<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Nancy Olivier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/nancy-olivier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>With Chance and a Quick Brush, Artist Invents Nocturnal Dramas</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2005/11/with-chance-and-a-quick-brush-artist-invents-nocturnal-dramas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2005/11/with-chance-and-a-quick-brush-artist-invents-nocturnal-dramas/</link>
			<dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2005/11/with-chance-and-a-quick-brush-artist-invents-nocturnal-dramas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/111405_article_naves.jpg?w=241&h=300" />Was it Plato who remarked that seeing an image in the clouds signified nothing so much as the lowest form of the imagination? You wonder how the old contrarian would appraise Roland Flexner&rsquo;s recent works-on-paper on display at Caren Golden Fine Art. Mr. Flexner divines images within smears and stains of ink.</p>
<p>Employing a traditional method of Japanese ornamentation known as <i>suminagashi</i>&mdash; literally translated as &ldquo;ink floating&rdquo;&mdash;Mr. Flexner submerges small sheets of paper within a tray of water and sumi ink. Upon removing the paper, Mr. Flexner has only a few moments&mdash;10 seconds at the max, I am told&mdash;to respond with his brush to the resulting flow. The extent to which his response determines the final result is something of a mystery, and a good one at that.</p>
<p>The work, collectively titled <i>Nocturne</i>, seems like the umpteenth riff on Automatist drawing. Favored by the Surrealists and made famous by Jackson Pollock, this mode of making art sought to circumvent rational thought by tapping into the primordial impulses of the subconscious. Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s fluid slurs of ink bring to mind the <i>frottage</i> paintings of Max Ernst, wherein oil paint was blotted onto a canvas and then converted into Surrealist dreamscapes.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s where the comparison between Ernst and Mr. Flexner ends. The devastating distinction in character and quality between the artists lies in their respective approaches to <i>transformation</i>. Chance incident, for Ernst, launched the foundation of an image, but did not carry through to its shaping. Fantastic panoramas, painted with a drab and illustrational hand, were superimposed upon underlying random textures. Though promulgated in the name of psychic liberation, Ernst&rsquo;s efforts in <i>frottage</i> were ultimately the product of conscious determination.</p>
<p>Mr. Flexner, by contrast, doesn&rsquo;t stifle chance incident by imposing upon it emblems of a humdrum imagination; he embraces it as a means of unlocking the associative capabilities of the materials themselves. Mr. Flexner doesn&rsquo;t discern images in the clouds so much as the clouds unveil images to him. It&rsquo;s his responsibility as an artist to endow them with a greater clarity and presence. What would Plato have to say about that?</p>
<p>Mr. Flexner does exert some control over the <i>suminagashi</i> process, though it&rsquo;s difficult to ascertain how. He has a supple and, to be frank, eerie gift for working intuitively within its strictures. (The lone exception is the skull that one can detect without too much strain in a drawing in Golden&rsquo;s back room.) The craggy landscapes, cosmological phenomena and fantastic bestiaries&mdash;the evocative fluidity of it all is brought to focus with an uncanny specificity. Some of the pieces will prompt double takes. Can a simple blur of paint contain that much drama? That depends on what you mean by &ldquo;simple.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Despite Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s knowledge of the artistic practices of non-Western cultures, the meticulousness of the drawings is reminiscent of Netherlandish painting, Bosch especially. Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s sepia-toned, often grotesque cosmos is mesmerizing and lucid, impossibly particular. Would that Golden had given individual pictures their due&mdash;the one-after-another-after-another installation isn&rsquo;t as kind to Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s untamed art as it could be. But that&rsquo;s a small complaint given its humble and irresistible sweep.</p>
<p><i>Roland Flexner: Nocturne</i> is at Caren Golden Fine Art, 539 West 23rd Street, until Nov. 26.</p>
<p>Elementary Art</p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><i>Trace Elements</i> is the title of an exhibition of abstract paintings by Nancy Olivier, and it fits. By overlapping brushstrokes, lines, runs of acrylic paint and a recurring grid on small, sometimes irregularly shaped panels, Ms. Olivier launches detailed investigations into facets of the basic principles of painting&mdash;alternately reiterating, obscuring and uncovering them.</p>
<p>Emphasis on the handcrafted object, establishment of illusory space, careful juxtaposition of form and the often-vexing material independence of paint&mdash;Ms. Olivier&rsquo;s pictures offer a fairly relentless dissection of her chosen craft. Clement Greenberg famously suggested that painting must shed its extraneous baggage to achieve a purity of medium. Ms. Olivier&rsquo;s overriding desire is to interrogate that purity. And to muck it up a bit, too.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s how the paintings bypass the theoretical and pedantic. Ms. Olivier knows that there has been more than enough skepticism concerning the viability of art and its ability to withstand the driving force of history. Her aesthetic pursuit admits no defeat; instead, it affirms the role that individuality and optimism can play in the regenerative potential of art.</p>
<p>For Ms. Olivier, painting is as much a plaything as it is a calling. An unaffected, almost childlike whimsy defines the work. Though mindful of the weight of tradition, the paintings never take themselves too seriously. Titles like <i>Some Assembly Required</i> and <i>Full Contact Karaoke</i> indicate the self-deprecating side of Ms. Olivier&rsquo;s approach.</p>
<p>More persuasive and integral to her vision are the sharp and icy palette, the touch that&rsquo;s immediate, studied and offhand all at once, and the homely wood-shop leftovers she paints upon. Hers is an art of heroic ambitions and unassuming means, rigorous methodology and throwaway improvisation. Ms. Olivier knows that being smart and fooling around aren&rsquo;t mutually exclusive. And she knows that art isn&rsquo;t anything unless it embraces paradox.</p>
<p><i>Nancy Olivier: Trace Elements&mdash;New Paintings</i> is at Bond Gallery, 5 Rivington Street, until Dec. 4.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/111405_article_naves.jpg?w=241&h=300" />Was it Plato who remarked that seeing an image in the clouds signified nothing so much as the lowest form of the imagination? You wonder how the old contrarian would appraise Roland Flexner&rsquo;s recent works-on-paper on display at Caren Golden Fine Art. Mr. Flexner divines images within smears and stains of ink.</p>
<p>Employing a traditional method of Japanese ornamentation known as <i>suminagashi</i>&mdash; literally translated as &ldquo;ink floating&rdquo;&mdash;Mr. Flexner submerges small sheets of paper within a tray of water and sumi ink. Upon removing the paper, Mr. Flexner has only a few moments&mdash;10 seconds at the max, I am told&mdash;to respond with his brush to the resulting flow. The extent to which his response determines the final result is something of a mystery, and a good one at that.</p>
<p>The work, collectively titled <i>Nocturne</i>, seems like the umpteenth riff on Automatist drawing. Favored by the Surrealists and made famous by Jackson Pollock, this mode of making art sought to circumvent rational thought by tapping into the primordial impulses of the subconscious. Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s fluid slurs of ink bring to mind the <i>frottage</i> paintings of Max Ernst, wherein oil paint was blotted onto a canvas and then converted into Surrealist dreamscapes.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s where the comparison between Ernst and Mr. Flexner ends. The devastating distinction in character and quality between the artists lies in their respective approaches to <i>transformation</i>. Chance incident, for Ernst, launched the foundation of an image, but did not carry through to its shaping. Fantastic panoramas, painted with a drab and illustrational hand, were superimposed upon underlying random textures. Though promulgated in the name of psychic liberation, Ernst&rsquo;s efforts in <i>frottage</i> were ultimately the product of conscious determination.</p>
<p>Mr. Flexner, by contrast, doesn&rsquo;t stifle chance incident by imposing upon it emblems of a humdrum imagination; he embraces it as a means of unlocking the associative capabilities of the materials themselves. Mr. Flexner doesn&rsquo;t discern images in the clouds so much as the clouds unveil images to him. It&rsquo;s his responsibility as an artist to endow them with a greater clarity and presence. What would Plato have to say about that?</p>
<p>Mr. Flexner does exert some control over the <i>suminagashi</i> process, though it&rsquo;s difficult to ascertain how. He has a supple and, to be frank, eerie gift for working intuitively within its strictures. (The lone exception is the skull that one can detect without too much strain in a drawing in Golden&rsquo;s back room.) The craggy landscapes, cosmological phenomena and fantastic bestiaries&mdash;the evocative fluidity of it all is brought to focus with an uncanny specificity. Some of the pieces will prompt double takes. Can a simple blur of paint contain that much drama? That depends on what you mean by &ldquo;simple.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Despite Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s knowledge of the artistic practices of non-Western cultures, the meticulousness of the drawings is reminiscent of Netherlandish painting, Bosch especially. Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s sepia-toned, often grotesque cosmos is mesmerizing and lucid, impossibly particular. Would that Golden had given individual pictures their due&mdash;the one-after-another-after-another installation isn&rsquo;t as kind to Mr. Flexner&rsquo;s untamed art as it could be. But that&rsquo;s a small complaint given its humble and irresistible sweep.</p>
<p><i>Roland Flexner: Nocturne</i> is at Caren Golden Fine Art, 539 West 23rd Street, until Nov. 26.</p>
<p>Elementary Art</p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><i>Trace Elements</i> is the title of an exhibition of abstract paintings by Nancy Olivier, and it fits. By overlapping brushstrokes, lines, runs of acrylic paint and a recurring grid on small, sometimes irregularly shaped panels, Ms. Olivier launches detailed investigations into facets of the basic principles of painting&mdash;alternately reiterating, obscuring and uncovering them.</p>
<p>Emphasis on the handcrafted object, establishment of illusory space, careful juxtaposition of form and the often-vexing material independence of paint&mdash;Ms. Olivier&rsquo;s pictures offer a fairly relentless dissection of her chosen craft. Clement Greenberg famously suggested that painting must shed its extraneous baggage to achieve a purity of medium. Ms. Olivier&rsquo;s overriding desire is to interrogate that purity. And to muck it up a bit, too.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s how the paintings bypass the theoretical and pedantic. Ms. Olivier knows that there has been more than enough skepticism concerning the viability of art and its ability to withstand the driving force of history. Her aesthetic pursuit admits no defeat; instead, it affirms the role that individuality and optimism can play in the regenerative potential of art.</p>
<p>For Ms. Olivier, painting is as much a plaything as it is a calling. An unaffected, almost childlike whimsy defines the work. Though mindful of the weight of tradition, the paintings never take themselves too seriously. Titles like <i>Some Assembly Required</i> and <i>Full Contact Karaoke</i> indicate the self-deprecating side of Ms. Olivier&rsquo;s approach.</p>
<p>More persuasive and integral to her vision are the sharp and icy palette, the touch that&rsquo;s immediate, studied and offhand all at once, and the homely wood-shop leftovers she paints upon. Hers is an art of heroic ambitions and unassuming means, rigorous methodology and throwaway improvisation. Ms. Olivier knows that being smart and fooling around aren&rsquo;t mutually exclusive. And she knows that art isn&rsquo;t anything unless it embraces paradox.</p>
<p><i>Nancy Olivier: Trace Elements&mdash;New Paintings</i> is at Bond Gallery, 5 Rivington Street, until Dec. 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2005/11/with-chance-and-a-quick-brush-artist-invents-nocturnal-dramas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/111405_article_naves.jpg?w=241&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Channeling Cozy Nostalgia, Neatly Skipping Sentimentality</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2002/12/channeling-cozy-nostalgia-neatly-skipping-sentimentality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2002/12/channeling-cozy-nostalgia-neatly-skipping-sentimentality/</link>
			<dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2002/12/channeling-cozy-nostalgia-neatly-skipping-sentimentality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two of the words I like least in the lexicon of contemporary art are "appropriation" and "irony." The former connotes a facile borrowing of style and/or imagery; the latter a smug indifference to purpose. Neither term is bandied about as promiscuously as it once was, but that doesn't mean they've lost their currency-on the contrary, they're endemic to the scene. So how come I'm enamored of the paintings of Duncan Hannah? Mr. Hannah, whose work is on view at James Graham &amp; Sons and its Chelsea offshoot, JG Contemporary, appropriates imagery found in vintage newspapers and magazines and does so with irony. The irony, however, is so parched and fleeting that it transforms not only itself but also the nature of Mr. Hannah's appropriation (he favors old postcards, nudie pin-ups and what look to be storybook illustrations). Mr. Hannah doesn't commandeer images so much as channel-and subsequently refine-the emotions they engender. The paintings, with their affectless touch and unruffled palette, partake of nostalgia but not of sentimentality-a tricky balancing act that Mr. Hannah pulls off with dexterity.</p>
<p>Not every time, of course. The paintings based on girlie pictures, seen at JG Contemporary, don't transform their source material so much as comment on it, and Mr. Hannah's commentary doesn't delve very deeply-he's amused by kitsch eroticism, and that's about it. Uptown, he fares better, with reveries on adolescence, magic, European culture and the not-altogether-explicable behavior of steam-ships. This last motif figures in Mr. Hannah's most intriguing pictures. There's not much to them, really-with few exceptions, they're straightforward transcriptions of holiday postcards. (The invitation for Mr. Hannah's show is, in fact, designed like a postcard.) But the boat pictures, so plainly set forth and so tightly withdrawn, end up entrancing us-meaning, while obscured, is nevertheless present and persistent. There's something hollow in these evasions, and something comforting, too. Mr. Hannah's strength as an artist lies in his ability to pull us in even as he keeps us at a firm remove.</p>
<p> Duncan Hannah: New Work is at James Graham &amp; Sons, 1014 Madison Avenue, and Hannah's Nudes at JG Contemporary, 505 West 28th Street, until Dec. 21.</p>
<p> Serious Fun</p>
<p> In the past few years, there's been a tendency for painters to exhibit, alongside their recent efforts on canvas, a temporary wall painting created specifically for its venue. This trend is anif-you-can't-beat-'em-join-'em phenomenon, indicative of nothing so much as the painter's insecurity in the face of an art scene dominated by the site-specific, the object-oriented and the sensational. It was with some trepidation, therefore, that I attended Wall , an exhibition at Metaphor Contemporary Art: Sculptor Jim Osman and painter Nancy Olivier had been invited to transform the gallery's environs by painting on one wall apiece. My trepidation was unwarranted. Mr. Osman and Ms. Olivier have acquitted themselves honorably. Mr. Osman, whose fascination with cut-rate architecture is tongue-in-cheek but devoid of condescension, has created a geometric fresco reminiscent of the Williamsburg Housing Murals on display at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. Ms. Olivier, who's done wall paintings before, overlaps looping calligraphy, satiny grids and vertical drips to impressive decorative effect.</p>
<p> Still, both artists lose something when straying from, in Mr. Osman's case, the three-dimensional and, in Ms. Olivier's, the physical parameters of the painting support. Indeed, Wall underscores how pivotal the right format is to an artist's vision, how it can energize and focus style. Mr. Osman's mural is sturdy and fine, his paintings of faux brickwork droll but no more-whereas Here and There Wall (2002), the lone sculpture on view, is dead-on, activating space in a deceivingly simple and curious manner. As for Ms. Olivier, her coupling of chance incident and the utterly methodical gains in rigor, wit and authority the more it's contained : Compression does wonders for her. The recent paintings on panel, aligned on the vertical and measuring 24 by 18 inches, are her strongest work to date. Two of them-the abrupt classicism that is House Arrest (2002), and First Among Equals (also 2002), with its wan light and wandering drips-are among the most beautiful abstractions I've seen by a contemporary painter. Hard-headed yet flexible, smart and funky, Ms. Olivier is a formalist who likes to have fun-and her fun is serious business.</p>
<p> Wall: Jim Osman and Nancy Olivier is at Metaphor Contemporary Art, 70 Washington Street, Suite 1113, in Brooklyn until Dec. 15.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two of the words I like least in the lexicon of contemporary art are "appropriation" and "irony." The former connotes a facile borrowing of style and/or imagery; the latter a smug indifference to purpose. Neither term is bandied about as promiscuously as it once was, but that doesn't mean they've lost their currency-on the contrary, they're endemic to the scene. So how come I'm enamored of the paintings of Duncan Hannah? Mr. Hannah, whose work is on view at James Graham &amp; Sons and its Chelsea offshoot, JG Contemporary, appropriates imagery found in vintage newspapers and magazines and does so with irony. The irony, however, is so parched and fleeting that it transforms not only itself but also the nature of Mr. Hannah's appropriation (he favors old postcards, nudie pin-ups and what look to be storybook illustrations). Mr. Hannah doesn't commandeer images so much as channel-and subsequently refine-the emotions they engender. The paintings, with their affectless touch and unruffled palette, partake of nostalgia but not of sentimentality-a tricky balancing act that Mr. Hannah pulls off with dexterity.</p>
<p>Not every time, of course. The paintings based on girlie pictures, seen at JG Contemporary, don't transform their source material so much as comment on it, and Mr. Hannah's commentary doesn't delve very deeply-he's amused by kitsch eroticism, and that's about it. Uptown, he fares better, with reveries on adolescence, magic, European culture and the not-altogether-explicable behavior of steam-ships. This last motif figures in Mr. Hannah's most intriguing pictures. There's not much to them, really-with few exceptions, they're straightforward transcriptions of holiday postcards. (The invitation for Mr. Hannah's show is, in fact, designed like a postcard.) But the boat pictures, so plainly set forth and so tightly withdrawn, end up entrancing us-meaning, while obscured, is nevertheless present and persistent. There's something hollow in these evasions, and something comforting, too. Mr. Hannah's strength as an artist lies in his ability to pull us in even as he keeps us at a firm remove.</p>
<p> Duncan Hannah: New Work is at James Graham &amp; Sons, 1014 Madison Avenue, and Hannah's Nudes at JG Contemporary, 505 West 28th Street, until Dec. 21.</p>
<p> Serious Fun</p>
<p> In the past few years, there's been a tendency for painters to exhibit, alongside their recent efforts on canvas, a temporary wall painting created specifically for its venue. This trend is anif-you-can't-beat-'em-join-'em phenomenon, indicative of nothing so much as the painter's insecurity in the face of an art scene dominated by the site-specific, the object-oriented and the sensational. It was with some trepidation, therefore, that I attended Wall , an exhibition at Metaphor Contemporary Art: Sculptor Jim Osman and painter Nancy Olivier had been invited to transform the gallery's environs by painting on one wall apiece. My trepidation was unwarranted. Mr. Osman and Ms. Olivier have acquitted themselves honorably. Mr. Osman, whose fascination with cut-rate architecture is tongue-in-cheek but devoid of condescension, has created a geometric fresco reminiscent of the Williamsburg Housing Murals on display at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. Ms. Olivier, who's done wall paintings before, overlaps looping calligraphy, satiny grids and vertical drips to impressive decorative effect.</p>
<p> Still, both artists lose something when straying from, in Mr. Osman's case, the three-dimensional and, in Ms. Olivier's, the physical parameters of the painting support. Indeed, Wall underscores how pivotal the right format is to an artist's vision, how it can energize and focus style. Mr. Osman's mural is sturdy and fine, his paintings of faux brickwork droll but no more-whereas Here and There Wall (2002), the lone sculpture on view, is dead-on, activating space in a deceivingly simple and curious manner. As for Ms. Olivier, her coupling of chance incident and the utterly methodical gains in rigor, wit and authority the more it's contained : Compression does wonders for her. The recent paintings on panel, aligned on the vertical and measuring 24 by 18 inches, are her strongest work to date. Two of them-the abrupt classicism that is House Arrest (2002), and First Among Equals (also 2002), with its wan light and wandering drips-are among the most beautiful abstractions I've seen by a contemporary painter. Hard-headed yet flexible, smart and funky, Ms. Olivier is a formalist who likes to have fun-and her fun is serious business.</p>
<p> Wall: Jim Osman and Nancy Olivier is at Metaphor Contemporary Art, 70 Washington Street, Suite 1113, in Brooklyn until Dec. 15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2002/12/channeling-cozy-nostalgia-neatly-skipping-sentimentality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
