<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; The Lovely Bones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/the-lovely-bones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Box Office Breakdown: Redundancy Rules as Avatar Wins Again</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-redundancy-rules-as-iavatari-wins-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:25:31 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-redundancy-rules-as-iavatari-wins-again/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-redundancy-rules-as-iavatari-wins-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/avatargirl_0.jpg?w=300&h=168" />Stop us if you've heard this one before: <em>Avatar</em> is the number one movie in America! For the <em>sixth</em> weekend in a row, James Cameron's wild blue epic <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2010&amp;wknd=04&amp;p=.htm">topped the charts and shattered records in the process</a>&mdash;its $36 million haul is the largest sixth weekend gross for any film in history, beating the previously held mark by <em>Titanic</em>. (Something tells us that won't be the only time we mention <em>Avatar</em> beating <em>Titanic</em> in the coming weeks.) For the new releases, things weren't as historic: <em>Legion </em>surprised with a decent showing in second place; <em>The Tooth Fairy</em> disappointed in fourth; and <em>Extraordinary Measures</em> really disappointed, landing in seventh place with a pedestrian $7 million. Not that anyone thought it was going to do well, right? Err, <a href="/2010/culture/opening-weekend-where-are-good-movies">never mind</a>. As we do each Monday, here's a breakdown of the top five at the box office.</p>
<p><strong>1.<em> Avatar</em>: $36 million ($552.7 million total)</strong></p>
<p>And then there was one. On Saturday, <em>Avatar</em> passed <em>The Dark Knight </em>to become the second highest domestic grosser ever, leaving only <em>Titanic </em>as the last film standing between Pandora and U.S. history. At just over $48 million away from <em>Titanic</em>'s record domestic number of $600.8 million, and with ridiculously small attrition rates&mdash;<em>Avatar</em> dipped just 16 percent this weekend&mdash;expect the big ship to go down sometime around the weekend of February 5th. And as if that weren't enough, later today James Cameron will officially become King of the <em>World</em>... all over again. <em>Avatar</em>'s worldwide total now stands at $1.84 billion, meaning its just $2 million shy of tying <em>Titanic</em>'s worldwide record. Ka-ching.</p>
<p><strong>2.<em> Legion</em>: $18.2 million ($18.2 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Considering <em>Legion</em> only cost a reported $25 million to make and featured Paul Bettany as an action hero-cum-angel (!), finishing as runner-up to <em>Avatar</em> with $18.2 million is nothing to sneeze at&mdash;bear in mind, its prohibitive R-rating didn't stop it from beating the kid-friendly, star-heavy <em>The Tooth Fairy</em>. The only quibble we can see? Screen Gems, the low-budget horror label from Sony, got <em>Underworld: Rise of Lycans</em> to $20.8 million on this weekend last year. If only <em>Legion</em> featured vampires and werewolves...</p>
<p><strong>3.<em> The Book of Eli</em>: $17 million ($62 million total)</strong></p>
<p>When you're dealing with the month of January, a 48 percent drop from weekend to weekend constitutes legs. With that in mind, hello to <em>The Book of Eli</em>! There is a lot to like here for Warner Brothers, not the least of which being that <em>Eli</em> had to tangle with the aforementioned <em>Legion</em> in the race to get post-apocalyptic dollars from moviegoers and still held its own. More good news: with $62 million already, <em>Eli</em> is on course to become the fourth highest grossing movie of Denzel Washington's career, behind only <em>American Gangster</em>, <em>Remember the Titans</em> and <em>The Pelican Brief</em>. We're guessing neither the Academy Award-winning star (nor his character in <em>The Book of Eli</em>, wink!) saw this kind of result coming.</p>
<p><strong>4.<em> The Tooth Fairy</em>: $14.5 million ($14.5 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Dwayne Johnson, thy name is stagnant. Despite possessing loads of charisma and tons of positive press, the man formerly known as The Rock can't seem to break out at the box office. The opening for <em>The Tooth Fairy</em> is a disappointment no matter how you color it: not only is it down from his previous forays into family entertainment&mdash;<em>Race to Witch Mountain</em> opened with $24 million last spring; <em>The Game Plan</em> started with $22 million in 2008&mdash;but it also falls under the average opening for his more masculine efforts. If the star can figure out how to combine both audiences, he could have something substantial. Until then, though, he's a better-liked Vin Diesel.</p>
<p><strong>5. <em>The Lovely Bones</em>: $8.8 million ($31.6 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Peter Jackson's much derided adaptation of Alice Sebold's best-selling novel barely held off <em>Sherlock Holmes</em> ($7.1 million/$191.5 million total) to finish in fifth place after dropping a reasonable 48 percent from its wide release last weekend. Call this a case of managing expectations: when <em>The Lovely Bones</em> was first announced, it seemed like a slam-dunk financial success and Oscar-contender. However after terrible reviews and atrocious returns in limited release, a final domestic tally of around $45 million has to be viewed by Paramount as a victory. They got as much out of this lemon as they possibly could.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/avatargirl_0.jpg?w=300&h=168" />Stop us if you've heard this one before: <em>Avatar</em> is the number one movie in America! For the <em>sixth</em> weekend in a row, James Cameron's wild blue epic <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2010&amp;wknd=04&amp;p=.htm">topped the charts and shattered records in the process</a>&mdash;its $36 million haul is the largest sixth weekend gross for any film in history, beating the previously held mark by <em>Titanic</em>. (Something tells us that won't be the only time we mention <em>Avatar</em> beating <em>Titanic</em> in the coming weeks.) For the new releases, things weren't as historic: <em>Legion </em>surprised with a decent showing in second place; <em>The Tooth Fairy</em> disappointed in fourth; and <em>Extraordinary Measures</em> really disappointed, landing in seventh place with a pedestrian $7 million. Not that anyone thought it was going to do well, right? Err, <a href="/2010/culture/opening-weekend-where-are-good-movies">never mind</a>. As we do each Monday, here's a breakdown of the top five at the box office.</p>
<p><strong>1.<em> Avatar</em>: $36 million ($552.7 million total)</strong></p>
<p>And then there was one. On Saturday, <em>Avatar</em> passed <em>The Dark Knight </em>to become the second highest domestic grosser ever, leaving only <em>Titanic </em>as the last film standing between Pandora and U.S. history. At just over $48 million away from <em>Titanic</em>'s record domestic number of $600.8 million, and with ridiculously small attrition rates&mdash;<em>Avatar</em> dipped just 16 percent this weekend&mdash;expect the big ship to go down sometime around the weekend of February 5th. And as if that weren't enough, later today James Cameron will officially become King of the <em>World</em>... all over again. <em>Avatar</em>'s worldwide total now stands at $1.84 billion, meaning its just $2 million shy of tying <em>Titanic</em>'s worldwide record. Ka-ching.</p>
<p><strong>2.<em> Legion</em>: $18.2 million ($18.2 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Considering <em>Legion</em> only cost a reported $25 million to make and featured Paul Bettany as an action hero-cum-angel (!), finishing as runner-up to <em>Avatar</em> with $18.2 million is nothing to sneeze at&mdash;bear in mind, its prohibitive R-rating didn't stop it from beating the kid-friendly, star-heavy <em>The Tooth Fairy</em>. The only quibble we can see? Screen Gems, the low-budget horror label from Sony, got <em>Underworld: Rise of Lycans</em> to $20.8 million on this weekend last year. If only <em>Legion</em> featured vampires and werewolves...</p>
<p><strong>3.<em> The Book of Eli</em>: $17 million ($62 million total)</strong></p>
<p>When you're dealing with the month of January, a 48 percent drop from weekend to weekend constitutes legs. With that in mind, hello to <em>The Book of Eli</em>! There is a lot to like here for Warner Brothers, not the least of which being that <em>Eli</em> had to tangle with the aforementioned <em>Legion</em> in the race to get post-apocalyptic dollars from moviegoers and still held its own. More good news: with $62 million already, <em>Eli</em> is on course to become the fourth highest grossing movie of Denzel Washington's career, behind only <em>American Gangster</em>, <em>Remember the Titans</em> and <em>The Pelican Brief</em>. We're guessing neither the Academy Award-winning star (nor his character in <em>The Book of Eli</em>, wink!) saw this kind of result coming.</p>
<p><strong>4.<em> The Tooth Fairy</em>: $14.5 million ($14.5 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Dwayne Johnson, thy name is stagnant. Despite possessing loads of charisma and tons of positive press, the man formerly known as The Rock can't seem to break out at the box office. The opening for <em>The Tooth Fairy</em> is a disappointment no matter how you color it: not only is it down from his previous forays into family entertainment&mdash;<em>Race to Witch Mountain</em> opened with $24 million last spring; <em>The Game Plan</em> started with $22 million in 2008&mdash;but it also falls under the average opening for his more masculine efforts. If the star can figure out how to combine both audiences, he could have something substantial. Until then, though, he's a better-liked Vin Diesel.</p>
<p><strong>5. <em>The Lovely Bones</em>: $8.8 million ($31.6 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Peter Jackson's much derided adaptation of Alice Sebold's best-selling novel barely held off <em>Sherlock Holmes</em> ($7.1 million/$191.5 million total) to finish in fifth place after dropping a reasonable 48 percent from its wide release last weekend. Call this a case of managing expectations: when <em>The Lovely Bones</em> was first announced, it seemed like a slam-dunk financial success and Oscar-contender. However after terrible reviews and atrocious returns in limited release, a final domestic tally of around $45 million has to be viewed by Paramount as a victory. They got as much out of this lemon as they possibly could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-redundancy-rules-as-iavatari-wins-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/avatargirl_0.jpg?w=300&#38;h=168" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Box Office Breakdown: Not Even Denzel Can Stop The King of the World</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-not-even-denzel-can-stop-the-king-of-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:36:29 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-not-even-denzel-can-stop-the-king-of-the-world/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-not-even-denzel-can-stop-the-king-of-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/avatarpeepsatglobes.jpg?w=300&h=205" />Three cheers for <em>The Book of Eli</em>! The post-apocalyptic film (a.k.a. <em>The Road</em> for Dummies) pulled down $38 million over the Martin Luther King holiday, and $32.7 million from Friday-to-Sunday, which was good for the third biggest January opening ever. <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2010&amp;wknd=03a&amp;p=">And yet it still didn't even come close to finishing in first place</a>. That's because now in week five, <em>Avatar</em> shows no signs of slowing down. To wit: its $54.6 million four-day haul was higher than any January opening weekend ever and set a record for the Martin Luther King holiday frame. As we do each Tuesday, here's a breakdown of the top five at the box office.</p>
<p><strong>1.<em> Avatar</em>: $54.6 million ($505 million total)</strong></p>
<p>On Saturday <em>Avatar</em> passed <em>Star Wars</em> to become the third highest grossing movie of all time. And at the rates <em>Avatar</em> is receding&mdash;which is to say, not at all; over the holiday it actually <em>rose</em> 9 percent from last weekend&mdash;it will pass <em>The Dark Knight</em> next week and could eventually even top <em>Titanic</em>. Speaking of the soon-to-be former biggest movie ever, internationally <em>Avatar</em> is already at $1.6 billion, meaning it should grab <em>Titanic</em>'s global crown sometime at the end of the month. In a word: gasp. And we didn't even mention the Golden Globe wins for James Cameron and the film itself, which probably fully cement <em>Avatar</em> as the Oscar frontrunner (not that the Globes mean anything, but they kinda do). We can't be the only ones who think <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/121061/saturday-night-live-digital-short-laser-cats-5">James Cameron's <em>Laser Cats 5</em></a> would gross at least $250 million, right?</p>
<p><strong>2.<em> The Book of Eli</em>: $38 million ($38 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Who needs John Travolta anyway? Certainly not Denzel Washington. After stumbling over the summer with mediocre returns for <em>Taking of Pelham 1 2 3</em>, Denzel returned to theaters and almost found career best numbers for <em>The Book of Eli</em>. For the record, this is the second best opening of Mr. Washington's lengthy career, behind only <em>American Gangster</em>, and based on the per screen averages (over $12,000), it could have good legs through the end of the month. Somewhere, Harvey Weinstein is wondering why he wasn't able to get numbers like this for <em>The Road</em> and probably cursing up a storm while doing so.</p>
<p><strong>3.<em> The Lovely Bones</em>: $20.5 million ($21 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Stuck in the in-between of failed limited release for the past five weeks, <em>The Lovely Bones</em> finally went wide this weekend and found itself a respectable $20.5 million in the process. As The Weinstein Company learned with <em>Nine</em> (a dismal $18 million total after five weeks), when an Oscar hopeful gets destroyed by the critics, finding any audience is borderline impossible. Credit then to Paramont for getting <em>The Lovely Bones</em> off ground. The studio refocused the ad campaign from "awards bait" to "'tween girls and a whodunit" and it worked. We doubt the future for <em>Bones</em> is bright, but at least it'll wind up with better numbers than <em>Nine</em>.</p>
<p><strong>4.<em> Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel</em>: $15 million ($196 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Further proof the end of the world is nigh: <em>Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel</em> dipped just 9 percent over the weekend and will now cross $200 million sometime this week. For those of you without intimate knowledge of the grosses for the original <em>Alvin and the Chipmunks</em>, that means the squeakquel will gross even more before all is said and done. As the saying goes: fool us once, shame on you; fool us twice... and start buying canned tuna fish and Twinkies.</p>
<p><strong>5. <em>The Spy Next Door</em>: $13 million ($13 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Jackie Chan is back! Kinda! The much-derided <em>The Spy Next Door</em> barely held off <em>Sherlock Holmes</em> (starring Golden Globe winner Robert Downey Jr.; huh?) to finish in fifth place over the holiday. Don't expect much more from this title&mdash;it should be on DVD by March&mdash;but it bodes a bit well for <em>The Karate Kid</em> remake co-starring Mr. Chan as Mr. Miyagi. If something as bad as this can gross $13 million, what can a slick remake of a classic gross? Probably more than we would like.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/avatarpeepsatglobes.jpg?w=300&h=205" />Three cheers for <em>The Book of Eli</em>! The post-apocalyptic film (a.k.a. <em>The Road</em> for Dummies) pulled down $38 million over the Martin Luther King holiday, and $32.7 million from Friday-to-Sunday, which was good for the third biggest January opening ever. <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2010&amp;wknd=03a&amp;p=">And yet it still didn't even come close to finishing in first place</a>. That's because now in week five, <em>Avatar</em> shows no signs of slowing down. To wit: its $54.6 million four-day haul was higher than any January opening weekend ever and set a record for the Martin Luther King holiday frame. As we do each Tuesday, here's a breakdown of the top five at the box office.</p>
<p><strong>1.<em> Avatar</em>: $54.6 million ($505 million total)</strong></p>
<p>On Saturday <em>Avatar</em> passed <em>Star Wars</em> to become the third highest grossing movie of all time. And at the rates <em>Avatar</em> is receding&mdash;which is to say, not at all; over the holiday it actually <em>rose</em> 9 percent from last weekend&mdash;it will pass <em>The Dark Knight</em> next week and could eventually even top <em>Titanic</em>. Speaking of the soon-to-be former biggest movie ever, internationally <em>Avatar</em> is already at $1.6 billion, meaning it should grab <em>Titanic</em>'s global crown sometime at the end of the month. In a word: gasp. And we didn't even mention the Golden Globe wins for James Cameron and the film itself, which probably fully cement <em>Avatar</em> as the Oscar frontrunner (not that the Globes mean anything, but they kinda do). We can't be the only ones who think <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/121061/saturday-night-live-digital-short-laser-cats-5">James Cameron's <em>Laser Cats 5</em></a> would gross at least $250 million, right?</p>
<p><strong>2.<em> The Book of Eli</em>: $38 million ($38 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Who needs John Travolta anyway? Certainly not Denzel Washington. After stumbling over the summer with mediocre returns for <em>Taking of Pelham 1 2 3</em>, Denzel returned to theaters and almost found career best numbers for <em>The Book of Eli</em>. For the record, this is the second best opening of Mr. Washington's lengthy career, behind only <em>American Gangster</em>, and based on the per screen averages (over $12,000), it could have good legs through the end of the month. Somewhere, Harvey Weinstein is wondering why he wasn't able to get numbers like this for <em>The Road</em> and probably cursing up a storm while doing so.</p>
<p><strong>3.<em> The Lovely Bones</em>: $20.5 million ($21 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Stuck in the in-between of failed limited release for the past five weeks, <em>The Lovely Bones</em> finally went wide this weekend and found itself a respectable $20.5 million in the process. As The Weinstein Company learned with <em>Nine</em> (a dismal $18 million total after five weeks), when an Oscar hopeful gets destroyed by the critics, finding any audience is borderline impossible. Credit then to Paramont for getting <em>The Lovely Bones</em> off ground. The studio refocused the ad campaign from "awards bait" to "'tween girls and a whodunit" and it worked. We doubt the future for <em>Bones</em> is bright, but at least it'll wind up with better numbers than <em>Nine</em>.</p>
<p><strong>4.<em> Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel</em>: $15 million ($196 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Further proof the end of the world is nigh: <em>Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel</em> dipped just 9 percent over the weekend and will now cross $200 million sometime this week. For those of you without intimate knowledge of the grosses for the original <em>Alvin and the Chipmunks</em>, that means the squeakquel will gross even more before all is said and done. As the saying goes: fool us once, shame on you; fool us twice... and start buying canned tuna fish and Twinkies.</p>
<p><strong>5. <em>The Spy Next Door</em>: $13 million ($13 million total)</strong></p>
<p>Jackie Chan is back! Kinda! The much-derided <em>The Spy Next Door</em> barely held off <em>Sherlock Holmes</em> (starring Golden Globe winner Robert Downey Jr.; huh?) to finish in fifth place over the holiday. Don't expect much more from this title&mdash;it should be on DVD by March&mdash;but it bodes a bit well for <em>The Karate Kid</em> remake co-starring Mr. Chan as Mr. Miyagi. If something as bad as this can gross $13 million, what can a slick remake of a classic gross? Probably more than we would like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/01/box-office-breakdown-not-even-denzel-can-stop-the-king-of-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/avatarpeepsatglobes.jpg?w=300&#38;h=205" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Opening This Weekend: Denzel Washington Does Road Warrior, Jackie Chan Doesn&#8217;t Do Windows</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/01/opening-this-weekend-denzel-washington-does-iroad-warriori-jackie-chan-doesnt-do-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:05:51 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/01/opening-this-weekend-denzel-washington-does-iroad-warriori-jackie-chan-doesnt-do-windows/</link>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/01/opening-this-weekend-denzel-washington-does-iroad-warriori-jackie-chan-doesnt-do-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bookofeli_0.jpg?w=300&h=199" />And you thought last weekend was bad! Martin Luther King weekend brings two more craptastic feature films, but since there is nothing else out in theaters&mdash;unless you're really itching for another dose of <em>Avatar</em>&mdash;they might end up being box office hits (see: <em>Paul Blart: Mall Cop</em>, which came out on this weekend last year). As we do every Friday, here's a handy guide to the new releases.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Book of Eli</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> Think of this as <em>The Road</em>, but with the potential for an audience. Denzel Washington stars as the titular Eli, a road warrior walking across the scorched earth of post-apocalyptic America with a book that may or may not have something to do with King James. Gary Oldman co-stars as the villain (we can't expect him to play characters like Commissioner Gordon all the time!), meaning the chances for this thing to entertain are fairly great. The Hughes Brothers (<em>Menace II Society</em>) direct for the first time since 2005's <em>From Hell</em>, meaning violence should be expected. And, <a href="/2010/culture/road-not-taken">based on the vague reviews</a>, so should a twist ending that you might not see coming. Add it all together and <em>The Book of Eli</em> could be the <em>Knowing </em>of 2010. Do with that information what you will.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> Cormac McCarthy.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Spy Next Door</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> And think of this as <em>Paul Blart</em>, but without the audience. Or, so we hope. Just a few weeks after <em>Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel</em> threatened to ruin the youth of America, here comes Jackie Chan in a movie that looks an awful lot like the Hulk Hogan classic <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107612/">Mr. Nanny</a></em> (emphasis, of course, on "awful"). Not sure what's more surprising here: that <em>The Spy Next Door</em> exists or that it features Billy Ray Cyrus in a major role. Scary thought: we'd rather see Mr. Chan's ill-advised remake of <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy3TwgpOfr0">The Karate Kid</a></em> fifty times over than sit through this.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> Miley Cyrus.</p>
<p>Also opening this weekend: the very delectable Michael Fassbender (at least according to Slate's <a href="http://twitter.com/thehighsign/status/7754226715">Dana Stevens</a>) stars in the <a href="/2010/culture/tank-girl">well-received indie <em>Fish Tank</em></a>; and, hey, remember <em><a href="/2009/culture/opening-weekend-matt-damon-gets-scrum-morgan-freeman-peter-jackson-rattles-lovely-bones">The Lovely Bones</a></em>? Peter Jackson's adaptation of Alice Sebold's novel came out in limited release over a month ago and&mdash;<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/01/vultures_critics_poll_whats_th_1.html#photo=4">after getting universally panned</a>&mdash;it finally finds a home in 2,400 theaters this weekend.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bookofeli_0.jpg?w=300&h=199" />And you thought last weekend was bad! Martin Luther King weekend brings two more craptastic feature films, but since there is nothing else out in theaters&mdash;unless you're really itching for another dose of <em>Avatar</em>&mdash;they might end up being box office hits (see: <em>Paul Blart: Mall Cop</em>, which came out on this weekend last year). As we do every Friday, here's a handy guide to the new releases.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Book of Eli</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> Think of this as <em>The Road</em>, but with the potential for an audience. Denzel Washington stars as the titular Eli, a road warrior walking across the scorched earth of post-apocalyptic America with a book that may or may not have something to do with King James. Gary Oldman co-stars as the villain (we can't expect him to play characters like Commissioner Gordon all the time!), meaning the chances for this thing to entertain are fairly great. The Hughes Brothers (<em>Menace II Society</em>) direct for the first time since 2005's <em>From Hell</em>, meaning violence should be expected. And, <a href="/2010/culture/road-not-taken">based on the vague reviews</a>, so should a twist ending that you might not see coming. Add it all together and <em>The Book of Eli</em> could be the <em>Knowing </em>of 2010. Do with that information what you will.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> Cormac McCarthy.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Spy Next Door</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> And think of this as <em>Paul Blart</em>, but without the audience. Or, so we hope. Just a few weeks after <em>Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel</em> threatened to ruin the youth of America, here comes Jackie Chan in a movie that looks an awful lot like the Hulk Hogan classic <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107612/">Mr. Nanny</a></em> (emphasis, of course, on "awful"). Not sure what's more surprising here: that <em>The Spy Next Door</em> exists or that it features Billy Ray Cyrus in a major role. Scary thought: we'd rather see Mr. Chan's ill-advised remake of <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy3TwgpOfr0">The Karate Kid</a></em> fifty times over than sit through this.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> Miley Cyrus.</p>
<p>Also opening this weekend: the very delectable Michael Fassbender (at least according to Slate's <a href="http://twitter.com/thehighsign/status/7754226715">Dana Stevens</a>) stars in the <a href="/2010/culture/tank-girl">well-received indie <em>Fish Tank</em></a>; and, hey, remember <em><a href="/2009/culture/opening-weekend-matt-damon-gets-scrum-morgan-freeman-peter-jackson-rattles-lovely-bones">The Lovely Bones</a></em>? Peter Jackson's adaptation of Alice Sebold's novel came out in limited release over a month ago and&mdash;<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/01/vultures_critics_poll_whats_th_1.html#photo=4">after getting universally panned</a>&mdash;it finally finds a home in 2,400 theaters this weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/01/opening-this-weekend-denzel-washington-does-iroad-warriori-jackie-chan-doesnt-do-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bookofeli_0.jpg?w=300&#38;h=199" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Opening This Weekend: Matt Damon Gets in a Scrum for Morgan Freeman, Peter Jackson Rattles The Lovely Bones and Tom Ford Goes Mad Men</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/12/opening-this-weekend-matt-damon-gets-in-a-scrum-for-morgan-freeman-peter-jackson-rattles-ithe-lovely-bonesi-and-tom-ford-goes-imad-meni/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:58:26 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/12/opening-this-weekend-matt-damon-gets-in-a-scrum-for-morgan-freeman-peter-jackson-rattles-ithe-lovely-bonesi-and-tom-ford-goes-imad-meni/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/12/opening-this-weekend-matt-damon-gets-in-a-scrum-for-morgan-freeman-peter-jackson-rattles-ithe-lovely-bonesi-and-tom-ford-goes-imad-meni/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/the_lovely_bones05.jpg?w=300&h=169" />A pair of Oscar-winning directors debut new films this weekend, but all anyone really wants to talk about is the King of the World. Thanks to some <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/avatar-film-review-1004052868.story">embargo-breaking reviews</a>, the first (and second and third) word on James Cameron's <em>Avatar</em> has finally reached the masses. And, apparently, it's better than it looks! (Be honest, the ad campaign for this thing has been terrible.) In fact, some critics have even gone so far as to say that <em>Avatar </em>is <a href="http://blogs.ktla.com/samrubin/2009/12/new-avatar-movie-james-cameron-will-go-to-the-oscars-as-nominees.html">Oscar-bound</a>. Like the rest of you, we'll reserve our judgment until we can see those giant blue aliens in all their 3-D glory, starting next week. In the meantime, this trio of Academy Awards bait will have to hold our interest. As we do every Friday, here's a handy guide to the new releases.</p>
<p><strong><em>Invictus</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> If Clint Eastwood is releasing a film, it's officially Oscar season! <em>Invictus</em>, the prolific septuagenarian's <em>seventh</em> film since 2003, stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as the rugby player the South African president tasked to help bring his country together in 1995 by winning the World Cup. (Spoiler alert: Use Google to find out if South Africa wins.) Reviews for <em>Invictus </em>have been strong and everyone seems unanimous in their <a href="/2009/culture/im-cheering-morgan-freeman">praise of Mr. Freeman</a>, who is poised for his first Best Actor nomination since <em>The Shawshank Redemption </em>in 1995. Plus, despite an accent that sounds lifted out of the now-defunct <em>Flight of the Conchords</em>, Mr. Damon has some Oscar heat, too (though in the supporting category)! Fun fact: <em>Invictus</em> derives its box-office&ndash;unfriendly name from a William Ernest Henley poem that Freeman-as-Mandela recites while in prison.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> South Africa's 2007 World Cup&ndash;winning rugby team.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Lovely Bones</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> If Peter Jackson is releasing a film, it's &hellip; well, you get the idea. The long-awaited adaptation of Alice Sebold's best-selling novel about a young girl (Saoirse Ronan) who helps solve her brutal murder from the hereafter finally hits theaters with a din of bad buzz surrounding its ethereal landscapes. While our Rex Reed called the film "<a href="/2009/culture/nightmare-their-street">enthralling</a>," other critics haven't been so kind; <em>The Lovely Bones</em> has <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1189344-lovely_bones/">Fresh rating</a> on Rotten Tomatoes comparable to <em>Armored.</em> Also, apropos of nothing: Are we the only ones who can't look at Ms. Ronan with any sympathy because of the unctuous pill she played in <em>Atonement</em>? Just wondering.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> People who own a copy of <em>What Dreams May Come</em>.</p>
<p><strong><em>A Single Man</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> Not to be confused with <em>A Serious Man</em>, the latest hilariously overrated cinematic hunk of junk from the Coen brothers, here comes <em><a href="/2009/culture/distinguished-gentleman">A Single Man</a></em>. Tom Ford directs (yep, <em>that </em>Tom Ford) this adaptation of Christopher Isherwood's 1964 novel about a college professor (Colin Firth) who must overcome the death of his longtime partner (Matthew Goode). Since <em>A Single Man</em> takes place in 1962 (hey, <em>Mad Men</em>!), Mr. Ford is afforded the opportunity to embrace his inner Matthew Weiner, from the costume design all the way down to a vocal cameo appearance from none other than Don Draper himself, Jon Hamm. Julianne Moore co-stars, and we can only hope she leaves whatever accent she was trying to do on last night's episode of <em>30 Rock</em> at home.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> Salvatore Romano.</p>
<p>Also opening this weekend: Disney's latest sure-to-be box office smash, <em>The Princess and The Frog</em>, expands nationwide<em>.</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/the_lovely_bones05.jpg?w=300&h=169" />A pair of Oscar-winning directors debut new films this weekend, but all anyone really wants to talk about is the King of the World. Thanks to some <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/avatar-film-review-1004052868.story">embargo-breaking reviews</a>, the first (and second and third) word on James Cameron's <em>Avatar</em> has finally reached the masses. And, apparently, it's better than it looks! (Be honest, the ad campaign for this thing has been terrible.) In fact, some critics have even gone so far as to say that <em>Avatar </em>is <a href="http://blogs.ktla.com/samrubin/2009/12/new-avatar-movie-james-cameron-will-go-to-the-oscars-as-nominees.html">Oscar-bound</a>. Like the rest of you, we'll reserve our judgment until we can see those giant blue aliens in all their 3-D glory, starting next week. In the meantime, this trio of Academy Awards bait will have to hold our interest. As we do every Friday, here's a handy guide to the new releases.</p>
<p><strong><em>Invictus</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> If Clint Eastwood is releasing a film, it's officially Oscar season! <em>Invictus</em>, the prolific septuagenarian's <em>seventh</em> film since 2003, stars Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as the rugby player the South African president tasked to help bring his country together in 1995 by winning the World Cup. (Spoiler alert: Use Google to find out if South Africa wins.) Reviews for <em>Invictus </em>have been strong and everyone seems unanimous in their <a href="/2009/culture/im-cheering-morgan-freeman">praise of Mr. Freeman</a>, who is poised for his first Best Actor nomination since <em>The Shawshank Redemption </em>in 1995. Plus, despite an accent that sounds lifted out of the now-defunct <em>Flight of the Conchords</em>, Mr. Damon has some Oscar heat, too (though in the supporting category)! Fun fact: <em>Invictus</em> derives its box-office&ndash;unfriendly name from a William Ernest Henley poem that Freeman-as-Mandela recites while in prison.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> South Africa's 2007 World Cup&ndash;winning rugby team.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Lovely Bones</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> If Peter Jackson is releasing a film, it's &hellip; well, you get the idea. The long-awaited adaptation of Alice Sebold's best-selling novel about a young girl (Saoirse Ronan) who helps solve her brutal murder from the hereafter finally hits theaters with a din of bad buzz surrounding its ethereal landscapes. While our Rex Reed called the film "<a href="/2009/culture/nightmare-their-street">enthralling</a>," other critics haven't been so kind; <em>The Lovely Bones</em> has <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1189344-lovely_bones/">Fresh rating</a> on Rotten Tomatoes comparable to <em>Armored.</em> Also, apropos of nothing: Are we the only ones who can't look at Ms. Ronan with any sympathy because of the unctuous pill she played in <em>Atonement</em>? Just wondering.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> People who own a copy of <em>What Dreams May Come</em>.</p>
<p><strong><em>A Single Man</em></strong></p>
<p><em>What's the story:</em> Not to be confused with <em>A Serious Man</em>, the latest hilariously overrated cinematic hunk of junk from the Coen brothers, here comes <em><a href="/2009/culture/distinguished-gentleman">A Single Man</a></em>. Tom Ford directs (yep, <em>that </em>Tom Ford) this adaptation of Christopher Isherwood's 1964 novel about a college professor (Colin Firth) who must overcome the death of his longtime partner (Matthew Goode). Since <em>A Single Man</em> takes place in 1962 (hey, <em>Mad Men</em>!), Mr. Ford is afforded the opportunity to embrace his inner Matthew Weiner, from the costume design all the way down to a vocal cameo appearance from none other than Don Draper himself, Jon Hamm. Julianne Moore co-stars, and we can only hope she leaves whatever accent she was trying to do on last night's episode of <em>30 Rock</em> at home.</p>
<p><em>Who should see it:</em> Salvatore Romano.</p>
<p>Also opening this weekend: Disney's latest sure-to-be box office smash, <em>The Princess and The Frog</em>, expands nationwide<em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/12/opening-this-weekend-matt-damon-gets-in-a-scrum-for-morgan-freeman-peter-jackson-rattles-ithe-lovely-bonesi-and-tom-ford-goes-imad-meni/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/the_lovely_bones05.jpg?w=300&#38;h=169" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>A Nightmare on Their Street</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/12/a-nightmare-on-their-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:57:12 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/12/a-nightmare-on-their-street/</link>
			<dc:creator>Rex Reed</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/12/a-nightmare-on-their-street/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/lovely-bones.jpg?w=300&h=169" /><strong>The Lovely Bones</strong><br /><em>Running time 135 minutes <br />Written by Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Peter Jackson<br />Directed by Peter Jackson<br />Starring&nbsp; Saoirse Ronan, Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, Susan Sarandon, Stanley Tucci </em></p>
<p>I&rsquo;m no fan of Peter Jackson, but as much as I hated the 2005 remake of <em>King Kong</em> and all of those silly, overrated <em>Lord of the Rings</em> comic books, the New Zealand director&rsquo;s trademark recipe of fantasy, realism and computerized visual effects turns <em>The Lovely Bones </em>into a thrilling adventure. I love the exquisite blend of chilling murder mystery, suspenseful crime story and domestic melodrama, and especially the way Mr. Jackson lets his imagination run barefoot through the flames to deal with very difficult material indeed. My heart was pounding in my throat from start to finish. Take a Valium. The suspense could kill you.</p>
<p class="TEXT"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt">The movie&rsquo;s based on the acclaimed Alice Sebold novel about a serial killer on the loose in a placid Pennsylvania neighborhood and a dead 14-year-old girl who helps solve her own murder from beyond the grave; this was challenging stuff on the printed page, almost impossible to adapt to the screen. But great acting, relentless fantasy sequences and dark undercurrents of terror propel the creepy narrative with a cinematic rhythm as sinister as it is mesmerizing. Since we know the identity of the gentle-looking maniac who rapes and kills teenager Susie Salmon on her way home from school, you might think the plot is ruined from the beginning. Wrong. Susie&rsquo;s friends and her parents (Mark Wahlberg and Rachel Weisz) will not abandon the search for the missing child, even after the police have given up. In the movie, like the book, Susie is stuck somewhere between heaven and earth, where she relives her life posthumously, feverishly sending clues and signals about Mr. Harvey, the weird neighbor who watched her unnaturally from the green house down the street, and the fatal day she allowed him to lure her into a candlelit playroom beneath the cornfield, filled with toys, teddy bears and comic books. As the years pass, forensic evidence like the blue jacket and yellow corduroys Susie wore home that day is juxtaposed with the surreal spaces and seasons of an in-between place beyond life where Susie waits to be rescued. This is the blue horizon of Salvador Dali beaches, leaves that blow from tree branches and back again like detachable feathers, a lighthouse rising out of the misty murder scene. The cinematography is breathtaking. Even a shot of a sailing ship in a glass bottle looks like an oil painting brushed with polyurethane. When your hair isn&rsquo;t standing on end, you always have something to look at, peruse, sift through like a police file. The scene where Susie&rsquo;s suspicious sister (Rose McIver) sneaks into Mr. Harvey&rsquo;s house and rummages through his desk drawers while he slowly climbs the stairs is as bloodcurdlingly scary as anything I&rsquo;ve ever seen on film.</span></p>
<p class="TEXT"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt">The performances are truly remarkable, from Ms. Weisz as a mother so anguished that she leaves home to pick fruit in California; to Mr. Wahlberg as a father so driven by grief that he loses reason; to Susan Sarandon as a chain-smoking grandmother who runs the vacuum cleaner in her mink coat and copes with a bottle of kitchen sherry. But two electrifying performances, without a hair out of place, dominate this film and leave you drained from excitement: As the tortured victim seeking closure, the fetchingly beautiful young Irish actress Saoirse Ronan (the lying little sister who caused all the trouble in <em>Atonement</em>) makes a memorable Susie; and as the benign monster with yellow hair, spectacles and a voice soft as a kitten&rsquo;s tongue, living in the sinister house down the block, Stanley Tucci gives one of the most sensational performances of his versatile career. Look for him to make some noise when awards season arrives.</span></p>
<p class="TEXT"><em><span style="letter-spacing: -0.25pt">The Lovely Bones</span></em><span style="letter-spacing: -0.25pt"> is a complex and unusual film, alluring, enthralling and perturbing. Weeks after seeing it, it still gives me nightmares.<em>&nbsp; rreed@observer.com </em><br /></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/lovely-bones.jpg?w=300&h=169" /><strong>The Lovely Bones</strong><br /><em>Running time 135 minutes <br />Written by Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Peter Jackson<br />Directed by Peter Jackson<br />Starring&nbsp; Saoirse Ronan, Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, Susan Sarandon, Stanley Tucci </em></p>
<p>I&rsquo;m no fan of Peter Jackson, but as much as I hated the 2005 remake of <em>King Kong</em> and all of those silly, overrated <em>Lord of the Rings</em> comic books, the New Zealand director&rsquo;s trademark recipe of fantasy, realism and computerized visual effects turns <em>The Lovely Bones </em>into a thrilling adventure. I love the exquisite blend of chilling murder mystery, suspenseful crime story and domestic melodrama, and especially the way Mr. Jackson lets his imagination run barefoot through the flames to deal with very difficult material indeed. My heart was pounding in my throat from start to finish. Take a Valium. The suspense could kill you.</p>
<p class="TEXT"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt">The movie&rsquo;s based on the acclaimed Alice Sebold novel about a serial killer on the loose in a placid Pennsylvania neighborhood and a dead 14-year-old girl who helps solve her own murder from beyond the grave; this was challenging stuff on the printed page, almost impossible to adapt to the screen. But great acting, relentless fantasy sequences and dark undercurrents of terror propel the creepy narrative with a cinematic rhythm as sinister as it is mesmerizing. Since we know the identity of the gentle-looking maniac who rapes and kills teenager Susie Salmon on her way home from school, you might think the plot is ruined from the beginning. Wrong. Susie&rsquo;s friends and her parents (Mark Wahlberg and Rachel Weisz) will not abandon the search for the missing child, even after the police have given up. In the movie, like the book, Susie is stuck somewhere between heaven and earth, where she relives her life posthumously, feverishly sending clues and signals about Mr. Harvey, the weird neighbor who watched her unnaturally from the green house down the street, and the fatal day she allowed him to lure her into a candlelit playroom beneath the cornfield, filled with toys, teddy bears and comic books. As the years pass, forensic evidence like the blue jacket and yellow corduroys Susie wore home that day is juxtaposed with the surreal spaces and seasons of an in-between place beyond life where Susie waits to be rescued. This is the blue horizon of Salvador Dali beaches, leaves that blow from tree branches and back again like detachable feathers, a lighthouse rising out of the misty murder scene. The cinematography is breathtaking. Even a shot of a sailing ship in a glass bottle looks like an oil painting brushed with polyurethane. When your hair isn&rsquo;t standing on end, you always have something to look at, peruse, sift through like a police file. The scene where Susie&rsquo;s suspicious sister (Rose McIver) sneaks into Mr. Harvey&rsquo;s house and rummages through his desk drawers while he slowly climbs the stairs is as bloodcurdlingly scary as anything I&rsquo;ve ever seen on film.</span></p>
<p class="TEXT"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt">The performances are truly remarkable, from Ms. Weisz as a mother so anguished that she leaves home to pick fruit in California; to Mr. Wahlberg as a father so driven by grief that he loses reason; to Susan Sarandon as a chain-smoking grandmother who runs the vacuum cleaner in her mink coat and copes with a bottle of kitchen sherry. But two electrifying performances, without a hair out of place, dominate this film and leave you drained from excitement: As the tortured victim seeking closure, the fetchingly beautiful young Irish actress Saoirse Ronan (the lying little sister who caused all the trouble in <em>Atonement</em>) makes a memorable Susie; and as the benign monster with yellow hair, spectacles and a voice soft as a kitten&rsquo;s tongue, living in the sinister house down the block, Stanley Tucci gives one of the most sensational performances of his versatile career. Look for him to make some noise when awards season arrives.</span></p>
<p class="TEXT"><em><span style="letter-spacing: -0.25pt">The Lovely Bones</span></em><span style="letter-spacing: -0.25pt"> is a complex and unusual film, alluring, enthralling and perturbing. Weeks after seeing it, it still gives me nightmares.<em>&nbsp; rreed@observer.com </em><br /></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/12/a-nightmare-on-their-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/lovely-bones.jpg?w=300&#38;h=169" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Joss Whedon, King of the Overrateds</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/05/joss-whedon-king-of-the-overrateds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:16:46 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/05/joss-whedon-king-of-the-overrateds/</link>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/05/joss-whedon-king-of-the-overrateds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/joss.jpg?w=300&h=196" />
<p class="MsoNormal">We love a good round of blogosphere-led hand wringing, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i666afabc28491e6a5d5861d83ae30855">so the news that Vertigo Entertainment is planning a reboot of the <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em> franchise totally tickles our fancy</a>. Rather than include creator Joss Whedon or any of the beloved supporting characters he created for television, Vertigo is relying on the immortal Fran Rubel Kuzui, director of the long-forgotten original <em>Buffy</em> with Kristy Swanson and Luke Perry, to produce a film that &ldquo;compliments&rdquo; Mr. Whedon&rsquo;s niche series. Think <em>Star Trek</em>, if J.J. Abrams kept Captain Kirk but replaced the crew of the Enterprise with some other dudes.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It goes without saying that this is a hilariously misguided idea, but it doesn&rsquo;t seem worth the apoplectic reactions splattered about the web, specifically with regards to Mr. Whedon&rsquo;s potential lack of involvement; <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/05/new-buffy-movie.html">as an intrepid blogger over at <em>Entertainment Weekly</em> put it</a>: &ldquo;Worst Idea Ever of the year!&rdquo; Is it though? Mr. Whedon is talented, sure, but his absence from a <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer </em>movie doesn&rsquo;t necessarily mean it will, well, suck (pun most certainly intended!). Fact is, beyond the<em> Buffy</em>-verse, Mr. Whedon hasn&rsquo;t done anything to warrant his status as a sacred cow; being one of four screenwriters on the original <em>Toy Story</em> is nice, but that achievement clearly gets canceled out by being the only writer for <em>Alien Resurrection</em>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Anyway, all this got us thinking: Who are some other wildly overrated Hollywood commodities? Here are three of our favorites.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Danny Boyle</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There was a meme running through the Oscar season last year which seemed to say that Danny Boyle was &ldquo;due&rdquo; for some Academy recognition. Come again? We love <em>Trainspotting </em>too, but this guy is not markedly better than other genre filmmakers in his peer group. And his work on <em>Slumdog Millionaire </em>felt like nothing more than warmed over Tony Scott. Needless to say, that is not a compliment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>James Cameron</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Not even we can deny that the King of the World is one of the biggest directors ever: <em>Aliens</em>, <em>T2</em>, <em>Titanic</em>; any filmmaker would love to have one of those movies on their resume, let alone all three. The reason Mr. Cameron skates into the land of overrated, though, is because there seems to be this feeling <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/25/movies/25avatar.html">amongst journalists and tastemakers that audiences are waiting with baited breath for what he does next</a>. But by the time his 3-D-palooza, <em>Avatar</em>,<em> </em>is released in December, thirteen years will have passed from when Mr. Cameron ruled earth with <em>Titanic</em>. Does anyone even remember back that far? And, more important, did everyone forget that underneath all its technical prowess, <em>Titanic</em> was purely a mediocre melodrama?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Peter Jackson</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We don&rsquo;t think we&rsquo;ve liked a Peter Jackson movie since <em>The Frighteners. </em>His laborious <em>Lord of the Rings</em> adaptations were bad enough, but what really pushes him over the top is <em>King Kong</em>. Here&rsquo;s an idea, let&rsquo;s take a fun creature feature and turn it into a three hour prestige picture. Ugh! Perhaps his take on <em>The Lovely Bones</em>, due in December, will fare better. At least in that film, <a href="http://www.fancast.com/movies/King-Kong/17006/782225532/Playing-on-Ice/videos">we&rsquo;ll be assured of seeing no ice skating giant apes</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/joss.jpg?w=300&h=196" />
<p class="MsoNormal">We love a good round of blogosphere-led hand wringing, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i666afabc28491e6a5d5861d83ae30855">so the news that Vertigo Entertainment is planning a reboot of the <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em> franchise totally tickles our fancy</a>. Rather than include creator Joss Whedon or any of the beloved supporting characters he created for television, Vertigo is relying on the immortal Fran Rubel Kuzui, director of the long-forgotten original <em>Buffy</em> with Kristy Swanson and Luke Perry, to produce a film that &ldquo;compliments&rdquo; Mr. Whedon&rsquo;s niche series. Think <em>Star Trek</em>, if J.J. Abrams kept Captain Kirk but replaced the crew of the Enterprise with some other dudes.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It goes without saying that this is a hilariously misguided idea, but it doesn&rsquo;t seem worth the apoplectic reactions splattered about the web, specifically with regards to Mr. Whedon&rsquo;s potential lack of involvement; <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/05/new-buffy-movie.html">as an intrepid blogger over at <em>Entertainment Weekly</em> put it</a>: &ldquo;Worst Idea Ever of the year!&rdquo; Is it though? Mr. Whedon is talented, sure, but his absence from a <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer </em>movie doesn&rsquo;t necessarily mean it will, well, suck (pun most certainly intended!). Fact is, beyond the<em> Buffy</em>-verse, Mr. Whedon hasn&rsquo;t done anything to warrant his status as a sacred cow; being one of four screenwriters on the original <em>Toy Story</em> is nice, but that achievement clearly gets canceled out by being the only writer for <em>Alien Resurrection</em>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Anyway, all this got us thinking: Who are some other wildly overrated Hollywood commodities? Here are three of our favorites.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Danny Boyle</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There was a meme running through the Oscar season last year which seemed to say that Danny Boyle was &ldquo;due&rdquo; for some Academy recognition. Come again? We love <em>Trainspotting </em>too, but this guy is not markedly better than other genre filmmakers in his peer group. And his work on <em>Slumdog Millionaire </em>felt like nothing more than warmed over Tony Scott. Needless to say, that is not a compliment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>James Cameron</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Not even we can deny that the King of the World is one of the biggest directors ever: <em>Aliens</em>, <em>T2</em>, <em>Titanic</em>; any filmmaker would love to have one of those movies on their resume, let alone all three. The reason Mr. Cameron skates into the land of overrated, though, is because there seems to be this feeling <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/25/movies/25avatar.html">amongst journalists and tastemakers that audiences are waiting with baited breath for what he does next</a>. But by the time his 3-D-palooza, <em>Avatar</em>,<em> </em>is released in December, thirteen years will have passed from when Mr. Cameron ruled earth with <em>Titanic</em>. Does anyone even remember back that far? And, more important, did everyone forget that underneath all its technical prowess, <em>Titanic</em> was purely a mediocre melodrama?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Peter Jackson</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We don&rsquo;t think we&rsquo;ve liked a Peter Jackson movie since <em>The Frighteners. </em>His laborious <em>Lord of the Rings</em> adaptations were bad enough, but what really pushes him over the top is <em>King Kong</em>. Here&rsquo;s an idea, let&rsquo;s take a fun creature feature and turn it into a three hour prestige picture. Ugh! Perhaps his take on <em>The Lovely Bones</em>, due in December, will fare better. At least in that film, <a href="http://www.fancast.com/movies/King-Kong/17006/782225532/Playing-on-Ice/videos">we&rsquo;ll be assured of seeing no ice skating giant apes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/05/joss-whedon-king-of-the-overrateds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/joss.jpg?w=300&#38;h=196" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>12 Movies for 12 Months: 2009 in Preview</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/01/12-movies-for-12-months-2009-in-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:44:53 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/01/12-movies-for-12-months-2009-in-preview/</link>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/01/12-movies-for-12-months-2009-in-preview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We've gone ahead and surveyed the monthly film landscape to find for you the twelve key movies to see during the upcoming year. <em>You're welcome</em>! Naturally, all release dates are subject to change.</p>
<p><strong>January: <em>Notorious </em>(dir. George Tillman, Jr.)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/o2/could-january-actually-be-cruellest-month">As our esteemed colleague so accurately wrote</a>, January is truly the coldest month for Hollywood. Unless you plan on catching up on all the holiday releases, there won't be a whole lot of reasons to sneak out to the local cineplex in the coming weeks. Still, we would implore you to make an exception and catch <em>Notorious</em>. Based on the life of Notorious B.I.G., <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDDv6pAbN_U">the film looks like one-third <em>American Gangster</em>, one-third <em>Walk the Line</em> and one-third awesomeness</a>. Newcomer Jamaal Woolard stars as Biggie, but we're more excited for the supporting cast: Derek Luke as Puff Daddy; Anthony Mackie as Tupac; and Angela Bassett as Voletta &quot;What kind of grown ass man calls himself Puffy?&quot; Wallace. (January 16th)</p>
<p><strong>February: <em>He's Just Not That Into You </em>(dir. Ken Kwapis)</strong></p>
<p>February is really a month for lovers. So if you're single, that means wallowing and watching romantic comedies with happy endings to make yourself feel better. (Not that we know anything about that!) We'd understand if you thought <em>He's Just Not That Into You </em>, based on the best-selling book, looked like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TDtFrD-Ol4&amp;feature=related">filmic arsenic</a>. However, there is hope: Director Ken Kwapis has helmed some of the very best episodes of the American <em>Office</em> (we'll forget that he also directed the atrocious <em>License to Wed</em>) and the cast is sprawling, featuring everyone from Jennifer Aniston to Kevin Connolly. Mostly, we just want to see it for the ever-adorable Ginnifer Goodwin. (February 6th)</p>
<p><strong>March: <em>Duplicity </em>(dir. Tony Gilroy)</strong></p>
<p>We've been on a <em>Michael Clayton </em>binge over the last couple of weeks, watching it over and over on cable and loving it a little more after each viewing. So consider us incredibly amped up to see what director Tony Gilroy comes up with next. <em>Duplicity </em>has been on our radar ever since its perfect cat and mouse <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/o2/out-sight-clive-and-julia-star-heist-romp">trailer appeared online just before Thanksgiving</a>. The title is terrible, but that's about our only complaint. Clive Owen, Julia Roberts, Tom Wilkinson and Paul Giamatti star. (March 20th)</p>
<p><strong>April: <em>Observe and Report </em>(dir. Jody Hill)</strong></p>
<p>The latest film from the Judd Apatow comedy factory is supposedly so dark and twisted, <a href="http://www.collider.com/entertainment/interviews/article.asp?aid=9552&amp;tcid=1">we've seen it compared to <em>Taxi Driver</em></a>. Sign us up! Seth Rogen stars as a vindictive and angry mall cop, trying to stop a flasher before the real cops do. Please don't confuse this with that stupid <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49I5FJ_W178">Kevin James movie</a>. (April 10th)</p>
<p><strong>May: <em>Star Trek </em>(dir. J.J. Abrams)</strong></p>
<p>As usual, May is absolutely loaded with big movies: <em>Terminator Salvation</em>, Pixar's <em>Up</em>, <em>Angels and Demons</em>, <em>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</em> and <em>Night at the Museum 2</em>. Still, of that group, <em>Star Trek </em>might be the best. We were never fans of the series, <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/o2/live-long-and-angry-i-star-trek-i-trailer-upsets-fans">but we <em>are</em> big fans of the trailer for the franchise reboot</a>. Plus, we're suckers for anything with J. J. Abrams' name on it. Well, anything but <em>October Road. </em>(May 8th)</p>
<p><strong>June: <em>The Hangover </em>(dir. Todd Phillips)</strong></p>
<p>A groom-to-be (Justin Bartha) and his three friends (Bradley Cooper, Zack Galifianakis, Ed Helms) head to Las Vegas for a Bachelor Party and when morning arrives … the groom is nowhere to be found. The latest from <em>Old School </em>director Todd Phillips seems poised to be a huge hit, something no doubt helped by three stars that are on the cusp of major breakthroughs. We're pretty much banking on this being the funniest film of the summer. (June 12th)</p>
<p><strong>July: <em>Public Enemies </em>(dir. Michael Mann)</strong></p>
<p>The last time Michael Mann directed two heavyweight lead actors in a summer blockbuster he gave us <em>Miami Vice</em>, a movie which still plays best with the sound off. This time around Mr. Mann tells the story of John Dillinger with (we hope!) better results. Johnny Depp portrays the famous bank robber while Christian Bale is the FBI agent tracking him down. In case you were wondering: you have to go all the way back to <em>Forrest Gump</em> in 1994 to find a Best Picture winner that was released in July. (July 1st)</p>
<p><strong>August: <em>Taking Woodstock </em>(dir. Ang Lee)</strong></p>
<p>This will be your girlfriend's favorite movie of the summer. Just look at the cast: Emile Hirsch, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Liev Schreiber, Paul Dano and Demetri Martin. While the comedic tone of <em>Taking Woodstock</em> seems like a departure for Ang Lee, perhaps it'll be a welcome one. After <em>Brokeback Mountain </em>and <em>Lust, Caution</em>, the guy needs to lighten up. (August 14th) </p>
<p><strong>September: <em>The Informant </em>(dir. Steven Soderbergh)</strong></p>
<p>You know that Steven Soderbegh comedy you've been waiting for? Here 'tis! Matt Damon stars as the titular whistleblower, a former vice president helping the government in a case against his agri-business employer. Sounds serious until you check out the rest of the cast: Patton Oswalt, <em>30 Rock</em>'s Scott Adsit, Tony Hale, Mike O'Malley, Paul F. Thompkins and Joel McHale from <em>The Soup</em>. Hell, even Biff from <em>Back to the Future</em> shows up. Expect laughs and wackiness. Think <em>The Insider</em> mixed with <em>Out of Sight</em>. (September 18th)</p>
<p><strong>October: <em>Shutter Island </em>(dir. Martin Scorsese)</strong></p>
<p>Martin Scorsese's first feature film since winning the Oscar for <em>The Departed </em>once again stars Leonardo DiCaprio and takes place in Boston. The similarities end there. Based on the Dennis Lehane book, <em>Shutter Island</em> is set in 1954 and finds Mr. DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo as a pair of U.S. marshals sent to the remote island to find an escaped mental patient. One of these days, Mr. DiCaprio is going to get his Oscar. Perhaps this is the movie. (October 2nd)</p>
<p><strong>November: <em>The Box </em>(dir. Richard Kelly)</strong></p>
<p>We think we'd be pretty excited to see <em>The Box</em> even if <a href="http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/news/148217-arcade-fires-butler-talks-miroir-noir-the-box-score">Arcade Fire</a> wasn't scoring the entire movie. The premise is <em>Twilight Zone-</em>ready: a married couple (Cameron Diaz and James Marsden) discovers a mysterious box on their doorstep, which if opened gives them instant wealth. The only catch? Opening it kills someone they don't know. Richard Kelly, he of <em>Donnie Darko</em> and <em>Southland Tales</em>, directs, meaning: Expect some insanity. (November 6th)</p>
<p><strong>December: <em>The Lovely Bones</em> (dir. Peter Jackson)</strong></p>
<p>Based on the acclaimed book by Alice Siebold, <em>The Lovely Bones</em> is Peter Jackson's first film since spending the last decade dealing with orcs and giant apes. <em>Atonement</em> pill Saoirse Ronan stars as a murdered young girl who watches over her family&mdash;and her killer&mdash;from heaven. Mark Wahlberg and Rachel Weisz play the parents, which is fine, until you remember that Ryan Gosling could have been the star. Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/celebrity/Ryan-Gosling-Too-Demanding-Too-Cheesy-For-Lovely-Bones-6953.html">he was supposedly fired for gaining too much weight</a>. Mr. Gosling might not <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/37753/saturday-night-live-mark-wahlberg-talks-to-animals" target="_blank">talk to animals</a>, but he's a way better actor than Mr. Wahlberg. Early, early prediction: Expect Oscar heat for Susan Sarandon as the grandmother. (December 11th)</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've gone ahead and surveyed the monthly film landscape to find for you the twelve key movies to see during the upcoming year. <em>You're welcome</em>! Naturally, all release dates are subject to change.</p>
<p><strong>January: <em>Notorious </em>(dir. George Tillman, Jr.)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/o2/could-january-actually-be-cruellest-month">As our esteemed colleague so accurately wrote</a>, January is truly the coldest month for Hollywood. Unless you plan on catching up on all the holiday releases, there won't be a whole lot of reasons to sneak out to the local cineplex in the coming weeks. Still, we would implore you to make an exception and catch <em>Notorious</em>. Based on the life of Notorious B.I.G., <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDDv6pAbN_U">the film looks like one-third <em>American Gangster</em>, one-third <em>Walk the Line</em> and one-third awesomeness</a>. Newcomer Jamaal Woolard stars as Biggie, but we're more excited for the supporting cast: Derek Luke as Puff Daddy; Anthony Mackie as Tupac; and Angela Bassett as Voletta &quot;What kind of grown ass man calls himself Puffy?&quot; Wallace. (January 16th)</p>
<p><strong>February: <em>He's Just Not That Into You </em>(dir. Ken Kwapis)</strong></p>
<p>February is really a month for lovers. So if you're single, that means wallowing and watching romantic comedies with happy endings to make yourself feel better. (Not that we know anything about that!) We'd understand if you thought <em>He's Just Not That Into You </em>, based on the best-selling book, looked like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TDtFrD-Ol4&amp;feature=related">filmic arsenic</a>. However, there is hope: Director Ken Kwapis has helmed some of the very best episodes of the American <em>Office</em> (we'll forget that he also directed the atrocious <em>License to Wed</em>) and the cast is sprawling, featuring everyone from Jennifer Aniston to Kevin Connolly. Mostly, we just want to see it for the ever-adorable Ginnifer Goodwin. (February 6th)</p>
<p><strong>March: <em>Duplicity </em>(dir. Tony Gilroy)</strong></p>
<p>We've been on a <em>Michael Clayton </em>binge over the last couple of weeks, watching it over and over on cable and loving it a little more after each viewing. So consider us incredibly amped up to see what director Tony Gilroy comes up with next. <em>Duplicity </em>has been on our radar ever since its perfect cat and mouse <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/o2/out-sight-clive-and-julia-star-heist-romp">trailer appeared online just before Thanksgiving</a>. The title is terrible, but that's about our only complaint. Clive Owen, Julia Roberts, Tom Wilkinson and Paul Giamatti star. (March 20th)</p>
<p><strong>April: <em>Observe and Report </em>(dir. Jody Hill)</strong></p>
<p>The latest film from the Judd Apatow comedy factory is supposedly so dark and twisted, <a href="http://www.collider.com/entertainment/interviews/article.asp?aid=9552&amp;tcid=1">we've seen it compared to <em>Taxi Driver</em></a>. Sign us up! Seth Rogen stars as a vindictive and angry mall cop, trying to stop a flasher before the real cops do. Please don't confuse this with that stupid <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49I5FJ_W178">Kevin James movie</a>. (April 10th)</p>
<p><strong>May: <em>Star Trek </em>(dir. J.J. Abrams)</strong></p>
<p>As usual, May is absolutely loaded with big movies: <em>Terminator Salvation</em>, Pixar's <em>Up</em>, <em>Angels and Demons</em>, <em>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</em> and <em>Night at the Museum 2</em>. Still, of that group, <em>Star Trek </em>might be the best. We were never fans of the series, <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/o2/live-long-and-angry-i-star-trek-i-trailer-upsets-fans">but we <em>are</em> big fans of the trailer for the franchise reboot</a>. Plus, we're suckers for anything with J. J. Abrams' name on it. Well, anything but <em>October Road. </em>(May 8th)</p>
<p><strong>June: <em>The Hangover </em>(dir. Todd Phillips)</strong></p>
<p>A groom-to-be (Justin Bartha) and his three friends (Bradley Cooper, Zack Galifianakis, Ed Helms) head to Las Vegas for a Bachelor Party and when morning arrives … the groom is nowhere to be found. The latest from <em>Old School </em>director Todd Phillips seems poised to be a huge hit, something no doubt helped by three stars that are on the cusp of major breakthroughs. We're pretty much banking on this being the funniest film of the summer. (June 12th)</p>
<p><strong>July: <em>Public Enemies </em>(dir. Michael Mann)</strong></p>
<p>The last time Michael Mann directed two heavyweight lead actors in a summer blockbuster he gave us <em>Miami Vice</em>, a movie which still plays best with the sound off. This time around Mr. Mann tells the story of John Dillinger with (we hope!) better results. Johnny Depp portrays the famous bank robber while Christian Bale is the FBI agent tracking him down. In case you were wondering: you have to go all the way back to <em>Forrest Gump</em> in 1994 to find a Best Picture winner that was released in July. (July 1st)</p>
<p><strong>August: <em>Taking Woodstock </em>(dir. Ang Lee)</strong></p>
<p>This will be your girlfriend's favorite movie of the summer. Just look at the cast: Emile Hirsch, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Liev Schreiber, Paul Dano and Demetri Martin. While the comedic tone of <em>Taking Woodstock</em> seems like a departure for Ang Lee, perhaps it'll be a welcome one. After <em>Brokeback Mountain </em>and <em>Lust, Caution</em>, the guy needs to lighten up. (August 14th) </p>
<p><strong>September: <em>The Informant </em>(dir. Steven Soderbergh)</strong></p>
<p>You know that Steven Soderbegh comedy you've been waiting for? Here 'tis! Matt Damon stars as the titular whistleblower, a former vice president helping the government in a case against his agri-business employer. Sounds serious until you check out the rest of the cast: Patton Oswalt, <em>30 Rock</em>'s Scott Adsit, Tony Hale, Mike O'Malley, Paul F. Thompkins and Joel McHale from <em>The Soup</em>. Hell, even Biff from <em>Back to the Future</em> shows up. Expect laughs and wackiness. Think <em>The Insider</em> mixed with <em>Out of Sight</em>. (September 18th)</p>
<p><strong>October: <em>Shutter Island </em>(dir. Martin Scorsese)</strong></p>
<p>Martin Scorsese's first feature film since winning the Oscar for <em>The Departed </em>once again stars Leonardo DiCaprio and takes place in Boston. The similarities end there. Based on the Dennis Lehane book, <em>Shutter Island</em> is set in 1954 and finds Mr. DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo as a pair of U.S. marshals sent to the remote island to find an escaped mental patient. One of these days, Mr. DiCaprio is going to get his Oscar. Perhaps this is the movie. (October 2nd)</p>
<p><strong>November: <em>The Box </em>(dir. Richard Kelly)</strong></p>
<p>We think we'd be pretty excited to see <em>The Box</em> even if <a href="http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/news/148217-arcade-fires-butler-talks-miroir-noir-the-box-score">Arcade Fire</a> wasn't scoring the entire movie. The premise is <em>Twilight Zone-</em>ready: a married couple (Cameron Diaz and James Marsden) discovers a mysterious box on their doorstep, which if opened gives them instant wealth. The only catch? Opening it kills someone they don't know. Richard Kelly, he of <em>Donnie Darko</em> and <em>Southland Tales</em>, directs, meaning: Expect some insanity. (November 6th)</p>
<p><strong>December: <em>The Lovely Bones</em> (dir. Peter Jackson)</strong></p>
<p>Based on the acclaimed book by Alice Siebold, <em>The Lovely Bones</em> is Peter Jackson's first film since spending the last decade dealing with orcs and giant apes. <em>Atonement</em> pill Saoirse Ronan stars as a murdered young girl who watches over her family&mdash;and her killer&mdash;from heaven. Mark Wahlberg and Rachel Weisz play the parents, which is fine, until you remember that Ryan Gosling could have been the star. Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/celebrity/Ryan-Gosling-Too-Demanding-Too-Cheesy-For-Lovely-Bones-6953.html">he was supposedly fired for gaining too much weight</a>. Mr. Gosling might not <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/37753/saturday-night-live-mark-wahlberg-talks-to-animals" target="_blank">talk to animals</a>, but he's a way better actor than Mr. Wahlberg. Early, early prediction: Expect Oscar heat for Susan Sarandon as the grandmother. (December 11th)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/01/12-movies-for-12-months-2009-in-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Peter Jackson: Gosling Got Too Fat</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/10/peter-jackson-gosling-got-too-fat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:18:22 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/10/peter-jackson-gosling-got-too-fat/</link>
			<dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/10/peter-jackson-gosling-got-too-fat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.observer.com/files/2007/10/gosling2.bmp" /><a href="/2007/gosling-quits-lovely-bones-movie ">We told you</a> yesterday that Ryan Gosling left the Peter Jackson-directed film adaptation of <em>The Lovely Bones</em> this weekend, but now <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/la-et-goslingclooney23oct23,0,1107668.story?coll=la-home-entertainment"><i>The Los Angeles Times</i></a> is reporting that a little chub might have been the reason behind those so-called &quot;creative differences.&quot;</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>Peter Jackson was said to be quite surprised that Gosling had showed up to start work on &quot;The Lovely Bones&quot; looking like he'd donned a fat suit. According to sources, the 26-year-old Gosling had apparently told the director he was going to gain weight to age himself up to play the part of a grieving father, but Jackson was still expecting some movie star allure -- not paunch and a beard. By Friday, Gosling had left the high-profile production over those pesky &quot;creative differences,&quot; and, by Sunday, he'd been replaced by 36-year-old Mark Wahlberg, who actually could be old enough to father a teenager. </p>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.observer.com/files/2007/10/gosling2.bmp" /><a href="/2007/gosling-quits-lovely-bones-movie ">We told you</a> yesterday that Ryan Gosling left the Peter Jackson-directed film adaptation of <em>The Lovely Bones</em> this weekend, but now <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/la-et-goslingclooney23oct23,0,1107668.story?coll=la-home-entertainment"><i>The Los Angeles Times</i></a> is reporting that a little chub might have been the reason behind those so-called &quot;creative differences.&quot;</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>Peter Jackson was said to be quite surprised that Gosling had showed up to start work on &quot;The Lovely Bones&quot; looking like he'd donned a fat suit. According to sources, the 26-year-old Gosling had apparently told the director he was going to gain weight to age himself up to play the part of a grieving father, but Jackson was still expecting some movie star allure -- not paunch and a beard. By Friday, Gosling had left the high-profile production over those pesky &quot;creative differences,&quot; and, by Sunday, he'd been replaced by 36-year-old Mark Wahlberg, who actually could be old enough to father a teenager. </p>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/10/peter-jackson-gosling-got-too-fat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.observer.com/files/2007/10/gosling2.bmp" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Gosling Quits Lovely Bones Movie</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/10/gosling-quits-ilovely-bonesi-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:27:38 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/10/gosling-quits-ilovely-bonesi-movie/</link>
			<dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/10/gosling-quits-ilovely-bonesi-movie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/ryangosling.jpg?w=300&h=184" />One day before shooting began, Ryan Gosling walked away from his part as a greiving father in Peter Jackson's adaptation of the Alice Sebold novel, <em>The Lovely Bones</em>, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117974450.html?categoryId=2431&amp;cs=1">according to Variety.</a></p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>[Gosling] stepped out after gaining 20 pounds and growing a beard for the job. Sources attributed the exit to creative differences.    </p>
</p></div>
<p>Mark Wahlberg will replace him.  </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/ryangosling.jpg?w=300&h=184" />One day before shooting began, Ryan Gosling walked away from his part as a greiving father in Peter Jackson's adaptation of the Alice Sebold novel, <em>The Lovely Bones</em>, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117974450.html?categoryId=2431&amp;cs=1">according to Variety.</a></p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>[Gosling] stepped out after gaining 20 pounds and growing a beard for the job. Sources attributed the exit to creative differences.    </p>
</p></div>
<p>Mark Wahlberg will replace him.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/10/gosling-quits-ilovely-bonesi-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/ryangosling.jpg?w=300&#38;h=184" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
