<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; The New Yorker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/the-new-yorker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>9 of Our Favorite #BuzzFeedNewYorker Tweets</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2013/01/9-of-our-favorite-buzzfeednewyorker-tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:29:21 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2013/01/9-of-our-favorite-buzzfeednewyorker-tweets/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=286425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_286429" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 241px"><a href="http://observer.com/2013/01/3281757641_9fdf0d4f98/" rel="attachment wp-att-286429"><img class="size-medium wp-image-286429" alt="3281757641_9fdf0d4f98" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/3281757641_9fdf0d4f98.jpeg?w=231" width="231" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo credit: The New Yorker.</p></div></p>
<p>BuzzFeed and <em>The New Yorker</em> couldn't be more different, right? Well, what if you combined them? In honor (we assume) of the <a href="http://observer.com/2013/01/matt-buchanan-leaving-buzzfeed-for-the-new-yorker/">news of tech editor Matt Buchanan's</a> seemingly unlikely path from the Internet-friendly world of BuzzFeed to the prestige brand of <em>The</em> <em>New Yorker</em>, a hashtag has sprung up on Twitter to mash up the two sensibilities. Meet #BuzzFeedNewYorker.</p>
<p>Here are our nine of our favorites (in no particular order):<!--more--></p>
<p>https://twitter.com/scottalyoung/status/296756759958286337</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/tomgara/status/296755753266577408</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/EmilyGould/status/296742568933335040</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/joshgreenman/status/296738719082360832</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/joshspero/status/296755287942127617</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/SimonMaloy/status/296735471709589504</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/mjanssen/status/296753200713850881</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/brfreed/status/296752510826323968</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/NickyWoolf/status/296751930447908869</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_286429" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 241px"><a href="http://observer.com/2013/01/3281757641_9fdf0d4f98/" rel="attachment wp-att-286429"><img class="size-medium wp-image-286429" alt="3281757641_9fdf0d4f98" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/3281757641_9fdf0d4f98.jpeg?w=231" width="231" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo credit: The New Yorker.</p></div></p>
<p>BuzzFeed and <em>The New Yorker</em> couldn't be more different, right? Well, what if you combined them? In honor (we assume) of the <a href="http://observer.com/2013/01/matt-buchanan-leaving-buzzfeed-for-the-new-yorker/">news of tech editor Matt Buchanan's</a> seemingly unlikely path from the Internet-friendly world of BuzzFeed to the prestige brand of <em>The</em> <em>New Yorker</em>, a hashtag has sprung up on Twitter to mash up the two sensibilities. Meet #BuzzFeedNewYorker.</p>
<p>Here are our nine of our favorites (in no particular order):<!--more--></p>
<p>https://twitter.com/scottalyoung/status/296756759958286337</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/tomgara/status/296755753266577408</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/EmilyGould/status/296742568933335040</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/joshgreenman/status/296738719082360832</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/joshspero/status/296755287942127617</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/SimonMaloy/status/296735471709589504</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/mjanssen/status/296753200713850881</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/brfreed/status/296752510826323968</p>
<p>https://twitter.com/NickyWoolf/status/296751930447908869</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2013/01/9-of-our-favorite-buzzfeednewyorker-tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/3281757641_9fdf0d4f98.jpeg?w=231" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">3281757641_9fdf0d4f98</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Cartoon Blues: The Life of The New Yorker&#8217;s Favorite Depressive Is Drawn Out in New Bio</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/12/cartoon-blues-the-life-of-the-new-yorkers-favorite-depressive-is-drawn-out-in-new-bio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:26:58 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/12/cartoon-blues-the-life-of-the-new-yorkers-favorite-depressive-is-drawn-out-in-new-bio/</link>
			<dc:creator>James Camp</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=282178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_282179" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 215px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/12/cartoon-blues-the-life-of-the-new-yorkers-favorite-depressive-is-drawn-out-in-new-bio/saul-steinberg/" rel="attachment wp-att-282179"><img class="size-medium wp-image-282179" alt="Saul Steinberg. (Photo by Gjon Mill/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/steinberg.jpg?w=205" width="205" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Saul Steinberg. (Photo by Gjon Mill/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Saul Steinberg was the best-loved nonwriter in the history of <i>The</i> <i>New Yorker</i>. He did cartoons, fake maps, trick diplomas and tinkered-with postcards, a sketchbook from behind the Iron Curtain and another on the road with the Milwaukee Braves. Often he just did the doodles (the “spots,” as editors called them) adorning the columns of spotless prose. He even drew some of the advertisements that appeared in the magazine’s margins, until he got so rich he stopped needing the work. The Romanian-born Steinberg did his first <i>New Yorker</i> drawing for Harold Ross in 1941 and his last for David Remnick in 1999, the year of his death. Along the way, he did 90 covers, a number that continues, posthumously, to rise; Steinberg’s ghost most recently had the cover last week. His masterpiece appeared 36 years earlier, on March 29th, 1976: “View of the World From 9th Avenue,” his emblem of New York self-centeredness, in which the expanses of Ninth and 10th Avenues give way to a fat strip of the Hudson, the foreshortened flyover states and the tapered specks of far-off Asia.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Steinberg was an intellectual who made a big deal of not being too intellectual. With William Shawn, his friend and editor, he shared a lighthearted, no-bullshit style. “The true lover of art,” Steinberg once said, goes through a museum “on roller skates and is extremely tired after five minutes.” He could be ironic about his adoptive homeland. His America was a green land of Red Indians, road trips and cliché. His classic drawings—of an ordinary “E” contemplating a jazzed-up “É” in a thought bubble, of a stick-figure knight on horseback tilting his lance at a giant baby, of Santa Claus and Sigmund Freud presiding over a pyramid of Americana—have the character of agreeable riddles. They were existential cartoons for people who thought existentialism was too serious and cartoons not serious enough. Steinberg’s knack for being deep without being difficult made him the darling of gallerists and editors. By the time he died, at age 84, it had long since made him famous. In his obituary for Steinberg, Adam Gopnik proclaimed him the “greatest artist to be associated with [<i>The New Yorker</i>] and the most original man of his time.”</p>
<p>Between the greatness of the artist and the originality of the man, the biographer builds a bridge. Deirdre Bair’s <i>Saul Steinberg: A Biography</i> (Nan A. Talese, 752 pp., $40), a tremendous feat of fact-gathering marred by a lot of bad writing, provides the reader with evidence to construct several versions of its subject. Steinberg was by turns a striver, a genius, a prankster, a victim, a great friend, a bad husband, a self-deluding roué and a grim old man whose “suicidal ideation” was only halted by the pancreatic cancer that killed him. The biography teeters under the weight of these contradictions, and one often wishes that Ms. Bair had tried harder to give her findings the shape of a story.</p>
<p>As for her prose style, one wishes that Ms. Bair had tried harder in general. Perhaps it’s inevitable that a figure as sui generis as Steinberg would be stalely praised for “refreshing originality,” but a sentence like “His contribution to the genre’s evolution was with innovative drawings that departed from the expected and took the viewer into the realm of the surprising and unexpected,” which makes a bland observation and then repeats it three times, is so bad that it casts doubt on both the writer and the editors behind her.</p>
<p>It’s the kind of sloppiness that can sometimes detract from an interesting story. Laid out in full, Steinberg’s life assumes the dimensions of a cautionary tale about the human costs of a career in irony. One of his favorite images was of a “toothpick bird” perched inside the maw of a crocodile: “Nobody in the world is as safe as that bird in the crocodile’s mouth.” It’s easy to see Steinberg, who liked to laugh in the teeth of tragedy, in that bird, but his biography gives one cause to wonder what all the crocodile breath may have done to his soul. It turns out that he was a pretty unpleasant guy who was capable of ugly behavior. One surprise of Ms. Bair’s biography is that Mr. Gopnik, no indifferent parent, would show such personal esteem for a man who, rumored to have a thing for too-young women, once gave a sleeping baby a static shock on purpose. “All he wanted was to create a situation where the child would always remember him,” as Steinberg explained over the baby’s tears to its mother.</p>
<p>The ability to be childlike even in child abuse wasn’t the only one of Steinberg’s paradoxes. He was a depressive who liked to drive sports cars, a perfectionist who preferred his work to appear in the pages of a perishable, general-interest weekly, a self-described “writer who draws.” He preferred the company of art critics like Harold Rosenberg to the crazy artists Rosenberg wrote about. Ms. Bair makes it clear that Steinberg was a man who lived for adultery, yet he could also be improbably loyal: for decades, he funded the lives of parents he didn’t like (he modeled his caricatures of Mussolini on his mother), a half-dozen cousins he hardly knew, a college girlfriend who cheated on him and the guy she cheated on him with. That guy, Aldo Buzzi, was such a close friend that he ended up with the byline on Steinberg’s memoirs; it’s hard to write about Steinberg without recourse to oxymorons of this kind.</p>
<p>Ms. Bair describes Steinberg’s life as “a parallel to the history of the twentieth century,” and it’s true that he lived on a grand scale. Steinberg was raised by lower-class Jewish parents in the Bucharest of the 1920s. In 1933, he moved to Milan to study architecture, where he got his start cartooning for a satirical weekly called <i>Bertoldo</i>. Soon, the precarious expat with the “X-ray” physique had a fan base, a few girlfriends and enough spare cash to stand drinks for friends. Success stories are always a little opaque, but Ms. Bair still might have done a better job explaining the ease with which Steinberg transformed doodling into a living. He continued to draw for <i>Bertoldo</i> until 1938, when Mussolini began enacting a raft of anti-Semitic legislation and work dried up for “the foreign Jew.” By 1940, he had surrendered himself under pressure to his local police chief, who remanded him to the Italian concentration camp at Tortoreto.</p>
<p>This disaster set the stage for five decades of professional windfalls. Steinberg’s term in Tortoreto only lasted a month, as Romanian relatives living in America successfully intervened to get him out of Europe. He ended up in Santo Domingo, a city he found “vulgar.” He surfaced on the radar of <i>New Yorker </i>founder Harold Ross. “I’m told he’s in his twenties, and a man of ideas,” Jim Geraghty, <i>The New Yorker</i>’s art director, told Ross, and by late June of 1942 he had helped Steinberg immigrate to the United States. He’d hardly arrived when, in 1943, he was packed off to China by “Wild” Bill Donovan’s OSS. “God knows how your knowledge of the Italian people will benefit you in China,” commented Geraghty, “but perhaps the Navy knows best.” By the time he returned, Steinberg was engaged to the Romanian-American painter Hedda Sterne. He was already endeared to <i>New Yorker </i>readers, for whom he’d done a series of well-liked drawings about his forays in the Orient.</p>
<p>Settling in America involved Steinberg in a lot of traveling beyond America. He was a frequent flier when flight was glamorous, haring around the globe to meet deadlines, arrange exhibitions, have sex with women Ms. Bair leaves unnamed and dine with friends whose celebrated surnames are searchable in her index. Ms. Bair works hard to untangle these itineraries, and though the researcher in her is clearly game, the writer can seem overwhelmed. I lost count of the number of times that she described Steinberg’s lifestyle as “frenetic.”</p>
<p>It’s true that with his trademark big glasses and bald head, Steinberg could seem omnipresent. He was popular, promiscuous and lucky. Typical was his trip to Russia, where <i>The New Yorker</i> dispatched him in 1956. On the flight over, he was seated next to Graham Greene. It was their only meeting, and they got drunk together. Greene told Steinberg what kind of coat to take to the tundra. This cameo kicks off one of the biography’s funnier sequences, in which Steinberg, bored by Soviet hosts who repeatedly send him to pompous cultural events (“Once again he had to sit through <i>Don Quixote</i>”), starts ducking away between arias for quickies with strangers (“Girl from Swedish Embassy”). Though Steinberg, like his biographer, was mostly discreet enough not to name names, he wasn’t above itemizing his trysts in a diary he knew his wife was bound to read. “Do you want to live with such a monster?” he once asked her.</p>
<p>Sterne left Steinberg in 1960. To the extent that Ms. Bair has given her material dramatic shape, it’s as a tragedy culminating in the suicide of Sigrid Spaeth, Steinberg’s chief girlfriend for the next 35 years, with Steinberg’s personal coldness in the role of nemesis. (He “deflavorized” emotions, according to Sterne.) Spaeth was a German woman 20 years Steinberg’s junior whom Steinberg met at a party. She became his sexual obsession. She used to joke about her parents’ role in Kristallnacht at dinners on the Upper East Side. Ms. Bair theorizes that Steinberg, who donated to Jewish charities, found this exciting. Though he paid her expenses, Steinberg couldn’t, or maybe wouldn’t, do much for her career as a designer of book jackets. Spaeth depended on his stipends even when they weren’t speaking. She was always high-strung, but it’s possible that Steinberg’s combination of munificence and neglect drove her insane. “I hope I am not dying,” she wrote of one failed suicide attempt—“despite the interesting side effects it would have on Saul.”</p>
<p>When, in 1996, Spaeth fatally jumped off the roof of her apartment building on Riverside Drive, Steinberg mailed photocopies of her suicide note to friends. This seems to have been his way of grieving for her. Though he had given her nearly everything she owned, Spaeth willed the bulk of her assets to her analyst, a Jungian whom Steinberg had placed on retainer. Steinberg fell into a melancholy, and when he became suicidal, he was persuaded to try electroshock therapy, which damaged his memory but didn’t work. He died in 1999, his self-loathing, to all appearances, intact. “Mr. Steinberg, you don’t know how to be close, only in the mind,” Spaeth wrote him in 1970. “But I am human not an idea and the caress of a bum at the right moment when I needed it was more assuring than all your words.”</p>
<p>The opposition of life and art—of “the caress of a bum” and the “brooding of the hand,” as Steinberg once described doodling—is a heavy subject; yet the Steinberg-Spaeth psychodrama doesn’t carry the weight it should. This might be because Ms. Bair has so little to say about Steinberg’s work. “By putting his own particular spin on what he drew,” she writes, “he could turn his subjects into an ‘aha!’ moment for those who beheld his work.” Discussion of “aha!” moments is about as epiphanic as her art criticism gets, and it’s a shame. A biographer who saw more in the art might have seen more to like, or understand, in its maker. For this “sweetest of cruel men” was well aware of the tax he paid on his devastating gifts. “I have tried so hard to break through the asbestos that coats me,” he said. “Inside, deep inside, I am soft.” Whether the softness within would excuse the asbestos without was a question for which Steinberg didn’t have an answer. He knew that “work was ... the only form of altruism the artist has.” Did he work hard enough?</p>
<p align="right"><i>editorial@observer.com</i></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_282179" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 215px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/12/cartoon-blues-the-life-of-the-new-yorkers-favorite-depressive-is-drawn-out-in-new-bio/saul-steinberg/" rel="attachment wp-att-282179"><img class="size-medium wp-image-282179" alt="Saul Steinberg. (Photo by Gjon Mill/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/steinberg.jpg?w=205" width="205" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Saul Steinberg. (Photo by Gjon Mill/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Saul Steinberg was the best-loved nonwriter in the history of <i>The</i> <i>New Yorker</i>. He did cartoons, fake maps, trick diplomas and tinkered-with postcards, a sketchbook from behind the Iron Curtain and another on the road with the Milwaukee Braves. Often he just did the doodles (the “spots,” as editors called them) adorning the columns of spotless prose. He even drew some of the advertisements that appeared in the magazine’s margins, until he got so rich he stopped needing the work. The Romanian-born Steinberg did his first <i>New Yorker</i> drawing for Harold Ross in 1941 and his last for David Remnick in 1999, the year of his death. Along the way, he did 90 covers, a number that continues, posthumously, to rise; Steinberg’s ghost most recently had the cover last week. His masterpiece appeared 36 years earlier, on March 29th, 1976: “View of the World From 9th Avenue,” his emblem of New York self-centeredness, in which the expanses of Ninth and 10th Avenues give way to a fat strip of the Hudson, the foreshortened flyover states and the tapered specks of far-off Asia.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Steinberg was an intellectual who made a big deal of not being too intellectual. With William Shawn, his friend and editor, he shared a lighthearted, no-bullshit style. “The true lover of art,” Steinberg once said, goes through a museum “on roller skates and is extremely tired after five minutes.” He could be ironic about his adoptive homeland. His America was a green land of Red Indians, road trips and cliché. His classic drawings—of an ordinary “E” contemplating a jazzed-up “É” in a thought bubble, of a stick-figure knight on horseback tilting his lance at a giant baby, of Santa Claus and Sigmund Freud presiding over a pyramid of Americana—have the character of agreeable riddles. They were existential cartoons for people who thought existentialism was too serious and cartoons not serious enough. Steinberg’s knack for being deep without being difficult made him the darling of gallerists and editors. By the time he died, at age 84, it had long since made him famous. In his obituary for Steinberg, Adam Gopnik proclaimed him the “greatest artist to be associated with [<i>The New Yorker</i>] and the most original man of his time.”</p>
<p>Between the greatness of the artist and the originality of the man, the biographer builds a bridge. Deirdre Bair’s <i>Saul Steinberg: A Biography</i> (Nan A. Talese, 752 pp., $40), a tremendous feat of fact-gathering marred by a lot of bad writing, provides the reader with evidence to construct several versions of its subject. Steinberg was by turns a striver, a genius, a prankster, a victim, a great friend, a bad husband, a self-deluding roué and a grim old man whose “suicidal ideation” was only halted by the pancreatic cancer that killed him. The biography teeters under the weight of these contradictions, and one often wishes that Ms. Bair had tried harder to give her findings the shape of a story.</p>
<p>As for her prose style, one wishes that Ms. Bair had tried harder in general. Perhaps it’s inevitable that a figure as sui generis as Steinberg would be stalely praised for “refreshing originality,” but a sentence like “His contribution to the genre’s evolution was with innovative drawings that departed from the expected and took the viewer into the realm of the surprising and unexpected,” which makes a bland observation and then repeats it three times, is so bad that it casts doubt on both the writer and the editors behind her.</p>
<p>It’s the kind of sloppiness that can sometimes detract from an interesting story. Laid out in full, Steinberg’s life assumes the dimensions of a cautionary tale about the human costs of a career in irony. One of his favorite images was of a “toothpick bird” perched inside the maw of a crocodile: “Nobody in the world is as safe as that bird in the crocodile’s mouth.” It’s easy to see Steinberg, who liked to laugh in the teeth of tragedy, in that bird, but his biography gives one cause to wonder what all the crocodile breath may have done to his soul. It turns out that he was a pretty unpleasant guy who was capable of ugly behavior. One surprise of Ms. Bair’s biography is that Mr. Gopnik, no indifferent parent, would show such personal esteem for a man who, rumored to have a thing for too-young women, once gave a sleeping baby a static shock on purpose. “All he wanted was to create a situation where the child would always remember him,” as Steinberg explained over the baby’s tears to its mother.</p>
<p>The ability to be childlike even in child abuse wasn’t the only one of Steinberg’s paradoxes. He was a depressive who liked to drive sports cars, a perfectionist who preferred his work to appear in the pages of a perishable, general-interest weekly, a self-described “writer who draws.” He preferred the company of art critics like Harold Rosenberg to the crazy artists Rosenberg wrote about. Ms. Bair makes it clear that Steinberg was a man who lived for adultery, yet he could also be improbably loyal: for decades, he funded the lives of parents he didn’t like (he modeled his caricatures of Mussolini on his mother), a half-dozen cousins he hardly knew, a college girlfriend who cheated on him and the guy she cheated on him with. That guy, Aldo Buzzi, was such a close friend that he ended up with the byline on Steinberg’s memoirs; it’s hard to write about Steinberg without recourse to oxymorons of this kind.</p>
<p>Ms. Bair describes Steinberg’s life as “a parallel to the history of the twentieth century,” and it’s true that he lived on a grand scale. Steinberg was raised by lower-class Jewish parents in the Bucharest of the 1920s. In 1933, he moved to Milan to study architecture, where he got his start cartooning for a satirical weekly called <i>Bertoldo</i>. Soon, the precarious expat with the “X-ray” physique had a fan base, a few girlfriends and enough spare cash to stand drinks for friends. Success stories are always a little opaque, but Ms. Bair still might have done a better job explaining the ease with which Steinberg transformed doodling into a living. He continued to draw for <i>Bertoldo</i> until 1938, when Mussolini began enacting a raft of anti-Semitic legislation and work dried up for “the foreign Jew.” By 1940, he had surrendered himself under pressure to his local police chief, who remanded him to the Italian concentration camp at Tortoreto.</p>
<p>This disaster set the stage for five decades of professional windfalls. Steinberg’s term in Tortoreto only lasted a month, as Romanian relatives living in America successfully intervened to get him out of Europe. He ended up in Santo Domingo, a city he found “vulgar.” He surfaced on the radar of <i>New Yorker </i>founder Harold Ross. “I’m told he’s in his twenties, and a man of ideas,” Jim Geraghty, <i>The New Yorker</i>’s art director, told Ross, and by late June of 1942 he had helped Steinberg immigrate to the United States. He’d hardly arrived when, in 1943, he was packed off to China by “Wild” Bill Donovan’s OSS. “God knows how your knowledge of the Italian people will benefit you in China,” commented Geraghty, “but perhaps the Navy knows best.” By the time he returned, Steinberg was engaged to the Romanian-American painter Hedda Sterne. He was already endeared to <i>New Yorker </i>readers, for whom he’d done a series of well-liked drawings about his forays in the Orient.</p>
<p>Settling in America involved Steinberg in a lot of traveling beyond America. He was a frequent flier when flight was glamorous, haring around the globe to meet deadlines, arrange exhibitions, have sex with women Ms. Bair leaves unnamed and dine with friends whose celebrated surnames are searchable in her index. Ms. Bair works hard to untangle these itineraries, and though the researcher in her is clearly game, the writer can seem overwhelmed. I lost count of the number of times that she described Steinberg’s lifestyle as “frenetic.”</p>
<p>It’s true that with his trademark big glasses and bald head, Steinberg could seem omnipresent. He was popular, promiscuous and lucky. Typical was his trip to Russia, where <i>The New Yorker</i> dispatched him in 1956. On the flight over, he was seated next to Graham Greene. It was their only meeting, and they got drunk together. Greene told Steinberg what kind of coat to take to the tundra. This cameo kicks off one of the biography’s funnier sequences, in which Steinberg, bored by Soviet hosts who repeatedly send him to pompous cultural events (“Once again he had to sit through <i>Don Quixote</i>”), starts ducking away between arias for quickies with strangers (“Girl from Swedish Embassy”). Though Steinberg, like his biographer, was mostly discreet enough not to name names, he wasn’t above itemizing his trysts in a diary he knew his wife was bound to read. “Do you want to live with such a monster?” he once asked her.</p>
<p>Sterne left Steinberg in 1960. To the extent that Ms. Bair has given her material dramatic shape, it’s as a tragedy culminating in the suicide of Sigrid Spaeth, Steinberg’s chief girlfriend for the next 35 years, with Steinberg’s personal coldness in the role of nemesis. (He “deflavorized” emotions, according to Sterne.) Spaeth was a German woman 20 years Steinberg’s junior whom Steinberg met at a party. She became his sexual obsession. She used to joke about her parents’ role in Kristallnacht at dinners on the Upper East Side. Ms. Bair theorizes that Steinberg, who donated to Jewish charities, found this exciting. Though he paid her expenses, Steinberg couldn’t, or maybe wouldn’t, do much for her career as a designer of book jackets. Spaeth depended on his stipends even when they weren’t speaking. She was always high-strung, but it’s possible that Steinberg’s combination of munificence and neglect drove her insane. “I hope I am not dying,” she wrote of one failed suicide attempt—“despite the interesting side effects it would have on Saul.”</p>
<p>When, in 1996, Spaeth fatally jumped off the roof of her apartment building on Riverside Drive, Steinberg mailed photocopies of her suicide note to friends. This seems to have been his way of grieving for her. Though he had given her nearly everything she owned, Spaeth willed the bulk of her assets to her analyst, a Jungian whom Steinberg had placed on retainer. Steinberg fell into a melancholy, and when he became suicidal, he was persuaded to try electroshock therapy, which damaged his memory but didn’t work. He died in 1999, his self-loathing, to all appearances, intact. “Mr. Steinberg, you don’t know how to be close, only in the mind,” Spaeth wrote him in 1970. “But I am human not an idea and the caress of a bum at the right moment when I needed it was more assuring than all your words.”</p>
<p>The opposition of life and art—of “the caress of a bum” and the “brooding of the hand,” as Steinberg once described doodling—is a heavy subject; yet the Steinberg-Spaeth psychodrama doesn’t carry the weight it should. This might be because Ms. Bair has so little to say about Steinberg’s work. “By putting his own particular spin on what he drew,” she writes, “he could turn his subjects into an ‘aha!’ moment for those who beheld his work.” Discussion of “aha!” moments is about as epiphanic as her art criticism gets, and it’s a shame. A biographer who saw more in the art might have seen more to like, or understand, in its maker. For this “sweetest of cruel men” was well aware of the tax he paid on his devastating gifts. “I have tried so hard to break through the asbestos that coats me,” he said. “Inside, deep inside, I am soft.” Whether the softness within would excuse the asbestos without was a question for which Steinberg didn’t have an answer. He knew that “work was ... the only form of altruism the artist has.” Did he work hard enough?</p>
<p align="right"><i>editorial@observer.com</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/12/cartoon-blues-the-life-of-the-new-yorkers-favorite-depressive-is-drawn-out-in-new-bio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/steinberg-1.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/steinberg-1.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">steinberg (1)</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2e863fdf2200f4a23e7af8024f84d8c5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jcamp</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/steinberg.jpg?w=205" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Saul Steinberg. (Photo by Gjon Mill/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The New Yorker’s Cover Gives Us Déjà vu</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-cover-gives-us-deja-vu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:42:41 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-cover-gives-us-deja-vu/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=271856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_271905" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 370px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-cover-gives-us-deja-vu/web_illo_edit/" rel="attachment wp-att-271905"><img class=" wp-image-271905" title="WEB_ILLO_edit" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/web_illo_edit.jpg?w=600" height="224" width="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Barry Blitt's <em>New Yorker</em> cover and Victor Juhasz's cover standing side-by-side.</p></div></p>
<p>If the cover of this week's <em>New Yorker</em> looked familiar, it may be because you saw <em>The New York Observer</em> back in May of 2005. The illustration for <a href="http://observer.com/2005/05/jolie-laide/">our cover story on Angelina Jolie</a>, by Victor Juhasz, showed Ms. Jolie getting the names of her former paramours crossed off her arm by a tattoo artist. The current cover of <em>The New Yorker </em>depicts Mitt Romney in the tattoo chair as he gets his policy positions erased from his shoulder.<!--more--></p>
<p>Now, we are not saying Barry Blitt (who, as a side note, used to draw for our paper) copied us--both Mr. Blitt and Mr. Juhasz were no doubt inspired by one of the more perplexing Norman Rockwell paintings--"<a href="http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/exhibitions/norman_rockwell/">The Tattoo Artist</a>."</p>
<p>Mr. Blitt explains as a much in a <em>New Yorker </em><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/10/cover-story-mitt-romney-norman-rockwell-tattoos.html">blog post</a>: “My grandfather was a Sunday painter, he used to copy a lot of Norman Rockwell paintings, so I was aware of all the classic images at a very young age."</p>
<p>However, we would still like to note the striking coincidence. View a larger comparison of the covers below.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_271872" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-cover-gives-us-deja-vu/new-yorker-cover/" rel="attachment wp-att-271872"><img class="size-large wp-image-271872" title="New Yorker Cover" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/new-yorker-cover.jpg?w=600" height="374" width="600" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Barry Blitt's cover, Victor Juhasz's cover</p></div></p>
<p><strong>Update (2:28 p.m.):</strong><em> The story originally said that the Angelina Jolie story ran in July of 2005. It actually ran in May.</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_271905" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 370px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-cover-gives-us-deja-vu/web_illo_edit/" rel="attachment wp-att-271905"><img class=" wp-image-271905" title="WEB_ILLO_edit" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/web_illo_edit.jpg?w=600" height="224" width="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Barry Blitt's <em>New Yorker</em> cover and Victor Juhasz's cover standing side-by-side.</p></div></p>
<p>If the cover of this week's <em>New Yorker</em> looked familiar, it may be because you saw <em>The New York Observer</em> back in May of 2005. The illustration for <a href="http://observer.com/2005/05/jolie-laide/">our cover story on Angelina Jolie</a>, by Victor Juhasz, showed Ms. Jolie getting the names of her former paramours crossed off her arm by a tattoo artist. The current cover of <em>The New Yorker </em>depicts Mitt Romney in the tattoo chair as he gets his policy positions erased from his shoulder.<!--more--></p>
<p>Now, we are not saying Barry Blitt (who, as a side note, used to draw for our paper) copied us--both Mr. Blitt and Mr. Juhasz were no doubt inspired by one of the more perplexing Norman Rockwell paintings--"<a href="http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/exhibitions/norman_rockwell/">The Tattoo Artist</a>."</p>
<p>Mr. Blitt explains as a much in a <em>New Yorker </em><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/10/cover-story-mitt-romney-norman-rockwell-tattoos.html">blog post</a>: “My grandfather was a Sunday painter, he used to copy a lot of Norman Rockwell paintings, so I was aware of all the classic images at a very young age."</p>
<p>However, we would still like to note the striking coincidence. View a larger comparison of the covers below.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_271872" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-cover-gives-us-deja-vu/new-yorker-cover/" rel="attachment wp-att-271872"><img class="size-large wp-image-271872" title="New Yorker Cover" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/new-yorker-cover.jpg?w=600" height="374" width="600" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Barry Blitt's cover, Victor Juhasz's cover</p></div></p>
<p><strong>Update (2:28 p.m.):</strong><em> The story originally said that the Angelina Jolie story ran in July of 2005. It actually ran in May.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-cover-gives-us-deja-vu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/web_illo_edit.jpg?w=600" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">WEB_ILLO_edit</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/new-yorker-cover.jpg?w=600" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">New Yorker Cover</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The New Yorker on The New Yorker</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-on-the-new-yorker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:27:41 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-on-the-new-yorker/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=268654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_268655" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-on-the-new-yorker/rebeccameadnewyorkerfestival2012mothcrtl9rib2nal/" rel="attachment wp-att-268655"><img class="size-medium wp-image-268655" title="Rebecca+Mead+New+Yorker+Festival+2012+Moth+cRtL9riB2nal" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/rebeccameadnewyorkerfestival2012mothcrtl9rib2nal.jpeg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Rebecca Mead on Middlemarch</p></div></p>
<p>On a recent Friday evening, we headed all the way west on 37th Street to hear <em>New Yorker</em> writers recount stories about being that most exciting of things—a <em>New Yorker</em> writer. The event was the opening night of the blitz of panels, conversations and chances to see what writers look like that is the annual New Yorker Festival.</p>
<p>The hangar-like space was converted into a lounge with the addition of cafe tables and chairs. A cash bar offered wine, beer and snacks in serving bowls fashioned  to look like martini glasses. Snippets of conversation—overheard while we looked for a seat—sounded like, dare we say it, the premise of many a <em>New Yorker </em>cartoon.<!--more--></p>
<p>“Did you buy a place?” we heard a woman sipping red wine ask.</p>
<p>“In the process,” her tablemate responded.</p>
<p>“How <em>was</em> Monterey?” someone squealed.</p>
<p>A woman seated alone waited for the show to start, clutching, appropriately enough, this week’s issue.</p>
<p>Andy Borowitz, the magazine’s humor writer, hosted. “When David Remnick asked me if I wanted to write for <em>The New Yorker</em>, I was so excited I said I would do that for free,” he said.</p>
<p>The editor, Mr. Borowitz said, apparently had the same idea.</p>
<p>Thus, the tone was set. Lauren Collins, in black ankle boots and a patterned dress, reminisced about throwing up on Donatella Versace while on assignment in Lake Como. When she confessed to Mr. Remnick, he made her include it in the story “as penance.” Nicholas Schmidle told a story about interviewing Russian arms dealer Victor Bout, who demanded a subscription in exchange for talking to the magazine. Mr. Schmidle no longer speaks to the inmate, but he does renew his gift subscription.</p>
<p><em>“The New </em>Yorker makes a lovely gift and the holidays are just around the corner,” Mr. Borowitz said after Mr. Schmidle’s 10 minutes were up. “David Remnick will be selling subscriptions at intermission.” Mr. Remnick, who sat in the audience, stage right, looked amused.</p>
<p>“Did you know, David Remnick hasn’t read the magazine in the 14 years he has been the editor?” joked Mr. Borowitz. “He has them all in a pile on his bedside table, but he can’t seem to get to them.”</p>
<p>Rebecca Mead told a heartwarming story about finding herself while writing about <em>Middlemarch</em>. Film critic Anthony Lan<strong>e</strong> held the mic and paced like a seasoned stand-up.</p>
<p>“When it happens, it’s like a dog that can dance,” Mr. Remnick told <em>The Observer</em> later. “Anthony Lane is a natural comedian.”</p>
<p>Will Mr. Remnick ever tell his story onstage?</p>
<p>“No one has asked me, and if drafted I will not run,” he said. “I swear to God. It’s mortifying enough to hear your name in someone’s story.”</p>
<p>Larry Wright, who closed the show, had the folksy charm of a storyteller at a campfire (he lives in Austin, Texas) as he talked about his 25,000-word story about Scientology. He described the fact-checking process with the notoriously touchy (and litigious) church. “I’ve come to think of the fact-checkers as very erudite and polite agents with the KGB,” he said.</p>
<p>Like everything else about the magazine on this evening, even the fact-checkers became the stuff of legend</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_268655" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-on-the-new-yorker/rebeccameadnewyorkerfestival2012mothcrtl9rib2nal/" rel="attachment wp-att-268655"><img class="size-medium wp-image-268655" title="Rebecca+Mead+New+Yorker+Festival+2012+Moth+cRtL9riB2nal" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/rebeccameadnewyorkerfestival2012mothcrtl9rib2nal.jpeg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Rebecca Mead on Middlemarch</p></div></p>
<p>On a recent Friday evening, we headed all the way west on 37th Street to hear <em>New Yorker</em> writers recount stories about being that most exciting of things—a <em>New Yorker</em> writer. The event was the opening night of the blitz of panels, conversations and chances to see what writers look like that is the annual New Yorker Festival.</p>
<p>The hangar-like space was converted into a lounge with the addition of cafe tables and chairs. A cash bar offered wine, beer and snacks in serving bowls fashioned  to look like martini glasses. Snippets of conversation—overheard while we looked for a seat—sounded like, dare we say it, the premise of many a <em>New Yorker </em>cartoon.<!--more--></p>
<p>“Did you buy a place?” we heard a woman sipping red wine ask.</p>
<p>“In the process,” her tablemate responded.</p>
<p>“How <em>was</em> Monterey?” someone squealed.</p>
<p>A woman seated alone waited for the show to start, clutching, appropriately enough, this week’s issue.</p>
<p>Andy Borowitz, the magazine’s humor writer, hosted. “When David Remnick asked me if I wanted to write for <em>The New Yorker</em>, I was so excited I said I would do that for free,” he said.</p>
<p>The editor, Mr. Borowitz said, apparently had the same idea.</p>
<p>Thus, the tone was set. Lauren Collins, in black ankle boots and a patterned dress, reminisced about throwing up on Donatella Versace while on assignment in Lake Como. When she confessed to Mr. Remnick, he made her include it in the story “as penance.” Nicholas Schmidle told a story about interviewing Russian arms dealer Victor Bout, who demanded a subscription in exchange for talking to the magazine. Mr. Schmidle no longer speaks to the inmate, but he does renew his gift subscription.</p>
<p><em>“The New </em>Yorker makes a lovely gift and the holidays are just around the corner,” Mr. Borowitz said after Mr. Schmidle’s 10 minutes were up. “David Remnick will be selling subscriptions at intermission.” Mr. Remnick, who sat in the audience, stage right, looked amused.</p>
<p>“Did you know, David Remnick hasn’t read the magazine in the 14 years he has been the editor?” joked Mr. Borowitz. “He has them all in a pile on his bedside table, but he can’t seem to get to them.”</p>
<p>Rebecca Mead told a heartwarming story about finding herself while writing about <em>Middlemarch</em>. Film critic Anthony Lan<strong>e</strong> held the mic and paced like a seasoned stand-up.</p>
<p>“When it happens, it’s like a dog that can dance,” Mr. Remnick told <em>The Observer</em> later. “Anthony Lane is a natural comedian.”</p>
<p>Will Mr. Remnick ever tell his story onstage?</p>
<p>“No one has asked me, and if drafted I will not run,” he said. “I swear to God. It’s mortifying enough to hear your name in someone’s story.”</p>
<p>Larry Wright, who closed the show, had the folksy charm of a storyteller at a campfire (he lives in Austin, Texas) as he talked about his 25,000-word story about Scientology. He described the fact-checking process with the notoriously touchy (and litigious) church. “I’ve come to think of the fact-checkers as very erudite and polite agents with the KGB,” he said.</p>
<p>Like everything else about the magazine on this evening, even the fact-checkers became the stuff of legend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-new-yorker-on-the-new-yorker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/rebeccameadnewyorkerfestival2012mothcrtl9rib2nal.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Rebecca+Mead+New+Yorker+Festival+2012+Moth+cRtL9riB2nal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Budget Cuts at Condé Nast</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/budget-cuts-at-conde-nast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:37:34 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/budget-cuts-at-conde-nast/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=267958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/budget-cuts-at-conde-nast/original_new_yorker_cover-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-267960"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-267960" title="Original_New_Yorker_cover" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/original_new_yorker_cover.png" alt="" width="200" height="271" /></a>Condé Nast President Bob Sauerberg and Chief Financial Officer John Bellando are in the middle of going over preliminary budgets for next year and are looking to trim some fat. They are asking all the magazines to cut 5 percent from next year's budget, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/conde_budget_cuts_of_on_agenda_AFYlyciUjBlltoq3GPL2NN">the <em>Post</em> reports</a>.</p>
<p>“I think the goal is 5 percent, and there is not a lot of leniency,” a Condé Nast source told the<em> Post</em>. So far, no magazine has been asked to cut more than the mandatory 5 percent, but this cut is is addition to the ten percent that most Condé mags had to cut from the current budget over the summer. Most, but not all. During that round of cuts, <em>The New Yorker </em>remained untouched. But this time, not even <em>The New Yorker </em>is going to be spared.</p>
<p>As with all news of budget cuts, rumors of layoffs are sure to follow. Although none have been announced yet, it may be a matter of time and some open jobs are going unfilled in order to avoid the inevitable.</p>
<p>One position that will have to be filled is that of publisher of luxury fashion mag<em> W </em>in the wake of Nina Lawrence's surprise announcement yesterday. Ms. Lawrence is leaving her post at <em>W</em> to go to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> as vice president of global marketing and advertising sales.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/budget-cuts-at-conde-nast/original_new_yorker_cover-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-267960"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-267960" title="Original_New_Yorker_cover" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/original_new_yorker_cover.png" alt="" width="200" height="271" /></a>Condé Nast President Bob Sauerberg and Chief Financial Officer John Bellando are in the middle of going over preliminary budgets for next year and are looking to trim some fat. They are asking all the magazines to cut 5 percent from next year's budget, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/conde_budget_cuts_of_on_agenda_AFYlyciUjBlltoq3GPL2NN">the <em>Post</em> reports</a>.</p>
<p>“I think the goal is 5 percent, and there is not a lot of leniency,” a Condé Nast source told the<em> Post</em>. So far, no magazine has been asked to cut more than the mandatory 5 percent, but this cut is is addition to the ten percent that most Condé mags had to cut from the current budget over the summer. Most, but not all. During that round of cuts, <em>The New Yorker </em>remained untouched. But this time, not even <em>The New Yorker </em>is going to be spared.</p>
<p>As with all news of budget cuts, rumors of layoffs are sure to follow. Although none have been announced yet, it may be a matter of time and some open jobs are going unfilled in order to avoid the inevitable.</p>
<p>One position that will have to be filled is that of publisher of luxury fashion mag<em> W </em>in the wake of Nina Lawrence's surprise announcement yesterday. Ms. Lawrence is leaving her post at <em>W</em> to go to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> as vice president of global marketing and advertising sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/budget-cuts-at-conde-nast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/original_new_yorker_cover.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Original_New_Yorker_cover</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>To Do Saturday: Talk of the Town</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:30:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=267089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_267091" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 219px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/wont-back-down-new-york-premiere-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-267091"><img class="size-medium wp-image-267091" title="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/152660632.jpg?w=209" alt="" width="209" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>It’s what all the house ads in our pile of unread <em>New Yorker</em> magazines—we’ve been busy!—have been hinting toward. The New Yorker Festival began last night and continues today. Events include<!--more--> a discussion with celebu-cobbler <strong>Christian Louboutin</strong>, a panel of presidential biographers moderated by editor <strong>David Remnick</strong> and celebrity drop-ins from interviewees <strong>Viola Davis</strong>, <strong>Sarah Silverman</strong>, <strong>Ben Stiller</strong> and, surprisingly, our onetime <em>Friend</em> <strong>Lisa Kudrow</strong>. Those without evening plans can check out a preview of <em>Cloud Atlas</em>, the upcoming genre-bending sci-fi flick, followed by a chat with the directors—yes, like everyone else here (but for Ms. Kudrow), they were profiled in the magazine first!</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker Festival, multiple times and locations, tickets and schedule can be found at newyorker.com/festival/program-guide.</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_267091" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 219px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/wont-back-down-new-york-premiere-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-267091"><img class="size-medium wp-image-267091" title="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/152660632.jpg?w=209" alt="" width="209" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>It’s what all the house ads in our pile of unread <em>New Yorker</em> magazines—we’ve been busy!—have been hinting toward. The New Yorker Festival began last night and continues today. Events include<!--more--> a discussion with celebu-cobbler <strong>Christian Louboutin</strong>, a panel of presidential biographers moderated by editor <strong>David Remnick</strong> and celebrity drop-ins from interviewees <strong>Viola Davis</strong>, <strong>Sarah Silverman</strong>, <strong>Ben Stiller</strong> and, surprisingly, our onetime <em>Friend</em> <strong>Lisa Kudrow</strong>. Those without evening plans can check out a preview of <em>Cloud Atlas</em>, the upcoming genre-bending sci-fi flick, followed by a chat with the directors—yes, like everyone else here (but for Ms. Kudrow), they were profiled in the magazine first!</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker Festival, multiple times and locations, tickets and schedule can be found at newyorker.com/festival/program-guide.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/a35c3d1b27e222b5e66c510f759693b3?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ddaddarioobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/152660632.jpg?w=209" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The Best New Yorker Sentence Ever Written</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-best-new-yorker-sentence-ever-written/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:57:13 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-best-new-yorker-sentence-ever-written/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=266778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_266787" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 218px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/annals.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-266787" title="annals" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/annals.jpg?w=208" alt="" width="208" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The New Yorker goes for baroque. (Bruce Gilden)</p></div></p>
<p>We found this by accident, skimming languidly through an old copy of <em>The New Yorker</em> on a weekend (as one is wont to do) in search of any articles we may have deemed "passable" the first time around. How we could have ever thought that of <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/09/03/120903fa_fact_friend">Tad Friend's piece</a> on future director/former gang leader Elgin James is beyond us. It's truly quite something, and contains the best use of "baroque," "DustBuster," and "human thighbone" in the same sentence.</p>
<p>We managed to take a screenshot and highlight the relevant part for you:<br />
<!--more--><br />
<a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/tumblr_mb57dxwn941qzetv9o1_1280.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-266780" title="tumblr_mb57dxwN941qzetv9o1_1280" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/tumblr_mb57dxwn941qzetv9o1_1280.jpg" alt="" width="546" height="389" /></a><br />
Yes. Perfect.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_266787" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 218px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/annals.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-266787" title="annals" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/annals.jpg?w=208" alt="" width="208" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The New Yorker goes for baroque. (Bruce Gilden)</p></div></p>
<p>We found this by accident, skimming languidly through an old copy of <em>The New Yorker</em> on a weekend (as one is wont to do) in search of any articles we may have deemed "passable" the first time around. How we could have ever thought that of <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/09/03/120903fa_fact_friend">Tad Friend's piece</a> on future director/former gang leader Elgin James is beyond us. It's truly quite something, and contains the best use of "baroque," "DustBuster," and "human thighbone" in the same sentence.</p>
<p>We managed to take a screenshot and highlight the relevant part for you:<br />
<!--more--><br />
<a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/tumblr_mb57dxwn941qzetv9o1_1280.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-266780" title="tumblr_mb57dxwN941qzetv9o1_1280" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/tumblr_mb57dxwn941qzetv9o1_1280.jpg" alt="" width="546" height="389" /></a><br />
Yes. Perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/the-best-new-yorker-sentence-ever-written/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/annals.jpg?w=104" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/annals.jpg?w=104" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">annals</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/66171f102efbbabd4a08d4202ed36b91?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dgrantobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/annals.jpg?w=208" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">annals</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/tumblr_mb57dxwn941qzetv9o1_1280.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tumblr_mb57dxwN941qzetv9o1_1280</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Haunted by The New Yorker?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/09/haunted-by-the-new-yorker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:35:44 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/09/haunted-by-the-new-yorker/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=265966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/09/haunted-by-the-new-yorker/screen-shot-2012-09-26-at-3-30-48-pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-266012"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-266012" title="Malcolm Gladwell" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/screen-shot-2012-09-26-at-3-30-48-pm.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></a>So is the Upright Citizens Brigade. And they made a video about it. Because the only thing more terrifying than a stack of unread <em>New Yorkers</em> is getting a phone call from Malcolm Gladwell reminding you that you are 14 issues behind and will never catch up.<!--more--></p>
<p>Everyone knows the feeling. <em>The New Yorker</em> shows up again and you haven't even finished the issue from last week. Or that #longreads profile that everybody was talking about two weeks ago is only half read and now it's too late to be part of The Conversation (were you ever even part of it?). Cue maniacal laughter.</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/RuqLuLrN7yA?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/09/haunted-by-the-new-yorker/screen-shot-2012-09-26-at-3-30-48-pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-266012"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-266012" title="Malcolm Gladwell" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/screen-shot-2012-09-26-at-3-30-48-pm.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></a>So is the Upright Citizens Brigade. And they made a video about it. Because the only thing more terrifying than a stack of unread <em>New Yorkers</em> is getting a phone call from Malcolm Gladwell reminding you that you are 14 issues behind and will never catch up.<!--more--></p>
<p>Everyone knows the feeling. <em>The New Yorker</em> shows up again and you haven't even finished the issue from last week. Or that #longreads profile that everybody was talking about two weeks ago is only half read and now it's too late to be part of The Conversation (were you ever even part of it?). Cue maniacal laughter.</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/RuqLuLrN7yA?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/09/haunted-by-the-new-yorker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/screen-shot-2012-09-26-at-3-30-48-pm.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Malcolm Gladwell</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>What is the Deal With Seinfeld Nostalgia This Week? (Video)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/07/what-is-the-deal-with-seinfeld-nostalgia-this-week-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:06:11 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/07/what-is-the-deal-with-seinfeld-nostalgia-this-week-video/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=253187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_253188" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/07/what-is-the-deal-with-seinfeld-nostalgia-this-week-video/seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon/" rel="attachment wp-att-253188"><img class="size-medium wp-image-253188" title="seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Elaine's cartoon, finally in the 'The New Yorker'</p></div></p>
<p>It must be something about <a href="http://observer.com/2012/07/directv-dish-and-time-warner-how-your-cable-provider-will-be-screwing-you-this-summer/">having our cable indiscriminately taken away from us</a>: we're all back to watching re-runs of Larry David's seminal show and getting misty-eyed.</p>
<p>First there was <a href="http://contest.newyorker.com/CaptionContest.aspx?affiliate=ny-caption">this week's caption contest</a> from <em>The New Yorker</em>, which ripped off Elaine's idea from a 1998 episode. It involves a pig going up to a complaint box, and yes, Kramer's answer is definitely the winner: "My wife is a slut."</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
It only took <em>The New Yorker</em> fourteen years to "publish" their next issue, in <em>Seinfeld </em>time.<br />
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY-h3spBAgI</p>
<p>But that wasn't the end of Seinfeld-ism for the week. Yesterday, a new web series from Jerry Seinfeld, <em><a href="http://comediansincarsgettingcoffee.com/">Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee</a></em>. The first episode featured the comedian and Larry David driving around, talking about pancakes and hot lunches. Definitely worth a watch, especially if you are David Remnick and are finally catching up on the last two decades of television.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_253188" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/07/what-is-the-deal-with-seinfeld-nostalgia-this-week-video/seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon/" rel="attachment wp-att-253188"><img class="size-medium wp-image-253188" title="seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Elaine's cartoon, finally in the 'The New Yorker'</p></div></p>
<p>It must be something about <a href="http://observer.com/2012/07/directv-dish-and-time-warner-how-your-cable-provider-will-be-screwing-you-this-summer/">having our cable indiscriminately taken away from us</a>: we're all back to watching re-runs of Larry David's seminal show and getting misty-eyed.</p>
<p>First there was <a href="http://contest.newyorker.com/CaptionContest.aspx?affiliate=ny-caption">this week's caption contest</a> from <em>The New Yorker</em>, which ripped off Elaine's idea from a 1998 episode. It involves a pig going up to a complaint box, and yes, Kramer's answer is definitely the winner: "My wife is a slut."</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
It only took <em>The New Yorker</em> fourteen years to "publish" their next issue, in <em>Seinfeld </em>time.<br />
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY-h3spBAgI</p>
<p>But that wasn't the end of Seinfeld-ism for the week. Yesterday, a new web series from Jerry Seinfeld, <em><a href="http://comediansincarsgettingcoffee.com/">Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee</a></em>. The first episode featured the comedian and Larry David driving around, talking about pancakes and hot lunches. Definitely worth a watch, especially if you are David Remnick and are finally catching up on the last two decades of television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/07/what-is-the-deal-with-seinfeld-nostalgia-this-week-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/66171f102efbbabd4a08d4202ed36b91?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dgrantobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">seinfeld-new-yorker-cartoon</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The New Yorker Will Serialize Jennifer Egan&#8217;s Short Story on Twitter, Starting Tonight</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/05/the-new-yorker-will-serialize-jennifer-egans-short-story-on-twitter-starting-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:30:24 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/05/the-new-yorker-will-serialize-jennifer-egans-short-story-on-twitter-starting-tonight/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kat Stoeffel</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=242146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_242154" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 251px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/113198757.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-242154" title="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/113198757.jpg?w=241" alt="" width="241" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">@egangoonsquad</p></div></p>
<p>What are you doing from 8-9 p.m. tonight, and for the next nine nights after that?</p>
<p>Tweeting about the shows you're watching on your ex-boyfriend's mom's HBO Go account? Staring at your iPhone until you know shows up at the party? Catching up on your <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/sexstrology">Sexstrology</a>?</p>
<p>Good! Then you'll be in just the place to catch "Black Box," <strong>Jennifer Egan</strong>'s latest <em>New Yorker</em> story, which will be serialized on Twitter, starting tonight.<!--more--></p>
<p>The installments of &lt;140 character paragraphs will be rounded up each day on the<em> New Yorker's </em>Page-Turner blog, and the full story will appear in the Monday "Science Fiction" issue.</p>
<p>Over on <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/05/coming-soon-jennifer-egan-black-box.html">Page-Turner</a>, Ms. Egan explained that when she wrote "Black Box" she was interested in "fiction that takes the form of lists; stories that appear to be told inadvertently, using a narrator’s notes to him or herself."</p>
<p>"Another long-term goal of mine has been to take a character from a naturalistic story and travel with her into a different genre," she wrote, citing <strong>Jon Scieszka</strong>'s <em>The True Story of the Three Little Pigs!</em>, as inspiration."I wondered whether I could do something analogous with a character from my novel <em>A Visit From the Goon Squad</em>: create a cartoon version of that person, for example—or, in this case, a spy-thriller version."</p>
<p>"I found myself imagining a series of terse mental dispatches from a female spy of the future, working undercover by the Mediterranean Sea. I wrote these bulletins by hand in a Japanese notebook that had eight rectangles on each page. The story was originally nearly twice its present length; it took me a year, on and off, to control and calibrate the material into what is now 'Black Box.'"</p>
<p>Though clearly attuned to the artistic potential of the medium, Ms. Egan is a spartan tweeter and has faced some technical difficulties of late. Her account was <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/egangoonsquad">hacked</a> by a vitamin supplements company.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_242154" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 251px"><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/113198757.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-242154" title="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/113198757.jpg?w=241" alt="" width="241" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">@egangoonsquad</p></div></p>
<p>What are you doing from 8-9 p.m. tonight, and for the next nine nights after that?</p>
<p>Tweeting about the shows you're watching on your ex-boyfriend's mom's HBO Go account? Staring at your iPhone until you know shows up at the party? Catching up on your <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/sexstrology">Sexstrology</a>?</p>
<p>Good! Then you'll be in just the place to catch "Black Box," <strong>Jennifer Egan</strong>'s latest <em>New Yorker</em> story, which will be serialized on Twitter, starting tonight.<!--more--></p>
<p>The installments of &lt;140 character paragraphs will be rounded up each day on the<em> New Yorker's </em>Page-Turner blog, and the full story will appear in the Monday "Science Fiction" issue.</p>
<p>Over on <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/05/coming-soon-jennifer-egan-black-box.html">Page-Turner</a>, Ms. Egan explained that when she wrote "Black Box" she was interested in "fiction that takes the form of lists; stories that appear to be told inadvertently, using a narrator’s notes to him or herself."</p>
<p>"Another long-term goal of mine has been to take a character from a naturalistic story and travel with her into a different genre," she wrote, citing <strong>Jon Scieszka</strong>'s <em>The True Story of the Three Little Pigs!</em>, as inspiration."I wondered whether I could do something analogous with a character from my novel <em>A Visit From the Goon Squad</em>: create a cartoon version of that person, for example—or, in this case, a spy-thriller version."</p>
<p>"I found myself imagining a series of terse mental dispatches from a female spy of the future, working undercover by the Mediterranean Sea. I wrote these bulletins by hand in a Japanese notebook that had eight rectangles on each page. The story was originally nearly twice its present length; it took me a year, on and off, to control and calibrate the material into what is now 'Black Box.'"</p>
<p>Though clearly attuned to the artistic potential of the medium, Ms. Egan is a spartan tweeter and has faced some technical difficulties of late. Her account was <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/egangoonsquad">hacked</a> by a vitamin supplements company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/05/the-new-yorker-will-serialize-jennifer-egans-short-story-on-twitter-starting-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2a3d80fe9d0b8bdc5b869bdabb1ee9c6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kstoeffelobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/113198757.jpg?w=241" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
