<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Laurel Snyder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/laurel-snyder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Katharine Weber On Literary/Religious Identity (and Muriel Spark)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/07/katharine-weber-on-literaryreligious-identity-and-muriel-spark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:41:37 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/07/katharine-weber-on-literaryreligious-identity-and-muriel-spark/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/07/katharine-weber-on-literaryreligious-identity-and-muriel-spark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My report on a literary evening <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy.html"> at Makor</a> brought another demurral, on points large and small, from <em>Triangle </em>author <a href="http://www.katharineweber.com/">Katharine Weber</a>: </p>
<div class="oldbq">I did not say "cramped," but crammed.</p>
<p>My mother being raised in a Protestant identity bubble<br />
by her Protestant mother, despite being a Warburg in<br />
New York City, does signify and pertain to the<br />
question at hand, who is a Jew, how are we identified,<br />
and by whom? </p></div>
<p><!--break--></p>
<div class="oldbq">Though apparently the name Warburg<br />
(Warburg! Warburg!) has some special resonance for<br />
you.  The Jew Mu was uncle Felix's house, yet rabbis<br />
insist she was not a Jew, I am not a Jew, my daughters<br />
are not Jews, though we are all the daughters of<br />
Jewish fathers. And yes, and yet, the Third Reich<br />
would have shoved, crammed (and then I am sure it<br />
would have been cramped), all of us into a cattle car.<br />
To say this is certainly not disingenuous<br />
Holocaust-dropping by the privileged, no matter what<br />
acerbic words of Muriel Spark about fireside martyrs<br />
may come to mind for you. (She was, incidentally,<br />
someone it was my privilege to know, through letters<br />
back and forth, and her words of approval offered out<br />
of the blue for my second novel, which is where we<br />
began, mean a great deal to me. Muriel Camberg<br />
meanwhile had her own exquisitely tortured<br />
relationship to her Jewishness.)</p>
<p> This issue of labels and identities is precisely what<br />
the panel was about, what Maya Gottfried wrote and<br />
spoke about so compellingly.</p>
<p>My daughter's boyfriend has a rubber, not metal<br />
bracelet, with the words LIVE JEWISH. A tiny detail,<br />
to be sure, but one of several little elements to<br />
which you added meaning.</p>
<p>My essay was written for this anthology. It was my<br />
good fortune to sell it to the NYT Op-Ed,<br />
subsequently, and so it appeared there before the book<br />
was published. Laurel Snyder did not ask me to write<br />
about spiritual issues, and it was her choice to<br />
include my esay in her anthology. The collection, as<br />
is true of the panel, is about what it is about. It<br />
was not about what it was not about. And if the lack<br />
of spirituality in my essay and in the discussion that<br />
evening made you feel that you did not get your<br />
money's worth (although spirituality was simply not on<br />
the agenda, if you had raised your hand to ask a<br />
question about it, perhaps the discussion would have<br />
taken this up in a compelling and interesting way --<br />
we will never know), then I offer now, as I did in my<br />
vanished post last week, to refund your money out of<br />
my own pocket with unWarburgian dollars I have earned,<br />
because, alas, I do not have the Warburg fortune you<br />
presume comes with the name. (Why I don't have the<br />
money has to do with my grandmother's big romance with<br />
George Gershwin and the subsequent family upheavals,<br />
but now I have uttered another name that probably<br />
resonates for you far beyond the meaning at hand for<br />
me in my family history.)</p></div>
<p>My general policy is, Let readers have the last word. I might quibble with a couple of characterizations by Weber and <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy.html">Laurel Snyder </a>, but I've had my say, they've had theirs. Years ago when I read Melville's comment to his editor after Mardi was savaged in the press&#151;"I shall no more stab at a book (in print, I mean) than I would stab at a man"&#151;I had great sympathy; it's hard for writers to criticize other authors, especially if you've felt the lance. Now I begin to think Melville's comment entitled (as so much of his experience was) and wonder if a little mutual criticism isn't just part of the territory...</p>
<p>Also: Weber will be reading at <a href="http://www.rockysullivans.com/RSHomePage2.html">Rocky Sullivan's </a> in New York on Wed. night, July 12, at 8 p.m.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My report on a literary evening <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy.html"> at Makor</a> brought another demurral, on points large and small, from <em>Triangle </em>author <a href="http://www.katharineweber.com/">Katharine Weber</a>: </p>
<div class="oldbq">I did not say "cramped," but crammed.</p>
<p>My mother being raised in a Protestant identity bubble<br />
by her Protestant mother, despite being a Warburg in<br />
New York City, does signify and pertain to the<br />
question at hand, who is a Jew, how are we identified,<br />
and by whom? </p></div>
<p><!--break--></p>
<div class="oldbq">Though apparently the name Warburg<br />
(Warburg! Warburg!) has some special resonance for<br />
you.  The Jew Mu was uncle Felix's house, yet rabbis<br />
insist she was not a Jew, I am not a Jew, my daughters<br />
are not Jews, though we are all the daughters of<br />
Jewish fathers. And yes, and yet, the Third Reich<br />
would have shoved, crammed (and then I am sure it<br />
would have been cramped), all of us into a cattle car.<br />
To say this is certainly not disingenuous<br />
Holocaust-dropping by the privileged, no matter what<br />
acerbic words of Muriel Spark about fireside martyrs<br />
may come to mind for you. (She was, incidentally,<br />
someone it was my privilege to know, through letters<br />
back and forth, and her words of approval offered out<br />
of the blue for my second novel, which is where we<br />
began, mean a great deal to me. Muriel Camberg<br />
meanwhile had her own exquisitely tortured<br />
relationship to her Jewishness.)</p>
<p> This issue of labels and identities is precisely what<br />
the panel was about, what Maya Gottfried wrote and<br />
spoke about so compellingly.</p>
<p>My daughter's boyfriend has a rubber, not metal<br />
bracelet, with the words LIVE JEWISH. A tiny detail,<br />
to be sure, but one of several little elements to<br />
which you added meaning.</p>
<p>My essay was written for this anthology. It was my<br />
good fortune to sell it to the NYT Op-Ed,<br />
subsequently, and so it appeared there before the book<br />
was published. Laurel Snyder did not ask me to write<br />
about spiritual issues, and it was her choice to<br />
include my esay in her anthology. The collection, as<br />
is true of the panel, is about what it is about. It<br />
was not about what it was not about. And if the lack<br />
of spirituality in my essay and in the discussion that<br />
evening made you feel that you did not get your<br />
money's worth (although spirituality was simply not on<br />
the agenda, if you had raised your hand to ask a<br />
question about it, perhaps the discussion would have<br />
taken this up in a compelling and interesting way --<br />
we will never know), then I offer now, as I did in my<br />
vanished post last week, to refund your money out of<br />
my own pocket with unWarburgian dollars I have earned,<br />
because, alas, I do not have the Warburg fortune you<br />
presume comes with the name. (Why I don't have the<br />
money has to do with my grandmother's big romance with<br />
George Gershwin and the subsequent family upheavals,<br />
but now I have uttered another name that probably<br />
resonates for you far beyond the meaning at hand for<br />
me in my family history.)</p></div>
<p>My general policy is, Let readers have the last word. I might quibble with a couple of characterizations by Weber and <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy.html">Laurel Snyder </a>, but I've had my say, they've had theirs. Years ago when I read Melville's comment to his editor after Mardi was savaged in the press&#151;"I shall no more stab at a book (in print, I mean) than I would stab at a man"&#151;I had great sympathy; it's hard for writers to criticize other authors, especially if you've felt the lance. Now I begin to think Melville's comment entitled (as so much of his experience was) and wonder if a little mutual criticism isn't just part of the territory...</p>
<p>Also: Weber will be reading at <a href="http://www.rockysullivans.com/RSHomePage2.html">Rocky Sullivan's </a> in New York on Wed. night, July 12, at 8 p.m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/07/katharine-weber-on-literaryreligious-identity-and-muriel-spark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Laurel Snyder Responds. I Was Inaccurate, and Mean-Spirited. (Oy)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:02:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A week or so back I did a snarky <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/06/my-night-with-3-halfjewish-writers-and-one-34-at-makor.html">take</a> on Laurel Snyder's new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933368241/102-2709251-6448151?v=glance&amp;n=283155">Half-Life: Jew-ish Tales From Interfaith Homes</a> and a reading she had at <a href="http://www.92y.org/shop/category.asp?category=Makor+%2F+Steinhardt+Center888Makor888&amp;redirect=MakorHP">Makor </a>, then walked away whistling. But after trying to comment on my post and being foiled somehow by the Observer's system (apologies), Snyder sent me a (generous and fair and maybe wise too) response.</p>
<p>Here it is:</p>
<div class="oldbq">[T]hough I appreciate that you think I'm pretty, your physical description<br />
of me didn't make me feel any better and it didn't seem terribly relevant.</p>
<p>If nothing else, I feel I should be allowed to correct the inaccuracies of<br />
your blog post (i.e. that my son had a hospital circumcision , that I<br />
"chose" Judaism, etc)  I'm not sure how/where you got these ideas... but<br />
they're untrue , and anyone present at Makor on June 22 could tell you that.<br />
I hope you didn't just dream them up to stregthen your remarks about me.</p>
<p>That would be poor journalism I think.</p>
<p>In trying to look past your creative revision of the event at Makor, I'd<br />
like to say that regardless of your dislike for me, I'm glad you enjoyed<br />
Maya Gottfried's reading.  No matter how your blog might have hurt my<br />
personal feelings, there are bigger things at stake with a book like this,<br />
and  if you got something out of the event, that's far more important than<br />
my little ego. </p></div>
<p><!--break--></p>
<div class="oldbq">Maya is amazing and the Jewish world would do well to meet<br />
her, so thank you for drawing attention to her work.</p>
<p>Regarding my status as a "natterpuss", I'm not going to argue that you're<br />
entirely wrong.  There's a business to publishing and I'm admittedly trying<br />
to learn it.  But I'll say that one does not take a year off from one's own<br />
writing to pour oneself into a project like this (on an indie press, for no<br />
money, I might add) because one enjoys networking. Particularly not when one<br />
has just become a mother, and would like to be home sitting on her nest).<br />
One networks because one believes that the book (and the issue) deserves it.</p>
<p>If my mention of the Iowa Writers' Workshop (or BUST Magazine) bothered you,<br />
I'm sorry, but I'll remind you that they were mentioned only in my<br />
introductions of the readers, in order to describe how I met each author<br />
present.  I hoped to communicate the idea that Jews from intermarriages are<br />
"everywhere."  Specifically I was trying to show how Readerville.com and the<br />
internet led me to find a "half-Jewish geography"... though maybe I<br />
failed...</p>
<p>I did not mean to name drop, and if the mention of such institutions<br />
distracted from the purpose of the event, I wish I'd presented each reader<br />
differently. In fact, I appreciate your comment, as it will certainly affect<br />
my future speaking engagements.</p>
<p>Regarding the "spirit" of the event: he topic of the evening was not<br />
spirituality, though I'd happily meet with you for Torah study sometime. If<br />
you knew me, you'd know that I care deeply about spirit, and Jewish content,<br />
Torah, tradition, philosophy, and history, and it makes me sad to think I<br />
presented myself as uninterested in such things.  I can't imagine why I'd go<br />
to such trouble if there wasn't a deeper love behind my work.  More to the<br />
point, I clearly remember stating several times that one must, when<br />
discussing "how Jewish" a person is, consider that there are really two<br />
distinct ways of being Jewish: cultureally/genetically, and religiously.   I<br />
think about this a lot, as I work often with younger Jews who consider<br />
themselves "secular Jews."</p>
<p>Honestly, I wish the organized Jewish community were more concerned with<br />
spirit and less with bloodlines.  Maybe if that were true, Maya's story<br />
would have been different.</p>
<p>I want to tell you I didn't mean my comment on your blog angrily, and was<br />
surprised that you refused to let me correct your inaccuracies, as a print<br />
newspaper would have done.  I would like to think that a blog is accountable<br />
in all the ways print media is accountable. But maybe that's not the case at<br />
the Observer.</p>
<p>Again, I don't know how you heard what you heard at Makor... but maybe you'd<br />
do well to listen a little more carefully in future. To the "spirit" of what<br />
someone is saying.  A blog can be dangerous, as a deadline for criticism can<br />
be harmful. The constant need for "something to say", and a desire for wit,<br />
leads bloggers (myself included) down a slippery slope.</p>
<p>P.S. [Per Weiss comment "Baltimore is Catholic"] Maryland was founded as a Catholic<br />
Colony, and that (while there is a HUGE Jewish Community in Pikesville, a<br />
suburb) Baltimore has an extremely large Catholic population,  particularly<br />
in the non-Jewish neighborhoods where I grew up. Not that it matters, but it came up.
</p></div>
<p>Snyder gets big points in my book for responding with good humor and openness. I'm going to (crawl into a hole and) mull this, see if I have a comeback.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A week or so back I did a snarky <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/06/my-night-with-3-halfjewish-writers-and-one-34-at-makor.html">take</a> on Laurel Snyder's new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933368241/102-2709251-6448151?v=glance&amp;n=283155">Half-Life: Jew-ish Tales From Interfaith Homes</a> and a reading she had at <a href="http://www.92y.org/shop/category.asp?category=Makor+%2F+Steinhardt+Center888Makor888&amp;redirect=MakorHP">Makor </a>, then walked away whistling. But after trying to comment on my post and being foiled somehow by the Observer's system (apologies), Snyder sent me a (generous and fair and maybe wise too) response.</p>
<p>Here it is:</p>
<div class="oldbq">[T]hough I appreciate that you think I'm pretty, your physical description<br />
of me didn't make me feel any better and it didn't seem terribly relevant.</p>
<p>If nothing else, I feel I should be allowed to correct the inaccuracies of<br />
your blog post (i.e. that my son had a hospital circumcision , that I<br />
"chose" Judaism, etc)  I'm not sure how/where you got these ideas... but<br />
they're untrue , and anyone present at Makor on June 22 could tell you that.<br />
I hope you didn't just dream them up to stregthen your remarks about me.</p>
<p>That would be poor journalism I think.</p>
<p>In trying to look past your creative revision of the event at Makor, I'd<br />
like to say that regardless of your dislike for me, I'm glad you enjoyed<br />
Maya Gottfried's reading.  No matter how your blog might have hurt my<br />
personal feelings, there are bigger things at stake with a book like this,<br />
and  if you got something out of the event, that's far more important than<br />
my little ego. </p></div>
<p><!--break--></p>
<div class="oldbq">Maya is amazing and the Jewish world would do well to meet<br />
her, so thank you for drawing attention to her work.</p>
<p>Regarding my status as a "natterpuss", I'm not going to argue that you're<br />
entirely wrong.  There's a business to publishing and I'm admittedly trying<br />
to learn it.  But I'll say that one does not take a year off from one's own<br />
writing to pour oneself into a project like this (on an indie press, for no<br />
money, I might add) because one enjoys networking. Particularly not when one<br />
has just become a mother, and would like to be home sitting on her nest).<br />
One networks because one believes that the book (and the issue) deserves it.</p>
<p>If my mention of the Iowa Writers' Workshop (or BUST Magazine) bothered you,<br />
I'm sorry, but I'll remind you that they were mentioned only in my<br />
introductions of the readers, in order to describe how I met each author<br />
present.  I hoped to communicate the idea that Jews from intermarriages are<br />
"everywhere."  Specifically I was trying to show how Readerville.com and the<br />
internet led me to find a "half-Jewish geography"... though maybe I<br />
failed...</p>
<p>I did not mean to name drop, and if the mention of such institutions<br />
distracted from the purpose of the event, I wish I'd presented each reader<br />
differently. In fact, I appreciate your comment, as it will certainly affect<br />
my future speaking engagements.</p>
<p>Regarding the "spirit" of the event: he topic of the evening was not<br />
spirituality, though I'd happily meet with you for Torah study sometime. If<br />
you knew me, you'd know that I care deeply about spirit, and Jewish content,<br />
Torah, tradition, philosophy, and history, and it makes me sad to think I<br />
presented myself as uninterested in such things.  I can't imagine why I'd go<br />
to such trouble if there wasn't a deeper love behind my work.  More to the<br />
point, I clearly remember stating several times that one must, when<br />
discussing "how Jewish" a person is, consider that there are really two<br />
distinct ways of being Jewish: cultureally/genetically, and religiously.   I<br />
think about this a lot, as I work often with younger Jews who consider<br />
themselves "secular Jews."</p>
<p>Honestly, I wish the organized Jewish community were more concerned with<br />
spirit and less with bloodlines.  Maybe if that were true, Maya's story<br />
would have been different.</p>
<p>I want to tell you I didn't mean my comment on your blog angrily, and was<br />
surprised that you refused to let me correct your inaccuracies, as a print<br />
newspaper would have done.  I would like to think that a blog is accountable<br />
in all the ways print media is accountable. But maybe that's not the case at<br />
the Observer.</p>
<p>Again, I don't know how you heard what you heard at Makor... but maybe you'd<br />
do well to listen a little more carefully in future. To the "spirit" of what<br />
someone is saying.  A blog can be dangerous, as a deadline for criticism can<br />
be harmful. The constant need for "something to say", and a desire for wit,<br />
leads bloggers (myself included) down a slippery slope.</p>
<p>P.S. [Per Weiss comment "Baltimore is Catholic"] Maryland was founded as a Catholic<br />
Colony, and that (while there is a HUGE Jewish Community in Pikesville, a<br />
suburb) Baltimore has an extremely large Catholic population,  particularly<br />
in the non-Jewish neighborhoods where I grew up. Not that it matters, but it came up.
</p></div>
<p>Snyder gets big points in my book for responding with good humor and openness. I'm going to (crawl into a hole and) mull this, see if I have a comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/07/laurel-snyder-responds-i-was-inaccurate-and-meanspirited-oy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>My Night With 3 Half-Jewish Writers, and One 3/4, at Makor</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/06/my-night-with-3-halfjewish-writers-and-one-34-at-makor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:41:23 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/06/my-night-with-3-halfjewish-writers-and-one-34-at-makor/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/06/my-night-with-3-halfjewish-writers-and-one-34-at-makor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I want to say more about my literary evening at <a href="http://www.92y.org/shop/category.asp?category=Makor+%2F+Steinhardt+Center888Makor888&amp;redirect=MakorHP">Makor </a>the other night, and about the four authors who read from their contributions to the book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933368241/102-2709251-6448151?v=glance&amp;n=283155">Half-Life: Jew-ish Tales From Interfaith Homes.</a> </p>
<p>Laurel Snyder ran the show. The book is her brainchild. She's a tall pretty woman, 32, with high strawberry-brunette coloring and a strong narrow face. She's a go-getter. She got the book idea at the Iowa writers' workshop, as she informed us, and it is a good idea (though she's not the first, my friend Wendy Marston got in on the <a href="http://halfjew.com">HalfJew stuff </a>years ago). </p>
<p>You'd think because this is a religious subject, Laurel Snyder might be a spiritual person, but you'd be wrong. She doesn't speak in spiritual terms. She's a busy networker&#151; editors of collections often are&#151;and her talk was full of her networking experiences.<br />
<!--break--><br />
How she met so and so in Iowa. How she once worked for <a href="http://www.bust.com/">Bust </a>magazine. How she emailed Thisbe who emailed Maya. How she's read half of Katharine's new novel and it rocks. How she's been to Haifa and Hillel. Laurel Snyder has got a lot of plates in the air. All of them are spinning, amazingly, but none has a very spiritual character. </p>
<p>She networks religions the same way she networks literary life. She says her mother's Christian and has gotten devoutly Catholic. Her father's Jewish and has gotten more Jewish. Baltimore where she's from is Catholic. She herself looks Irish but she's chosen to be Jewish, thus her website <a href="http://Jewshyirishy.com">Jewshyirishy.com </a>and she's going to raise her child Jewish, even though the father isn't Jewish, and she had the bris in the hospital because she didn't know how her nonJewish inlaws would react to the ceremony. (The recipient of the bris was in the audience, in the arms of Laurel Snyder's mother.) But nothing about the spiritual heart of Judaism. Nothing about <em>rachmones</em>, or fairness, or respect for workers and animals, or love of the underdog. Just ¾ Jewish and Corpus Christi Church and my bat mitzvah, etc.  </p>
<p>I should admire Snyder's energy and enterprise more, having a baby and getting out a good book and going on tour, all at once. I think I was annoyed because she's a natterpuss. When she was quiet, we got to hear from the panel's belletrist: <a href="http://www.katharineweber.com/">Katharine Weber</a>. Weber is older (my age) and accomplished. In fact, she had set cards promoting events for her new (and very-well-received) book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0374281424/ref=ase_wwwkatharinew-20/102-2709251-6448151">Triangle,</a> a novel about the Triangle Shirt Waist Factory fire, on each of our seats ahead of time. That can be excused; writers have to be "hustlers and caterers," as John Updike once said in the New Yorker, and Weber was hustling. My problem with her was she didn't sing for her supper. (The event had cost me $15). Her essay for the book was <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0F15FA3D540C748DDDAB0994DD404482">a piece reprinted from the Op Ed </a>page of the Times that had gotten a lot of attention, about buying a Christmas tree as a 5-year-old girl with her father. It was ho-hum and I thought madeup in its perfect tiny moments. Just what you'd want on the Op-Ed page. Not in a book about religious/spiritual issues you read on the couch. </p>
<p>The piece did not address the question Laurel Snyder had framed, Half-Life, headon, so Weber vamped on it for a bit. She informed us that she was ¾-Jewish. Her mother was half Jewish, and that Jew was "a Warburg." I know that because she said it twice. "A Warburg."  This is a pretty rarefied form of self-namedropping. If she said it a third time I was going to ask her for money. The other thing Weber said was that even though her children are only 7/8 Jewish, her children would be "cramped into the cattle car" along with other Jews.</p>
<p>Holocaust-dropping by privileged Americans gets my back up. <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/muriel_spark/">Muriel Spark </a>had a great name for people like this, back in 1956, in her first (religious) novel: "fireside martyrs." Webber's a fireside martyr, 60 years on. I don't think she had one spiritual thought to impart. She did say that when a child brought a friend home with a metal wristband that said, "Live Jewish," she objected strongly to it on grammatical grounds. The belletrist. </p>
<p>There isn't much to say about the one guy on the panel, <a href="http://www.nyu.edu/fas/program/religiousstudies/faculty/SharletJeff.html">Jeff Sharlet</a>. The piece he read felt like a goofball entertainment, which in no way prepared me for his thoughtful statements during the panel discussion about such issues as fundamentalist Christianity. Sharp well-informed statements. <a href="http://www.killingthebuddha.com">Sharlet's</a> got a better mind than he shows on paper. He reminded me somewhat of myself at his age, about 35: doesn't exhibit much self-awareness, isn't really a writer yet, the way my boss Peter Kaplan always intones "writer," like it's Yiddish: a <em>RITE-uh</em>: someone who knows what he feels and knows how to say it. Sharlet has to leave the cork out for a while. But again, he had not much to say about his spirituality, which is why I was there. Much more about ideas.  </p>
<p>The fourth writer was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0375830499/qid=1151418521/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-2709251-6448151?s=books&amp;v=glance&amp;n=283155">Maya Gottfried</a>. I mentioned her <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/06/my-jewish-problem-cted-the-exclusivity-issue.html">the other day,</a> apropos of My Jewish Problem. She's a big woman with a wide face and tumbling blond hair. </p>
<p>I was only half-listening when she began to read. She told the story of going to a seder as a teenager and getting into a quarrel without meaning to with her uncle who suffered from mental illness. She had talked to him about a paper she'd written for class that said Nixon's early traumas accounted for his actions as an adult, and the uncle went into an angry state and chanted, "Nixon is a very very bad man." Only later did she learn from her father that Nixon was one of the people her uncle fixated on. Gottfried didn't really mind the unpleasantness; she was glad to let her uncle vent. </p>
<p>The Passover scene ended with this line: "None of us knew that a few years later I would be diagnosed with the same illness." </p>
<p>A light true crazy line of prose. After that, my idle thoughts ended abruptly, I sat riveted. Gottfried was clearly engaged with spiritual issues, and boy can this chick write: </p>
<div class="oldbq">"I knew that although I had the genetic pedigree of a half-breed, I didn't truly have knowledge of the meanings of either faith. This filament of self-doubt grew and finally erupted in unison with my first manic episode. Following a very disruptive and disturbing few-months-long crash course in mental illness, I returned to identifying as a half and halfsy."</div>
<p>Her narration ended with the episode of her going to Passover as an adult at the home of a rebbetzin, a rabbi's wife, and her encounter with the rebbetzin on the couch. "'You're not Jewish,' [the rebbetzin] said without a glimmer of kindness." Said it twice. Till then Maya Gottfried had felt that she had the best of both worlds. After that, she said, "I no longer felt half Jewish, I felt like nothing..." Notwithstanding the fact she had three Jewish grandparents, this encounter brought about a basic reexamination of her religious identity. She felt that she had been "perpetuating a lie about my religious identity and I didn't want to be a liar." </p>
<p>In a small hall, this was a tough performance: personal, not prescriptive, hard-won. So no one really wanted to talk about it. In the ensuing Q and A most of the questions had to do with practical issues, like How do you raise the children in a mixed marriage. Etc. Laurel Snyder is a smart, practical woman, and she took this on practically, with various bromides and poultices that I now forget. And this is also when Katharine Weber&#151;who I believe may be related to the Rockefellers&#151;told us about how her 7/8 kids would be "cramped into a cattle car." </p>
<p>Finally someone said something to Gottfried, and she said that her halfsy-story ended with her decision to be baptized. In her search for meaning, she said selfmockingly, she had become a Wiccan for a week, and one thing the Wiccans say is that you're on your path and have to follow it. She felt like she'd been reaching out to Judaism and the rabbi's wife had rejected her, and that was her path. She moved on. </p>
<p>I thought again about Muriel Spark, who resolved her half-Jewish spiritual conflicts about the same time in her life, in <a href="http://www.nls.uk/murielspark/published.html">1954</a> or so, by converting to Catholicism (and in years to come could be a pain in the ass as a proselyte, as the late Brendan Gill reported in <em>Here at the New Yorker</em>). </p>
<p>Thanks to Laurel Snyder&#151;yes, you have to hand it to a good networker&#151;I now know about Maya Gottfried. I gather from Amazon that <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0375823883/sr=8-2/qid=1151420318/ref=sr_1_2/102-2709251-6448151?ie=UTF8">she's written children's books</a>. I can't wait to see what she writes next for adults. Because everything she had said was real, precise and full of meaning. The rejection by the rabbi's wife, the Wiccan wisdom about her path, the identification with her uncle's mental illness, the feelings of nothingness, these were all spiritual moments. Nothing about religious organizations or Warburgs or cattle cars, just a soul fumbling to find words. What more can you ask from a <em>RITE-uh</em>?</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to say more about my literary evening at <a href="http://www.92y.org/shop/category.asp?category=Makor+%2F+Steinhardt+Center888Makor888&amp;redirect=MakorHP">Makor </a>the other night, and about the four authors who read from their contributions to the book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933368241/102-2709251-6448151?v=glance&amp;n=283155">Half-Life: Jew-ish Tales From Interfaith Homes.</a> </p>
<p>Laurel Snyder ran the show. The book is her brainchild. She's a tall pretty woman, 32, with high strawberry-brunette coloring and a strong narrow face. She's a go-getter. She got the book idea at the Iowa writers' workshop, as she informed us, and it is a good idea (though she's not the first, my friend Wendy Marston got in on the <a href="http://halfjew.com">HalfJew stuff </a>years ago). </p>
<p>You'd think because this is a religious subject, Laurel Snyder might be a spiritual person, but you'd be wrong. She doesn't speak in spiritual terms. She's a busy networker&#151; editors of collections often are&#151;and her talk was full of her networking experiences.<br />
<!--break--><br />
How she met so and so in Iowa. How she once worked for <a href="http://www.bust.com/">Bust </a>magazine. How she emailed Thisbe who emailed Maya. How she's read half of Katharine's new novel and it rocks. How she's been to Haifa and Hillel. Laurel Snyder has got a lot of plates in the air. All of them are spinning, amazingly, but none has a very spiritual character. </p>
<p>She networks religions the same way she networks literary life. She says her mother's Christian and has gotten devoutly Catholic. Her father's Jewish and has gotten more Jewish. Baltimore where she's from is Catholic. She herself looks Irish but she's chosen to be Jewish, thus her website <a href="http://Jewshyirishy.com">Jewshyirishy.com </a>and she's going to raise her child Jewish, even though the father isn't Jewish, and she had the bris in the hospital because she didn't know how her nonJewish inlaws would react to the ceremony. (The recipient of the bris was in the audience, in the arms of Laurel Snyder's mother.) But nothing about the spiritual heart of Judaism. Nothing about <em>rachmones</em>, or fairness, or respect for workers and animals, or love of the underdog. Just ¾ Jewish and Corpus Christi Church and my bat mitzvah, etc.  </p>
<p>I should admire Snyder's energy and enterprise more, having a baby and getting out a good book and going on tour, all at once. I think I was annoyed because she's a natterpuss. When she was quiet, we got to hear from the panel's belletrist: <a href="http://www.katharineweber.com/">Katharine Weber</a>. Weber is older (my age) and accomplished. In fact, she had set cards promoting events for her new (and very-well-received) book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0374281424/ref=ase_wwwkatharinew-20/102-2709251-6448151">Triangle,</a> a novel about the Triangle Shirt Waist Factory fire, on each of our seats ahead of time. That can be excused; writers have to be "hustlers and caterers," as John Updike once said in the New Yorker, and Weber was hustling. My problem with her was she didn't sing for her supper. (The event had cost me $15). Her essay for the book was <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0F15FA3D540C748DDDAB0994DD404482">a piece reprinted from the Op Ed </a>page of the Times that had gotten a lot of attention, about buying a Christmas tree as a 5-year-old girl with her father. It was ho-hum and I thought madeup in its perfect tiny moments. Just what you'd want on the Op-Ed page. Not in a book about religious/spiritual issues you read on the couch. </p>
<p>The piece did not address the question Laurel Snyder had framed, Half-Life, headon, so Weber vamped on it for a bit. She informed us that she was ¾-Jewish. Her mother was half Jewish, and that Jew was "a Warburg." I know that because she said it twice. "A Warburg."  This is a pretty rarefied form of self-namedropping. If she said it a third time I was going to ask her for money. The other thing Weber said was that even though her children are only 7/8 Jewish, her children would be "cramped into the cattle car" along with other Jews.</p>
<p>Holocaust-dropping by privileged Americans gets my back up. <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/muriel_spark/">Muriel Spark </a>had a great name for people like this, back in 1956, in her first (religious) novel: "fireside martyrs." Webber's a fireside martyr, 60 years on. I don't think she had one spiritual thought to impart. She did say that when a child brought a friend home with a metal wristband that said, "Live Jewish," she objected strongly to it on grammatical grounds. The belletrist. </p>
<p>There isn't much to say about the one guy on the panel, <a href="http://www.nyu.edu/fas/program/religiousstudies/faculty/SharletJeff.html">Jeff Sharlet</a>. The piece he read felt like a goofball entertainment, which in no way prepared me for his thoughtful statements during the panel discussion about such issues as fundamentalist Christianity. Sharp well-informed statements. <a href="http://www.killingthebuddha.com">Sharlet's</a> got a better mind than he shows on paper. He reminded me somewhat of myself at his age, about 35: doesn't exhibit much self-awareness, isn't really a writer yet, the way my boss Peter Kaplan always intones "writer," like it's Yiddish: a <em>RITE-uh</em>: someone who knows what he feels and knows how to say it. Sharlet has to leave the cork out for a while. But again, he had not much to say about his spirituality, which is why I was there. Much more about ideas.  </p>
<p>The fourth writer was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0375830499/qid=1151418521/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-2709251-6448151?s=books&amp;v=glance&amp;n=283155">Maya Gottfried</a>. I mentioned her <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/06/my-jewish-problem-cted-the-exclusivity-issue.html">the other day,</a> apropos of My Jewish Problem. She's a big woman with a wide face and tumbling blond hair. </p>
<p>I was only half-listening when she began to read. She told the story of going to a seder as a teenager and getting into a quarrel without meaning to with her uncle who suffered from mental illness. She had talked to him about a paper she'd written for class that said Nixon's early traumas accounted for his actions as an adult, and the uncle went into an angry state and chanted, "Nixon is a very very bad man." Only later did she learn from her father that Nixon was one of the people her uncle fixated on. Gottfried didn't really mind the unpleasantness; she was glad to let her uncle vent. </p>
<p>The Passover scene ended with this line: "None of us knew that a few years later I would be diagnosed with the same illness." </p>
<p>A light true crazy line of prose. After that, my idle thoughts ended abruptly, I sat riveted. Gottfried was clearly engaged with spiritual issues, and boy can this chick write: </p>
<div class="oldbq">"I knew that although I had the genetic pedigree of a half-breed, I didn't truly have knowledge of the meanings of either faith. This filament of self-doubt grew and finally erupted in unison with my first manic episode. Following a very disruptive and disturbing few-months-long crash course in mental illness, I returned to identifying as a half and halfsy."</div>
<p>Her narration ended with the episode of her going to Passover as an adult at the home of a rebbetzin, a rabbi's wife, and her encounter with the rebbetzin on the couch. "'You're not Jewish,' [the rebbetzin] said without a glimmer of kindness." Said it twice. Till then Maya Gottfried had felt that she had the best of both worlds. After that, she said, "I no longer felt half Jewish, I felt like nothing..." Notwithstanding the fact she had three Jewish grandparents, this encounter brought about a basic reexamination of her religious identity. She felt that she had been "perpetuating a lie about my religious identity and I didn't want to be a liar." </p>
<p>In a small hall, this was a tough performance: personal, not prescriptive, hard-won. So no one really wanted to talk about it. In the ensuing Q and A most of the questions had to do with practical issues, like How do you raise the children in a mixed marriage. Etc. Laurel Snyder is a smart, practical woman, and she took this on practically, with various bromides and poultices that I now forget. And this is also when Katharine Weber&#151;who I believe may be related to the Rockefellers&#151;told us about how her 7/8 kids would be "cramped into a cattle car." </p>
<p>Finally someone said something to Gottfried, and she said that her halfsy-story ended with her decision to be baptized. In her search for meaning, she said selfmockingly, she had become a Wiccan for a week, and one thing the Wiccans say is that you're on your path and have to follow it. She felt like she'd been reaching out to Judaism and the rabbi's wife had rejected her, and that was her path. She moved on. </p>
<p>I thought again about Muriel Spark, who resolved her half-Jewish spiritual conflicts about the same time in her life, in <a href="http://www.nls.uk/murielspark/published.html">1954</a> or so, by converting to Catholicism (and in years to come could be a pain in the ass as a proselyte, as the late Brendan Gill reported in <em>Here at the New Yorker</em>). </p>
<p>Thanks to Laurel Snyder&#151;yes, you have to hand it to a good networker&#151;I now know about Maya Gottfried. I gather from Amazon that <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0375823883/sr=8-2/qid=1151420318/ref=sr_1_2/102-2709251-6448151?ie=UTF8">she's written children's books</a>. I can't wait to see what she writes next for adults. Because everything she had said was real, precise and full of meaning. The rejection by the rabbi's wife, the Wiccan wisdom about her path, the identification with her uncle's mental illness, the feelings of nothingness, these were all spiritual moments. Nothing about religious organizations or Warburgs or cattle cars, just a soul fumbling to find words. What more can you ask from a <em>RITE-uh</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/06/my-night-with-3-halfjewish-writers-and-one-34-at-makor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
