text">Which makes one wonder: Could coming out with 10 issues a year be a economic new model for the monthly? (And then what would you call it instead of “monthly”?) <em>Portfolio</em> announced its plans to do that back in October. </p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt">Then again, it’s not a guaranteed formula for profit. <em>Men’s Vogue </em>ran unsuccessfully at 10 times a year, and now its production schedule has been reduced to a barely-there twice per year. And as ad buyers become more selective, it makes one wonder how many magazines in the same category one parent company can sustain. (Witness the sad crumbling of <em>O at Home, House and Garden, </em>etc. Could food and fashion be next?)</span></p>
<p class="text">“It’s like, ‘Oh my God, if we start in this hole, how can we dig out of this,’” Mr. Lauf said.</p>
<p style="text-align: left" class="emailtagline" align="left"><em>jkoblin@observer.com</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/otr2_5.jpg?w=221&h=300" />Over the next week or two, the January issues of monthly magazines will start hitting newsstands—or perhaps “lightly floating onto newstands like little snowflakes” would be a better way of putting it.
<p class="text">“A lot of people are really, really down in the dumps about what January looks like,” said Jay Lauf, the publisher of the recently revamped <em>Atlantic</em><em>. </em></p>
<p class="text">Layoffs, hiring freezes and canceled Christmas parties have cast a general chill over the magazine world. But with budget season finally wrapped up, it looked like the industry could finally take a much-needed breather right before the New Year.</p>
<p class="text">Then suddenly more bad news emerged from the business side: bleaker-than-usual ad-page numbers for January.<span>  </span></p>
<p class="text">“I think they’re dramatically, dramatically off,” said one Condé Nast insider. “The issues are much thinner than I expected.”</p>
<p class="text">January is a historically anemic month for magazines ad pages. (Who wants to buy an ad after everyone is finished with their Christmas shopping?) But the gauntness of January 2009 is drawing extra scrutiny, since this is the first round of books that closed post-crash, at some point in mid- or late-October, a full month after Lehman Brothers went down on Sept. 15.</p>
<p class="text">Now some are wondering if this could be a harbinger of even grimmer times ahead. “Rightly or wrongly, people are looking at this as a sign of a really, really, really tough year,” Mr. Lauf said.</p>
<p class="text">Word started spreading at magazine palaces like 4 Times Square and Hearst Tower as soon as ad-sales staffers returned from Thanksgiving break: their waistlines expanded; their bottom lines, not so much.</p>
<p class="text">Early copies of <em>Bon Appetit</em>, Condé Nast’s B food magazine (after <em>Gourmet</em>), especially raised eyebrows. A source who got a peek at the January issue told Off the Record that it’s only 108 pages altogether—practically a leaflet—and its table of contents page appears on the magazine’s second page, a discomfortingly early placement at the front of the book. The space inside its back cover is an advertisement for a <em>Bon Appetit </em>cooking volume: a house ad rather than the traditional big outside corporate purchase. </p>
<p class="text">“It’s barely perfect-bound,” said our source, referring to the glued spine that is the modern standard for monthly glossies of a certain length.</p>
<p class="text"><em>Wired </em>is also expected to have a very rough month after getting hit hard due to a slump with consumer electronic ads. A more modest loss is projected for the Tina Fey cover of <em>Vanity Fair, </em>which will fall back about 7 percent this January, down to 43.48 pages from 46.75 last year.</p>
<p class="text">Over at Hearst, meanwhile, spokeswoman Alexandra Carlin conceded that <em>Harper’s Bazaar</em> is off by one or two pages. “But January is traditionally a lighter month for magazines,” she reminded Off the Record.</p>
<p class="text">“January issues will never be a litmus test,” said one optimistic publisher who nonetheless requested anonymity, given the skittish climate. “All it takes is four or five advertisers for most magazines to go in either direction”—good or bad.</p>
<p class="text">“The year always ends with kind of a whimper,” the publisher continued. “You can’t derive great importance from it.”</p>
<p class="text">Mr. Lauf also refused to think bad thoughts—out loud, at least.</p>
<p class="text">“It’s about not letting a negative prognosis become a self-fulfilling prophecy,” he said. “I don’t think we should read too, too much into it.”</p>
<p class="text">But Mr. Lauf is in a better position than most. Ever since <em>The Atlantic</em> cut back its publishing schedule to 10 issues per year from 12, it’s free from the burden of having to sell a stand-alone January issue. He got to squish the ugly month in with February!</p>
<p class="text">Mr. Lauf said that <em>The Atlantic</em>’s ad-page count might remain flat for their first 2009 issue, but there are still a few more weeks till close. </p>
<p class="text">Which makes one wonder: Could coming out with 10 issues a year be a economic new model for the monthly? (And then what would you call it instead of “monthly”?) <em>Portfolio</em> announced its plans to do that back in October. </p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt">Then again, it’s not a guaranteed formula for profit. <em>Men’s Vogue </em>ran unsuccessfully at 10 times a year, and now its production schedule has been reduced to a barely-there twice per year. And as ad buyers become more selective, it makes one wonder how many magazines in the same category one parent company can sustain. (Witness the sad crumbling of <em>O at Home, House and Garden, </em>etc. Could food and fashion be next?)</span></p>
<p class="text">“It’s like, ‘Oh my God, if we start in this hole, how can we dig out of this,’” Mr. Lauf said.</p>
<p style="text-align: left" class="emailtagline" align="left"><em>jkoblin@observer.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/12/january-groans-mags-lean-month-gets-downright-gaunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/otr2_5.jpg?w=221&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>No More House &amp; Garden, But Strangely, Lots of Comparable Titles Remain</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/11/no-more-ihouse-gardeni-but-strangely-lots-of-comparable-titles-remain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:21:06 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/11/no-more-ihouse-gardeni-but-strangely-lots-of-comparable-titles-remain/</link>
			<dc:creator>Leon Neyfakh</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/11/no-more-ihouse-gardeni-but-strangely-lots-of-comparable-titles-remain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="/2007/it-may-not-be-just-house-garden-trouble">Writing on <em>The Observer</em>'s Real Estate blog</a>, Tom Acitelli notes a<em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119429723381882981.html">Wall Street Journal </a></em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119429723381882981.html">story</a> about how even though the weak housing market may have been responsible for the collapse of Condé Nast's <em>House &amp; Garden</em>, the &quot;shelter mag&quot; genre is enjoying a moment of disproportionate prosperity. <span> </span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p class="times">Media buyers say the industry is overrun with so-called shelter magazines, industry parlance that includes titles focusing on home design. Along with Condé Nast's own Architectural Digest, shelter magazines include House Beautiful, Dwell, Traditional Home, Metropolitan Home, Midwest Living and Home magazine.</p>
<p class="times">Six new magazines focusing on homes started up in the first quarter of 2007, according to New York-based trade group Magazine Publishers of America. ... </p>
<p class="times">The glut of decorating magazines comes as the U.S. housing market faces a crisis. &quot;It's a magazine category that will be hit by the housing issues,&quot; says Jen Neal, managing partner of Phd, a media buying unit of Omnicom Group.</p>
</p></div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/2007/it-may-not-be-just-house-garden-trouble">Writing on <em>The Observer</em>'s Real Estate blog</a>, Tom Acitelli notes a<em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119429723381882981.html">Wall Street Journal </a></em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119429723381882981.html">story</a> about how even though the weak housing market may have been responsible for the collapse of Condé Nast's <em>House &amp; Garden</em>, the &quot;shelter mag&quot; genre is enjoying a moment of disproportionate prosperity. <span> </span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p class="times">Media buyers say the industry is overrun with so-called shelter magazines, industry parlance that includes titles focusing on home design. Along with Condé Nast's own Architectural Digest, shelter magazines include House Beautiful, Dwell, Traditional Home, Metropolitan Home, Midwest Living and Home magazine.</p>
<p class="times">Six new magazines focusing on homes started up in the first quarter of 2007, according to New York-based trade group Magazine Publishers of America. ... </p>
<p class="times">The glut of decorating magazines comes as the U.S. housing market faces a crisis. &quot;It's a magazine category that will be hit by the housing issues,&quot; says Jen Neal, managing partner of Phd, a media buying unit of Omnicom Group.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/11/no-more-ihouse-gardeni-but-strangely-lots-of-comparable-titles-remain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>House &amp; Garden Folds</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/11/ihouse-gardeni-folds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:38:23 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/11/ihouse-gardeni-folds/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/11/ihouse-gardeni-folds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Conde Nast's <em>House &amp; Garden</em> has folded.</p>
<p>&quot;We have announced this morning that with the December issue we will cease publication,&quot; said Maurie Perl, spokeswoman for Conde Nast to <em>The Observer</em> this morning. </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: 'Times New Roman';color: black">“Our investment in <em>House &amp; Garden</em> throughout the years has been substantial and we no longer believe it is a viable business investment for the company,&quot; said <span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: 'Times New Roman';color: black">Charles Townsend, President &amp; CEO of Condé Nast in a statement. </span></span></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conde Nast's <em>House &amp; Garden</em> has folded.</p>
<p>&quot;We have announced this morning that with the December issue we will cease publication,&quot; said Maurie Perl, spokeswoman for Conde Nast to <em>The Observer</em> this morning. </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: 'Times New Roman';color: black">“Our investment in <em>House &amp; Garden</em> throughout the years has been substantial and we no longer believe it is a viable business investment for the company,&quot; said <span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: 'Times New Roman';color: black">Charles Townsend, President &amp; CEO of Condé Nast in a statement. </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/11/ihouse-gardeni-folds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
