<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; RFP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/rfp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Dumbo Apartments Set Sail: Brooklyn Bridge Park Seeking Developers for Latest Controversial Project</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/12/dumbo-apartments-set-sail-brooklyn-bridge-park-seeking-developers-for-latest-controversial-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:08:08 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/12/dumbo-apartments-set-sail-brooklyn-bridge-park-seeking-developers-for-latest-controversial-project/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Chaban</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=281840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_281867" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-12-14-02-pm.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-281867" alt="Waterfront wonder. (Bing Maps)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-12-14-02-pm.png" width="600" height="419" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Waterfront wonder. (Bing Maps)</p></div></p>
<p><div id="attachment_281869" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 200px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-1-05-19-pm.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-281869" alt="The future design for this corner of the park. (BBP)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-1-05-19-pm.png?w=190" width="190" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The future design for this corner of the park. (BBP)</p></div></p>
<p>How would you like to wake up to views of the Manhattan Bridge and Lower Manhattan beyond, a lavish waterfront park right outside? That is the vision Brooklyn Bridge Park is hoping will entice developers into the newest private development within <a href="http://observer.com/term/libertarian-parks/">the libertarian park</a>. Today, the park released a request for proposals for a development at the nexus of John and Pearl streets in Dumbo. The project calls for no more than 130 residential units in a 101,000-square foot development that can rise no higher than 13 stories.</p>
<p>“The addition of the residential development at the John Street site represents a critical element of our park maintenance plan,” Regina Myer, president of Brooklyn Bridge Park, said in a statement. “This development will not only benefit the DUMBO community, it will further activate the northern end of the park.”<!--more--></p>
<p>Located at the most northern edge of the park, on the far side of the Manhattan Bridge, this section is so far untrafficked because the open space has yet to be built out, though it does have funding for construction to begin, tentatively next year. In addition to the apartments, the project will have space for ground-floor retail.</p>
<p>Among the requirements for the development outlined in the RFP are a strong architectural identity for the project, a design that is complimentary to the park, achieve LEED certification for sustainablity and, above all, "generate a financially feasible and economically viable project, with lease payments that will contribute to ongoing maintenance and operations of the Park."</p>
<p>Some locals have <a href="http://observer.com/2011/08/here-come-the-brooklyn-bridge-park-condos/">criticized the park for being funded by development on public land</a>, but supporters, including the Bloomberg administration, argue that without these developments there would be no park. (This problem is not limited to Brooklyn Bridge Park, as <a href="http://observer.com/2012/12/sinking-pier-40-durst-leaves-hudson-river-park-amid-mutiny-over-its-future/">those on the Hudson can attest</a>.) But by reserving parcels for private development, it inherently means a smaller park (in this case, 85 acres), as well as a whiff of commercialism in what should be the public realm.</p>
<p>But at least the project will not be quite as big as previously proposed, at 17 stories and 140,000 square feet. Last year, State Senator Dan Squadron and Assemblywoman Joan Millman negotiated a reduction in the development's size as <a href="http://observer.com/2011/08/god-willing-brooklyn-bridge-park-will-have-less-condos/">part of a deal with the Bloomberg administration over trying to reduce the amount of apartments</a> in the park. This is not, however, one of the developments that could be totally eliminated by a special tax placed on Jehovah's Witnesses property.</p>
<p>It will be curious to see what developers turn up for this project, given the intense interest from <a href="http://observer.com/2011/08/related-two-trees-andre-balazs-fxfowle-among-firms-flooding-brooklyn-bridge-park-pier-1/">some of the city's biggest names</a> in the previous commercial development in the park, <a href="http://observer.com/2011/11/brooklyn-bridge-park-gets-its-starchitecture/">a development of a hotel and apartments at Pier 1</a>. McMansion and Northside Piers builders Toll Brothers and hotel financier Starwood Capital <a href="http://observer.com/2012/06/anchormen-a-new-hotel-and-other-developments-as-brooklyn-bridge-parks-pier-1-approved/">won that project</a>.</p>
<p>The John Street development is smaller and more out of the way, but considering that Dumbo has become in only a decade the borough's most expensive neighborhood, it would seem the competition for any development opportunity will be fierce.</p>
<p><em><strong>Correction:</strong></em>An earlier version of this post said the project would include park amenities within the building, such as toilets and space for park workers. This is not currently in the plans. <em>The Observer </em>regrets the error.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_281867" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-12-14-02-pm.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-281867" alt="Waterfront wonder. (Bing Maps)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-12-14-02-pm.png" width="600" height="419" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Waterfront wonder. (Bing Maps)</p></div></p>
<p><div id="attachment_281869" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 200px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-1-05-19-pm.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-281869" alt="The future design for this corner of the park. (BBP)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-1-05-19-pm.png?w=190" width="190" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The future design for this corner of the park. (BBP)</p></div></p>
<p>How would you like to wake up to views of the Manhattan Bridge and Lower Manhattan beyond, a lavish waterfront park right outside? That is the vision Brooklyn Bridge Park is hoping will entice developers into the newest private development within <a href="http://observer.com/term/libertarian-parks/">the libertarian park</a>. Today, the park released a request for proposals for a development at the nexus of John and Pearl streets in Dumbo. The project calls for no more than 130 residential units in a 101,000-square foot development that can rise no higher than 13 stories.</p>
<p>“The addition of the residential development at the John Street site represents a critical element of our park maintenance plan,” Regina Myer, president of Brooklyn Bridge Park, said in a statement. “This development will not only benefit the DUMBO community, it will further activate the northern end of the park.”<!--more--></p>
<p>Located at the most northern edge of the park, on the far side of the Manhattan Bridge, this section is so far untrafficked because the open space has yet to be built out, though it does have funding for construction to begin, tentatively next year. In addition to the apartments, the project will have space for ground-floor retail.</p>
<p>Among the requirements for the development outlined in the RFP are a strong architectural identity for the project, a design that is complimentary to the park, achieve LEED certification for sustainablity and, above all, "generate a financially feasible and economically viable project, with lease payments that will contribute to ongoing maintenance and operations of the Park."</p>
<p>Some locals have <a href="http://observer.com/2011/08/here-come-the-brooklyn-bridge-park-condos/">criticized the park for being funded by development on public land</a>, but supporters, including the Bloomberg administration, argue that without these developments there would be no park. (This problem is not limited to Brooklyn Bridge Park, as <a href="http://observer.com/2012/12/sinking-pier-40-durst-leaves-hudson-river-park-amid-mutiny-over-its-future/">those on the Hudson can attest</a>.) But by reserving parcels for private development, it inherently means a smaller park (in this case, 85 acres), as well as a whiff of commercialism in what should be the public realm.</p>
<p>But at least the project will not be quite as big as previously proposed, at 17 stories and 140,000 square feet. Last year, State Senator Dan Squadron and Assemblywoman Joan Millman negotiated a reduction in the development's size as <a href="http://observer.com/2011/08/god-willing-brooklyn-bridge-park-will-have-less-condos/">part of a deal with the Bloomberg administration over trying to reduce the amount of apartments</a> in the park. This is not, however, one of the developments that could be totally eliminated by a special tax placed on Jehovah's Witnesses property.</p>
<p>It will be curious to see what developers turn up for this project, given the intense interest from <a href="http://observer.com/2011/08/related-two-trees-andre-balazs-fxfowle-among-firms-flooding-brooklyn-bridge-park-pier-1/">some of the city's biggest names</a> in the previous commercial development in the park, <a href="http://observer.com/2011/11/brooklyn-bridge-park-gets-its-starchitecture/">a development of a hotel and apartments at Pier 1</a>. McMansion and Northside Piers builders Toll Brothers and hotel financier Starwood Capital <a href="http://observer.com/2012/06/anchormen-a-new-hotel-and-other-developments-as-brooklyn-bridge-parks-pier-1-approved/">won that project</a>.</p>
<p>The John Street development is smaller and more out of the way, but considering that Dumbo has become in only a decade the borough's most expensive neighborhood, it would seem the competition for any development opportunity will be fierce.</p>
<p><em><strong>Correction:</strong></em>An earlier version of this post said the project would include park amenities within the building, such as toilets and space for park workers. This is not currently in the plans. <em>The Observer </em>regrets the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/12/dumbo-apartments-set-sail-brooklyn-bridge-park-seeking-developers-for-latest-controversial-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-12-14-02-pm.png?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-12-14-02-pm.png?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Screen Shot 2012-12-17 at 12.14.02 PM</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/be8fb62d88bc48f517bbcc9c9f2750dc?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mchabanobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-12-14-02-pm.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Waterfront wonder. (Bing Maps)</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-1-05-19-pm.png?w=190" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">The future design for this corner of the park. (BBP)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Developers, You&#8217;re On! City Wants To Spruce Up Brooklyn&#8217;s Kings Theater</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/03/developers-youre-on-city-wants-to-spruce-up-brooklyns-kings-theater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:10:07 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/03/developers-youre-on-city-wants-to-spruce-up-brooklyns-kings-theater/</link>
			<dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/03/developers-youre-on-city-wants-to-spruce-up-brooklyns-kings-theater/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/kingstheater.jpg?w=300&h=199" />The city is looking for developers to renovate and operate the landmarked, long-derelict Loew’s Kings Theater—“the Kings” as locals called it back in the day—on Flatbush Avenue in Brooklyn. Designed in 1929 by Rapp and Rapp Architects, the 3,769-seat movie palace modeled after the Paris Opera House is the only one of the five “Wonder Theaters” Loew’s built in the city that has not been renovated or converted into a church.
<p>Rehabilitating the majestic, rotting Art Deco building will not be cheap. It has remained shuttered since 1978—the city took it over in 1983—and the city's Economic Development Corporation estimated that the project would cost a minimum of $70 million in the request for proposals it issued this week. </p>
<p>The roofs of the Loew’s retail spaces have collapsed and several of the walls have serious water damage; no interior maintenance has been done for three decades; and the building is teaming with asbestos, lead, and toxic mold. But the mahogany paneling and chandeliers are still in place. </p>
<p>In the RFP, the EDC is encouraging the 68,300-square-foot theater to be reused and potentially expanded to accommodate additional performance and rehearsal space for dance, theater, and music; meeting and event rooms; and an entertainment venue. The parcel also includes two adjacent, city-owned lots on East 22<sup>nd</sup>   Street. The site is zoned for entertainment and restricted retail uses, and the RFP says any retail development included in the proposal must strengthen the neighborhood’s existing offerings. </p>
<p>There have been several aborted attempts to make-over the Loew’s. In 1990, the city’s public development corporation released a “Requests for Expressions of Interests,” <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE0DF1338F93BA25750C0A966958260">the <em>New York Times </em>reported</a>; and Magic Johnson planned to renovate it in 1999. Last December the city floated the idea again, but did not release projections on the cost or time-frame. </p>
<p>Even if developers bite this time, the project won't be completed anytime in the <a href="http://curbed.com/archives/2006/06/16/the_kings_in_exile_a_flatbush_movie_palace.php">near future</a> or before Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz retires in 2009. But here's a sweetener from a story in the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/brooklyn/2007/12/04/2007-12-04_famed_loews_kings_movie_palace_remains_s.html"><em>Daily News</em></a>: This might be one of the few construction projects in Brooklyn that seems unlikely to encounter much community opposition.     </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/kingstheater.jpg?w=300&h=199" />The city is looking for developers to renovate and operate the landmarked, long-derelict Loew’s Kings Theater—“the Kings” as locals called it back in the day—on Flatbush Avenue in Brooklyn. Designed in 1929 by Rapp and Rapp Architects, the 3,769-seat movie palace modeled after the Paris Opera House is the only one of the five “Wonder Theaters” Loew’s built in the city that has not been renovated or converted into a church.
<p>Rehabilitating the majestic, rotting Art Deco building will not be cheap. It has remained shuttered since 1978—the city took it over in 1983—and the city's Economic Development Corporation estimated that the project would cost a minimum of $70 million in the request for proposals it issued this week. </p>
<p>The roofs of the Loew’s retail spaces have collapsed and several of the walls have serious water damage; no interior maintenance has been done for three decades; and the building is teaming with asbestos, lead, and toxic mold. But the mahogany paneling and chandeliers are still in place. </p>
<p>In the RFP, the EDC is encouraging the 68,300-square-foot theater to be reused and potentially expanded to accommodate additional performance and rehearsal space for dance, theater, and music; meeting and event rooms; and an entertainment venue. The parcel also includes two adjacent, city-owned lots on East 22<sup>nd</sup>   Street. The site is zoned for entertainment and restricted retail uses, and the RFP says any retail development included in the proposal must strengthen the neighborhood’s existing offerings. </p>
<p>There have been several aborted attempts to make-over the Loew’s. In 1990, the city’s public development corporation released a “Requests for Expressions of Interests,” <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE0DF1338F93BA25750C0A966958260">the <em>New York Times </em>reported</a>; and Magic Johnson planned to renovate it in 1999. Last December the city floated the idea again, but did not release projections on the cost or time-frame. </p>
<p>Even if developers bite this time, the project won't be completed anytime in the <a href="http://curbed.com/archives/2006/06/16/the_kings_in_exile_a_flatbush_movie_palace.php">near future</a> or before Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz retires in 2009. But here's a sweetener from a story in the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/brooklyn/2007/12/04/2007-12-04_famed_loews_kings_movie_palace_remains_s.html"><em>Daily News</em></a>: This might be one of the few construction projects in Brooklyn that seems unlikely to encounter much community opposition.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/03/developers-youre-on-city-wants-to-spruce-up-brooklyns-kings-theater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/kingstheater.jpg?w=300&#38;h=199" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
