<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Lexington (Kentucky)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/lexington-kentucky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:29:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Hamptons Real-Estate Ad War Spreading?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/04/hamptons-realestate-ad-war-spreading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:51:36 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/04/hamptons-realestate-ad-war-spreading/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/04/hamptons-realestate-ad-war-spreading/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/Picture0221.html"><img src="http://therealestate.observer.com/Picture022-thumb.jpg" width="410" height="307" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Weak in the knees over the competition for lucrative Hamptons real-estate ads?</p>
<p>Here, at the corner of 54th Street and Lexington, is a fallen soldier: a box for <em>Dan's Papers</em>, the beloved and batty Hamptons weekly. Although it's not exactly involved in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/business/media/09hamptons.html">drama between</a> <em>The East Hampton Star</em> and the budding <em>East Hampton Press</em>, maybe Dan's is feeling the pressure?</p>
<p><em>- John Koblin</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/Picture0221.html"><img src="http://therealestate.observer.com/Picture022-thumb.jpg" width="410" height="307" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Weak in the knees over the competition for lucrative Hamptons real-estate ads?</p>
<p>Here, at the corner of 54th Street and Lexington, is a fallen soldier: a box for <em>Dan's Papers</em>, the beloved and batty Hamptons weekly. Although it's not exactly involved in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/business/media/09hamptons.html">drama between</a> <em>The East Hampton Star</em> and the budding <em>East Hampton Press</em>, maybe Dan's is feeling the pressure?</p>
<p><em>- John Koblin</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/04/hamptons-realestate-ad-war-spreading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://therealestate.observer.com/Picture022-thumb.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Armory Armageddon (Well, Hellish at Least)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/11/armory-armageddon-well-hellish-at-least/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:50:44 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/11/armory-armageddon-well-hellish-at-least/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/11/armory-armageddon-well-hellish-at-least/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="PkAv66Armory.gif" src="http://therealestate.observer.com/PkAv66Armory.gif" width="200" height="266" /></p>
<p>Chaos and indecision descended on Community Board 8's Seventh Regiment Armory subcommittee meeting last night at the New York Blood Center on the Upper East Side.<br></p>
<p>At issue are plans that the Seventh Regiment Armory Conservancy has for the 127-year-old brick fortress between Park and Lexington avenues and 66th and 67th streets. The conservancy, which expects to sign a 99-year lease with the state for a performance-arts center and exhibition space for the building, has been battling the Veterans of the Seventh Regiment and neighborhood groups who are opposed to the change.<br></p>
<p>At issue last night, at least initially, was whether to demand a thorough environmental-impact statement for the proposed use changes. (An E.I.S. is required for certain large-scale projects; it studies the environmental impact of traffic, noise and pollution, among other things, on the surrounding neighborhood.) The conservancy has already conducted an environmental assessment, which has less public-input mechanisms such as public hearings on both the draft and final findings.<br></p>
<p>The conservancy responded that it has fulfilled all its legal duties for the project to begin.<br></p>
<p>But rather than mollifying its critics, it infuriated them: "This is a community issue, not a legal issue," shouted one project opponent.<br></p>
<p>The veterans group, citing traffic engineer Brian Ketcham, also accused the conservancy of fudging certain traffic-count figures to minimize the traffic's effect on the surrounding community.<br></p>
<p>"It will be the equivalent of adding the amount of traffic as a Wal-Mart or Costco," said the veterans' attorney. He adding that an E.I.S. is mandated by law if only one adverse condition is projected for a new project.<br></p>
<p>The lawyer for the conservancy called the veterans' traffic engineer's findings "palpably erroneous." The conservancy's traffic engineer, Philip Habib, stated that the neighborhood would be able to accommodate the projected extra traffic.<br></p>
<p>The board has found itself in a curious twilight area with the project as of late. Sponsored by the powerful Empire State Development Corporation, a state private-public development entity, the project doesn't need the approval of the board to move forward. But the opposition groups were looking for a ally in demanding the E.I.S., hoping to leverage enough community outcry for the E.S.D.C. to concede and allow the E.I.S. to begin. But the board, stuck between two rival camps, each seemingly unwilling to compromise, itself devolved into indecisiveness and petty infighting.<br></p>
<p>Groans, jeers and scattered applause followed each testimony, depending on which side of the issue the strictly segregated audience sat. Catcalls and threats--"You will be held accountable"--even comments demeaning speakers' professional capabilities, were bandied about.<br></p>
<p>In the end, the board made no decision.<br></p>
<p>See The Real Estate's previous coverage <a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/2006/03/war-over-the-armory.html">here</a>.</p>
<p><i>-Matthew Grace</i></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="PkAv66Armory.gif" src="http://therealestate.observer.com/PkAv66Armory.gif" width="200" height="266" /></p>
<p>Chaos and indecision descended on Community Board 8's Seventh Regiment Armory subcommittee meeting last night at the New York Blood Center on the Upper East Side.<br></p>
<p>At issue are plans that the Seventh Regiment Armory Conservancy has for the 127-year-old brick fortress between Park and Lexington avenues and 66th and 67th streets. The conservancy, which expects to sign a 99-year lease with the state for a performance-arts center and exhibition space for the building, has been battling the Veterans of the Seventh Regiment and neighborhood groups who are opposed to the change.<br></p>
<p>At issue last night, at least initially, was whether to demand a thorough environmental-impact statement for the proposed use changes. (An E.I.S. is required for certain large-scale projects; it studies the environmental impact of traffic, noise and pollution, among other things, on the surrounding neighborhood.) The conservancy has already conducted an environmental assessment, which has less public-input mechanisms such as public hearings on both the draft and final findings.<br></p>
<p>The conservancy responded that it has fulfilled all its legal duties for the project to begin.<br></p>
<p>But rather than mollifying its critics, it infuriated them: "This is a community issue, not a legal issue," shouted one project opponent.<br></p>
<p>The veterans group, citing traffic engineer Brian Ketcham, also accused the conservancy of fudging certain traffic-count figures to minimize the traffic's effect on the surrounding community.<br></p>
<p>"It will be the equivalent of adding the amount of traffic as a Wal-Mart or Costco," said the veterans' attorney. He adding that an E.I.S. is mandated by law if only one adverse condition is projected for a new project.<br></p>
<p>The lawyer for the conservancy called the veterans' traffic engineer's findings "palpably erroneous." The conservancy's traffic engineer, Philip Habib, stated that the neighborhood would be able to accommodate the projected extra traffic.<br></p>
<p>The board has found itself in a curious twilight area with the project as of late. Sponsored by the powerful Empire State Development Corporation, a state private-public development entity, the project doesn't need the approval of the board to move forward. But the opposition groups were looking for a ally in demanding the E.I.S., hoping to leverage enough community outcry for the E.S.D.C. to concede and allow the E.I.S. to begin. But the board, stuck between two rival camps, each seemingly unwilling to compromise, itself devolved into indecisiveness and petty infighting.<br></p>
<p>Groans, jeers and scattered applause followed each testimony, depending on which side of the issue the strictly segregated audience sat. Catcalls and threats--"You will be held accountable"--even comments demeaning speakers' professional capabilities, were bandied about.<br></p>
<p>In the end, the board made no decision.<br></p>
<p>See The Real Estate's previous coverage <a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/2006/03/war-over-the-armory.html">here</a>.</p>
<p><i>-Matthew Grace</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/11/armory-armageddon-well-hellish-at-least/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://therealestate.observer.com/PkAv66Armory.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">PkAv66Armory.gif</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Breaking: Fire on East 70th, the City&#039;s Best Townhouse Block</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/10/breaking-fire-on-east-70th-the-citys-best-townhouse-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:23:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/10/breaking-fire-on-east-70th-the-citys-best-townhouse-block/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/10/breaking-fire-on-east-70th-the-citys-best-townhouse-block/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A nightmare week for the Upper East Side continues. <a href="http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&amp;aid=63425">NY1 reports</a> that there's been an enormous fire at Coach president Reed Krakoff's new $17 million home.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060703/20060703_Michael_Calderone_finance_manhattantransfers.asp">Michael Calderone wrote</a>:</p>
<div class="oldbq">When Mr. Krakoff purchased his new 30-foot-wide townhouse on East 70th Street, between Park and Lexington avenues--the same tony block that director Woody Allen now calls home--it was reported that the fashion executive would have about $2.5 million in renovations in front of him.</div>
<p>After it took 140 firemen to put out the main blaze, the FDNY said: the fire "appears suspicious."</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: <a href="http://wcbstv.com/">WCBS-TV</a> is reporting that authorities are suspicious because (a) the fire "began at around 2:30 in the morning" and (b) the townhouse "was not occupied; it was in the process of being renovated."</p>
<p>- <em>Max Abelson</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nightmare week for the Upper East Side continues. <a href="http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&amp;aid=63425">NY1 reports</a> that there's been an enormous fire at Coach president Reed Krakoff's new $17 million home.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060703/20060703_Michael_Calderone_finance_manhattantransfers.asp">Michael Calderone wrote</a>:</p>
<div class="oldbq">When Mr. Krakoff purchased his new 30-foot-wide townhouse on East 70th Street, between Park and Lexington avenues--the same tony block that director Woody Allen now calls home--it was reported that the fashion executive would have about $2.5 million in renovations in front of him.</div>
<p>After it took 140 firemen to put out the main blaze, the FDNY said: the fire "appears suspicious."</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: <a href="http://wcbstv.com/">WCBS-TV</a> is reporting that authorities are suspicious because (a) the fire "began at around 2:30 in the morning" and (b) the townhouse "was not occupied; it was in the process of being renovated."</p>
<p>- <em>Max Abelson</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/10/breaking-fire-on-east-70th-the-citys-best-townhouse-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Feel Good Story of the Summer?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/07/feel-good-story-of-the-summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/07/feel-good-story-of-the-summer/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/07/feel-good-story-of-the-summer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="pratt.bmp" src="http://therealestate.observer.com/pratt.bmp" width="159" height="86" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.prattarea.org/">Pratt Area Community Council</a> has renovated and sold ten green (and affordable) Brooklyn buildings--thanks to a $2 million loan from the <a href="http://www.enterprisefoundation.org/">Enterprise Foundation</a> and a $1.3 million subsidy from Housing and Urban Development (more on them soon). The homes have energy efficient ventilation, inuslation, and cooling systems, plus "room by room temperature control allowing for passive solar heating."</p>
<p>But according to this week's <em>City Limits</em> profile, the story hasn't always been a happy one. In the late 90s, HUD's 203(k) program was "designed to rehabilitate poorly kept buildings and sell them to owners who would live in them." Instead, speculators created bogus non-profits, leading to years of fraud. Meanwhile, the tenants of the already downtrodden Brooklyn buildings suffered. </p>
<p>In 2002, the NY Dept. of Housing Preservation and Development finally brought in non-sham groups like Pratt: since then, $168 million has been dedicated to fixing the 2003(k) mess. $1.3m is a good start.</p>
<p>A full list of the ten renovated buildings is after the jump.</p>
<p> - <em>Max Abelson</em><br />
<!--break--></p>
<li>205 Macon Street
<li>210 Spencer Street
<li>274 Putnam Avenue
<li>308 Quincy Street
<li>188 Lexington Avenue
<li>196 Madison Street
<li>755 Marcy Avenue
<li>89 Halsey Street
<li>119 Halsey Street
<li>213 Monroe Street<br />
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="pratt.bmp" src="http://therealestate.observer.com/pratt.bmp" width="159" height="86" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.prattarea.org/">Pratt Area Community Council</a> has renovated and sold ten green (and affordable) Brooklyn buildings--thanks to a $2 million loan from the <a href="http://www.enterprisefoundation.org/">Enterprise Foundation</a> and a $1.3 million subsidy from Housing and Urban Development (more on them soon). The homes have energy efficient ventilation, inuslation, and cooling systems, plus "room by room temperature control allowing for passive solar heating."</p>
<p>But according to this week's <em>City Limits</em> profile, the story hasn't always been a happy one. In the late 90s, HUD's 203(k) program was "designed to rehabilitate poorly kept buildings and sell them to owners who would live in them." Instead, speculators created bogus non-profits, leading to years of fraud. Meanwhile, the tenants of the already downtrodden Brooklyn buildings suffered. </p>
<p>In 2002, the NY Dept. of Housing Preservation and Development finally brought in non-sham groups like Pratt: since then, $168 million has been dedicated to fixing the 2003(k) mess. $1.3m is a good start.</p>
<p>A full list of the ten renovated buildings is after the jump.</p>
<p> - <em>Max Abelson</em><br />
<!--break--></p>
<li>205 Macon Street
<li>210 Spencer Street
<li>274 Putnam Avenue
<li>308 Quincy Street
<li>188 Lexington Avenue
<li>196 Madison Street
<li>755 Marcy Avenue
<li>89 Halsey Street
<li>119 Halsey Street
<li>213 Monroe Street<br />
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/07/feel-good-story-of-the-summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://therealestate.observer.com/pratt.bmp" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pratt.bmp</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Events for July 17-18, 2006</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/07/events-for-july-1718-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/07/events-for-july-1718-2006/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/07/events-for-july-1718-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tonight, Tom Suozzi will hold a town hall meeting at a Knights of Columbus in Queens to answer questions about his candidacy and his plans for New York.</p>
<p>Tomorrow, the Lexington Democratic Club host Jessica Lappin and Scott Stringer at their monthly meeting at Brown Gardens.</p>
<p>The Women's National Republican Club hosts a <a href="http://urbanelephants.com/nyc/node/4561">summer BBQ</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://upcoming.org/event/90448/">A benefit</a> to save Washington Square Park will be held at St. Mark's Church.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://unitedforpeace.org/calendar.php?calid=17289">peace rally</a> will take place at the U.N.</p>
<p><i>&mdash;Nicole Brydson</i></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight, Tom Suozzi will hold a town hall meeting at a Knights of Columbus in Queens to answer questions about his candidacy and his plans for New York.</p>
<p>Tomorrow, the Lexington Democratic Club host Jessica Lappin and Scott Stringer at their monthly meeting at Brown Gardens.</p>
<p>The Women's National Republican Club hosts a <a href="http://urbanelephants.com/nyc/node/4561">summer BBQ</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://upcoming.org/event/90448/">A benefit</a> to save Washington Square Park will be held at St. Mark's Church.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://unitedforpeace.org/calendar.php?calid=17289">peace rally</a> will take place at the U.N.</p>
<p><i>&mdash;Nicole Brydson</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/07/events-for-july-1718-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>A Hole in Green&#8217;s Silk Stocking</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/05/a-hole-in-greens-silk-stocking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 11:53:58 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/05/a-hole-in-greens-silk-stocking/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/05/a-hole-in-greens-silk-stocking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they really like Andrew Cuomo. </p>
<p>Or maybe it was just a concession to the <a href="http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/NYElection2006_060510.htm">polls.</a></p>
<p>(I'm going with the latter.)</p>
<p>But last night, the executive committee of the Lexington Democratic Club - the oldest and largest club in the heart Mark Green's home base on the East Side of Manhattan --  voted to endorse Andrew Cuomo.  </p>
<p>Following the lead of Jonathan Bing, a club member who was the first elected official on the East Side to endorse Cuomo, the Lexington Democrats went for him by a vote 20-13, despite the fact that nearly all of the Club's six District Leaders and two State Committee members recommended supporting Green. </p>
<p>Needless to say, this is not helpful to Green's efforts to build support heading into the Democratic State Convention in Buffalo on Memorial Day weekend.  </p>
<p>The club's general membership votes on June 1.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they really like Andrew Cuomo. </p>
<p>Or maybe it was just a concession to the <a href="http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/NYElection2006_060510.htm">polls.</a></p>
<p>(I'm going with the latter.)</p>
<p>But last night, the executive committee of the Lexington Democratic Club - the oldest and largest club in the heart Mark Green's home base on the East Side of Manhattan --  voted to endorse Andrew Cuomo.  </p>
<p>Following the lead of Jonathan Bing, a club member who was the first elected official on the East Side to endorse Cuomo, the Lexington Democrats went for him by a vote 20-13, despite the fact that nearly all of the Club's six District Leaders and two State Committee members recommended supporting Green. </p>
<p>Needless to say, this is not helpful to Green's efforts to build support heading into the Democratic State Convention in Buffalo on Memorial Day weekend.  </p>
<p>The club's general membership votes on June 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/05/a-hole-in-greens-silk-stocking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>It’s Always the Broken Headlight:  Dotty Pothead Nabbed on Road</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road/</link>
			<dc:creator>Ralph Gardner Jr.</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One mistake crooks frequently make is that they attract unnecessary attention to themselves. They get pulled over for something preventable, such as running a red light, and then when the cop searches the vehicle, he finds an arsenal of weapons, or enough meth to illuminate the entire tristate area.</p>
<p>Something like that happened on Jan. 30, shortly after 3 p.m., on 65th Street between Lexington and Third avenues. A 54-year-old male was observed by a police officer driving a blue 1991 Volvo with a defective headlight.</p>
<p>It happens to the best of us. But must we have a can of beer in our lap, or an entire six-pack&mdash;or, in this guy&rsquo;s case, a ziplock bag containing pot? And how did the cop discover that his suspect was a pothead? It wasn&rsquo;t because the inside of his vehicle was obscured by cumulus clouds of dope, or because it suffered the unmistakable scent of cannabis.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s because the fool tried to throw his stash out the window. And lest you think I&rsquo;m being too hard on the guy, he admitted so himself. Rather than playing dumb&mdash;&ldquo;Marijuana? What marijuana? That&rsquo;s incense&rdquo;&mdash;he told the cop, &ldquo;I should have eaten the marijuana instead of throwing it out the window.&rdquo;</p>
<p>A computer check pursuant to his arrest for criminal possession of marijuana revealed an outstanding warrant of an undisclosed nature.</p>
<p>Hey, Cop, Over Here!</p>
<p>In a similar but more serious case of being your own worst enemy, a police officer observed two males illegally parked in front of 187 East 80th Street on Jan. 23 at 8:45 p.m. It was a rather boneheaded thing to do, because the men were wanted for several recent armed robberies, including two in the 19th Precinct and three in the 20th Precinct on the West Side.</p>
<p>And in one of those cases of trying too hard to look innocent, thus attracting additional suspicion, the driver got out of the car, approached the cop and asked him whether it was legal to park there. When the officer looked at the car before offering his opinion, he spotted the second male sitting in the passenger seat and engaged in what the police described as &ldquo;furtive movements.&rdquo; Which is usually the way it is when you&rsquo;re trying to hide a firearm from a cop.</p>
<p>In any case, the officer may have been more attuned to suspicious behavior than usual because the 4-to-midnight tour had been dispatched from the stationhouse with instructions to be on the lookout for these exact robbers.</p>
<p>So the officer asked the passenger to get out of the car. He refused&mdash;numerous times&mdash;undoubtedly confirming the cop&rsquo;s suspicions that these two weren&rsquo;t garden-variety scofflaws, and making the decision to remove him forcibly from the vehicle and handcuff his hands behind his back a relatively easy one.</p>
<p>The officer discovered the loaded firearm that the suspect, 19, was trying to hide, in the immediate vicinity of where he&rsquo;d been sitting. And wouldn&rsquo;t you know it, the other guy&rsquo;s New York State driver&rsquo;s license had been suspended. He also happened to be carrying a knife, and probably not for peeling fruit; when the police searched the car&rsquo;s trunk, they found a black 9-millimeter Makarov pistol with seven live rounds, a black magazine (apparently of the ballistics rather than the literary sort), a .22-caliber revolver and four live .22 cartridges.</p>
<p>The suspects were arrested for criminal possession of a weapon, though not for illegal parking, and line-ups with some of their robbery victims were in the works. &ldquo;The investigation is ongoing,&rdquo; said a police official who expects the suspects to be connected to additional crimes.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One mistake crooks frequently make is that they attract unnecessary attention to themselves. They get pulled over for something preventable, such as running a red light, and then when the cop searches the vehicle, he finds an arsenal of weapons, or enough meth to illuminate the entire tristate area.</p>
<p>Something like that happened on Jan. 30, shortly after 3 p.m., on 65th Street between Lexington and Third avenues. A 54-year-old male was observed by a police officer driving a blue 1991 Volvo with a defective headlight.</p>
<p>It happens to the best of us. But must we have a can of beer in our lap, or an entire six-pack&mdash;or, in this guy&rsquo;s case, a ziplock bag containing pot? And how did the cop discover that his suspect was a pothead? It wasn&rsquo;t because the inside of his vehicle was obscured by cumulus clouds of dope, or because it suffered the unmistakable scent of cannabis.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s because the fool tried to throw his stash out the window. And lest you think I&rsquo;m being too hard on the guy, he admitted so himself. Rather than playing dumb&mdash;&ldquo;Marijuana? What marijuana? That&rsquo;s incense&rdquo;&mdash;he told the cop, &ldquo;I should have eaten the marijuana instead of throwing it out the window.&rdquo;</p>
<p>A computer check pursuant to his arrest for criminal possession of marijuana revealed an outstanding warrant of an undisclosed nature.</p>
<p>Hey, Cop, Over Here!</p>
<p>In a similar but more serious case of being your own worst enemy, a police officer observed two males illegally parked in front of 187 East 80th Street on Jan. 23 at 8:45 p.m. It was a rather boneheaded thing to do, because the men were wanted for several recent armed robberies, including two in the 19th Precinct and three in the 20th Precinct on the West Side.</p>
<p>And in one of those cases of trying too hard to look innocent, thus attracting additional suspicion, the driver got out of the car, approached the cop and asked him whether it was legal to park there. When the officer looked at the car before offering his opinion, he spotted the second male sitting in the passenger seat and engaged in what the police described as &ldquo;furtive movements.&rdquo; Which is usually the way it is when you&rsquo;re trying to hide a firearm from a cop.</p>
<p>In any case, the officer may have been more attuned to suspicious behavior than usual because the 4-to-midnight tour had been dispatched from the stationhouse with instructions to be on the lookout for these exact robbers.</p>
<p>So the officer asked the passenger to get out of the car. He refused&mdash;numerous times&mdash;undoubtedly confirming the cop&rsquo;s suspicions that these two weren&rsquo;t garden-variety scofflaws, and making the decision to remove him forcibly from the vehicle and handcuff his hands behind his back a relatively easy one.</p>
<p>The officer discovered the loaded firearm that the suspect, 19, was trying to hide, in the immediate vicinity of where he&rsquo;d been sitting. And wouldn&rsquo;t you know it, the other guy&rsquo;s New York State driver&rsquo;s license had been suspended. He also happened to be carrying a knife, and probably not for peeling fruit; when the police searched the car&rsquo;s trunk, they found a black 9-millimeter Makarov pistol with seven live rounds, a black magazine (apparently of the ballistics rather than the literary sort), a .22-caliber revolver and four live .22 cartridges.</p>
<p>The suspects were arrested for criminal possession of a weapon, though not for illegal parking, and line-ups with some of their robbery victims were in the works. &ldquo;The investigation is ongoing,&rdquo; said a police official who expects the suspects to be connected to additional crimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>It&#8217;s Always the Broken Headlight: Dotty Pothead Nabbed on Road</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road-2/</link>
			<dc:creator>Ralph Gardner Jr.</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One mistake crooks frequently make is that they attract unnecessary attention to themselves. They get pulled over for something preventable, such as running a red light, and then when the cop searches the vehicle, he finds an arsenal of weapons, or enough meth to illuminate the entire tristate area.</p>
<p> Something like that happened on Jan. 30, shortly after 3 p.m., on 65th Street between Lexington and Third avenues. A 54-year-old male was observed by a police officer driving a blue 1991 Volvo with a defective headlight.</p>
<p> It happens to the best of us. But must we have a can of beer in our lap, or an entire six-pack—or, in this guy’s case, a ziplock bag containing pot? And how did the cop discover that his suspect was a pothead? It wasn’t because the inside of his vehicle was obscured by cumulus clouds of dope, or because it suffered the unmistakable scent of cannabis.</p>
<p> It’s because the fool tried to throw his stash out the window. And lest you think I’m being too hard on the guy, he admitted so himself. Rather than playing dumb—“Marijuana? What marijuana? That’s incense”—he told the cop, “I should have eaten the marijuana instead of throwing it out the window.”</p>
<p> A computer check pursuant to his arrest for criminal possession of marijuana revealed an outstanding warrant of an undisclosed nature.</p>
<p> Hey, Cop, Over Here!</p>
<p> In a similar but more serious case of being your own worst enemy, a police officer observed two males illegally parked in front of 187 East 80th Street on Jan. 23 at 8:45 p.m. It was a rather boneheaded thing to do, because the men were wanted for several recent armed robberies, including two in the 19th Precinct and three in the 20th Precinct on the West Side.</p>
<p> And in one of those cases of trying too hard to look innocent, thus attracting additional suspicion, the driver got out of the car, approached the cop and asked him whether it was legal to park there. When the officer looked at the car before offering his opinion, he spotted the second male sitting in the passenger seat and engaged in what the police described as “furtive movements.” Which is usually the way it is when you’re trying to hide a firearm from a cop.</p>
<p> In any case, the officer may have been more attuned to suspicious behavior than usual because the 4-to-midnight tour had been dispatched from the stationhouse with instructions to be on the lookout for these exact robbers.</p>
<p> So the officer asked the passenger to get out of the car. He refused—numerous times—undoubtedly confirming the cop’s suspicions that these two weren’t garden-variety scofflaws, and making the decision to remove him forcibly from the vehicle and handcuff his hands behind his back a relatively easy one.</p>
<p> The officer discovered the loaded firearm that the suspect, 19, was trying to hide, in the immediate vicinity of where he’d been sitting. And wouldn’t you know it, the other guy’s New York State driver’s license had been suspended. He also happened to be carrying a knife, and probably not for peeling fruit; when the police searched the car’s trunk, they found a black 9-millimeter Makarov pistol with seven live rounds, a black magazine (apparently of the ballistics rather than the literary sort), a .22-caliber revolver and four live .22 cartridges.</p>
<p> The suspects were arrested for criminal possession of a weapon, though not for illegal parking, and line-ups with some of their robbery victims were in the works. “The investigation is ongoing,” said a police official who expects the suspects to be connected to additional crimes.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One mistake crooks frequently make is that they attract unnecessary attention to themselves. They get pulled over for something preventable, such as running a red light, and then when the cop searches the vehicle, he finds an arsenal of weapons, or enough meth to illuminate the entire tristate area.</p>
<p> Something like that happened on Jan. 30, shortly after 3 p.m., on 65th Street between Lexington and Third avenues. A 54-year-old male was observed by a police officer driving a blue 1991 Volvo with a defective headlight.</p>
<p> It happens to the best of us. But must we have a can of beer in our lap, or an entire six-pack—or, in this guy’s case, a ziplock bag containing pot? And how did the cop discover that his suspect was a pothead? It wasn’t because the inside of his vehicle was obscured by cumulus clouds of dope, or because it suffered the unmistakable scent of cannabis.</p>
<p> It’s because the fool tried to throw his stash out the window. And lest you think I’m being too hard on the guy, he admitted so himself. Rather than playing dumb—“Marijuana? What marijuana? That’s incense”—he told the cop, “I should have eaten the marijuana instead of throwing it out the window.”</p>
<p> A computer check pursuant to his arrest for criminal possession of marijuana revealed an outstanding warrant of an undisclosed nature.</p>
<p> Hey, Cop, Over Here!</p>
<p> In a similar but more serious case of being your own worst enemy, a police officer observed two males illegally parked in front of 187 East 80th Street on Jan. 23 at 8:45 p.m. It was a rather boneheaded thing to do, because the men were wanted for several recent armed robberies, including two in the 19th Precinct and three in the 20th Precinct on the West Side.</p>
<p> And in one of those cases of trying too hard to look innocent, thus attracting additional suspicion, the driver got out of the car, approached the cop and asked him whether it was legal to park there. When the officer looked at the car before offering his opinion, he spotted the second male sitting in the passenger seat and engaged in what the police described as “furtive movements.” Which is usually the way it is when you’re trying to hide a firearm from a cop.</p>
<p> In any case, the officer may have been more attuned to suspicious behavior than usual because the 4-to-midnight tour had been dispatched from the stationhouse with instructions to be on the lookout for these exact robbers.</p>
<p> So the officer asked the passenger to get out of the car. He refused—numerous times—undoubtedly confirming the cop’s suspicions that these two weren’t garden-variety scofflaws, and making the decision to remove him forcibly from the vehicle and handcuff his hands behind his back a relatively easy one.</p>
<p> The officer discovered the loaded firearm that the suspect, 19, was trying to hide, in the immediate vicinity of where he’d been sitting. And wouldn’t you know it, the other guy’s New York State driver’s license had been suspended. He also happened to be carrying a knife, and probably not for peeling fruit; when the police searched the car’s trunk, they found a black 9-millimeter Makarov pistol with seven live rounds, a black magazine (apparently of the ballistics rather than the literary sort), a .22-caliber revolver and four live .22 cartridges.</p>
<p> The suspects were arrested for criminal possession of a weapon, though not for illegal parking, and line-ups with some of their robbery victims were in the works. “The investigation is ongoing,” said a police official who expects the suspects to be connected to additional crimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/02/its-always-the-broken-headlight-dotty-pothead-nabbed-on-road-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Toxic Substance at Sotheby’s!  House HazMat Team Cleans Up</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2005/12/toxic-substance-at-sothebys-house-hazmat-team-cleans-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2005/12/toxic-substance-at-sothebys-house-hazmat-team-cleans-up/</link>
			<dc:creator>Ralph Gardner Jr.</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2005/12/toxic-substance-at-sothebys-house-hazmat-team-cleans-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The high-end auction-house business is considered among the more genteel of professions. But apparently it has its perils&mdash;and not just for those who bid over their heads. On Dec. 5, the NYPD was summoned to Sotheby&rsquo;s after three employees were exposed to a toxic substance.</p>
<p>The substance in question wasn&rsquo;t formaldehyde that leaked from some Damien Hirst shark tank after competing buyers came to blows in an effort to take it home. Rather, the workers were exposed to mercury after a grandfather clock they were unpacking at the 1334 York Avenue location at 10:20 a.m. was discovered to be leaking.</p>
<p>The area was sealed off, and the workers&mdash;three males age 35, 38 and 44&mdash;were decontaminated, along with E.M.S. workers who responded to the scene. Then the Sotheby&rsquo;s employees, complaining of headaches, were removed to New York Presbyterian&ndash;Weill Cornell Hospital.</p>
<p>The contaminated area was scrubbed by Sotheby&rsquo;s HazMat team (who knew Sotheby&rsquo;s had a HazMat team?) in conjunction with an FDNY HazMat team, and the area was deemed safe.</p>
<p>In a separate incident at Sotheby&rsquo;s that occurred on Oct. 11 but wasn&rsquo;t reported to the police until Dec. 2, $50,000 worth of various wines consigned to the auction house went missing from a storage area. A security video of the space revealed no suspicious activity.</p>
<p>Mug Shots</p>
<p>Fists, or rather mugs, were flying on Fifth Avenue and 81st Street, according to cross complaints filed at the 19th Precinct on Dec. 5. The victim in the first report, the employer, told the police that her housekeeper grabbed a coffee mug out of her hand and threatened to strike her with it. Fearing for her safety, the boss tried to grab it back, struggling with her coffee-cup-brandishing assailant. In the process of doing so, she says, she fell to the floor and injured her neck. However, her injury didn&rsquo;t prevent her from getting to Lenox Hill Hospital, where she was treated and released.</p>
<p>Her employee, unsurprisingly, has a drastically different take on the incident. She says that her boss was the one wielding the mug with deadly precision. She claims that her boss hit her over the head with the crockery, then threw hot tea in her face, causing a minor abrasion&mdash;and that she has a bump on her head to prove it.</p>
<p>She was also removed to Lenox Hill Hospital, where she apparently didn&rsquo;t run into her boss. The employer was said to have fled the apartment in a taxicab. The worker, a 44-year-old Queens resident, had high blood pressure and was suffering from chest pains as a result of the incident. However, she might also have the last word: In her complaint, the employer put her age as 37; her housekeeper, who ought to know, says she&rsquo;s actually 40.</p>
<p>Brown-Bagging It</p>
<p>Perhaps it&rsquo;s no surprise that anyone who decides to take his bike for a ride at 4 a.m., as one East 94th Street resident did on Nov. 13, has a surfeit of courage&mdash;either that, or he doesn&rsquo;t mind getting mugged. The victim was standing at the corner of 94th Street and Madison Avenue at that desolate hour when a male approached him and stated, &ldquo;Give me your money. I have a gun.&rdquo;</p>
<p>And to prove it, he produced a brown paper bag. &ldquo;No,&rdquo; his unimpressed victim observed, &ldquo;you have a paper bag.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The perp admitted that, yes, he was indeed carrying a paper bag, but the gun was inside the bag.</p>
<p>The bicyclist either didn&rsquo;t believe him or felt physical activity was the answer to his insomnia, because he grabbed the lock off his bike and struck his assailant on the left side of the head with it. That took the fight out of the attacker, who was last seen fleeing toward Fifth Avenue.</p>
<p><b>Dangerous Urges</b></p>
<p>Before starting to take incriminating photographs of crooks trying to disable MetroCard machines, as one token-booth clerk did at the 77th Street and Lexington Avenue subway stop on Nov. 23, you probably ought to ask yourself whether you&rsquo;ll need to leave the bullet-proof safety of your booth to go to the bathroom before either the crooks disperse or the cops arrive.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s the mistake a 56-year-old transit employee made at 4:17 p.m. after she snapped pictures of a couple of perps messing with the machines so that they could sell passengers turnstile &ldquo;swipes.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;I&rsquo;m going to fuck you up when you come out of there,&rdquo; one of the suspects threatened.</p>
<p>And come out she did&mdash;because she apparently couldn&rsquo;t hold it any longer. One of the bad guys grabbed her while the other punched her and pushed her against the booth. The municipal employee also suffered a bruise when she hit her head against a step. And one of the thieves threw a bottle at her, the vessel hitting her in the leg and breaking into pieces.</p>
<p>The good thing about attacks at busy subway stations at the start of the afternoon rush hour is that there tend to be cops in the vicinity, as there were in this case. The officers arrived promptly and arrested the crooks, one 16, the other 18, for assault.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The high-end auction-house business is considered among the more genteel of professions. But apparently it has its perils&mdash;and not just for those who bid over their heads. On Dec. 5, the NYPD was summoned to Sotheby&rsquo;s after three employees were exposed to a toxic substance.</p>
<p>The substance in question wasn&rsquo;t formaldehyde that leaked from some Damien Hirst shark tank after competing buyers came to blows in an effort to take it home. Rather, the workers were exposed to mercury after a grandfather clock they were unpacking at the 1334 York Avenue location at 10:20 a.m. was discovered to be leaking.</p>
<p>The area was sealed off, and the workers&mdash;three males age 35, 38 and 44&mdash;were decontaminated, along with E.M.S. workers who responded to the scene. Then the Sotheby&rsquo;s employees, complaining of headaches, were removed to New York Presbyterian&ndash;Weill Cornell Hospital.</p>
<p>The contaminated area was scrubbed by Sotheby&rsquo;s HazMat team (who knew Sotheby&rsquo;s had a HazMat team?) in conjunction with an FDNY HazMat team, and the area was deemed safe.</p>
<p>In a separate incident at Sotheby&rsquo;s that occurred on Oct. 11 but wasn&rsquo;t reported to the police until Dec. 2, $50,000 worth of various wines consigned to the auction house went missing from a storage area. A security video of the space revealed no suspicious activity.</p>
<p>Mug Shots</p>
<p>Fists, or rather mugs, were flying on Fifth Avenue and 81st Street, according to cross complaints filed at the 19th Precinct on Dec. 5. The victim in the first report, the employer, told the police that her housekeeper grabbed a coffee mug out of her hand and threatened to strike her with it. Fearing for her safety, the boss tried to grab it back, struggling with her coffee-cup-brandishing assailant. In the process of doing so, she says, she fell to the floor and injured her neck. However, her injury didn&rsquo;t prevent her from getting to Lenox Hill Hospital, where she was treated and released.</p>
<p>Her employee, unsurprisingly, has a drastically different take on the incident. She says that her boss was the one wielding the mug with deadly precision. She claims that her boss hit her over the head with the crockery, then threw hot tea in her face, causing a minor abrasion&mdash;and that she has a bump on her head to prove it.</p>
<p>She was also removed to Lenox Hill Hospital, where she apparently didn&rsquo;t run into her boss. The employer was said to have fled the apartment in a taxicab. The worker, a 44-year-old Queens resident, had high blood pressure and was suffering from chest pains as a result of the incident. However, she might also have the last word: In her complaint, the employer put her age as 37; her housekeeper, who ought to know, says she&rsquo;s actually 40.</p>
<p>Brown-Bagging It</p>
<p>Perhaps it&rsquo;s no surprise that anyone who decides to take his bike for a ride at 4 a.m., as one East 94th Street resident did on Nov. 13, has a surfeit of courage&mdash;either that, or he doesn&rsquo;t mind getting mugged. The victim was standing at the corner of 94th Street and Madison Avenue at that desolate hour when a male approached him and stated, &ldquo;Give me your money. I have a gun.&rdquo;</p>
<p>And to prove it, he produced a brown paper bag. &ldquo;No,&rdquo; his unimpressed victim observed, &ldquo;you have a paper bag.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The perp admitted that, yes, he was indeed carrying a paper bag, but the gun was inside the bag.</p>
<p>The bicyclist either didn&rsquo;t believe him or felt physical activity was the answer to his insomnia, because he grabbed the lock off his bike and struck his assailant on the left side of the head with it. That took the fight out of the attacker, who was last seen fleeing toward Fifth Avenue.</p>
<p><b>Dangerous Urges</b></p>
<p>Before starting to take incriminating photographs of crooks trying to disable MetroCard machines, as one token-booth clerk did at the 77th Street and Lexington Avenue subway stop on Nov. 23, you probably ought to ask yourself whether you&rsquo;ll need to leave the bullet-proof safety of your booth to go to the bathroom before either the crooks disperse or the cops arrive.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s the mistake a 56-year-old transit employee made at 4:17 p.m. after she snapped pictures of a couple of perps messing with the machines so that they could sell passengers turnstile &ldquo;swipes.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;I&rsquo;m going to fuck you up when you come out of there,&rdquo; one of the suspects threatened.</p>
<p>And come out she did&mdash;because she apparently couldn&rsquo;t hold it any longer. One of the bad guys grabbed her while the other punched her and pushed her against the booth. The municipal employee also suffered a bruise when she hit her head against a step. And one of the thieves threw a bottle at her, the vessel hitting her in the leg and breaking into pieces.</p>
<p>The good thing about attacks at busy subway stations at the start of the afternoon rush hour is that there tend to be cops in the vicinity, as there were in this case. The officers arrived promptly and arrested the crooks, one 16, the other 18, for assault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2005/12/toxic-substance-at-sothebys-house-hazmat-team-cleans-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Big Step for Seagram</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2005/12/big-step-for-seagram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2005/12/big-step-for-seagram/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2005/12/big-step-for-seagram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/uploaded_images/610Lex -763704-799370.jpg"><img style="float:left;margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer;cursor:hand" src="http://therealestate.observer.com/uploaded_images/610Lex -763704-798149.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
We're a little late on this one, but last week the Landmark Preservation Commission approved RFR Realty's plan under Section 74-79 of the city's zoning text for its development at 610 Lexington Avenue. RFR is halfway home now--it now needs to get approval from the Department of City Planning to transfer air rights from the Seagram Building, at 375 Park, before construction begins.</p>
<p>Section 74-79 allows developers to transfer air rights from landmarked buildings as long as the upkeep of the landmarked property is guaranteed. RFR, which owns both the Seagram Building and 610 Lexington--it's an old YWCA, for now--has agreed to maintain the property for perpetuity (which means, if it sells the building, its maintenance will be written into the deed).</p>
<p>The new 257,000-square-foot, 62-story building, if and when it's built, will be residential condos and a hotel.</p>
<p><i>-Matthew Grace</i></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/uploaded_images/610Lex -763704-799370.jpg"><img style="float:left;margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer;cursor:hand" src="http://therealestate.observer.com/uploaded_images/610Lex -763704-798149.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
We're a little late on this one, but last week the Landmark Preservation Commission approved RFR Realty's plan under Section 74-79 of the city's zoning text for its development at 610 Lexington Avenue. RFR is halfway home now--it now needs to get approval from the Department of City Planning to transfer air rights from the Seagram Building, at 375 Park, before construction begins.</p>
<p>Section 74-79 allows developers to transfer air rights from landmarked buildings as long as the upkeep of the landmarked property is guaranteed. RFR, which owns both the Seagram Building and 610 Lexington--it's an old YWCA, for now--has agreed to maintain the property for perpetuity (which means, if it sells the building, its maintenance will be written into the deed).</p>
<p>The new 257,000-square-foot, 62-story building, if and when it's built, will be residential condos and a hotel.</p>
<p><i>-Matthew Grace</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2005/12/big-step-for-seagram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://therealestate.observer.com/uploaded_images/610Lex-763704-798149.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
