<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Paywalls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/paywalls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>The New York Times Paywall Will Be Back Up Soon</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/11/the-new-york-times-paywall-will-be-back-up-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:19:04 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/11/the-new-york-times-paywall-will-be-back-up-soon/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=274785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/the-new-york-times-paywall-will-be-back-up-soon/screen-shot-2012-11-02-at-12-10-04-pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-274806"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-274806" title="Screen shot 2012-11-02 at 12.10.04 PM" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/screen-shot-2012-11-02-at-12-10-04-pm.png" height="94" width="576" /></a>The New York Time</em><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/storm-surge-threatens-paywalls-receed/"> lifted their paywall </a>as a public service during the storm. But the storm's over, the recovery is slowly inching along and it's time to get back to business.  And let's face it. Newspapers are business. So later today, the <em>Times</em> will begin charging again.</p>
<p>But, as the <i>Times </i>points out, you can continue getting unlimited access. Just click on the link. Oh, and, have your credit card ready. This news free-for-all is over. So start reading all those style pieces before it's too late. Maybe print out a few articles to read later, assuming you have a printer and electricity. <span style="text-align:center;">And of course, readers who don't feel like shelling out the big bucks for all that news that's fit to print can still see 10 free articles a month. Who's going to know?</span></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/the-new-york-times-paywall-will-be-back-up-soon/screen-shot-2012-11-02-at-12-10-04-pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-274806"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-274806" title="Screen shot 2012-11-02 at 12.10.04 PM" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/screen-shot-2012-11-02-at-12-10-04-pm.png" height="94" width="576" /></a>The New York Time</em><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/storm-surge-threatens-paywalls-receed/"> lifted their paywall </a>as a public service during the storm. But the storm's over, the recovery is slowly inching along and it's time to get back to business.  And let's face it. Newspapers are business. So later today, the <em>Times</em> will begin charging again.</p>
<p>But, as the <i>Times </i>points out, you can continue getting unlimited access. Just click on the link. Oh, and, have your credit card ready. This news free-for-all is over. So start reading all those style pieces before it's too late. Maybe print out a few articles to read later, assuming you have a printer and electricity. <span style="text-align:center;">And of course, readers who don't feel like shelling out the big bucks for all that news that's fit to print can still see 10 free articles a month. Who's going to know?</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/11/the-new-york-times-paywall-will-be-back-up-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/screen-shot-2012-11-02-at-12-10-04-pm.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Screen shot 2012-11-02 at 12.10.04 PM</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Storm Surge Threatens, Paywalls Recede</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/storm-surge-threatens-paywalls-receed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:04:37 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/storm-surge-threatens-paywalls-receed/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=272386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/storm-surge-threatens-paywalls-receed/screen-shot-2012-10-28-at-7-37-23-pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-272453"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-272453" title="Screen shot 2012-10-28 at 7.37.23 PM" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/screen-shot-2012-10-28-at-7-37-23-pm.png?w=300" height="249" width="300" /></a>As Hurricane Sandy threatens  to flood the city  and the last subway (to say nothing of normal life itself) grinds to a temporary halt, some news outlets have decided to remove their articles from behind paywalls. Both <em>The New York Times</em> and <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> are letting readers use their websites to keep up the minute on weather-related news- free of charge.</p>
<p>“The gateway has been removed from the entire site and all apps. The plan is to keep it that way until the weather emergency is over,” <em>Times </em>spokesperson <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/193261/new-york-times-to-suspend-paywall-for-hurricane-sandy/">Eileen Murphy emailed Poynter's</a>. <em>The Times</em> last suspended the paywall during Hurricaine Irene.<!--more--></p>
<p><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> Digital Network Managing Editor Raju Narisetti announced <a href="https://twitter.com/rajunarisetti/status/262626348206530561">via Twitter </a>this afternoon that weather-related <em>Journal </em>articles were free starting today and the rest of the website will be free starting tomorrow.</p>
<p>But, as <em>Washington Monthly</em> asks what of the ethics of reading non-storm related news behind a paywall if you are not paying?  "Which raises a question: Is it unethical for non-subscribers who’ve eclipsed their monthly NYT reading limits to ingest news items not related to Sandy? I say yes," writes <em><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_10/nyt_wsj_paywalls_taken_down040785.php">Washington Monthly</a>.</em></p>
<p>We agree.  Yes. It is going to be a long couple of days. Better get entertainment (and news) where you can find it. The booze is bound to run out soon.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/storm-surge-threatens-paywalls-receed/screen-shot-2012-10-28-at-7-37-23-pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-272453"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-272453" title="Screen shot 2012-10-28 at 7.37.23 PM" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/screen-shot-2012-10-28-at-7-37-23-pm.png?w=300" height="249" width="300" /></a>As Hurricane Sandy threatens  to flood the city  and the last subway (to say nothing of normal life itself) grinds to a temporary halt, some news outlets have decided to remove their articles from behind paywalls. Both <em>The New York Times</em> and <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> are letting readers use their websites to keep up the minute on weather-related news- free of charge.</p>
<p>“The gateway has been removed from the entire site and all apps. The plan is to keep it that way until the weather emergency is over,” <em>Times </em>spokesperson <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/193261/new-york-times-to-suspend-paywall-for-hurricane-sandy/">Eileen Murphy emailed Poynter's</a>. <em>The Times</em> last suspended the paywall during Hurricaine Irene.<!--more--></p>
<p><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> Digital Network Managing Editor Raju Narisetti announced <a href="https://twitter.com/rajunarisetti/status/262626348206530561">via Twitter </a>this afternoon that weather-related <em>Journal </em>articles were free starting today and the rest of the website will be free starting tomorrow.</p>
<p>But, as <em>Washington Monthly</em> asks what of the ethics of reading non-storm related news behind a paywall if you are not paying?  "Which raises a question: Is it unethical for non-subscribers who’ve eclipsed their monthly NYT reading limits to ingest news items not related to Sandy? I say yes," writes <em><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_10/nyt_wsj_paywalls_taken_down040785.php">Washington Monthly</a>.</em></p>
<p>We agree.  Yes. It is going to be a long couple of days. Better get entertainment (and news) where you can find it. The booze is bound to run out soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/storm-surge-threatens-paywalls-receed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/screen-shot-2012-10-28-at-7-37-23-pm.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Screen shot 2012-10-28 at 7.37.23 PM</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Fake News, Real Paywall</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/08/theoniondebutspaywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:27:16 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/08/theoniondebutspaywall/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=174905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/the-onion-front-page-001.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-174911" title="The Onion Front Page" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/the-onion-front-page-001.jpeg?w=300&h=180" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></a>News isn’t free, even if it's fake. <em>The Onion</em> <a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/about-the-onions-new-paid-content-system,60129/">announced</a> that they are testing out a new paywall system.</p>
<p>If you live overseas, and read more than five satirical articles a month – time to get out your credit card.</p>
<p>Unless, of course, you are overseas serving the US, in which case read away.</p>
<p><em>The Onion</em> explains: “It also won’t apply to areas where a lot of American troops are deployed in combat, as <em>The Onion</em> recognizes that it has a large fanbase in the armed forces, and it doesn’t wish to charge them for being overseas. They also have better stuff to worry about.”</p>
<p>While this is a good and noble idea, does it trouble anyone else that the armed forces is a “large fanbase” for the satirical news source? For example, an article earlier this summer ran with the headline: "<a href="http://www.theonion.com/articles/us-quietly-slips-out-of-afghanistan-in-dead-of-nig,20957/">U.S. Quietly Slips Out Of Afghanistan In Dead Of Night</a>." Hopefully, the armed forces fanbase reads other papers, too.</p>
<p>The new system won't limit access to the homepage, individual sections or the non-fake culture pages (The A.V. Club). All of that content is still free, as is the print publication.</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: normal;">Overall, this new plan is fairly unobjectionable. It also doesn’t sound like a moneymaker. But maybe fake news fans, who are overseas, who aren’t in the armed forces and read English are a big enough demographic to make a dent in the production costs.</span></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/the-onion-front-page-001.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-174911" title="The Onion Front Page" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/the-onion-front-page-001.jpeg?w=300&h=180" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></a>News isn’t free, even if it's fake. <em>The Onion</em> <a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/about-the-onions-new-paid-content-system,60129/">announced</a> that they are testing out a new paywall system.</p>
<p>If you live overseas, and read more than five satirical articles a month – time to get out your credit card.</p>
<p>Unless, of course, you are overseas serving the US, in which case read away.</p>
<p><em>The Onion</em> explains: “It also won’t apply to areas where a lot of American troops are deployed in combat, as <em>The Onion</em> recognizes that it has a large fanbase in the armed forces, and it doesn’t wish to charge them for being overseas. They also have better stuff to worry about.”</p>
<p>While this is a good and noble idea, does it trouble anyone else that the armed forces is a “large fanbase” for the satirical news source? For example, an article earlier this summer ran with the headline: "<a href="http://www.theonion.com/articles/us-quietly-slips-out-of-afghanistan-in-dead-of-nig,20957/">U.S. Quietly Slips Out Of Afghanistan In Dead Of Night</a>." Hopefully, the armed forces fanbase reads other papers, too.</p>
<p>The new system won't limit access to the homepage, individual sections or the non-fake culture pages (The A.V. Club). All of that content is still free, as is the print publication.</p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: normal;">Overall, this new plan is fairly unobjectionable. It also doesn’t sound like a moneymaker. But maybe fake news fans, who are overseas, who aren’t in the armed forces and read English are a big enough demographic to make a dent in the production costs.</span></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/08/theoniondebutspaywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/the-onion-front-page-001.jpeg?w=300&#38;h=180" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">The Onion Front Page</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>New Yorker to Change Online Subscription Sign-in Policy to Make Passwords Harder to Guess</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/10/emnew-yorkerem-to-change-online-subscription-signin-policy-to-make-passwords-harder-to-guess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:56:21 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/10/emnew-yorkerem-to-change-online-subscription-signin-policy-to-make-passwords-harder-to-guess/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/10/emnew-yorkerem-to-change-online-subscription-signin-policy-to-make-passwords-harder-to-guess/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/20newyorker121707big_0.jpg?w=217&h=300" />Yesterday, Flood magazine <a href="http://floodmagazine.com/2010/10/25/the-new-yorker-has-a-paywall-problem-part-2/">posted</a> an article that claimed it found a way to <a href="/2010/media/how-hack-paywall-protected-new-yorker-archives">access the archives</a> and paywall-protected content on the <em>New Yorker</em>'s website. The trick was, Flood explained, to obtain an email address of a subscriber and try it as the password, too &mdash; unless the user opted to change the default settings, the account could be accessed by entering the email into both the username and password fields.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But this won't be the case for long. A public relations representative at <em>The New Yorker</em> told <em>The Observer</em> that they are working on a system that would force all users to create a custom password, thereby making it impossible for an impostor to log in simply by repeating the email address. Subscribers who previously stuck to the default option will be unable to access their account until they choose a new password.&nbsp;</p>
<p>On when the bug will be fixed, the representative said "We suspect it will be in the next day or so."</p>
<p>Also, <em>The New Yorker</em> denied they had received any contact from representatives at Flood magazine. The article that was posted yesterday claimed that Flood had reached out to the publication for a comment.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/20newyorker121707big_0.jpg?w=217&h=300" />Yesterday, Flood magazine <a href="http://floodmagazine.com/2010/10/25/the-new-yorker-has-a-paywall-problem-part-2/">posted</a> an article that claimed it found a way to <a href="/2010/media/how-hack-paywall-protected-new-yorker-archives">access the archives</a> and paywall-protected content on the <em>New Yorker</em>'s website. The trick was, Flood explained, to obtain an email address of a subscriber and try it as the password, too &mdash; unless the user opted to change the default settings, the account could be accessed by entering the email into both the username and password fields.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But this won't be the case for long. A public relations representative at <em>The New Yorker</em> told <em>The Observer</em> that they are working on a system that would force all users to create a custom password, thereby making it impossible for an impostor to log in simply by repeating the email address. Subscribers who previously stuck to the default option will be unable to access their account until they choose a new password.&nbsp;</p>
<p>On when the bug will be fixed, the representative said "We suspect it will be in the next day or so."</p>
<p>Also, <em>The New Yorker</em> denied they had received any contact from representatives at Flood magazine. The article that was posted yesterday claimed that Flood had reached out to the publication for a comment.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/10/emnew-yorkerem-to-change-online-subscription-signin-policy-to-make-passwords-harder-to-guess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/20newyorker121707big_0.jpg?w=217&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Politico to Launch Subscription News Service</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/10/politico-to-launch-subscription-news-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/10/politico-to-launch-subscription-news-service/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/10/politico-to-launch-subscription-news-service/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/081016_vandeheis.jpg" /><a href="http://www.politico.com/">Politico</a> announced last night it will be launching Politico Pro, a subscription service that will provide reporting and analysis in the areas of health care, energy and technology to those who pony up the fee,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/business/media/26politico.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">The New York Times </a></em>reports. &nbsp;</p>
<p>Since 2006, Politico has posted a wealth of content to its website and placed copies of its print edition in bins all around Washington, D.C., free for the taking. Now, the launch of a pay-for-content system will give the publication another source of income, and pit it against the longstanding subscription services offered by <em>Congressional Quarterly</em> and the <a href="/2010/media/national-journal-hires-web-editor-boston-globe?utm_medium=partial-text&amp;utm_campaign=home">recently bulked-up</a> <em>National Journal</em>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Executive editor Jim VandeHei says there's still a niche for Politico in the market. "There is a perception that this market is overserved, when we actually think it&rsquo;s underserved," he told <em>The Times</em>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The announcement came hours after the&nbsp;<em>National Journal</em> <a href="/2010/media/revamped-national-journal-site-launch-oct-25-no-paywall">revealed</a> its newly designed website and magazine, with both the subscription service and the coverage outside the paywall expanded.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Politico says it will bring on 50 new people to staff the project, and once it's available the subscriptions will start at $1,495 for congressional offices and $2,000 for lobbyists and contractors.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Politico.com will remain free.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;line-height: 25px;font-size: 15px"><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></span></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/081016_vandeheis.jpg" /><a href="http://www.politico.com/">Politico</a> announced last night it will be launching Politico Pro, a subscription service that will provide reporting and analysis in the areas of health care, energy and technology to those who pony up the fee,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/business/media/26politico.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">The New York Times </a></em>reports. &nbsp;</p>
<p>Since 2006, Politico has posted a wealth of content to its website and placed copies of its print edition in bins all around Washington, D.C., free for the taking. Now, the launch of a pay-for-content system will give the publication another source of income, and pit it against the longstanding subscription services offered by <em>Congressional Quarterly</em> and the <a href="/2010/media/national-journal-hires-web-editor-boston-globe?utm_medium=partial-text&amp;utm_campaign=home">recently bulked-up</a> <em>National Journal</em>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Executive editor Jim VandeHei says there's still a niche for Politico in the market. "There is a perception that this market is overserved, when we actually think it&rsquo;s underserved," he told <em>The Times</em>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The announcement came hours after the&nbsp;<em>National Journal</em> <a href="/2010/media/revamped-national-journal-site-launch-oct-25-no-paywall">revealed</a> its newly designed website and magazine, with both the subscription service and the coverage outside the paywall expanded.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Politico says it will bring on 50 new people to staff the project, and once it's available the subscriptions will start at $1,495 for congressional offices and $2,000 for lobbyists and contractors.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Politico.com will remain free.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Georgia, serif;line-height: 25px;font-size: 15px"><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/10/politico-to-launch-subscription-news-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/081016_vandeheis.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
