<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Mary Carillo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/mary-carillo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:45:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>An Early Review of ESPN&#8217;s Coverage of the U.S. Open: We Like it (Mostly)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/09/an-early-review-of-espns-coverage-of-the-us-open-we-like-it-mostly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:36:44 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/09/an-early-review-of-espns-coverage-of-the-us-open-we-like-it-mostly/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/09/an-early-review-of-espns-coverage-of-the-us-open-we-like-it-mostly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rsz_cimg2091.jpg?w=300&h=225" />For the first time in decades, a new cable outlet is in town! Farewell USA and hello ESPN (well, ESPN2 technically). For the most part, we're enjoying what we're seeing. Here's a breakdown:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Things We Like:</span></p>
<p><strong>Mary Carillo:</strong> We never understood why Carillo, the best voice for tennis on ESPN, NBC and CBS (not to mention HBO with Bryant Gumbel), wasn't used by USA. It's no wonder that four channels would want her. If anything, we wish she wouldn't be relegated at night to women's matches.&nbsp; But at least we get to her for day matches, and for two weeks now.</p>
<p><strong>No Tracy Austin:</strong> She was probably the weakest link in USA's coverage. Her analysis was predictable, her interest in the matches was questionable. We're grateful ESPN stuck to its own team.</p>
<p><strong>Sideline reports:</strong> USA's coverage was familiar and wonderful, but in a way, it's been useful to shake things up because ESPN has brought a certain intensity to the coverage. On Monday night, when Venus Williams mysteriously called a trainer early in the match, they turned to Pam Shriver who interviewed Richard Williams and revealed she had a knee problem. Later in the match, Shriver interviewed Billie Jean King who gave even more: Venus told her recently that she suffered from patellar tendinitis. (We don't know, either, but we're happy to learn.) USA's Michael Barkann spent his time interviewing Tony Bennett or David Dinkins. We prefer it ESPN's way. It's also worth mentioning that Mary Joe Fernandez and Pam Shriver, once unlistenable, have become improved light years.</p>
<p><strong>Hannah Storm: </strong>We're not entirely sure how ESPN dug up Hannah Storm, but she looks great and she sounds even better. Nice move.</p>
<p><strong>Using the Outdoor Studio: </strong>USA only occassionally touched the outdoor patio outside the south gate of Ashe, and ESPN doesn't seem to get enough of it--or the use of its camera near the South Plaza. It's an intimate touch, and it connects the grounds to the matches inside. Really nicely done.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Things We Could Do Without:</span></p>
<p><strong>Chris Fowler in the broadcast booth:</strong> Though he seems to have actually read up on his tennis, he still lacks the soft touch of Ted Robinson that's critical to a good tennis broadcast. Someone remind him that this isn't college football.</p>
<p><strong>Too Much Brad Gilbert: </strong>He needs to be treated the way Tony Siragusa is dealt with at FOX for NFL broadcasts. Keep him on the sidelines and go to him occasionally. He can be a useful voice at times, but to use him as the primary voice? Too many fist-pumps, too little insight.</p>
<p><strong>Daren Cahill as on-court interviewer:</strong> He explains forehands and backhands. Don't let him do interviews. If you must experiment with him, try this at other smaller tournaments.</p>
<p><strong>The Patrick McEnroe and John McEnroe Broadcast team:</strong> We like each of these guys separately. But each announcer has benefited from partners not named McEnroe: Cliff Drysdale complimented Patrick at ESPN, and Ted Robinson and Dick Enberg have looked over John at NBC and CBS, respectively. The novelty of two brothers in the booth wears thin pretty fast.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rsz_cimg2091.jpg?w=300&h=225" />For the first time in decades, a new cable outlet is in town! Farewell USA and hello ESPN (well, ESPN2 technically). For the most part, we're enjoying what we're seeing. Here's a breakdown:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Things We Like:</span></p>
<p><strong>Mary Carillo:</strong> We never understood why Carillo, the best voice for tennis on ESPN, NBC and CBS (not to mention HBO with Bryant Gumbel), wasn't used by USA. It's no wonder that four channels would want her. If anything, we wish she wouldn't be relegated at night to women's matches.&nbsp; But at least we get to her for day matches, and for two weeks now.</p>
<p><strong>No Tracy Austin:</strong> She was probably the weakest link in USA's coverage. Her analysis was predictable, her interest in the matches was questionable. We're grateful ESPN stuck to its own team.</p>
<p><strong>Sideline reports:</strong> USA's coverage was familiar and wonderful, but in a way, it's been useful to shake things up because ESPN has brought a certain intensity to the coverage. On Monday night, when Venus Williams mysteriously called a trainer early in the match, they turned to Pam Shriver who interviewed Richard Williams and revealed she had a knee problem. Later in the match, Shriver interviewed Billie Jean King who gave even more: Venus told her recently that she suffered from patellar tendinitis. (We don't know, either, but we're happy to learn.) USA's Michael Barkann spent his time interviewing Tony Bennett or David Dinkins. We prefer it ESPN's way. It's also worth mentioning that Mary Joe Fernandez and Pam Shriver, once unlistenable, have become improved light years.</p>
<p><strong>Hannah Storm: </strong>We're not entirely sure how ESPN dug up Hannah Storm, but she looks great and she sounds even better. Nice move.</p>
<p><strong>Using the Outdoor Studio: </strong>USA only occassionally touched the outdoor patio outside the south gate of Ashe, and ESPN doesn't seem to get enough of it--or the use of its camera near the South Plaza. It's an intimate touch, and it connects the grounds to the matches inside. Really nicely done.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Things We Could Do Without:</span></p>
<p><strong>Chris Fowler in the broadcast booth:</strong> Though he seems to have actually read up on his tennis, he still lacks the soft touch of Ted Robinson that's critical to a good tennis broadcast. Someone remind him that this isn't college football.</p>
<p><strong>Too Much Brad Gilbert: </strong>He needs to be treated the way Tony Siragusa is dealt with at FOX for NFL broadcasts. Keep him on the sidelines and go to him occasionally. He can be a useful voice at times, but to use him as the primary voice? Too many fist-pumps, too little insight.</p>
<p><strong>Daren Cahill as on-court interviewer:</strong> He explains forehands and backhands. Don't let him do interviews. If you must experiment with him, try this at other smaller tournaments.</p>
<p><strong>The Patrick McEnroe and John McEnroe Broadcast team:</strong> We like each of these guys separately. But each announcer has benefited from partners not named McEnroe: Cliff Drysdale complimented Patrick at ESPN, and Ted Robinson and Dick Enberg have looked over John at NBC and CBS, respectively. The novelty of two brothers in the booth wears thin pretty fast.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/09/an-early-review-of-espns-coverage-of-the-us-open-we-like-it-mostly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rsz_cimg2091.jpg?w=300&#38;h=225" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Venus and Serena in History</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/09/venus-and-serena-in-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:23:33 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/09/venus-and-serena-in-history/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/09/venus-and-serena-in-history/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If Venus Williams goes on to win tomorrow night and then in the final, it will give the Williams sisters three of this year’s four Grand Slams -- an enormous comeback for them. </p>
<p>Yet, if we return to Mary Carillo’s <a href="http://www.observer.com/www.observer.com/2007/williams-family-bristles-carillo-assessment">point </a>from two weeks ago -- that the Williams sisters haven’t lived to their potential -- here’s something that underscores it.</p>
<p>Serena Williams has finished only one year at number one; Venus Williams never has. </p>
<p>Here’s a<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WTA_number_1_ranked_players"> look</a> at the number of weeks some big names have spent at number one: </p>
<div class="oldbq">Serena 57<br />Venus 11<br />Sánchez Vicario 12<br />Henin 85<br />Sharapova 14<br />Hingis 209<br />Graf 377</div>
<p>No one's going to argue with their amazing record in the big tournaments. But just think how dominant they'd be if they played all the time.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Venus Williams goes on to win tomorrow night and then in the final, it will give the Williams sisters three of this year’s four Grand Slams -- an enormous comeback for them. </p>
<p>Yet, if we return to Mary Carillo’s <a href="http://www.observer.com/www.observer.com/2007/williams-family-bristles-carillo-assessment">point </a>from two weeks ago -- that the Williams sisters haven’t lived to their potential -- here’s something that underscores it.</p>
<p>Serena Williams has finished only one year at number one; Venus Williams never has. </p>
<p>Here’s a<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WTA_number_1_ranked_players"> look</a> at the number of weeks some big names have spent at number one: </p>
<div class="oldbq">Serena 57<br />Venus 11<br />Sánchez Vicario 12<br />Henin 85<br />Sharapova 14<br />Hingis 209<br />Graf 377</div>
<p>No one's going to argue with their amazing record in the big tournaments. But just think how dominant they'd be if they played all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/09/venus-and-serena-in-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Williams Family Bristles at Carillo Assessment</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/08/williams-family-bristles-at-carillo-assessment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:23:53 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/08/williams-family-bristles-at-carillo-assessment/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/08/williams-family-bristles-at-carillo-assessment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/williamssisters.jpg" />TV analyst and ex-pro player Mary Carillo told reporters last week she thought five years ago that the Williams sisters would dominate and forever change women's tennis. </p>
<p>"I was dead wrong at that," she said.</p>
<p>It's not a new sentiment for Carillo, who told me last year in an interview that the Williams sisters "created a Tiger-like buzz" when they started winning, but never made a Tiger Woods-like imprint on  the game because "they play so seldom."</p>
<p>On Saturday, at a press briefing, Serena Williams responded to those comments in a typically aggressive way.  </p>
<p>"Well, I think I've had a little more effect on tennis history than she has," she said. "I'm pretty excited about that."</p>
<p>Her endlessly quotable dad, Richard Williams, had this to say:</p>
<p>"I think that Mary has a good idea of tennis, but I'm just glad that the Williams sisters don't play the way she did so they have a chance of winning."</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/williamssisters.jpg" />TV analyst and ex-pro player Mary Carillo told reporters last week she thought five years ago that the Williams sisters would dominate and forever change women's tennis. </p>
<p>"I was dead wrong at that," she said.</p>
<p>It's not a new sentiment for Carillo, who told me last year in an interview that the Williams sisters "created a Tiger-like buzz" when they started winning, but never made a Tiger Woods-like imprint on  the game because "they play so seldom."</p>
<p>On Saturday, at a press briefing, Serena Williams responded to those comments in a typically aggressive way.  </p>
<p>"Well, I think I've had a little more effect on tennis history than she has," she said. "I'm pretty excited about that."</p>
<p>Her endlessly quotable dad, Richard Williams, had this to say:</p>
<p>"I think that Mary has a good idea of tennis, but I'm just glad that the Williams sisters don't play the way she did so they have a chance of winning."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/08/williams-family-bristles-at-carillo-assessment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/williamssisters.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
