<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Ready for the Non-Madness and Non-Mayhem of the Supermoon?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/05/ready-for-the-non-madness-and-non-mayhem-of-the-supermoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:48:55 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/05/ready-for-the-non-madness-and-non-mayhem-of-the-supermoon/</link>
			<dc:creator>Steve Huff</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=237604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_237606" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/05/ready-for-the-non-madness-and-non-mayhem-of-the-supermoon/fullmoon/" rel="attachment wp-att-237606"><img class="size-medium wp-image-237606" title="FullMoon" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fullmoon.png?w=400&h=293" alt="" width="400" height="293" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Thank you, NASA. (screengrab)</p></div></p>
<p>Tonight the moon will come 15,000 miles closer to the Earth and will be full. This combination of proximity and brightness results in a phenomenon known as the supermoon--by far the brightest and largest full moon we'll see all year. As we are still primitive beasts loping madly across the plains and will surely be at each others' throats as soon as the moon is closest to us (11:35 p.m. E.T.), <a href="http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/05/05/supermoon-will-be-visible-in-the-city-on-saturday-night/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">the Associated Press has taken it upon themselves to soothe the cresting tides of madness to come</a>--with science!<!--more--></p>
<blockquote><p>But no matter how far away a full moon is, it's not going to make people kill themselves or others, commit other crimes, get admitted to a psychiatric hospital or do anything else that popular belief suggests, a psychologist says.</p>
<p>Studies that have tried to document such connections have found "pretty much a big mound of nothing, as far as I can tell," said Scott Lilienfeld of Emory University.</p></blockquote>
<p>Professor Lilienfeld, who addressed the myth of the maddening moon in <em>50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology</em>, told the A.P. that moon-related strangeness is a singularly intractable legend because those who believe it can so easily confirm their bias by attaching any coincidence that occurs under a full moon to the phenomenon.</p>
<p>NASA has also published a helpful video explaining away myths surrounding the moon <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOplwuMTyS4" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>So with all your moon-related fears dismissed, feel free to head out for a moon dance.</p>
<p>Which, if spotted, will surely confirm the still-uninformed viewer's idea that the supermoon is making someone super-crazy.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6oZg2B08uvM" frameborder="0" width="545" height="300"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_237606" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/05/ready-for-the-non-madness-and-non-mayhem-of-the-supermoon/fullmoon/" rel="attachment wp-att-237606"><img class="size-medium wp-image-237606" title="FullMoon" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fullmoon.png?w=400&h=293" alt="" width="400" height="293" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Thank you, NASA. (screengrab)</p></div></p>
<p>Tonight the moon will come 15,000 miles closer to the Earth and will be full. This combination of proximity and brightness results in a phenomenon known as the supermoon--by far the brightest and largest full moon we'll see all year. As we are still primitive beasts loping madly across the plains and will surely be at each others' throats as soon as the moon is closest to us (11:35 p.m. E.T.), <a href="http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/05/05/supermoon-will-be-visible-in-the-city-on-saturday-night/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">the Associated Press has taken it upon themselves to soothe the cresting tides of madness to come</a>--with science!<!--more--></p>
<blockquote><p>But no matter how far away a full moon is, it's not going to make people kill themselves or others, commit other crimes, get admitted to a psychiatric hospital or do anything else that popular belief suggests, a psychologist says.</p>
<p>Studies that have tried to document such connections have found "pretty much a big mound of nothing, as far as I can tell," said Scott Lilienfeld of Emory University.</p></blockquote>
<p>Professor Lilienfeld, who addressed the myth of the maddening moon in <em>50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology</em>, told the A.P. that moon-related strangeness is a singularly intractable legend because those who believe it can so easily confirm their bias by attaching any coincidence that occurs under a full moon to the phenomenon.</p>
<p>NASA has also published a helpful video explaining away myths surrounding the moon <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOplwuMTyS4" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>So with all your moon-related fears dismissed, feel free to head out for a moon dance.</p>
<p>Which, if spotted, will surely confirm the still-uninformed viewer's idea that the supermoon is making someone super-crazy.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6oZg2B08uvM" frameborder="0" width="545" height="300"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/05/ready-for-the-non-madness-and-non-mayhem-of-the-supermoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fullmoon.png?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fullmoon.png?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">FullMoon</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fullmoon.png?w=400&#38;h=293" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">FullMoon</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Semicolons and Exclamation Points&#8217; New Enemy in Punctuation Wars: Cormac McCarthy</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:37:17 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=222980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/semicolon/" rel="attachment wp-att-224261"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/semicolon.gif" alt="" title="semicolon" width="265" height="228" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-224261" /></a>The relatively-elusive novelist Cormac McCarthy has deviated from his job as novelist from time to time, and whenever he does—whether a rare appearance for press duties on his book, or a project that isn't a novel—it usually makes a fuss. This one's no exception. Cormac McCarthy, copy-editor, has emerged, and with him are some strong ideas about punctuation.<!--more--></p>
<p>The Oprah-approved author of harrowing, sparse-prose mastery such as <em>The Road</em>, <em>No Country for Old Men</em>, and <em>Blood Meridian</em> has taken on a special project in editing the paperback version of last year's well-received biography of famed scientist Richard Feynman, <em>Quantum Man: Richard Feynman’s Life in Science</em>. </p>
<p>As it turns out, Mr. McCarthy was a huge fan of the book, and offered his services to <em>Quantum Man</em> author Lawrence M. Krauss unprompted. With them, however, he also offered some distinct, Cormac McCarthy-esque adjustments. </p>
<p><a href="http://chronicle.com/blogs/pageview/the-novelist-edits-the-scientist/30027?sid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en">Via Pageview</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"To start with," Krauss writes, "<strong>he made me promise he could excise all exclamation points and semicolons, both of which he said have no place in literature.</strong>" The novelist, he adds, "went through the book in detail and made suggestions for rephrasing in certain points as well."</p></blockquote>
<p>And so it was. Question, though: For what it's worth, Richard Feynman was an exclamation point of a scientist. For example, would McCarthy have taken out the exclamation point <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surely_You%27re_Joking,_Mr._Feynman!">in the title of Richard Feynman's most famous work?</a> </p>
<p>In the mean time, as a biography of Richard Feynman becomes a tribute to the minimal elements that the man may have lived, that distant tapping sound you hear is the furious deletion of the aforementioned punctuation marks by many an MFA candidate. Previously: Cormac McCarthy, <a href="http://theater.nytimes.com/2006/10/31/theater/reviews/31suns.html">playwright</a>, brute-force killer of euphemistic racial-tension in theater. Hopefully he'll next emerge on Madison Avenue and tell every menswear fashion buyer in the world <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/straight-menswear-trend-02202012/">why non-effeminate bracelets</a> have no place in their stores.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/cormac-mccarthy-quantum-copyeditor/">ArtsBeat</a>]</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/semicolon/" rel="attachment wp-att-224261"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/semicolon.gif" alt="" title="semicolon" width="265" height="228" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-224261" /></a>The relatively-elusive novelist Cormac McCarthy has deviated from his job as novelist from time to time, and whenever he does—whether a rare appearance for press duties on his book, or a project that isn't a novel—it usually makes a fuss. This one's no exception. Cormac McCarthy, copy-editor, has emerged, and with him are some strong ideas about punctuation.<!--more--></p>
<p>The Oprah-approved author of harrowing, sparse-prose mastery such as <em>The Road</em>, <em>No Country for Old Men</em>, and <em>Blood Meridian</em> has taken on a special project in editing the paperback version of last year's well-received biography of famed scientist Richard Feynman, <em>Quantum Man: Richard Feynman’s Life in Science</em>. </p>
<p>As it turns out, Mr. McCarthy was a huge fan of the book, and offered his services to <em>Quantum Man</em> author Lawrence M. Krauss unprompted. With them, however, he also offered some distinct, Cormac McCarthy-esque adjustments. </p>
<p><a href="http://chronicle.com/blogs/pageview/the-novelist-edits-the-scientist/30027?sid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en">Via Pageview</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"To start with," Krauss writes, "<strong>he made me promise he could excise all exclamation points and semicolons, both of which he said have no place in literature.</strong>" The novelist, he adds, "went through the book in detail and made suggestions for rephrasing in certain points as well."</p></blockquote>
<p>And so it was. Question, though: For what it's worth, Richard Feynman was an exclamation point of a scientist. For example, would McCarthy have taken out the exclamation point <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surely_You%27re_Joking,_Mr._Feynman!">in the title of Richard Feynman's most famous work?</a> </p>
<p>In the mean time, as a biography of Richard Feynman becomes a tribute to the minimal elements that the man may have lived, that distant tapping sound you hear is the furious deletion of the aforementioned punctuation marks by many an MFA candidate. Previously: Cormac McCarthy, <a href="http://theater.nytimes.com/2006/10/31/theater/reviews/31suns.html">playwright</a>, brute-force killer of euphemistic racial-tension in theater. Hopefully he'll next emerge on Madison Avenue and tell every menswear fashion buyer in the world <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/straight-menswear-trend-02202012/">why non-effeminate bracelets</a> have no place in their stores.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/cormac-mccarthy-quantum-copyeditor/">ArtsBeat</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/02/cormac-mccarthy-punctuation-02202012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/26-mccarthy.jpg?w=111" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/26-mccarthy.jpg?w=111" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">26-mccarthy</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/semicolon.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">semicolon</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Study: Investment Banking is Bad for You, Will Make You An Alcoholic Adderall-Addicted Paranoid Shell of a Human Being</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/02/investment-banking-bad-for-you-02152012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:18:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/02/investment-banking-bad-for-you-02152012/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=221823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/wall-street-is-upset-photos-of-face-grabbing-traders-who-will-inevitably-wind-up-in-tomorrows-newspaper/stocks-tumble-in-worst-slump-since-2009-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-173910"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/120340269-e1312495894392.jpg?w=300&h=200" alt="" title="People on Wall Street, Stressed: The Stock Image Collection. " width="300" height="200" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-173910" /></a>Say what you will about investment banking as a benefit to and/or plague on the finance sector, economy, New York City, and the universe in general. Now there's science to back the idea that, yes, investment banking is actually, medically 'bad' for one's health. How bad? Try "insomnia, alcoholism, heart palpitations, eating disorders and an explosive temper" or at the very least "a stress-related physical or emotional ailment within several years on the job." Science!<!--more--></p>
<p>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reports that the results of University of Southern California assistant professor Alexandra Michel's ten-year long study of "roughly two dozen" entry-level bankers at two anonymous investment banking houses (who participated on the condition that they remain anonymous) will be released later this month in the next issue of <em>Administrative Science Quarterly</em>, with evidence explaining that conclusion. </p>
<p>Not a few, or a majority, but <em>all</em> of the bankers apparently exhibited the aforementioned stress-related ailment within a few years on the job. </p>
<p>If you think camping out in Zuccotti Park is hard, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204062704577223623824944472.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth">try this on for size</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>By the fourth year, however, many bankers were a mess, according to the study. Some were sleep-deprived, blaming their bodies for preventing them from finishing their work. <strong>Others developed allergies and substance addictions. Still others were diagnosed with long-term health conditions such as Crohn's disease, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and thyroid disorders.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204062704577223623824944472.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth">Also</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>One vice president <strong>described work as a never-ending nightmare, waking up every morning and wishing the day before "was just a bad dream."</strong> Another vice president said he was so worried others might notice his drinking problem that he would "keep losing half of what they are saying." By the sixth year, the participants, now in their mid-30s, had split into two camps: the 60% who remained "at war" with their bodies, and the remaining 40% who decided to prioritize their health...</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204062704577223623824944472.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth">And of course</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Some are addicted to prescription drugs like Adderall or Ritalin. To cope, they resort to "depersonalization,"</strong> a feeling of numbness toward the rest of the world. A few have been suicidal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe the Occupy movement's next strategy could just be some kind of counter-intuitive mind game encouraging investment bankers to work harder than ever, at which point they'll just sputter out and collapse. Of course, this could easily go the way of Michael Douglas in <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106856/">Falling Down</a></em>. In which case, please don't color that an endorsement.</p>
<p>Do you know any investment bankers who have lost their minds and their bodies on the job? Do you have any particularly great war stories from those trenches? Are you an investment banker currently in the throes of total, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iwK2jwqFfk">REEEDDRUMMMM</a>-like psychosis? Were you part of the study? If so, we'd love to hear <a href="mailto:fkamer@observer.com">some of your fun anecdotes</a>. Give us a shout!</p>
<p><em>fkamer@observer.com</em> | <a href="http://twitter.com/weareyourfek">@weareyourfek</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/wall-street-is-upset-photos-of-face-grabbing-traders-who-will-inevitably-wind-up-in-tomorrows-newspaper/stocks-tumble-in-worst-slump-since-2009-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-173910"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/120340269-e1312495894392.jpg?w=300&h=200" alt="" title="People on Wall Street, Stressed: The Stock Image Collection. " width="300" height="200" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-173910" /></a>Say what you will about investment banking as a benefit to and/or plague on the finance sector, economy, New York City, and the universe in general. Now there's science to back the idea that, yes, investment banking is actually, medically 'bad' for one's health. How bad? Try "insomnia, alcoholism, heart palpitations, eating disorders and an explosive temper" or at the very least "a stress-related physical or emotional ailment within several years on the job." Science!<!--more--></p>
<p>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reports that the results of University of Southern California assistant professor Alexandra Michel's ten-year long study of "roughly two dozen" entry-level bankers at two anonymous investment banking houses (who participated on the condition that they remain anonymous) will be released later this month in the next issue of <em>Administrative Science Quarterly</em>, with evidence explaining that conclusion. </p>
<p>Not a few, or a majority, but <em>all</em> of the bankers apparently exhibited the aforementioned stress-related ailment within a few years on the job. </p>
<p>If you think camping out in Zuccotti Park is hard, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204062704577223623824944472.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth">try this on for size</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>By the fourth year, however, many bankers were a mess, according to the study. Some were sleep-deprived, blaming their bodies for preventing them from finishing their work. <strong>Others developed allergies and substance addictions. Still others were diagnosed with long-term health conditions such as Crohn's disease, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and thyroid disorders.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204062704577223623824944472.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth">Also</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>One vice president <strong>described work as a never-ending nightmare, waking up every morning and wishing the day before "was just a bad dream."</strong> Another vice president said he was so worried others might notice his drinking problem that he would "keep losing half of what they are saying." By the sixth year, the participants, now in their mid-30s, had split into two camps: the 60% who remained "at war" with their bodies, and the remaining 40% who decided to prioritize their health...</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204062704577223623824944472.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth">And of course</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Some are addicted to prescription drugs like Adderall or Ritalin. To cope, they resort to "depersonalization,"</strong> a feeling of numbness toward the rest of the world. A few have been suicidal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe the Occupy movement's next strategy could just be some kind of counter-intuitive mind game encouraging investment bankers to work harder than ever, at which point they'll just sputter out and collapse. Of course, this could easily go the way of Michael Douglas in <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106856/">Falling Down</a></em>. In which case, please don't color that an endorsement.</p>
<p>Do you know any investment bankers who have lost their minds and their bodies on the job? Do you have any particularly great war stories from those trenches? Are you an investment banker currently in the throes of total, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iwK2jwqFfk">REEEDDRUMMMM</a>-like psychosis? Were you part of the study? If so, we'd love to hear <a href="mailto:fkamer@observer.com">some of your fun anecdotes</a>. Give us a shout!</p>
<p><em>fkamer@observer.com</em> | <a href="http://twitter.com/weareyourfek">@weareyourfek</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/02/investment-banking-bad-for-you-02152012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/120340269-e1312495894392.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/120340269-e1312495894392.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">People on Wall Street, Stressed: The Stock Image Collection.</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/120340269-e1312495894392.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">People on Wall Street, Stressed: The Stock Image Collection. </media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Grown-Up Science Fair Brings Waterfall Swing to New York (Video)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/09/grown-up-science-fair-brings-waterfall-swing-to-new-york-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:58:19 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/09/grown-up-science-fair-brings-waterfall-swing-to-new-york-video/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=185265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_185282" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/waterfall_swing1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-185282" title="waterfall_swing" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/waterfall_swing1.jpg?w=300&h=200" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Waterfall Swing</p></div></p>
<p>The New York Hall of Science was home to the <a href="http://makerfaire.com/">2nd Annual World Maker Faire</a> this past weekend, which is like a grown-up version of your middle school science fair, but much, much cooler. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLWru4YZnhQ">Robot drummers</a>! <a href="http://daily.makerfaire.com/constraints-make-human-dance">Super-fast dancing crutches</a>! Glasses that <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2011/09/double-rainbow-across-the-eyes.html">let you visualize sounds as double rainbows</a>! <a href="http://daily.makerfaire.com/the-comfy-chair">DIY comfy wheelchairs</a>! Most importantly, there was a Waterfall Swing, created by <a href="http://www.dash7design.com/">Dash 7 Designs</a>. Watch it in action:</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoHzvhWlct4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoHzvhWlct4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8JrQXxOQpo?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8JrQXxOQpo?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>We were a little dubious about this invention, since who among us didn't break a leg trying to hook up a water hose to a swing set when they were a kid? But the coolest part of the Waterfall Swing is that motion sensors activate the stream of water to keep you from falling off. This is <a href="http://www.dash7design.com/waterfall-swing/">Dash 5's technical explanation</a>, for those who understand such things:</p>
<blockquote><p>Towering steel swing set holding arrays of mechanical solenoids that  create a water plane falling in the path of its riders. Formed from a  tangent of ideas raised from the study of interactions of water as  space, the swing is the first in a series that play with interaction in  rides and installations. Riders pass through openings in a waterfall  created by precisely monitoring their path via axel-housed encoders,  creating the thrill of narrowly escaping obstacles.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hopefully this project will be more successful than New York's <a href="http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/31/35/31_35_sp_waterfalls_print.html">last waterfall-related experiment</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_185282" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/waterfall_swing1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-185282" title="waterfall_swing" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/waterfall_swing1.jpg?w=300&h=200" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Waterfall Swing</p></div></p>
<p>The New York Hall of Science was home to the <a href="http://makerfaire.com/">2nd Annual World Maker Faire</a> this past weekend, which is like a grown-up version of your middle school science fair, but much, much cooler. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLWru4YZnhQ">Robot drummers</a>! <a href="http://daily.makerfaire.com/constraints-make-human-dance">Super-fast dancing crutches</a>! Glasses that <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2011/09/double-rainbow-across-the-eyes.html">let you visualize sounds as double rainbows</a>! <a href="http://daily.makerfaire.com/the-comfy-chair">DIY comfy wheelchairs</a>! Most importantly, there was a Waterfall Swing, created by <a href="http://www.dash7design.com/">Dash 7 Designs</a>. Watch it in action:</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoHzvhWlct4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoHzvhWlct4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8JrQXxOQpo?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8JrQXxOQpo?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>We were a little dubious about this invention, since who among us didn't break a leg trying to hook up a water hose to a swing set when they were a kid? But the coolest part of the Waterfall Swing is that motion sensors activate the stream of water to keep you from falling off. This is <a href="http://www.dash7design.com/waterfall-swing/">Dash 5's technical explanation</a>, for those who understand such things:</p>
<blockquote><p>Towering steel swing set holding arrays of mechanical solenoids that  create a water plane falling in the path of its riders. Formed from a  tangent of ideas raised from the study of interactions of water as  space, the swing is the first in a series that play with interaction in  rides and installations. Riders pass through openings in a waterfall  created by precisely monitoring their path via axel-housed encoders,  creating the thrill of narrowly escaping obstacles.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hopefully this project will be more successful than New York's <a href="http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/31/35/31_35_sp_waterfalls_print.html">last waterfall-related experiment</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/09/grown-up-science-fair-brings-waterfall-swing-to-new-york-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/waterfall_swing1.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/waterfall_swing1.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">waterfall_swing</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/waterfall_swing1.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">waterfall_swing</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Hawking&#039;s Book Shoots to Top of Amazon Sales After He Denies God&#039;s Existence</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/09/hawkings-book-shoots-to-top-of-amazon-sales-after-he-denies-gods-existence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:48:53 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/09/hawkings-book-shoots-to-top-of-amazon-sales-after-he-denies-gods-existence/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/09/hawkings-book-shoots-to-top-of-amazon-sales-after-he-denies-gods-existence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101575576_1.jpg?w=218&h=300" />Yesterday, <em>The Times</em> of London printed <a href="/2010/culture/stephen-hawking-calls-creator-universe-redundant-awaits-his-response">excerpts from Stephen Hawking's new book </a><em>The Grand Design &mdash;&nbsp;</em>excerpts in which the renowned author and physicist casually called God "redundant" and explained how his existence is not essential to explaining creation. This caused quite the commotion among some members of God-centric religions. And as it often does, controversy is turning into book sales.</p>
<p><em>The Grand Design</em> has, in one day, gone from a science book only of interest because of Hawking's far-reaching name recognition to the hottest book on Amazon. It's currently <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_dp_ts_b_1">ranked number one in&nbsp;sales</a> among every book on the site, sitting above the three Steig Larsson books, <em>Freedom</em>, and all the other heavy hitters. To put its meteoric rise in perspective, let's compare these recent sales of Hawking's book to those of <em>Mockingjay</em>, the <a href="/2010/daily-transom/scholastic-goes-web-heavy-latest-book-club-iteration">publishing phenomenon</a> that has now been demoted to the number two spot on the Amazon bestseller list. Suzanne Collins' young adult novel has been in the top 100 for 220 days. <em>The Grand Design</em>, on the other hand, has been in the top 100 for two days. <em>Mockingjay </em>has 393 customer reviews. <em>The Grand Design</em> has 8.</p>
<p>The excerpts from the book prompted a response from religious figures from all parts of the world as they attempted to discount Hawking's logic and reaffirm God's importance.&nbsp;Jonathan Sacks, British Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregation, <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articles/509875-even-great-science-tells-us-nothing-about-god">slammed</a> Hawking's argument in an essay that ran beside it in <em>The Times</em> of London (though the article is still locked behind <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/has-rupert-murdochs-paywall-gamble-paid-off-2067907.html">Rupert Murdoch's paywall</a>). Dr. Rowan Williams &mdash; the Archbishop of Canterbury and head of the Church of England &mdash; said "physics on its own will not settle the question of why there is something rather than nothing," <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/09/03/hawking.god.universe.criticisms/#fbid=qn68NgKTlTS&amp;wom=false">CNN International reported</a>. As these attacks made the rounds, others spoke to <em>The Times</em> about how their faith could not take claims such as Hawking's seriously.</p>
<p>With hubbub not yet dying down, the number of copies of&nbsp;<em>The Grand Design</em>&nbsp;shipped will probably surge up until its Sept. 7 release date and after. If you only read one book this year in which physics explains the meaning of life, read this one!</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101575576_1.jpg?w=218&h=300" />Yesterday, <em>The Times</em> of London printed <a href="/2010/culture/stephen-hawking-calls-creator-universe-redundant-awaits-his-response">excerpts from Stephen Hawking's new book </a><em>The Grand Design &mdash;&nbsp;</em>excerpts in which the renowned author and physicist casually called God "redundant" and explained how his existence is not essential to explaining creation. This caused quite the commotion among some members of God-centric religions. And as it often does, controversy is turning into book sales.</p>
<p><em>The Grand Design</em> has, in one day, gone from a science book only of interest because of Hawking's far-reaching name recognition to the hottest book on Amazon. It's currently <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=pd_dp_ts_b_1">ranked number one in&nbsp;sales</a> among every book on the site, sitting above the three Steig Larsson books, <em>Freedom</em>, and all the other heavy hitters. To put its meteoric rise in perspective, let's compare these recent sales of Hawking's book to those of <em>Mockingjay</em>, the <a href="/2010/daily-transom/scholastic-goes-web-heavy-latest-book-club-iteration">publishing phenomenon</a> that has now been demoted to the number two spot on the Amazon bestseller list. Suzanne Collins' young adult novel has been in the top 100 for 220 days. <em>The Grand Design</em>, on the other hand, has been in the top 100 for two days. <em>Mockingjay </em>has 393 customer reviews. <em>The Grand Design</em> has 8.</p>
<p>The excerpts from the book prompted a response from religious figures from all parts of the world as they attempted to discount Hawking's logic and reaffirm God's importance.&nbsp;Jonathan Sacks, British Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregation, <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articles/509875-even-great-science-tells-us-nothing-about-god">slammed</a> Hawking's argument in an essay that ran beside it in <em>The Times</em> of London (though the article is still locked behind <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/has-rupert-murdochs-paywall-gamble-paid-off-2067907.html">Rupert Murdoch's paywall</a>). Dr. Rowan Williams &mdash; the Archbishop of Canterbury and head of the Church of England &mdash; said "physics on its own will not settle the question of why there is something rather than nothing," <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/09/03/hawking.god.universe.criticisms/#fbid=qn68NgKTlTS&amp;wom=false">CNN International reported</a>. As these attacks made the rounds, others spoke to <em>The Times</em> about how their faith could not take claims such as Hawking's seriously.</p>
<p>With hubbub not yet dying down, the number of copies of&nbsp;<em>The Grand Design</em>&nbsp;shipped will probably surge up until its Sept. 7 release date and after. If you only read one book this year in which physics explains the meaning of life, read this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/09/hawkings-book-shoots-to-top-of-amazon-sales-after-he-denies-gods-existence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101575576_1.jpg?w=218&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Stephen Hawking Calls Creator of Universe Redundant, Awaits His Response</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/09/stephen-hawking-calls-creator-of-universe-redundant-awaits-his-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:07:10 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/09/stephen-hawking-calls-creator-of-universe-redundant-awaits-his-response/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/09/stephen-hawking-calls-creator-of-universe-redundant-awaits-his-response/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101575576.jpg?w=218&h=300" />World-renowned author and physicist Stephen Hawking will reveal in his new book that a higher being would not have been needed in the creation of the universe, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6811FN20100902">Reuters </a>reports. In excerpts from <em>The Grand Design</em> &mdash; which Hawking co-wrote with fellow physicist-scholar Leonard Mlodinow &mdash; published today in <em><a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/">The Times<span style="font-style: normal"> of London</span></a></em>, Hawking claims that phenomena such as the law of gravity prove that creation will occur out of nothing and that this spontaneous creation explains how everything came to be. God, then, isn't really in the picture anymore. "It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going," reads the excerpt.</p>
<p>In previous works, such as <em>A Brief History of Time</em>, Hawking played coy on the subject. He's noted his personal thoughts regarding God's lack of existence, but instead of treating his beliefs as hard facts, he simply said creation theories did not need to name God as an agent. But these new opinions mark the first time Hawking has deemed a God-less conception of the universe the correct one.</p>
<p>Where did he get this idea from! There's some new evidence, the book states, that calls the idea that God made the galaxy in his image a bit presumptuous. The 1992 discovery of a planet orbiting a star other than our sun, for instance, indicates that our setup isn't that special. Hawking said this other example of celestial orbit "makes the coincidences of our planetary conditions &mdash; the single Sun, the lucky combination of Earth-Sun distance and solar mass, far less remarkable, and far less compelling evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us human beings."</p>
<p>Most who subscribe to a&nbsp;monotheistic religion will probably find themselves in stark disagreement with Hawking. Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregation and a believer in God, is already on the warpath. In a piece that's in today's <em><a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articles/509875-even-great-science-tells-us-nothing-about-god">Times</a><span style="font-style: normal"><a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articles/509875-even-great-science-tells-us-nothing-about-god">&nbsp;of London</a></span></em>, Sacks calls Hawking's claim a "misinterpretation" and works the old approach of arguing for the separation of science and religion.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Most of the Sacks essay, however, is stuck behind <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/has-rupert-murdochs-paywall-gamble-paid-off-2067907.html">Rupert Murdoch's paywall</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101575576.jpg?w=218&h=300" />World-renowned author and physicist Stephen Hawking will reveal in his new book that a higher being would not have been needed in the creation of the universe, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6811FN20100902">Reuters </a>reports. In excerpts from <em>The Grand Design</em> &mdash; which Hawking co-wrote with fellow physicist-scholar Leonard Mlodinow &mdash; published today in <em><a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/">The Times<span style="font-style: normal"> of London</span></a></em>, Hawking claims that phenomena such as the law of gravity prove that creation will occur out of nothing and that this spontaneous creation explains how everything came to be. God, then, isn't really in the picture anymore. "It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going," reads the excerpt.</p>
<p>In previous works, such as <em>A Brief History of Time</em>, Hawking played coy on the subject. He's noted his personal thoughts regarding God's lack of existence, but instead of treating his beliefs as hard facts, he simply said creation theories did not need to name God as an agent. But these new opinions mark the first time Hawking has deemed a God-less conception of the universe the correct one.</p>
<p>Where did he get this idea from! There's some new evidence, the book states, that calls the idea that God made the galaxy in his image a bit presumptuous. The 1992 discovery of a planet orbiting a star other than our sun, for instance, indicates that our setup isn't that special. Hawking said this other example of celestial orbit "makes the coincidences of our planetary conditions &mdash; the single Sun, the lucky combination of Earth-Sun distance and solar mass, far less remarkable, and far less compelling evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us human beings."</p>
<p>Most who subscribe to a&nbsp;monotheistic religion will probably find themselves in stark disagreement with Hawking. Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregation and a believer in God, is already on the warpath. In a piece that's in today's <em><a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articles/509875-even-great-science-tells-us-nothing-about-god">Times</a><span style="font-style: normal"><a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articles/509875-even-great-science-tells-us-nothing-about-god">&nbsp;of London</a></span></em>, Sacks calls Hawking's claim a "misinterpretation" and works the old approach of arguing for the separation of science and religion.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Most of the Sacks essay, however, is stuck behind <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/has-rupert-murdochs-paywall-gamble-paid-off-2067907.html">Rupert Murdoch's paywall</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/09/stephen-hawking-calls-creator-of-universe-redundant-awaits-his-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/101575576.jpg?w=218&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Ant Scientists Are &#039;Baffled&#039; by &#039;Mind-Boggling&#039; Artists</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/08/ant-scientists-are-baffled-by-mindboggling-artists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:02:30 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/08/ant-scientists-are-baffled-by-mindboggling-artists/</link>
			<dc:creator>Evan Mulvihill</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/08/ant-scientists-are-baffled-by-mindboggling-artists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/3382483.jpg?w=243&h=300" />What is <em>wrong</em> with artists these days? They&rsquo;re feeding ants <a title="click to read about sad ants and the artists that abuse them" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/science/24ants.html" target="_blank">all the wrong foods</a>, as the <em>Times</em>&rsquo; once-a-week Science section gloriously puts on display, just so they can make derivative art <a href="http://www.traditioninaction.org/Cultural/images/D012_Hirst_Cowhead_PdeV_2-25-05.jpg" target="_blank">in the style of</a> Damien Hirst, who, as we reported before, may be <a href="/2010/politics/end-damien-hirst-era">past his prime</a>. The Science section thankfully gives science and its practictioners a platform for taking these art-world people's ant installations to task. Otherwise, artists might get away with making a global statement about the terribleness of McDonald's by feeding ants hamburgers and McCafe Smoothies. Which are bad for you.</p>
<p>Entomologist Colin S. Brent, who practices professional bug-ology for the Federal Department of Foods and Agriculture. "My first response as a scientist would be bafflement as to why Pogonomyrmex was chosen." He is not baffled by the long and complicated-to-pronounce name of the ants, which are more cutely known as "Pogos." He is baffled because, in the wild, these ants live off seeds. Desert seeds. "They might enjoy the sesame seeds on the buns, but that would be about it."</p>
<p>Combination-style paleo-entomologist Michael S. Engel, who went a little easier on the artist. "If I had to toss in a particular group of ants into an enclosure to see how well they were going to thrive off junk food. I'd throw in generalist carnivores and omnivores like army ants."</p>
<p>Bert H&ouml;lldobler, a Pulitzer-Prize-winning pr&ouml;fessor who knows so much about ants that he c&ouml;-authored a book... called <em>The Ants</em>. "I have been asked repeatedly to help artists to fill their creations with ants. Some of the proposals were quite mind-boggling." You shut 'em down, H&ouml;lldobler.</p>
<p>The artist behind the piece, Elizabeth Demaray,&nbsp;<a href="http://ur.rutgers.edu/experts/index.php?a=display&amp;f=expert&amp;id=1262" target="_blank">works at Rutgers</a> as an Assistant Professor, but was unfortunately "out of the office," and could not return requests for comment. By the way, all of the ants in the exhibit are dying. But the ones that are surviving are really loving those tasty little seeds with which McDonald's so graciously sprinkes their buns.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/3382483.jpg?w=243&h=300" />What is <em>wrong</em> with artists these days? They&rsquo;re feeding ants <a title="click to read about sad ants and the artists that abuse them" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/science/24ants.html" target="_blank">all the wrong foods</a>, as the <em>Times</em>&rsquo; once-a-week Science section gloriously puts on display, just so they can make derivative art <a href="http://www.traditioninaction.org/Cultural/images/D012_Hirst_Cowhead_PdeV_2-25-05.jpg" target="_blank">in the style of</a> Damien Hirst, who, as we reported before, may be <a href="/2010/politics/end-damien-hirst-era">past his prime</a>. The Science section thankfully gives science and its practictioners a platform for taking these art-world people's ant installations to task. Otherwise, artists might get away with making a global statement about the terribleness of McDonald's by feeding ants hamburgers and McCafe Smoothies. Which are bad for you.</p>
<p>Entomologist Colin S. Brent, who practices professional bug-ology for the Federal Department of Foods and Agriculture. "My first response as a scientist would be bafflement as to why Pogonomyrmex was chosen." He is not baffled by the long and complicated-to-pronounce name of the ants, which are more cutely known as "Pogos." He is baffled because, in the wild, these ants live off seeds. Desert seeds. "They might enjoy the sesame seeds on the buns, but that would be about it."</p>
<p>Combination-style paleo-entomologist Michael S. Engel, who went a little easier on the artist. "If I had to toss in a particular group of ants into an enclosure to see how well they were going to thrive off junk food. I'd throw in generalist carnivores and omnivores like army ants."</p>
<p>Bert H&ouml;lldobler, a Pulitzer-Prize-winning pr&ouml;fessor who knows so much about ants that he c&ouml;-authored a book... called <em>The Ants</em>. "I have been asked repeatedly to help artists to fill their creations with ants. Some of the proposals were quite mind-boggling." You shut 'em down, H&ouml;lldobler.</p>
<p>The artist behind the piece, Elizabeth Demaray,&nbsp;<a href="http://ur.rutgers.edu/experts/index.php?a=display&amp;f=expert&amp;id=1262" target="_blank">works at Rutgers</a> as an Assistant Professor, but was unfortunately "out of the office," and could not return requests for comment. By the way, all of the ants in the exhibit are dying. But the ones that are surviving are really loving those tasty little seeds with which McDonald's so graciously sprinkes their buns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/08/ant-scientists-are-baffled-by-mindboggling-artists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/3382483.jpg?w=243&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Horrible Scientist Makes Young People Turn Off Phones and Stare Into Each Other&#039;s Eyes</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/08/horrible-scientist-makes-young-people-turn-off-phones-and-stare-into-each-others-eyes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:50:39 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/08/horrible-scientist-makes-young-people-turn-off-phones-and-stare-into-each-others-eyes/</link>
			<dc:creator>Molly Fischer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/08/horrible-scientist-makes-young-people-turn-off-phones-and-stare-into-each-others-eyes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/friendstab2.jpg?w=300&h=296" />As you may <a href="http://www.theshallowsbook.com/nicholascarr/The_Shallows.html" target="_blank">have heard</a>, the internet and iPhones and everything are ruining our ability to think about hard stuff and interact with our fellow humans.</p>
<p><em>The Guardian</em>'s John Harris <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/aug/20/internet-altering-your-mind" target="_blank">talked to the scientists</a> who study such problems. Dr. Gary Small of UCLA, for example, said that he sometimes tries to "retrain" his technology-addled students:</p>
<blockquote><p>"When I go to colleges and talk to students, I have them do one of our face-to-face human contact exercises: 'Turn to someone next to you, preferably someone you don't know, turn off your mobile device.' One person talks and the other one listens, and maintains eye contact. That's very powerful. One pair of kids started dating after they'd done it."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dr. Gary Small apparently does not realize that avoiding conversations is a carefully honed skill, not a disability.&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/friendstab2.jpg?w=300&h=296" />As you may <a href="http://www.theshallowsbook.com/nicholascarr/The_Shallows.html" target="_blank">have heard</a>, the internet and iPhones and everything are ruining our ability to think about hard stuff and interact with our fellow humans.</p>
<p><em>The Guardian</em>'s John Harris <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/aug/20/internet-altering-your-mind" target="_blank">talked to the scientists</a> who study such problems. Dr. Gary Small of UCLA, for example, said that he sometimes tries to "retrain" his technology-addled students:</p>
<blockquote><p>"When I go to colleges and talk to students, I have them do one of our face-to-face human contact exercises: 'Turn to someone next to you, preferably someone you don't know, turn off your mobile device.' One person talks and the other one listens, and maintains eye contact. That's very powerful. One pair of kids started dating after they'd done it."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dr. Gary Small apparently does not realize that avoiding conversations is a carefully honed skill, not a disability.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/08/horrible-scientist-makes-young-people-turn-off-phones-and-stare-into-each-others-eyes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/friendstab2.jpg?w=300&#38;h=296" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>&#039;Cougars&#039; May Be As Real As Bigfoot</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/08/cougars-may-be-as-real-as-bigfoot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:12:09 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/08/cougars-may-be-as-real-as-bigfoot/</link>
			<dc:creator>Steve Huff</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/08/cougars-may-be-as-real-as-bigfoot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/293-cox_-courteney-lc_-102709.jpg?w=185&h=300" />Australian researchers took to dating websites to study 22,400 singles profiles and they made a potentially startling discovery: across all cultures studied, women tend to go for older men or men in their own age group. Michael Dunn, of the Dept. of Psychology at the University of Wales, had researchers cull data from singles in 14 countries. He told the Australian Associated Press that he does believe "the cougar phenomenon is a myth" and "a media construct." It isn't exactly that cougars don't exist at all, Dunn said, it's just that they are rarer than their male counterparts. According to Dunn, there is "copious evidence revealing a distinctive preference by men for youthful women."</p>
<p><a href="http://abc.go.com/shows/cougar-town" target="_blank">Courtney Cox will be so disappointed</a>.</p>
<p>[<em><a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/study-finds-cougar-phenomenon-a-myth-20100818-12epa.html" target="_blank">Sydney Morning Herald</a></em>]</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/293-cox_-courteney-lc_-102709.jpg?w=185&h=300" />Australian researchers took to dating websites to study 22,400 singles profiles and they made a potentially startling discovery: across all cultures studied, women tend to go for older men or men in their own age group. Michael Dunn, of the Dept. of Psychology at the University of Wales, had researchers cull data from singles in 14 countries. He told the Australian Associated Press that he does believe "the cougar phenomenon is a myth" and "a media construct." It isn't exactly that cougars don't exist at all, Dunn said, it's just that they are rarer than their male counterparts. According to Dunn, there is "copious evidence revealing a distinctive preference by men for youthful women."</p>
<p><a href="http://abc.go.com/shows/cougar-town" target="_blank">Courtney Cox will be so disappointed</a>.</p>
<p>[<em><a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/study-finds-cougar-phenomenon-a-myth-20100818-12epa.html" target="_blank">Sydney Morning Herald</a></em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/08/cougars-may-be-as-real-as-bigfoot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/293-cox_-courteney-lc_-102709.jpg?w=185&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
