<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Michael Powell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/michael-powell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>[Update] Disgruntled New York Times Union Members Unleash a Sidewalk Protest</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/update-disgruntled-new-york-times-union-members-unleash-a-sidewalk-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:20:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/update-disgruntled-new-york-times-union-members-unleash-a-sidewalk-protest/</link>
			<dc:creator>Cynthia Cotts</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=268260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_268263" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/update-disgruntled-new-york-times-union-members-unleash-a-sidewalk-protest/img_7183/" rel="attachment wp-att-268263"><img class="size-medium wp-image-268263" title="IMG_7183" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_7183.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"><em>New York Times</em> columnist Michael Powell explains the contract dispute to a reporter.</p></div></p>
<p>At 3:35 this afternoon, an estimated 400 rank and file members of the <em>New York Times</em> union left their desks for a walk-out that began on 40th Street, headed up Eighth Avenue and turned right on 41st. As the crowd reassembled outside the north entrance to <em>Times</em> headquarters, union organizers such as columnists Jim Dwyer and Michael Powell gave interviews to camera crews and reporters from other organizations that had descended on the scene, hoping for something dramatic like rock-throwing or a chant.</p>
<p>Instead the mood was calm and collegial. The protesters wore white stickers with the words “Believe Us” printed on them. At one point after they reassembled, they applauded themselves for a rousing show of solidarity. A similar walk-out of about 23 union members took place at the company's Washington, D.C. bureau today.</p>
<p>The union is in a heated contract dispute with <em>Times</em> management, which wants a new contract hammered out and approved by the union by the end of the year. Sticking points include compensation, health benefits and overtime pay, all of which the union feels should increase, rather than decrease, over time. But the union feels that management has taken only baby steps to toward meeting its demands.</p>
<p>There has been no threat of punishing the protesters, <em>Times</em> Assistant to the Editor Walt Baranger told <em>The Observer</em> outside headquarters today. “News management gets it,” Mr. Baranger said. “We’re really talking to the boardroom -- the people who don’t understand that journalists are not interchangeable.”</p>
<p>Union members feel that they’ve already sacrificed enough -- they took a 5 percent pay cut in 2009 and their overtime pay has fallen by half since 2008. In the meantime, editors, reporters and web producers have been scrambling to create digital content--“doing more, but making less,” according to an online <a href="http://saveourtimes.com/" target="_blank">protest letter</a> addressed to <em>Times</em> management.</p>
<p>Newspaper analysts argue that newspaper companies have suffered such a steep decline in revenues of late that they must cut back on benefits such as pension plans to maintain profitability. On the contrary, the <em>Times</em> union organizers believe that the only way to continue producing top-quality journalism is to compensate the content producers fairly.</p>
<p>“Most of the people who walked out have shares in the company,” Mr. Baranger noted, aligning union members with other shareholders. “We’re motivated to get the shares back up and save the paper.”</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_268263" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/update-disgruntled-new-york-times-union-members-unleash-a-sidewalk-protest/img_7183/" rel="attachment wp-att-268263"><img class="size-medium wp-image-268263" title="IMG_7183" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_7183.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"><em>New York Times</em> columnist Michael Powell explains the contract dispute to a reporter.</p></div></p>
<p>At 3:35 this afternoon, an estimated 400 rank and file members of the <em>New York Times</em> union left their desks for a walk-out that began on 40th Street, headed up Eighth Avenue and turned right on 41st. As the crowd reassembled outside the north entrance to <em>Times</em> headquarters, union organizers such as columnists Jim Dwyer and Michael Powell gave interviews to camera crews and reporters from other organizations that had descended on the scene, hoping for something dramatic like rock-throwing or a chant.</p>
<p>Instead the mood was calm and collegial. The protesters wore white stickers with the words “Believe Us” printed on them. At one point after they reassembled, they applauded themselves for a rousing show of solidarity. A similar walk-out of about 23 union members took place at the company's Washington, D.C. bureau today.</p>
<p>The union is in a heated contract dispute with <em>Times</em> management, which wants a new contract hammered out and approved by the union by the end of the year. Sticking points include compensation, health benefits and overtime pay, all of which the union feels should increase, rather than decrease, over time. But the union feels that management has taken only baby steps to toward meeting its demands.</p>
<p>There has been no threat of punishing the protesters, <em>Times</em> Assistant to the Editor Walt Baranger told <em>The Observer</em> outside headquarters today. “News management gets it,” Mr. Baranger said. “We’re really talking to the boardroom -- the people who don’t understand that journalists are not interchangeable.”</p>
<p>Union members feel that they’ve already sacrificed enough -- they took a 5 percent pay cut in 2009 and their overtime pay has fallen by half since 2008. In the meantime, editors, reporters and web producers have been scrambling to create digital content--“doing more, but making less,” according to an online <a href="http://saveourtimes.com/" target="_blank">protest letter</a> addressed to <em>Times</em> management.</p>
<p>Newspaper analysts argue that newspaper companies have suffered such a steep decline in revenues of late that they must cut back on benefits such as pension plans to maintain profitability. On the contrary, the <em>Times</em> union organizers believe that the only way to continue producing top-quality journalism is to compensate the content producers fairly.</p>
<p>“Most of the people who walked out have shares in the company,” Mr. Baranger noted, aligning union members with other shareholders. “We’re motivated to get the shares back up and save the paper.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/update-disgruntled-new-york-times-union-members-unleash-a-sidewalk-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_7183.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_7183.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">IMG_7183</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/782b94aa51b9a568d661a8881fb224a6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cyncottsobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_7183.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">IMG_7183</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Rudy Giuliani Hated Times Reporter Michael Powell</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/08/rudy-giuliani-hated-emtimesem-reporter-michael-powell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:19:51 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/08/rudy-giuliani-hated-emtimesem-reporter-michael-powell/</link>
			<dc:creator>Zeke Turner</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/08/rudy-giuliani-hated-emtimesem-reporter-michael-powell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/0813rudy.jpg?w=300&h=200" /><em>Columbia Journalism Review</em> interviewed <em>New York Times </em>business reporter <a href="http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/q_a_new_york_times_reporter_mi.php?page=all">Michael Powell</a> (an <em>Observer</em> alumnus). Mr. Powell was <em>The Washington Post'</em>s New York bureau chief, and he covered Mayor Giuliani after September 11. Mr. Giuliani hated this. Mr. Powell was also part of <em>The Times</em> <a href="/2008/eliot-spitzer-new-york-times-behind-scenes-reporting">metro desk's epic scoop</a> about Governor Spitzer's <a href="/2008/touchable?page=1">involvement with a prositution ring</a>. A few excerpts from the <em>CJR</em> interview here:</p>
<p>On his early career:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I did the usual gypsy route from Burlington, Vermont, to <em>The Bergen Record</em>, to <em>New York Newsday</em> where I spent eight years, and then, when <em>New York Newsday</em> folded, killed by the Times Mirror Company, after a brief interregnum at the <em>New York Observer</em> I went down to Washington D.C. I covered Marion Barry there for <em>The Washington Post</em>."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On living in New York City:</p>
<blockquote><p>"There  are aspects of the city where you see in it things you don&rsquo;t like  in  yourself. You get crazed, and Type A, and all this sort of thing."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On covering Mayor Giuliani:</p>
<blockquote><p>"If  you did your job covering Giuliani you were going to have a   contentious relationship with him. His dislike of reporters was bred in   the bone and intense."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On his most cherished Giuliani quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;Fuck Michael Powell.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On how much time he had with Mr. Giuliani:</p>
<blockquote><p>"[H]e talked to me all of three minutes over the course of eight months."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On flying with the press on Air Force One:</p>
<blockquote><p>"It&rsquo;s suffocating."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On competing with other reporters:</p>
<blockquote><p>"[T]hough  it&rsquo;s perfectly collegial and many of the people from the  other papers  became friends of mine, you&rsquo;re in this sort of sweaty  competition at  the same time."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On covering the president:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Obama&rsquo;s a very challenging cat to cover."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On what President Obama told him about finding time to read during the campaign:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I basically floss my teeth and watch Sports Center."</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/0813rudy.jpg?w=300&h=200" /><em>Columbia Journalism Review</em> interviewed <em>New York Times </em>business reporter <a href="http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/q_a_new_york_times_reporter_mi.php?page=all">Michael Powell</a> (an <em>Observer</em> alumnus). Mr. Powell was <em>The Washington Post'</em>s New York bureau chief, and he covered Mayor Giuliani after September 11. Mr. Giuliani hated this. Mr. Powell was also part of <em>The Times</em> <a href="/2008/eliot-spitzer-new-york-times-behind-scenes-reporting">metro desk's epic scoop</a> about Governor Spitzer's <a href="/2008/touchable?page=1">involvement with a prositution ring</a>. A few excerpts from the <em>CJR</em> interview here:</p>
<p>On his early career:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I did the usual gypsy route from Burlington, Vermont, to <em>The Bergen Record</em>, to <em>New York Newsday</em> where I spent eight years, and then, when <em>New York Newsday</em> folded, killed by the Times Mirror Company, after a brief interregnum at the <em>New York Observer</em> I went down to Washington D.C. I covered Marion Barry there for <em>The Washington Post</em>."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On living in New York City:</p>
<blockquote><p>"There  are aspects of the city where you see in it things you don&rsquo;t like  in  yourself. You get crazed, and Type A, and all this sort of thing."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On covering Mayor Giuliani:</p>
<blockquote><p>"If  you did your job covering Giuliani you were going to have a   contentious relationship with him. His dislike of reporters was bred in   the bone and intense."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On his most cherished Giuliani quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;Fuck Michael Powell.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On how much time he had with Mr. Giuliani:</p>
<blockquote><p>"[H]e talked to me all of three minutes over the course of eight months."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On flying with the press on Air Force One:</p>
<blockquote><p>"It&rsquo;s suffocating."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On competing with other reporters:</p>
<blockquote><p>"[T]hough  it&rsquo;s perfectly collegial and many of the people from the  other papers  became friends of mine, you&rsquo;re in this sort of sweaty  competition at  the same time."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On covering the president:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Obama&rsquo;s a very challenging cat to cover."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>On what President Obama told him about finding time to read during the campaign:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I basically floss my teeth and watch Sports Center."</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/08/rudy-giuliani-hated-emtimesem-reporter-michael-powell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/0813rudy.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Schumer Discontent, on Background</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/02/schumer-discontent-on-background/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:35:42 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/02/schumer-discontent-on-background/</link>
			<dc:creator>Reid Pillifant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/02/schumer-discontent-on-background/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/96381082.jpg?w=226&h=300" />With his poll numbers <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2010/02/poll-stunner-schumer-slips-und.html">sagging</a>, his health care bill <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/us/politics/05dems.html?ref=politics">in limbo</a>, and new <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/nyregion/06ford.html">threats</a> to his <a href="/4777/charles-schumer-hegemon">hegemony</a> popping up around him,  <em>The Times</em> checks in on Chuck Schumer this morning. And finds him<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/nyregion/05schumer.html?ref=nyregion"> less voluble</a> than normal.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">"The usually unavoidable-for-comment, if-it&rsquo;s-Sunday-here-is-my-press-release senior senator from New York is being a little tetchy about going on the record," writes Michael Powell in his lead.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">His detractors are even more reticent. The harshest criticism of the man with a <a href="/2010/politics/schumers-29-million-quarter">$19 million dollar war chest</a>, who just might be the next Senate majority leader, comes&mdash;not surprisingly, and, as it often does&mdash;on background, at least for now.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">And the background noise doesn't seem to bother Mr. Schumer. &ldquo;There was another poll this same week that had much different numbers, so you can&rsquo;t rely on polls,&rdquo; he told <em>The Times</em>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia, serif;color: #000000;font-size: medium"><span style="font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">A better measure of Mr. Schumer's vulnerability might be when more people start saying&mdash;on the record&mdash;things like <a href="/2010/politics/lacking-candidate-kudlow-groups-hires-finance-chair">this</a>.</span></span></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/96381082.jpg?w=226&h=300" />With his poll numbers <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2010/02/poll-stunner-schumer-slips-und.html">sagging</a>, his health care bill <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/us/politics/05dems.html?ref=politics">in limbo</a>, and new <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/nyregion/06ford.html">threats</a> to his <a href="/4777/charles-schumer-hegemon">hegemony</a> popping up around him,  <em>The Times</em> checks in on Chuck Schumer this morning. And finds him<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/nyregion/05schumer.html?ref=nyregion"> less voluble</a> than normal.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">"The usually unavoidable-for-comment, if-it&rsquo;s-Sunday-here-is-my-press-release senior senator from New York is being a little tetchy about going on the record," writes Michael Powell in his lead.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">His detractors are even more reticent. The harshest criticism of the man with a <a href="/2010/politics/schumers-29-million-quarter">$19 million dollar war chest</a>, who just might be the next Senate majority leader, comes&mdash;not surprisingly, and, as it often does&mdash;on background, at least for now.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">And the background noise doesn't seem to bother Mr. Schumer. &ldquo;There was another poll this same week that had much different numbers, so you can&rsquo;t rely on polls,&rdquo; he told <em>The Times</em>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia, serif;color: #000000;font-size: medium"><span style="font-size: 15px;line-height: 22px">A better measure of Mr. Schumer's vulnerability might be when more people start saying&mdash;on the record&mdash;things like <a href="/2010/politics/lacking-candidate-kudlow-groups-hires-finance-chair">this</a>.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/02/schumer-discontent-on-background/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/96381082.jpg?w=226&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Bloomberg Uses Debate Footage</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/10/bloomberg-uses-debate-footage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:47:33 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/10/bloomberg-uses-debate-footage/</link>
			<dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/10/bloomberg-uses-debate-footage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The ad hits on a theme Michael Bloomberg's campaign has been pushing to reporters for some time: that when Bill Thompson is attacked over his tenure as president of the Board of Education, or over the pension fund, Thompson responds by saying other people had more responsibility in those areas than he did.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politickerny.com/5636/morning-read-debate-fallout-debate-spin-debate-security">David Chen took note</a> of the problem in his piece today.</p>
<p>It's true that Thompson didn't have the kind of control over schools that Bloomberg has had, but the defense that Thompson offers (as <a href="http://blogs.wnyc.org/lehrer/2009/10/13/wnyc-vote-2009-post-debate-chat-with-brian-and-andrea/">Andrea Bernstein of WNYC radio noted</a>) can be a hard to sell to an audience. Particularly when said audience is inundated with ads repeating the original criticism. </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad hits on a theme Michael Bloomberg's campaign has been pushing to reporters for some time: that when Bill Thompson is attacked over his tenure as president of the Board of Education, or over the pension fund, Thompson responds by saying other people had more responsibility in those areas than he did.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politickerny.com/5636/morning-read-debate-fallout-debate-spin-debate-security">David Chen took note</a> of the problem in his piece today.</p>
<p>It's true that Thompson didn't have the kind of control over schools that Bloomberg has had, but the defense that Thompson offers (as <a href="http://blogs.wnyc.org/lehrer/2009/10/13/wnyc-vote-2009-post-debate-chat-with-brian-and-andrea/">Andrea Bernstein of WNYC radio noted</a>) can be a hard to sell to an audience. Particularly when said audience is inundated with ads repeating the original criticism. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/10/bloomberg-uses-debate-footage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Times&#8217; Own Spitzer-Story &#8216;Tick Tock&#8217;: Spitzer&#8217;s &#8216;Almost Incomprehensible Tale&#8217;</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/03/itimesi-own-spitzerstory-tick-tock-spitzers-almost-incomprehensible-tale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:00:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/03/itimesi-own-spitzerstory-tick-tock-spitzers-almost-incomprehensible-tale/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/03/itimesi-own-spitzerstory-tick-tock-spitzers-almost-incomprehensible-tale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/spitzernytimes.jpg?w=295&h=300" />Michael Powell and Nicholas Confessore have the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/13/nyregion/13recon.html?pagewanted=2&amp;hp">exegesis </a>in the<em> Times</em> today that explains a bit of the reporting behind the paper's major break on the Eliot Spitzer story on Monday, along with a behind-the-scenes look at his life for the last six days.</p>
<p>Powell and Confessore write that reporters at the paper were reviewing a fairly run-of-the mill federal case against four people involved with a prostitution ring presented by the Manhattan U.S. Attorney last Thursday when they &quot;learned of the unusual presence of three lawyers from the corruption unit, including the boss of that division and an F.B.I. agent from one of the bureau’s public corruption squads. The public corruption units often look at the conduct of elected officials.&quot; Sources told the <em>Observer</em> that it was courts reporter William Rashbaum who secured the early tip--in this case, it appears information about the lawyers who were working the case--and was the lead in the earliest part of the paper's investigation.   </p>
<p>By the end of the day Friday, as the <em>Observer</em> <a href="/2008/touchable">reported yesterday</a>, the <em>Times</em> was confident that the elected official was Eliot Spitzer. By Saturday, the paper had a reporter camped outside Mr. Spitzer's home to see if he was meeting with senior aides. By Sunday, the paper emailed the governor's spokeswoman asking for &quot;the governor’s travel records for the week of Feb. 11, 2008, specifically Feb. 11 through Feb. 15. The message also requested the names of all the hotels he stayed at, where he traveled, flight records and any available records of receipts billed to the state.&quot;</p>
<p>The spokeswoman, Christine Anderson, presumed it was a story about the governor's on-going entanglement with Joe Bruno. It was that night that Spitzer--who was informed on Friday by investigators that he was wiretapped--fessed up. Powell and Confessore write:</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>Late that night, the governor told his wife, Mr. Baum and his friend, Lloyd Constantine, an almost incomprehensible tale: He was a client of a high-priced prostitution ring; he had been caught on a federal wiretap; The Times had requested records for the date of an alleged tryst with a prostitute in Washington.</p>
<p>The atmosphere was alternately charged and funereal. Mrs. Spitzer and Mr. Constantine, the governor’s senior adviser, counseled hanging tough. The governor, though, seemed convinced that he was finished. </p>
</div>
<p>The entire article also provides some lively anecdotes about Spitzer--including a run-down of what he did over the weekend, like taking jogs around Central Park--that make it a must read.  </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/spitzernytimes.jpg?w=295&h=300" />Michael Powell and Nicholas Confessore have the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/13/nyregion/13recon.html?pagewanted=2&amp;hp">exegesis </a>in the<em> Times</em> today that explains a bit of the reporting behind the paper's major break on the Eliot Spitzer story on Monday, along with a behind-the-scenes look at his life for the last six days.</p>
<p>Powell and Confessore write that reporters at the paper were reviewing a fairly run-of-the mill federal case against four people involved with a prostitution ring presented by the Manhattan U.S. Attorney last Thursday when they &quot;learned of the unusual presence of three lawyers from the corruption unit, including the boss of that division and an F.B.I. agent from one of the bureau’s public corruption squads. The public corruption units often look at the conduct of elected officials.&quot; Sources told the <em>Observer</em> that it was courts reporter William Rashbaum who secured the early tip--in this case, it appears information about the lawyers who were working the case--and was the lead in the earliest part of the paper's investigation.   </p>
<p>By the end of the day Friday, as the <em>Observer</em> <a href="/2008/touchable">reported yesterday</a>, the <em>Times</em> was confident that the elected official was Eliot Spitzer. By Saturday, the paper had a reporter camped outside Mr. Spitzer's home to see if he was meeting with senior aides. By Sunday, the paper emailed the governor's spokeswoman asking for &quot;the governor’s travel records for the week of Feb. 11, 2008, specifically Feb. 11 through Feb. 15. The message also requested the names of all the hotels he stayed at, where he traveled, flight records and any available records of receipts billed to the state.&quot;</p>
<p>The spokeswoman, Christine Anderson, presumed it was a story about the governor's on-going entanglement with Joe Bruno. It was that night that Spitzer--who was informed on Friday by investigators that he was wiretapped--fessed up. Powell and Confessore write:</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>Late that night, the governor told his wife, Mr. Baum and his friend, Lloyd Constantine, an almost incomprehensible tale: He was a client of a high-priced prostitution ring; he had been caught on a federal wiretap; The Times had requested records for the date of an alleged tryst with a prostitute in Washington.</p>
<p>The atmosphere was alternately charged and funereal. Mrs. Spitzer and Mr. Constantine, the governor’s senior adviser, counseled hanging tough. The governor, though, seemed convinced that he was finished. </p>
</div>
<p>The entire article also provides some lively anecdotes about Spitzer--including a run-down of what he did over the weekend, like taking jogs around Central Park--that make it a must read.  </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/03/itimesi-own-spitzerstory-tick-tock-spitzers-almost-incomprehensible-tale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/spitzernytimes.jpg?w=295&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>A Masterpiece Revived:  One Singular Sensation</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/10/a-masterpiece-revived-one-singular-sensation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/10/a-masterpiece-revived-one-singular-sensation/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/10/a-masterpiece-revived-one-singular-sensation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101606_article_heilpern.jpg?w=241&h=300" />Do you know what I think are the most beautiful words in the English language&mdash;certainly in the language of that great, lost invention, the all-American musical?</p>
<p><i>Right! Let&rsquo;s do the whole combination, facing away from the mirror. </i></p>
<p><i>From the top,</i></p>
<p><i>A five, six, seven, eight!</i></p>
<p>I have only to hear that &ldquo;a five, six, seven, eight!&rdquo; heralding the scintillating first number of <i>A Chorus Line</i>, and I&rsquo;m happy; I&rsquo;m exactly where I want to be. In some way that I can&rsquo;t explain, I&rsquo;m home.</p>
<p>Michael Bennett&rsquo;s <i>A Chorus Line</i> (1975), now happily back with us on Broadway in a loving revival directed by Bob Avian (Bennett&rsquo;s original co-choreographer), was the formative musical of my theatergoing life. When I saw the original production in London, I thought then&mdash;and still do&mdash;that it was the most innovative modern American musical I&rsquo;d ever seen.</p>
<p>The seven-minute opener is one of the greatest ever choreographed. For one singular sensation, it introduces us to every character and the world of a dance audition&mdash;&ldquo;God, I hope I get it / I hope I get it&rdquo;&mdash;in the same masterly way that the wordless overture to <i>Carousel</i> conveys an entire world in music.</p>
<p>The surprise for me about the revival is that <i>A Chorus Line</i> still moved me after all this time. Perhaps I was nostalgic for my younger self, for what was once contemporary and has now become a period piece. Yet that isn&rsquo;t quite it. <i>A Chorus Line</i> is still smashing and very much alive because it remains a great, irreplaceable, timeless <i>show</i>.</p>
<p>It continues America&rsquo;s long love affair with backstage stories and showbiz as a metaphor, from <i>Gypsy</i> to <i>42nd Street</i> to <i>Follies</i>. (Bob Fosse&rsquo;s <i>Chicago</i>, which also premiered in 1975, is <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s cynical showbiz underbelly). The book of <i>A Chorus Line</i>, by James Kirkwood and Nicholas Dante, rings truer than most because it&rsquo;s largely based on the life stories of the original cast members. To be sure, the show has a dollop of honest sentimentality, as backstage musicals must (&ldquo;What I Did for Love&rdquo;). In that sense, <i>A Chorus Line</i> is the showbiz heir to Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger&rsquo;s classic ballet film, <i>The Red Shoes</i> (1948).</p>
<p>Marvin Hamlisch&rsquo;s richly evocative score&mdash;the best that Mr. Hamlisch has written&mdash;and particularly Edward Kleban&rsquo;s edgy lyrics are a perfect expression of a dancer&rsquo;s hard, short-lived life (&ldquo;Play me the music / Give me the chance to come through&rdquo;), with bodies that are possibly fixable (&ldquo;Tits and ass / Bought myself a fancy pair&rdquo;) and an inescapable fate. &ldquo;I&rsquo;m a dancer,&rdquo; protests Cassie, the show&rsquo;s nearly star, begging to return to the chorus line. &ldquo;A dancer <i>dances</i>.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Has there ever been a major musical sequence that can top the sustained brilliance of <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s &ldquo;At the Ballet&rdquo;? The excellent Baayork Lee (who played Connie in the original <i>A Chorus Line</i>) has restaged Bennett&rsquo;s choreography wonderfully. &ldquo;At the Ballet&rdquo; touches greatness in a sublime synthesis of dance and music and light, as mirrors turn in space. We want to cry out at the wonder of it all: &ldquo;How beautiful! How beautiful life can be.&rdquo;</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s quite an irony that &ldquo;One,&rdquo; the show&rsquo;s now-famous finale, when everyone in the cast comes out to take their bow in their gold top hats and identical costumes, inevitably compels us to cheer them for surviving. But, in truth, it&rsquo;s no victory. Every individual has been reduced to characterless anonymity, a Rockette in a chorus line.</p>
<p>Theoni V. Aldredge has recreated her original costumes (thankfully resisting the temptation to update); Natasha Katz has adapted Tharon Musser&rsquo;s lighting; and set designer Robin Wagner has exactly recreated his empty space to represent the rehearsal studio. (There are only two props: a stool and the dancers&rsquo; bags). Peter Brook built an entire aesthetic, and a renowned book, around theories of theater as an empty space. In its apparent simplicity, Mr. Wagner&rsquo;s set for <i>A Chorus Line</i> conjures up a miracle with mirrors.</p>
<p>The set is the reverse of a Broadway musical dominated and swamped by too much design and too many special effects. The mirrors have since been widely imitated, down to Anthony Minghella&rsquo;s production of <i>Madama Butterfly</i> currently at the Met. But in a musical where the dancer and the mirror are inseparable, I have yet to see mirrors used so well&mdash;or more naturally.</p>
<p>Bennett would go on to direct and choreograph <i>Dreamgirls</i>, but he topped <i>A Chorus Line</i> only once: On one of the most amazing nights in showbiz history (Sept. 29, 1983), Bennett celebrated <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s record-breaking 3,389th performance by staging a gala production with a cast of 332 alumnae performers. As a concept director, he was never <i>small</i>. The Booth Theater, next-door to <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s former home in the Shubert on Broadway, served as a dressing room.</p>
<p>Bennett staged the gala after just four days of marathon rehearsal. The one-night-only performance, with wave after wave of chorus liners from different companies over the years joining each scene, literally brought the audience to the point of delirium. I knew then, of course, that the performance would belong to memory and storytelling and that it could never be repeated onstage. Nor could the first time I saw the original cast of <i>A Chorus Line</i> all those years ago be captured again with wide eyes.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s bound to be so, as time passes. The good old days never were as good as the good old days&hellip;. It was inevitable that in the current revival, two or three of the performances can&rsquo;t quite match up to the legendary originals. But not where it counts most, in their hearts. What more could the wonderful Charlotte d&rsquo;Amboise do as Cassie (the role that Donna McKechnie made famous)? Ms. d&rsquo;Amboise all but leaves her blood on the stage in the exceptionally demanding dance sequence, &ldquo;The Music and the Mirror&rdquo;&mdash;and she triumphs.</p>
<p>But yes, the world has changed a great deal in the three decades since the premiere of <i>A Chorus Line</i>. In 1987, Bennett himself, like so many gifted children of Broadway, died tragically of AIDS. (He was 44.) What the revival confirms marvelously for us is that <i>A Chorus Line</i> is now as much a classic piece of musical theater as <i>Gypsy</i> or <i>West Side Story</i>.</p>
<p>The young, unknown Bennett was coincidentally in the chorus of a touring production of <i>West Side Story</i>, and his god of dance was its director, Jerome Robbins. Bennett was born in Buffalo, N.Y. (&ldquo;To commit suicide in Buffalo is redundant&rdquo;), and he secretly studied all of Robbins&rsquo; dances and ballets. He would become Robbins&rsquo; heir on Broadway, and that&rsquo;s why Bennett&rsquo;s work&mdash;unlike Bob Fosse&rsquo;s&mdash;cannot be pastiched. Bennett took his choreography beyond the traps of a personal style into the higher realms of an artless art.</p>
<p>The chance to see his masterpiece again, or for the first time, shouldn&rsquo;t be missed. Bennett did not seek&mdash;as Mr. Brantley at <i>The Times</i> insists&mdash;&ldquo;to paint in kinetic strokes a group portrait ... like the inhabitants of densely peopled canvases by Velazquez or Rembrandt.&rdquo; Oh, my. If Michael Bennett had been as pretentious as that, we&rsquo;d never have heard of him or <i>A Chorus Line</i>. In fact, he borrowed and adapted film technique&mdash;dissolves, fast cuts and close-ups. He was an instinctive street kid, not an intellectual&mdash;a gypsy-genius of Broadway who loved dance and dancers and lived for the American musical.</p>
<p>When I first saw <i>A Chorus Line</i>, I thought I was seeing the future. And now, seeing it again so lovingly restored, I feel the bittersweet sense of both loss and possibility. Loss, because the American musical has for a generation lost all confidence in itself;  possibility, because <i>A Chorus Line</i> is not cynical, nor a pseudo-opera, a special effect, a puppet show, an infantile spelling bee or a jukebox.</p>
<p>Stop and look around you! <i>Jersey Boys</i>, <i>Mamma Mia!</i>, <i>Hairspray</i>, <i>Avenue Q</i> and the rest. For my money, <i>A Chorus Line</i> is still the best musical in town. </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101606_article_heilpern.jpg?w=241&h=300" />Do you know what I think are the most beautiful words in the English language&mdash;certainly in the language of that great, lost invention, the all-American musical?</p>
<p><i>Right! Let&rsquo;s do the whole combination, facing away from the mirror. </i></p>
<p><i>From the top,</i></p>
<p><i>A five, six, seven, eight!</i></p>
<p>I have only to hear that &ldquo;a five, six, seven, eight!&rdquo; heralding the scintillating first number of <i>A Chorus Line</i>, and I&rsquo;m happy; I&rsquo;m exactly where I want to be. In some way that I can&rsquo;t explain, I&rsquo;m home.</p>
<p>Michael Bennett&rsquo;s <i>A Chorus Line</i> (1975), now happily back with us on Broadway in a loving revival directed by Bob Avian (Bennett&rsquo;s original co-choreographer), was the formative musical of my theatergoing life. When I saw the original production in London, I thought then&mdash;and still do&mdash;that it was the most innovative modern American musical I&rsquo;d ever seen.</p>
<p>The seven-minute opener is one of the greatest ever choreographed. For one singular sensation, it introduces us to every character and the world of a dance audition&mdash;&ldquo;God, I hope I get it / I hope I get it&rdquo;&mdash;in the same masterly way that the wordless overture to <i>Carousel</i> conveys an entire world in music.</p>
<p>The surprise for me about the revival is that <i>A Chorus Line</i> still moved me after all this time. Perhaps I was nostalgic for my younger self, for what was once contemporary and has now become a period piece. Yet that isn&rsquo;t quite it. <i>A Chorus Line</i> is still smashing and very much alive because it remains a great, irreplaceable, timeless <i>show</i>.</p>
<p>It continues America&rsquo;s long love affair with backstage stories and showbiz as a metaphor, from <i>Gypsy</i> to <i>42nd Street</i> to <i>Follies</i>. (Bob Fosse&rsquo;s <i>Chicago</i>, which also premiered in 1975, is <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s cynical showbiz underbelly). The book of <i>A Chorus Line</i>, by James Kirkwood and Nicholas Dante, rings truer than most because it&rsquo;s largely based on the life stories of the original cast members. To be sure, the show has a dollop of honest sentimentality, as backstage musicals must (&ldquo;What I Did for Love&rdquo;). In that sense, <i>A Chorus Line</i> is the showbiz heir to Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger&rsquo;s classic ballet film, <i>The Red Shoes</i> (1948).</p>
<p>Marvin Hamlisch&rsquo;s richly evocative score&mdash;the best that Mr. Hamlisch has written&mdash;and particularly Edward Kleban&rsquo;s edgy lyrics are a perfect expression of a dancer&rsquo;s hard, short-lived life (&ldquo;Play me the music / Give me the chance to come through&rdquo;), with bodies that are possibly fixable (&ldquo;Tits and ass / Bought myself a fancy pair&rdquo;) and an inescapable fate. &ldquo;I&rsquo;m a dancer,&rdquo; protests Cassie, the show&rsquo;s nearly star, begging to return to the chorus line. &ldquo;A dancer <i>dances</i>.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Has there ever been a major musical sequence that can top the sustained brilliance of <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s &ldquo;At the Ballet&rdquo;? The excellent Baayork Lee (who played Connie in the original <i>A Chorus Line</i>) has restaged Bennett&rsquo;s choreography wonderfully. &ldquo;At the Ballet&rdquo; touches greatness in a sublime synthesis of dance and music and light, as mirrors turn in space. We want to cry out at the wonder of it all: &ldquo;How beautiful! How beautiful life can be.&rdquo;</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s quite an irony that &ldquo;One,&rdquo; the show&rsquo;s now-famous finale, when everyone in the cast comes out to take their bow in their gold top hats and identical costumes, inevitably compels us to cheer them for surviving. But, in truth, it&rsquo;s no victory. Every individual has been reduced to characterless anonymity, a Rockette in a chorus line.</p>
<p>Theoni V. Aldredge has recreated her original costumes (thankfully resisting the temptation to update); Natasha Katz has adapted Tharon Musser&rsquo;s lighting; and set designer Robin Wagner has exactly recreated his empty space to represent the rehearsal studio. (There are only two props: a stool and the dancers&rsquo; bags). Peter Brook built an entire aesthetic, and a renowned book, around theories of theater as an empty space. In its apparent simplicity, Mr. Wagner&rsquo;s set for <i>A Chorus Line</i> conjures up a miracle with mirrors.</p>
<p>The set is the reverse of a Broadway musical dominated and swamped by too much design and too many special effects. The mirrors have since been widely imitated, down to Anthony Minghella&rsquo;s production of <i>Madama Butterfly</i> currently at the Met. But in a musical where the dancer and the mirror are inseparable, I have yet to see mirrors used so well&mdash;or more naturally.</p>
<p>Bennett would go on to direct and choreograph <i>Dreamgirls</i>, but he topped <i>A Chorus Line</i> only once: On one of the most amazing nights in showbiz history (Sept. 29, 1983), Bennett celebrated <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s record-breaking 3,389th performance by staging a gala production with a cast of 332 alumnae performers. As a concept director, he was never <i>small</i>. The Booth Theater, next-door to <i>A Chorus Line</i>&rsquo;s former home in the Shubert on Broadway, served as a dressing room.</p>
<p>Bennett staged the gala after just four days of marathon rehearsal. The one-night-only performance, with wave after wave of chorus liners from different companies over the years joining each scene, literally brought the audience to the point of delirium. I knew then, of course, that the performance would belong to memory and storytelling and that it could never be repeated onstage. Nor could the first time I saw the original cast of <i>A Chorus Line</i> all those years ago be captured again with wide eyes.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s bound to be so, as time passes. The good old days never were as good as the good old days&hellip;. It was inevitable that in the current revival, two or three of the performances can&rsquo;t quite match up to the legendary originals. But not where it counts most, in their hearts. What more could the wonderful Charlotte d&rsquo;Amboise do as Cassie (the role that Donna McKechnie made famous)? Ms. d&rsquo;Amboise all but leaves her blood on the stage in the exceptionally demanding dance sequence, &ldquo;The Music and the Mirror&rdquo;&mdash;and she triumphs.</p>
<p>But yes, the world has changed a great deal in the three decades since the premiere of <i>A Chorus Line</i>. In 1987, Bennett himself, like so many gifted children of Broadway, died tragically of AIDS. (He was 44.) What the revival confirms marvelously for us is that <i>A Chorus Line</i> is now as much a classic piece of musical theater as <i>Gypsy</i> or <i>West Side Story</i>.</p>
<p>The young, unknown Bennett was coincidentally in the chorus of a touring production of <i>West Side Story</i>, and his god of dance was its director, Jerome Robbins. Bennett was born in Buffalo, N.Y. (&ldquo;To commit suicide in Buffalo is redundant&rdquo;), and he secretly studied all of Robbins&rsquo; dances and ballets. He would become Robbins&rsquo; heir on Broadway, and that&rsquo;s why Bennett&rsquo;s work&mdash;unlike Bob Fosse&rsquo;s&mdash;cannot be pastiched. Bennett took his choreography beyond the traps of a personal style into the higher realms of an artless art.</p>
<p>The chance to see his masterpiece again, or for the first time, shouldn&rsquo;t be missed. Bennett did not seek&mdash;as Mr. Brantley at <i>The Times</i> insists&mdash;&ldquo;to paint in kinetic strokes a group portrait ... like the inhabitants of densely peopled canvases by Velazquez or Rembrandt.&rdquo; Oh, my. If Michael Bennett had been as pretentious as that, we&rsquo;d never have heard of him or <i>A Chorus Line</i>. In fact, he borrowed and adapted film technique&mdash;dissolves, fast cuts and close-ups. He was an instinctive street kid, not an intellectual&mdash;a gypsy-genius of Broadway who loved dance and dancers and lived for the American musical.</p>
<p>When I first saw <i>A Chorus Line</i>, I thought I was seeing the future. And now, seeing it again so lovingly restored, I feel the bittersweet sense of both loss and possibility. Loss, because the American musical has for a generation lost all confidence in itself;  possibility, because <i>A Chorus Line</i> is not cynical, nor a pseudo-opera, a special effect, a puppet show, an infantile spelling bee or a jukebox.</p>
<p>Stop and look around you! <i>Jersey Boys</i>, <i>Mamma Mia!</i>, <i>Hairspray</i>, <i>Avenue Q</i> and the rest. For my money, <i>A Chorus Line</i> is still the best musical in town. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/10/a-masterpiece-revived-one-singular-sensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101606_article_heilpern.jpg?w=241&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
