<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Richard Feynman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/richard-feynman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Semicolons and Exclamation Points&#8217; New Enemy in Punctuation Wars: Cormac McCarthy</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:37:17 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=222980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/semicolon/" rel="attachment wp-att-224261"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/semicolon.gif" alt="" title="semicolon" width="265" height="228" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-224261" /></a>The relatively-elusive novelist Cormac McCarthy has deviated from his job as novelist from time to time, and whenever he does—whether a rare appearance for press duties on his book, or a project that isn't a novel—it usually makes a fuss. This one's no exception. Cormac McCarthy, copy-editor, has emerged, and with him are some strong ideas about punctuation.<!--more--></p>
<p>The Oprah-approved author of harrowing, sparse-prose mastery such as <em>The Road</em>, <em>No Country for Old Men</em>, and <em>Blood Meridian</em> has taken on a special project in editing the paperback version of last year's well-received biography of famed scientist Richard Feynman, <em>Quantum Man: Richard Feynman’s Life in Science</em>. </p>
<p>As it turns out, Mr. McCarthy was a huge fan of the book, and offered his services to <em>Quantum Man</em> author Lawrence M. Krauss unprompted. With them, however, he also offered some distinct, Cormac McCarthy-esque adjustments. </p>
<p><a href="http://chronicle.com/blogs/pageview/the-novelist-edits-the-scientist/30027?sid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en">Via Pageview</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"To start with," Krauss writes, "<strong>he made me promise he could excise all exclamation points and semicolons, both of which he said have no place in literature.</strong>" The novelist, he adds, "went through the book in detail and made suggestions for rephrasing in certain points as well."</p></blockquote>
<p>And so it was. Question, though: For what it's worth, Richard Feynman was an exclamation point of a scientist. For example, would McCarthy have taken out the exclamation point <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surely_You%27re_Joking,_Mr._Feynman!">in the title of Richard Feynman's most famous work?</a> </p>
<p>In the mean time, as a biography of Richard Feynman becomes a tribute to the minimal elements that the man may have lived, that distant tapping sound you hear is the furious deletion of the aforementioned punctuation marks by many an MFA candidate. Previously: Cormac McCarthy, <a href="http://theater.nytimes.com/2006/10/31/theater/reviews/31suns.html">playwright</a>, brute-force killer of euphemistic racial-tension in theater. Hopefully he'll next emerge on Madison Avenue and tell every menswear fashion buyer in the world <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/straight-menswear-trend-02202012/">why non-effeminate bracelets</a> have no place in their stores.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/cormac-mccarthy-quantum-copyeditor/">ArtsBeat</a>]</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/semicolon/" rel="attachment wp-att-224261"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/semicolon.gif" alt="" title="semicolon" width="265" height="228" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-224261" /></a>The relatively-elusive novelist Cormac McCarthy has deviated from his job as novelist from time to time, and whenever he does—whether a rare appearance for press duties on his book, or a project that isn't a novel—it usually makes a fuss. This one's no exception. Cormac McCarthy, copy-editor, has emerged, and with him are some strong ideas about punctuation.<!--more--></p>
<p>The Oprah-approved author of harrowing, sparse-prose mastery such as <em>The Road</em>, <em>No Country for Old Men</em>, and <em>Blood Meridian</em> has taken on a special project in editing the paperback version of last year's well-received biography of famed scientist Richard Feynman, <em>Quantum Man: Richard Feynman’s Life in Science</em>. </p>
<p>As it turns out, Mr. McCarthy was a huge fan of the book, and offered his services to <em>Quantum Man</em> author Lawrence M. Krauss unprompted. With them, however, he also offered some distinct, Cormac McCarthy-esque adjustments. </p>
<p><a href="http://chronicle.com/blogs/pageview/the-novelist-edits-the-scientist/30027?sid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en">Via Pageview</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"To start with," Krauss writes, "<strong>he made me promise he could excise all exclamation points and semicolons, both of which he said have no place in literature.</strong>" The novelist, he adds, "went through the book in detail and made suggestions for rephrasing in certain points as well."</p></blockquote>
<p>And so it was. Question, though: For what it's worth, Richard Feynman was an exclamation point of a scientist. For example, would McCarthy have taken out the exclamation point <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surely_You%27re_Joking,_Mr._Feynman!">in the title of Richard Feynman's most famous work?</a> </p>
<p>In the mean time, as a biography of Richard Feynman becomes a tribute to the minimal elements that the man may have lived, that distant tapping sound you hear is the furious deletion of the aforementioned punctuation marks by many an MFA candidate. Previously: Cormac McCarthy, <a href="http://theater.nytimes.com/2006/10/31/theater/reviews/31suns.html">playwright</a>, brute-force killer of euphemistic racial-tension in theater. Hopefully he'll next emerge on Madison Avenue and tell every menswear fashion buyer in the world <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/straight-menswear-trend-02202012/">why non-effeminate bracelets</a> have no place in their stores.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/cormac-mccarthy-quantum-copyeditor/">ArtsBeat</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/26-mccarthy.jpg?w=111" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/26-mccarthy.jpg?w=111" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">26-mccarthy</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/semicolon.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">semicolon</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>More Evidence That Critics of Israel Are Gaining in the U.S.</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2006/09/more-evidence-that-critics-of-israel-are-gaining-in-the-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:12:49 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2006/09/more-evidence-that-critics-of-israel-are-gaining-in-the-us/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2006/09/more-evidence-that-critics-of-israel-are-gaining-in-the-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>C-Span today broadcast a panel of the neoconservative <a href="http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=hudson_upcoming_events&amp;id=287">Hudson Institute </a>(Norman Podhoretz's sock) at which a Russian immigrant neocon in the audience rose to say that he had observed a trend. Those who opposed neoconservatism now spoke of the importance of winning "hearts and minds" in the Arab world, but invariably they pointed to one place to win hearts and minds: the Palestinian problem. The Russian asked if the panelists were not as disturbed by the trend as he is.</p>
<p>One panelist readily agreed this was the main front in the ideological wars. Author Douglas Murray said there is now a "big lie" that Israel/Palestine is at the root of troubles between radical Islam and the west. The so-called occupied territories, he said, was one of those lies.</p>
<p>These are glad tidings. For one thing, it's nice to get noticed by the neocons. They have had the only big idea of the last ten years. Now they're hearing footsteps&#151;the western critics of Israel/Palestine policy. And it is good when neocons baldly put their money down on the supposed lie of there being occupied territories. Taking such an absurd position can only help to elevate the occupation as an issue in the news, which is where it belongs. The more that Americans learn of the deprivation of civil rights to Palestinians under apartheid conditions in the West Bank, the more likely it is that an American sense of fairness will at last come to bear, politically, on this issue. </p>
<p>Here is the sensible  take of cab-driver/blogger <a href="http://www.purpleocean.org/blog/80">Denis Drew</a>:</p>
<div class="oldbq">USA media treats what happens in Israel as the equivalent of France being terrorized by Islamic extremists out of unreasoning hatred.  What is really happening in Israel is more like France being terrorized by Algerians resisting not simply colonial status but French nationals moving in and displacing their population while trying to get as many Algerians as possible to give up living in their land through harrassment (sounds like the beginning of my next effort).</p>
<p>Israel is the size of New Jersey and right now it seems like it is being run by New Jersey politicians (whose military super power they just don't comprehend the limits of).  Jews put out some of the smartest people in the world over here: Richard Feynman, Laurence Tribe.  But over there the government has seemed to sink to the usual useless politician level.
 </p></div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-Span today broadcast a panel of the neoconservative <a href="http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=hudson_upcoming_events&amp;id=287">Hudson Institute </a>(Norman Podhoretz's sock) at which a Russian immigrant neocon in the audience rose to say that he had observed a trend. Those who opposed neoconservatism now spoke of the importance of winning "hearts and minds" in the Arab world, but invariably they pointed to one place to win hearts and minds: the Palestinian problem. The Russian asked if the panelists were not as disturbed by the trend as he is.</p>
<p>One panelist readily agreed this was the main front in the ideological wars. Author Douglas Murray said there is now a "big lie" that Israel/Palestine is at the root of troubles between radical Islam and the west. The so-called occupied territories, he said, was one of those lies.</p>
<p>These are glad tidings. For one thing, it's nice to get noticed by the neocons. They have had the only big idea of the last ten years. Now they're hearing footsteps&#151;the western critics of Israel/Palestine policy. And it is good when neocons baldly put their money down on the supposed lie of there being occupied territories. Taking such an absurd position can only help to elevate the occupation as an issue in the news, which is where it belongs. The more that Americans learn of the deprivation of civil rights to Palestinians under apartheid conditions in the West Bank, the more likely it is that an American sense of fairness will at last come to bear, politically, on this issue. </p>
<p>Here is the sensible  take of cab-driver/blogger <a href="http://www.purpleocean.org/blog/80">Denis Drew</a>:</p>
<div class="oldbq">USA media treats what happens in Israel as the equivalent of France being terrorized by Islamic extremists out of unreasoning hatred.  What is really happening in Israel is more like France being terrorized by Algerians resisting not simply colonial status but French nationals moving in and displacing their population while trying to get as many Algerians as possible to give up living in their land through harrassment (sounds like the beginning of my next effort).</p>
<p>Israel is the size of New Jersey and right now it seems like it is being run by New Jersey politicians (whose military super power they just don't comprehend the limits of).  Jews put out some of the smartest people in the world over here: Richard Feynman, Laurence Tribe.  But over there the government has seemed to sink to the usual useless politician level.
 </p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2006/09/more-evidence-that-critics-of-israel-are-gaining-in-the-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
