<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Terrorists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/terrorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Video: Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Calling Occupy Wall Street &#8216;Terrorists,&#8217; in Review of Jesus Christ Superstar</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/05/video-oreilly-occupy-terrorists-fox-news-jesus-christ-superstar-05222012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:44:10 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/05/video-oreilly-occupy-terrorists-fox-news-jesus-christ-superstar-05222012/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=241761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fox-news-terrorism.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-241774" title="fox news terrorism" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fox-news-terrorism.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><em>New York Times</em> drama critics, protect your neck: Bill O'Reilly is now reviewing The Theatre for Fox News, and doing it with such urgency that he must join the network <em>by phone</em> to do so. This week, Bill took the time to review <em>Jesus Christ Superstar</em>, currently playing on Broadway.</p>
<p>And during that review, he somehow managed to note the Occupy movement as terrorists.</p>
<p>Apparently, some guy started giving Bill a hard time leaving The Theatre. Usually, people get harassed at the theatre because they didn't turn off their cell phone. We have no proof Bill O'Reilly didn't turn off his cell phone. We also have no proof that he did.</p>
<p>Anyway, the money quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>"<strong>This Occupy Wall Street movement is now very coordinated and they are terrorists</strong>. They are trying to create trouble, that’s what terrorists do.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, some people might take umbrage with this definition—like Occupy Wall Street and civil rights advocates—who'd argue that they're using their first amendment to practice free speech, who could then—based on O'Reilly's logic—reasonably equivocate blowing up buildings with free speech.</p>
<p>But that wouldn't make sense, because Occupy Wall Street hasn't killed anyone.</p>
<p>They have, however, had more cayenne pepper sprayed in their face than two weeks worth of pretty decent tamales. They also did not sink the global economy. So they've got that going for them.</p>
<p>Want to see? Of course you do.</p>
<p>Here. His ditty starts at about 1:34:</p>
<p>http://youtu.be/spE6yBn0xzo</p>
<p>More importantly, perhaps, is the fact that Bill O'Reilly saw <em>Jesus Christ Superstar</em>.</p>
<p>This musical:</p>
<p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AIRBpW1drE</p>
<p>On Broadway.</p>
<p>Bill O'Reilly hates Jesus.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.animalnewyork.com/2012/oreilly-calls-occupy-protesters-well-funded-terrorists/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=oreilly-calls-occupy-protesters-well-funded-terrorists" target="_blank">ANIMAL NY</a>]</p>
<p><em>fkamer@observer.com</em> | <a href="http://www.twitter.com/weareyourfek" target="_blank">@weareyourfek</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fox-news-terrorism.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-241774" title="fox news terrorism" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fox-news-terrorism.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><em>New York Times</em> drama critics, protect your neck: Bill O'Reilly is now reviewing The Theatre for Fox News, and doing it with such urgency that he must join the network <em>by phone</em> to do so. This week, Bill took the time to review <em>Jesus Christ Superstar</em>, currently playing on Broadway.</p>
<p>And during that review, he somehow managed to note the Occupy movement as terrorists.</p>
<p>Apparently, some guy started giving Bill a hard time leaving The Theatre. Usually, people get harassed at the theatre because they didn't turn off their cell phone. We have no proof Bill O'Reilly didn't turn off his cell phone. We also have no proof that he did.</p>
<p>Anyway, the money quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>"<strong>This Occupy Wall Street movement is now very coordinated and they are terrorists</strong>. They are trying to create trouble, that’s what terrorists do.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, some people might take umbrage with this definition—like Occupy Wall Street and civil rights advocates—who'd argue that they're using their first amendment to practice free speech, who could then—based on O'Reilly's logic—reasonably equivocate blowing up buildings with free speech.</p>
<p>But that wouldn't make sense, because Occupy Wall Street hasn't killed anyone.</p>
<p>They have, however, had more cayenne pepper sprayed in their face than two weeks worth of pretty decent tamales. They also did not sink the global economy. So they've got that going for them.</p>
<p>Want to see? Of course you do.</p>
<p>Here. His ditty starts at about 1:34:</p>
<p>http://youtu.be/spE6yBn0xzo</p>
<p>More importantly, perhaps, is the fact that Bill O'Reilly saw <em>Jesus Christ Superstar</em>.</p>
<p>This musical:</p>
<p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AIRBpW1drE</p>
<p>On Broadway.</p>
<p>Bill O'Reilly hates Jesus.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.animalnewyork.com/2012/oreilly-calls-occupy-protesters-well-funded-terrorists/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=oreilly-calls-occupy-protesters-well-funded-terrorists" target="_blank">ANIMAL NY</a>]</p>
<p><em>fkamer@observer.com</em> | <a href="http://www.twitter.com/weareyourfek" target="_blank">@weareyourfek</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/05/video-oreilly-occupy-terrorists-fox-news-jesus-christ-superstar-05222012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fox-news-terrorism.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fox-news-terrorism.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fox news terrorism</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f8ca6f7b44ae87c74e4272334c526ad?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fkamerobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fox-news-terrorism.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fox news terrorism</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Are the Terrorists Winning? Bomb Scare Nixes Deliveries to NYC Buildings</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/are-the-terrorists-winning-bomb-scare-nixes-deliveries-to-nyc-buildings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:18:38 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/are-the-terrorists-winning-bomb-scare-nixes-deliveries-to-nyc-buildings/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Chaban</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/are-the-terrorists-winning-bomb-scare-nixes-deliveries-to-nyc-buildings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/65_broadway.jpg?w=201&h=300" />Terrorism. The name says it all. Al Qaeda and groups like it are dead set on not only causing physical harm but also exacting a much wider psychic toll. After Friday's failed bomb plot, they seem to have succeeded in an unusual way here in the city</p>
<p>Even though the bombs were bound for Chicago, London and Dubai, at least three of the city's buildings have put the kibosh on deliveries from Fed Ex and UPS. (Is DSW somehow still safe?)&nbsp; The <em>Post</em> is <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/threat_makes_rod_take_walk_dC6bOkvn1JqkfnF9OEFjhM?CMP=OTC-rss&amp;FEEDNAME=">reporting</a> that <a href="/2010/real-estate/how-build-most-successful-building-all-time-87000-pieces-limestone">the Greatest Building Ever</a>, 15 Central Park West, is refusing to accept packages from the two companies while the <em>News</em> has <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/10/31/2010-10-31_city_building_puts_ban_on_ups__fedex.html">the news</a> that 55 and 61 Broadway, two office buildings downtown, were turning away deliveries.</p>
<p>Tenants were not entirely thrilled. "It's ridiculous," attorney Seth Kaufman, who works in one of the offices, told the <em>News</em>. "They have to be able to make deliveries. It's New York."</p>
<p>Amen to that! Hopefully this is simply a temporary scare and not a permanent overreaction. Sure, the U.S.-bound planes were <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2010/1029/Suspicious-UPS-FedEx-packages-raise-new-concerns-about-Al-Qaeda-in-Yemen">redirected to JFK</a> by F-16s, but this seems like a little much.</p>
<p>If you've had your own unusual experiences with deliveries of late, or heard of others' problems, do let us know in the comments or at the addresses below.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>An earlier version of this story listed one of the affected office buildings as 65 Broadway, not 55 Broadway, based on the <em>Daily News</em>' report. An representative for 65 Broadway called to say that was the wrong building.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:mchaban@observer.com">mchaban [at] observer.com</a> </strong>|<strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/MC_NYO">@mc_nyo</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/65_broadway.jpg?w=201&h=300" />Terrorism. The name says it all. Al Qaeda and groups like it are dead set on not only causing physical harm but also exacting a much wider psychic toll. After Friday's failed bomb plot, they seem to have succeeded in an unusual way here in the city</p>
<p>Even though the bombs were bound for Chicago, London and Dubai, at least three of the city's buildings have put the kibosh on deliveries from Fed Ex and UPS. (Is DSW somehow still safe?)&nbsp; The <em>Post</em> is <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/threat_makes_rod_take_walk_dC6bOkvn1JqkfnF9OEFjhM?CMP=OTC-rss&amp;FEEDNAME=">reporting</a> that <a href="/2010/real-estate/how-build-most-successful-building-all-time-87000-pieces-limestone">the Greatest Building Ever</a>, 15 Central Park West, is refusing to accept packages from the two companies while the <em>News</em> has <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/10/31/2010-10-31_city_building_puts_ban_on_ups__fedex.html">the news</a> that 55 and 61 Broadway, two office buildings downtown, were turning away deliveries.</p>
<p>Tenants were not entirely thrilled. "It's ridiculous," attorney Seth Kaufman, who works in one of the offices, told the <em>News</em>. "They have to be able to make deliveries. It's New York."</p>
<p>Amen to that! Hopefully this is simply a temporary scare and not a permanent overreaction. Sure, the U.S.-bound planes were <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2010/1029/Suspicious-UPS-FedEx-packages-raise-new-concerns-about-Al-Qaeda-in-Yemen">redirected to JFK</a> by F-16s, but this seems like a little much.</p>
<p>If you've had your own unusual experiences with deliveries of late, or heard of others' problems, do let us know in the comments or at the addresses below.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>An earlier version of this story listed one of the affected office buildings as 65 Broadway, not 55 Broadway, based on the <em>Daily News</em>' report. An representative for 65 Broadway called to say that was the wrong building.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:mchaban@observer.com">mchaban [at] observer.com</a> </strong>|<strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/MC_NYO">@mc_nyo</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/are-the-terrorists-winning-bomb-scare-nixes-deliveries-to-nyc-buildings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/65_broadway.jpg?w=201&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
