<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Viola Davis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/viola-davis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>To Do Saturday: Talk of the Town</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:30:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=267089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_267091" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 219px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/wont-back-down-new-york-premiere-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-267091"><img class="size-medium wp-image-267091" title="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/152660632.jpg?w=209" alt="" width="209" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>It’s what all the house ads in our pile of unread <em>New Yorker</em> magazines—we’ve been busy!—have been hinting toward. The New Yorker Festival began last night and continues today. Events include<!--more--> a discussion with celebu-cobbler <strong>Christian Louboutin</strong>, a panel of presidential biographers moderated by editor <strong>David Remnick</strong> and celebrity drop-ins from interviewees <strong>Viola Davis</strong>, <strong>Sarah Silverman</strong>, <strong>Ben Stiller</strong> and, surprisingly, our onetime <em>Friend</em> <strong>Lisa Kudrow</strong>. Those without evening plans can check out a preview of <em>Cloud Atlas</em>, the upcoming genre-bending sci-fi flick, followed by a chat with the directors—yes, like everyone else here (but for Ms. Kudrow), they were profiled in the magazine first!</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker Festival, multiple times and locations, tickets and schedule can be found at newyorker.com/festival/program-guide.</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_267091" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 219px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/wont-back-down-new-york-premiere-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-267091"><img class="size-medium wp-image-267091" title="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/152660632.jpg?w=209" alt="" width="209" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>It’s what all the house ads in our pile of unread <em>New Yorker</em> magazines—we’ve been busy!—have been hinting toward. The New Yorker Festival began last night and continues today. Events include<!--more--> a discussion with celebu-cobbler <strong>Christian Louboutin</strong>, a panel of presidential biographers moderated by editor <strong>David Remnick</strong> and celebrity drop-ins from interviewees <strong>Viola Davis</strong>, <strong>Sarah Silverman</strong>, <strong>Ben Stiller</strong> and, surprisingly, our onetime <em>Friend</em> <strong>Lisa Kudrow</strong>. Those without evening plans can check out a preview of <em>Cloud Atlas</em>, the upcoming genre-bending sci-fi flick, followed by a chat with the directors—yes, like everyone else here (but for Ms. Kudrow), they were profiled in the magazine first!</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker Festival, multiple times and locations, tickets and schedule can be found at newyorker.com/festival/program-guide.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/10/267089/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/a35c3d1b27e222b5e66c510f759693b3?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ddaddarioobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/152660632.jpg?w=209" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Substitutes Chalk It Up in Won&#8217;t Back Down</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/09/wont-back-down-rex-reed-maggie-gyllenhaal-viola-davis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:57:33 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/09/wont-back-down-rex-reed-maggie-gyllenhaal-viola-davis/</link>
			<dc:creator>Rex Reed</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=265754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Taking on the school choice issue that has made its way into the headlines via California’s controversial new parent trigger laws, <em>Won’t Back Down</em> faces an uphill climb at the box office. Its heroes are the parents and renegade teachers who risk everything to improve the education of children in failing schools. Its villains are the teachers’ unions that stand between a million rules and restrictions and the chance of a better life for a handful of children. The movie is going to be controversial, depending on how you feel about labor unions. My feeling is that the schoolroom is no place for political agendas, and all that matters is how good a movie it is. And it is pretty good, but flawed for a number of reasons, detailed below. Nevertheless, it’s a film that deserves to be seen, savored, debated and given serious attention. <!--more--></p>
<p>Set in Pittsburgh, the narrative centers on two mothers so appalled by the inner-city educational system that is leaving their children sub-literate that they set out to change it by closing down their children’s elementary school and starting one of their own. This is perfectly legal, but doesn’t begin to cover the obstacles mounted by administrators, union officials, school boards and teachers terrified of losing their pensions, not to mention the powerful and implacable bureaucracy that makes progress impossible. Maggie Gyllenhaal plays Jamie Fitzpatrick, a poor but spunky working-class mom who juggles three jobs to keep her dyslexic eight-year-old daughter in a school that neglects her needs. Viola Davis is Nona Alberts, a dedicated teacher at the same school, whose son has learning challenges of his own that require home tutoring. These children face inadequate teachers, overcrowded conditions and the kind of institutional apathy that passes students yearly who cannot read or write, just to get rid of them. Seizing on the new fail-safe laws that entitle disgruntled parents to turn the schools around, Jamie decides to bite the bullet and try. The process is designed for failure. First she has to rally 50 percent of the parents and teachers, then she must plow through miles of red tape, make appointments to petition the school board and plead her case—if she’s lucky enough to get a hearing. Against all odds, the reluctant Nona and the indefatigable Jamie build their case like a bridge, screwing in one bolt at a time. Printing flyers, staging rallies, baking cookies, ringing doorbells, cornering parents in the streets and parking lots, they are fueled by passion, and their never-say-quit idealism rubs off on others. Jamie begins as a concerned parent who wants to get her kid into a better school but can’t afford to move and meets nothing but rejection from the school principal—and she ends up a militant activist who “won’t back down.” In the process, the two women and the teachers and parents they convert to their cause are taught a few lessons themselves—about friendship, commitment, humanity and pride. If you don’t mind a few sentimental cobbles, there is still the dual magic of Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis, two stars who know a thing or two about conveying courage on the screen.</p>
<p>This is <em>Norma Rae</em> with chalk and erasers in place of a sewing machine, except for one major difference—this time it’s the unions that stand in the way of progress. With that in mind, it’s little surprise that political conservatives at the press screening I attended booed loudly. For the most part, the direction by Daniel Barnz is clear and substantial, and the screenplay, by the director and Brin Hill, is meticulously researched and stumble-free. As a message picture, its heart is in the right place. Too bad it doesn’t always manage to rise above a swirl of predictable Hollywood clichés. Jamie’s crusade pays off and lands her a boyfriend in the bargain, the children overcome their learning disabilities in record time, and the ogres on the school board reverse their opposition in a victory for the good guys that is too good to be true. And forgive my cynicism, but I had a hard time finding it credible when the conniving union representative (Holly Hunter) who threatens to destroy the women’s idealism applauds her own union’s defeat, even though it costs her her job. Oh well, she says. She can always go back to teaching.</p>
<p align="right"><em>rreed@observer.com</em></p>
<p>WON’T BACK DOWN</p>
<p>Running Time 120 minutes</p>
<p>Written by Brin Hill and Daniel Barnz</p>
<p>Directed by Daniel Barnz</p>
<p>Starring Viola Davis, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Holly Hunter</p>
<p>3/4</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking on the school choice issue that has made its way into the headlines via California’s controversial new parent trigger laws, <em>Won’t Back Down</em> faces an uphill climb at the box office. Its heroes are the parents and renegade teachers who risk everything to improve the education of children in failing schools. Its villains are the teachers’ unions that stand between a million rules and restrictions and the chance of a better life for a handful of children. The movie is going to be controversial, depending on how you feel about labor unions. My feeling is that the schoolroom is no place for political agendas, and all that matters is how good a movie it is. And it is pretty good, but flawed for a number of reasons, detailed below. Nevertheless, it’s a film that deserves to be seen, savored, debated and given serious attention. <!--more--></p>
<p>Set in Pittsburgh, the narrative centers on two mothers so appalled by the inner-city educational system that is leaving their children sub-literate that they set out to change it by closing down their children’s elementary school and starting one of their own. This is perfectly legal, but doesn’t begin to cover the obstacles mounted by administrators, union officials, school boards and teachers terrified of losing their pensions, not to mention the powerful and implacable bureaucracy that makes progress impossible. Maggie Gyllenhaal plays Jamie Fitzpatrick, a poor but spunky working-class mom who juggles three jobs to keep her dyslexic eight-year-old daughter in a school that neglects her needs. Viola Davis is Nona Alberts, a dedicated teacher at the same school, whose son has learning challenges of his own that require home tutoring. These children face inadequate teachers, overcrowded conditions and the kind of institutional apathy that passes students yearly who cannot read or write, just to get rid of them. Seizing on the new fail-safe laws that entitle disgruntled parents to turn the schools around, Jamie decides to bite the bullet and try. The process is designed for failure. First she has to rally 50 percent of the parents and teachers, then she must plow through miles of red tape, make appointments to petition the school board and plead her case—if she’s lucky enough to get a hearing. Against all odds, the reluctant Nona and the indefatigable Jamie build their case like a bridge, screwing in one bolt at a time. Printing flyers, staging rallies, baking cookies, ringing doorbells, cornering parents in the streets and parking lots, they are fueled by passion, and their never-say-quit idealism rubs off on others. Jamie begins as a concerned parent who wants to get her kid into a better school but can’t afford to move and meets nothing but rejection from the school principal—and she ends up a militant activist who “won’t back down.” In the process, the two women and the teachers and parents they convert to their cause are taught a few lessons themselves—about friendship, commitment, humanity and pride. If you don’t mind a few sentimental cobbles, there is still the dual magic of Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis, two stars who know a thing or two about conveying courage on the screen.</p>
<p>This is <em>Norma Rae</em> with chalk and erasers in place of a sewing machine, except for one major difference—this time it’s the unions that stand in the way of progress. With that in mind, it’s little surprise that political conservatives at the press screening I attended booed loudly. For the most part, the direction by Daniel Barnz is clear and substantial, and the screenplay, by the director and Brin Hill, is meticulously researched and stumble-free. As a message picture, its heart is in the right place. Too bad it doesn’t always manage to rise above a swirl of predictable Hollywood clichés. Jamie’s crusade pays off and lands her a boyfriend in the bargain, the children overcome their learning disabilities in record time, and the ogres on the school board reverse their opposition in a victory for the good guys that is too good to be true. And forgive my cynicism, but I had a hard time finding it credible when the conniving union representative (Holly Hunter) who threatens to destroy the women’s idealism applauds her own union’s defeat, even though it costs her her job. Oh well, she says. She can always go back to teaching.</p>
<p align="right"><em>rreed@observer.com</em></p>
<p>WON’T BACK DOWN</p>
<p>Running Time 120 minutes</p>
<p>Written by Brin Hill and Daniel Barnz</p>
<p>Directed by Daniel Barnz</p>
<p>Starring Viola Davis, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Holly Hunter</p>
<p>3/4</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/09/wont-back-down-rex-reed-maggie-gyllenhaal-viola-davis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e4d240ca4e5c5c4ff5cf2c9ef32616ef?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">rreed</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Stars Don&#8217;t Back Down from Film&#8217;s Politics</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/09/films-stars-dont-back-down-from-films-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:30:17 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/09/films-stars-dont-back-down-from-films-politics/</link>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Brennan</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=265063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_265175" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/09/films-stars-dont-back-down-from-films-politics/wont-back-down-new-york-premiere/" rel="attachment wp-att-265175"><img class="size-medium wp-image-265175" title="Viola Davis (left) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (Getty Images)" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/152660645.jpg?w=200" height="300" width="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (left) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p><em>Won’t Back Down,</em> starring Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis as a parent and teacher struggling to turn around a failing school, is a movie that clearly wants to say something, even if <em>The</em> <em>Observer </em>had a hard time hearing what they were saying because of chanting protestors.<!--more--></p>
<p>The film, directed by Daniel Barnz, premiered Sunday night at the Ziegfeld and was attended not only by the cast, but by the New Yorkers for Great Public Schools Coalition, an umbrella group of parents that gathered across the street. The protestors oppose the “parent trigger” laws that inspired the events of the film, through which parents can take over a failing school and possibly turn it into a charter school. Shouting “Move on over corporate takeover,” the group protested the film's financial backers, right-wing billionaires Philip Anschutz (of Walden Media) and Rupert Murdoch (CEO of News Corporation).</p>
<p>Mr. Barnz told <em>The Observer</em>: “The whole movie is about the benefits of protesting. There are many scenes of protesting in the film. I happen to know that what they’re protesting is different from what the movie is actually about. They’re here protesting parent trigger laws and as I explained to you this is not a parent trigger movie.” The film’s fictional law requires both parents and teachers to vote to take over the school.</p>
<p>“You don’t want a movie to feel like it’s an issue thing. You want it to feel like a human drama. I mean Oscar Isaac’s character, his whole narrative is about someone who’s a big union believer and is struggling with that in the course of the movie.”</p>
<p>The film’s stars, wearing grave political faces in addition to red carpet gowns, were ardent about education reform but wary of appearing anti-union. Ms. Gyllenhall said that she came from “the most progressive left. I wouldn’t be allowed to go home for Thanksgiving if I made an anti-union movie.”</p>
<p>When asked by <em>The Observer</em> about the film’s goals, Lance Reddick, who plays Ms. Davis’s husband, said, “I don’t know. I just know that things need to change. The other thing is I’m not really about gutting teachers unions because I’m a member of three unions and I wouldn’t be able to make a living if I wasn’t.”</p>
<p>Mr. Barnz, Ms. Davis, Ms. Gyllenhaal, and Rosie Perez also sat down earlier in the day at the Education Nation Summit to speak with MSNBC’s Alex Wagner. The summit showed a few of the film’s tear-jerking scenes between real-life panels discussing education reform.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_265175" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/09/films-stars-dont-back-down-from-films-politics/wont-back-down-new-york-premiere/" rel="attachment wp-att-265175"><img class="size-medium wp-image-265175" title="Viola Davis (left) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (Getty Images)" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/152660645.jpg?w=200" height="300" width="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (left) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p><em>Won’t Back Down,</em> starring Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis as a parent and teacher struggling to turn around a failing school, is a movie that clearly wants to say something, even if <em>The</em> <em>Observer </em>had a hard time hearing what they were saying because of chanting protestors.<!--more--></p>
<p>The film, directed by Daniel Barnz, premiered Sunday night at the Ziegfeld and was attended not only by the cast, but by the New Yorkers for Great Public Schools Coalition, an umbrella group of parents that gathered across the street. The protestors oppose the “parent trigger” laws that inspired the events of the film, through which parents can take over a failing school and possibly turn it into a charter school. Shouting “Move on over corporate takeover,” the group protested the film's financial backers, right-wing billionaires Philip Anschutz (of Walden Media) and Rupert Murdoch (CEO of News Corporation).</p>
<p>Mr. Barnz told <em>The Observer</em>: “The whole movie is about the benefits of protesting. There are many scenes of protesting in the film. I happen to know that what they’re protesting is different from what the movie is actually about. They’re here protesting parent trigger laws and as I explained to you this is not a parent trigger movie.” The film’s fictional law requires both parents and teachers to vote to take over the school.</p>
<p>“You don’t want a movie to feel like it’s an issue thing. You want it to feel like a human drama. I mean Oscar Isaac’s character, his whole narrative is about someone who’s a big union believer and is struggling with that in the course of the movie.”</p>
<p>The film’s stars, wearing grave political faces in addition to red carpet gowns, were ardent about education reform but wary of appearing anti-union. Ms. Gyllenhall said that she came from “the most progressive left. I wouldn’t be allowed to go home for Thanksgiving if I made an anti-union movie.”</p>
<p>When asked by <em>The Observer</em> about the film’s goals, Lance Reddick, who plays Ms. Davis’s husband, said, “I don’t know. I just know that things need to change. The other thing is I’m not really about gutting teachers unions because I’m a member of three unions and I wouldn’t be able to make a living if I wasn’t.”</p>
<p>Mr. Barnz, Ms. Davis, Ms. Gyllenhaal, and Rosie Perez also sat down earlier in the day at the Education Nation Summit to speak with MSNBC’s Alex Wagner. The summit showed a few of the film’s tear-jerking scenes between real-life panels discussing education reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/09/films-stars-dont-back-down-from-films-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f7f79c9fc126dbd13f5716e515afca57?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cbrennanobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/152660645.jpg?w=200" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Viola Davis (left) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>What Were the Best Oscar Moments?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/02/what-were-the-best-oscar-moments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:54:13 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/02/what-were-the-best-oscar-moments/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=224546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_224552" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 201px"><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/what-were-the-best-oscar-moments/84th-annual-academy-awards-governors-ball/" rel="attachment wp-att-224552"><img class="size-medium wp-image-224552" title="Streep (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/140047077.jpg?w=191&h=300" alt="" width="191" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Streep (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Last night's Oscars were as draggy as ever--perhaps it's time to give up the ghost of the hope that they can magically become a breezy ceremony, or at least to stop complaining annually that the jokes are hackneyed and the show's self-congratulatory. The jokes being hackneyed are kind of the point, and, given that this is a Hollywood trade show, the self-congratulation is REALLY the point. And the tributes would not have been so terrifically vague had they been able to be directed at nominated films people had seen--the <em>Bridesmaids</em>-a-palooza in the middle of the show should serve as a reminder of what the tributes at the Oscars look like when they're aimed at hit movies from this year and not "hit movies from all time."</p>
<p>The show's biggest surprise came late in the evening, when Meryl Streep beat out supposed front-runner Viola Davis for the Best Actress trophy; for those hoping for an epochal Oscar moment, it was both disappointing (Ms. Davis would have been only the second ever black Best Actress) and vivifying (Ms. Streep's Oscar was her third--and her first since 1983). The rest of the ceremony went according to plan, with top nominees <em>The Artist </em>and <em>Hugo </em>both winning five awards, the former in major categories and the latter in minor ones.</p>
<p>What else sticks out the morning after? Emma Stone's eagerness to take from Anne Hathaway the mantle of "the one eager to sing and dance" after it didn't quite work out for Ms. Hathaway. Chris Rock nailing sixty seconds of standup and, yes, fine, whatever, the same old Billy Crystal jokes Mom and Dad like. (We will say we've never gotten the "What the nominees are thinking" thing, but people apparently like it?) The Christopher Guest-directed <em>Wizard of Oz </em>parody, so utterly random it felt like a wonderful mistake. The indication that Tom Cruise has been rehabilitated by Hollywood in that he got to present Best Picture. Perhaps the best moment of last night was the appearance of Melissa Leo, the weird warrior queen of the 2011 Oscars, in a relatively normal sequined dress presenting an Oscar to someone else. Last year, she stole Kirk Douglas's cane--and this year, she just smiled and applauded and watched time march on and another Oscar ceremony enter the books.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_224552" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 201px"><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/what-were-the-best-oscar-moments/84th-annual-academy-awards-governors-ball/" rel="attachment wp-att-224552"><img class="size-medium wp-image-224552" title="Streep (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/140047077.jpg?w=191&h=300" alt="" width="191" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Streep (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Last night's Oscars were as draggy as ever--perhaps it's time to give up the ghost of the hope that they can magically become a breezy ceremony, or at least to stop complaining annually that the jokes are hackneyed and the show's self-congratulatory. The jokes being hackneyed are kind of the point, and, given that this is a Hollywood trade show, the self-congratulation is REALLY the point. And the tributes would not have been so terrifically vague had they been able to be directed at nominated films people had seen--the <em>Bridesmaids</em>-a-palooza in the middle of the show should serve as a reminder of what the tributes at the Oscars look like when they're aimed at hit movies from this year and not "hit movies from all time."</p>
<p>The show's biggest surprise came late in the evening, when Meryl Streep beat out supposed front-runner Viola Davis for the Best Actress trophy; for those hoping for an epochal Oscar moment, it was both disappointing (Ms. Davis would have been only the second ever black Best Actress) and vivifying (Ms. Streep's Oscar was her third--and her first since 1983). The rest of the ceremony went according to plan, with top nominees <em>The Artist </em>and <em>Hugo </em>both winning five awards, the former in major categories and the latter in minor ones.</p>
<p>What else sticks out the morning after? Emma Stone's eagerness to take from Anne Hathaway the mantle of "the one eager to sing and dance" after it didn't quite work out for Ms. Hathaway. Chris Rock nailing sixty seconds of standup and, yes, fine, whatever, the same old Billy Crystal jokes Mom and Dad like. (We will say we've never gotten the "What the nominees are thinking" thing, but people apparently like it?) The Christopher Guest-directed <em>Wizard of Oz </em>parody, so utterly random it felt like a wonderful mistake. The indication that Tom Cruise has been rehabilitated by Hollywood in that he got to present Best Picture. Perhaps the best moment of last night was the appearance of Melissa Leo, the weird warrior queen of the 2011 Oscars, in a relatively normal sequined dress presenting an Oscar to someone else. Last year, she stole Kirk Douglas's cane--and this year, she just smiled and applauded and watched time march on and another Oscar ceremony enter the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/02/what-were-the-best-oscar-moments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/140047077.jpg?w=191&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Streep (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Here&#8217;s Who Will Win the Oscars</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/02/heres-who-will-win-the-oscars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:23:58 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/02/heres-who-will-win-the-oscars/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=223925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_223953" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 231px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-223953" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/heres-who-will-win-the-oscars/les-infideles-paris-premiere/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-223953" title="Jean DuJardin, your Best Actor winner (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/138963802.jpg?w=221&h=300" alt="" width="221" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Jean DuJardin, your Best Actor winner (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>The Academy Awards are this Sunday--and we'll be liveblogging away at observer.com. So as to be optimally prepared for these mythical "Oscar pools" that exist only in the minds of entertainment writers, or at least to shout the winner a second before it happens, we've held the hive-mind of the Internet to our ear so as to decipher the buzz.</p>
<p>Here are your Oscar winners!</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture: </strong><em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>We're not ruling out a more conventional win from the more-traditional and higher-grossing <em>The Descendants</em>, but it'd be a surprise given the success <em>The Artist </em>has enjoyed among critics and different guild awards so far.</p>
<p><strong>Best Director: </strong>Michel Hazanavicius, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>It's not as though they're rushing to award this relative newcomer, but his opposition doesn't look credible enough to split Best Picture and Best Director. His toughest competition is Martin Scorsese, who already won this award recently and whose film is thematically similar to <em>The Artist</em>, if less well-loved.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actor: </strong>Jean DuJardin, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>Be real. Do you honestly think we live in a world where George Clooney will have won two Oscars for acting as early as this year? While his work in <em>The Descendants </em>was praised early on, we suspect some voters may be attracted to the fresh, new thing in this category.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actress: </strong>Viola Davis, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>While Meryl Streep really will win in this category one of these years, Viola Davis's movie was an actual hit with audiences and with the Academy--and the weird, hinky truth is that an Academy member will likely feel more virtuous for rewarding a portrayal of a noble, suffering maid than a performance as a controversial political figure.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong>: Christopher Plummer, <em>Beginners</em></p>
<p>One of two utterly dull supporting contests whose frontrunners have been ensconced since, like, November.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actress: </strong>Octavia Spencer, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>The other.</p>
<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong>: Woody Allen, <em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p>The perpetual notion that, if one wills it hard enough, a standard-issue Woody Allen film can be a true comeback picture, became a fixed idea this year. Everyone loves Woody again! This is where this movie gets rewarded.</p>
<p><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong>: Alexander Payne and Nat Faxon &amp; Jim Rash, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>And this is where <em>The Descendants</em>, a popular movie with no real chance at other honors besides Actor, gets rewarded.</p>
<p><strong>All the rest:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Best Animated Feature</strong>: <em>Rango</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Cinematography</strong>: <em>The Tree of Life</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Art Direction</strong>: <em>Hugo</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Costume Design</strong>: <em>W.E. </em>[we know, it's weird, but the Oscars really love films about the royals in this category]<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Documentary Feature</strong>: <em>Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Documentary Short</strong>: <em>Incident in New Baghdad </em>[on the shorts categories, one chooses the most portentous-sounding title, except for Best Animated Short, wherein one chooses the loopiest title]<em></em></p>
<p><strong>Best Film Editing</strong>: <em>The Artist</em> <em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Foreign Language Film</strong>: <em>A Separation </em>(Iran)</p>
<p><strong>Best Makeup</strong>: <em>The Iron Lady </em>[the fact that the makeup that turned Meryl Streep into Margaret  Thatcher is likely to get its own award would seem to take away from the  performance that did the same, no?]<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Original Score</strong>: <em>The Artist </em>[the tempest-in-a-teapot over whether this film stole unduly from the score for <em>Vertigo </em>shall likely matter little, as the score blares through the entire running time]</p>
<p><strong>Best Original Song</strong>: "Man or Muppet," <em>The Muppets</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Short Film (Animated): </strong><em>The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore </em>[see the rationale for Documentary Short]<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Short Film (Live-Action)</strong>: <em>Pentecost </em>[see above]<em></em></p>
<p><strong>Best Sound Editing</strong>: <em>War Horse </em></p>
<p><strong>Best Sound Mixing</strong>: <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo </em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Visual Effects</strong>: <em>Rise of the Planet of the Apes<br />
</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_223953" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 231px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-223953" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/02/heres-who-will-win-the-oscars/les-infideles-paris-premiere/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-223953" title="Jean DuJardin, your Best Actor winner (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/138963802.jpg?w=221&h=300" alt="" width="221" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Jean DuJardin, your Best Actor winner (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>The Academy Awards are this Sunday--and we'll be liveblogging away at observer.com. So as to be optimally prepared for these mythical "Oscar pools" that exist only in the minds of entertainment writers, or at least to shout the winner a second before it happens, we've held the hive-mind of the Internet to our ear so as to decipher the buzz.</p>
<p>Here are your Oscar winners!</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture: </strong><em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>We're not ruling out a more conventional win from the more-traditional and higher-grossing <em>The Descendants</em>, but it'd be a surprise given the success <em>The Artist </em>has enjoyed among critics and different guild awards so far.</p>
<p><strong>Best Director: </strong>Michel Hazanavicius, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>It's not as though they're rushing to award this relative newcomer, but his opposition doesn't look credible enough to split Best Picture and Best Director. His toughest competition is Martin Scorsese, who already won this award recently and whose film is thematically similar to <em>The Artist</em>, if less well-loved.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actor: </strong>Jean DuJardin, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>Be real. Do you honestly think we live in a world where George Clooney will have won two Oscars for acting as early as this year? While his work in <em>The Descendants </em>was praised early on, we suspect some voters may be attracted to the fresh, new thing in this category.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actress: </strong>Viola Davis, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>While Meryl Streep really will win in this category one of these years, Viola Davis's movie was an actual hit with audiences and with the Academy--and the weird, hinky truth is that an Academy member will likely feel more virtuous for rewarding a portrayal of a noble, suffering maid than a performance as a controversial political figure.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong>: Christopher Plummer, <em>Beginners</em></p>
<p>One of two utterly dull supporting contests whose frontrunners have been ensconced since, like, November.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actress: </strong>Octavia Spencer, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>The other.</p>
<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong>: Woody Allen, <em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p>The perpetual notion that, if one wills it hard enough, a standard-issue Woody Allen film can be a true comeback picture, became a fixed idea this year. Everyone loves Woody again! This is where this movie gets rewarded.</p>
<p><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong>: Alexander Payne and Nat Faxon &amp; Jim Rash, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>And this is where <em>The Descendants</em>, a popular movie with no real chance at other honors besides Actor, gets rewarded.</p>
<p><strong>All the rest:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Best Animated Feature</strong>: <em>Rango</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Cinematography</strong>: <em>The Tree of Life</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Art Direction</strong>: <em>Hugo</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Costume Design</strong>: <em>W.E. </em>[we know, it's weird, but the Oscars really love films about the royals in this category]<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Documentary Feature</strong>: <em>Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Documentary Short</strong>: <em>Incident in New Baghdad </em>[on the shorts categories, one chooses the most portentous-sounding title, except for Best Animated Short, wherein one chooses the loopiest title]<em></em></p>
<p><strong>Best Film Editing</strong>: <em>The Artist</em> <em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Foreign Language Film</strong>: <em>A Separation </em>(Iran)</p>
<p><strong>Best Makeup</strong>: <em>The Iron Lady </em>[the fact that the makeup that turned Meryl Streep into Margaret  Thatcher is likely to get its own award would seem to take away from the  performance that did the same, no?]<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Original Score</strong>: <em>The Artist </em>[the tempest-in-a-teapot over whether this film stole unduly from the score for <em>Vertigo </em>shall likely matter little, as the score blares through the entire running time]</p>
<p><strong>Best Original Song</strong>: "Man or Muppet," <em>The Muppets</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Short Film (Animated): </strong><em>The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore </em>[see the rationale for Documentary Short]<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Short Film (Live-Action)</strong>: <em>Pentecost </em>[see above]<em></em></p>
<p><strong>Best Sound Editing</strong>: <em>War Horse </em></p>
<p><strong>Best Sound Mixing</strong>: <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo </em><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Visual Effects</strong>: <em>Rise of the Planet of the Apes<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/02/heres-who-will-win-the-oscars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/138963802.jpg?w=221&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Jean DuJardin, your Best Actor winner (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>SAG Awards&#8211;Clooney and Streep Look a Lot Less Secure</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/01/sag-awards-clooney-and-streep-look-a-lot-less-secure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:30:43 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/01/sag-awards-clooney-and-streep-look-a-lot-less-secure/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=216239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_216240" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 190px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-216240" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/sag-awards-clooney-and-streep-look-a-lot-less-secure/viola-davis-arrives-at-the-18th-annual-s/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-216240" title="Viola Davis at the SAG Awards (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/137914564.jpg?w=180&h=300" alt="Viola Davis at the SAG Awards (Getty Images)" width="180" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis at the SAG Awards (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Last night's Screen Actors Guild Awards shook up the Oscar race insofar as it was able to be shaken up. Sure bets in the supporting categories Octavia Spencer (<em>The Help</em>) and Christopher Plummer (<em>Beginners</em>) cleaned up again, while frontrunning lead actors George Clooney (<em>The Descendants</em>) and Meryl Streep (<em>The Iron Lady</em>) were dethroned.</p>
<p>The beneficiaries were Jean DuJardin, star of <em>The Artist</em>, and Viola Davis of <em>The Help</em>. Both Best Actor and Best Actress races remain occluded going into the Oscars. Mr. DuJardin's speech was charming but Benignivian in its loose grip on the English language, making him an uncompelling threat for the biggest trophy despite the fact that he's already won a Golden Globe. Ms. Davis's speech was brief and moving--dealing with her lifelong dream of acting and her late-in-life breakthrough--but may not be enough to push her ahead of Meryl Streep. (Ms. Davis, a friend and former castmate of Ms. Streep, paid her particular homage--she was inescapable even in her defeat.)</p>
<p>At the moment, Ms. Davis appears to be leading Harvey Weinstein's two candidates in the Best Actress field--Ms. Streep and Michelle Williams in <em>My Week With Marilyn</em>. Mr. Weinstein has little about which to worry--Mr. DuJardin's victory means that even if he can't top George Clooney, the Weinstein Company film in which he stars, <em>The Artist</em>, is stronger than can be fathomed. <em>The Help</em>'s win for Best Ensemble poses little threat there.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_216240" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 190px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-216240" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/sag-awards-clooney-and-streep-look-a-lot-less-secure/viola-davis-arrives-at-the-18th-annual-s/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-216240" title="Viola Davis at the SAG Awards (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/137914564.jpg?w=180&h=300" alt="Viola Davis at the SAG Awards (Getty Images)" width="180" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis at the SAG Awards (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Last night's Screen Actors Guild Awards shook up the Oscar race insofar as it was able to be shaken up. Sure bets in the supporting categories Octavia Spencer (<em>The Help</em>) and Christopher Plummer (<em>Beginners</em>) cleaned up again, while frontrunning lead actors George Clooney (<em>The Descendants</em>) and Meryl Streep (<em>The Iron Lady</em>) were dethroned.</p>
<p>The beneficiaries were Jean DuJardin, star of <em>The Artist</em>, and Viola Davis of <em>The Help</em>. Both Best Actor and Best Actress races remain occluded going into the Oscars. Mr. DuJardin's speech was charming but Benignivian in its loose grip on the English language, making him an uncompelling threat for the biggest trophy despite the fact that he's already won a Golden Globe. Ms. Davis's speech was brief and moving--dealing with her lifelong dream of acting and her late-in-life breakthrough--but may not be enough to push her ahead of Meryl Streep. (Ms. Davis, a friend and former castmate of Ms. Streep, paid her particular homage--she was inescapable even in her defeat.)</p>
<p>At the moment, Ms. Davis appears to be leading Harvey Weinstein's two candidates in the Best Actress field--Ms. Streep and Michelle Williams in <em>My Week With Marilyn</em>. Mr. Weinstein has little about which to worry--Mr. DuJardin's victory means that even if he can't top George Clooney, the Weinstein Company film in which he stars, <em>The Artist</em>, is stronger than can be fathomed. <em>The Help</em>'s win for Best Ensemble poses little threat there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/01/sag-awards-clooney-and-streep-look-a-lot-less-secure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/137914564.jpg?w=180&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Viola Davis at the SAG Awards (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The Most Exciting Oscar Races</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/01/the-most-exciting-oscar-races/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:25:37 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/01/the-most-exciting-oscar-races/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=214695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong></p>
<p><div id="attachment_214700" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 219px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214700" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/the-most-exciting-oscar-races/viola-davis-arrives-for-the-17th-annual/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214700" title="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/136910317.jpg?w=209&h=300" alt="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" width="209" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Best Actress</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p>In the past few weeks, this race--long led by Viola Davis--got a lot more interesting with Golden Globe wins for Meryl Streep and Michelle Williams. Ms. Williams's film may feel too slight, but she's gone on the PR offensive with an in-character <em>GQ </em>cover; Ms. Streep's film has its detractors, and she hasn't won an Oscar in many moviegoers' lifetimes (the Academy likes to nominate her and award a "buzzier" actress, generally speaking).</p>
<p><strong>Best Cinematography</strong></p>
<p><em>The Artist</em>'s black-and-white work is the category's greatest curio, but <em>Hugo</em>'s camerawork was widely praised for bringing richness to too-often misused 3-D technology. This is also the only place, realistically speaking, where the Academy could award <em>The Tree of Life </em>for its vision of the beginning and end of life--one accomplished largely through Emmanuel Lubezki's work behind the camera.</p>
<p><strong>Best Director</strong></p>
<p>Whether or not <em>The Artist </em>has Best Picture sewn up, Martin Scorsese--honored in 2007 for his work on <em>The Departed</em>--has shown surprising strength this season for his so-called "love letter" to the cinema of his youth. It's the exact same narrative that accounts for the success of <em>The Artist</em>, with the crucial different of Mr. Scorsese's fame and reputation.</p>
<p><strong>Best Makeup</strong></p>
<p>No widely-nominated films are in this ever-scattershot category--will <em>The Iron Lady </em>team win for making Meryl Streep into Margaret Thatcher? (And does that discount the actress's own skill?) Will the <em>Harry Potter </em>series take a phrryic victory lap here? Will <em>Albert Nobbs </em>win for what we assume is good... make...up? (Still isn't playing in New York.)</p>
<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong></p>
<p>In this category, Oscar has historically rewarded novelty and/or innovation (<em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em>, <em>Juno</em>, Matt Damon). While Woody Allen's <em>Midnight in Paris </em>would seem to be in pole position, <em>A Separation </em>and <em>Bridesmaids </em>have their supporters ﻿(for radically different reasons). One winner elsewhere that may have trouble here? <em>The Artist</em>, which lacks for obvious reasons sparkling repartee.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></p>
<p><div id="attachment_214700" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 219px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214700" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/the-most-exciting-oscar-races/viola-davis-arrives-for-the-17th-annual/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214700" title="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/136910317.jpg?w=209&h=300" alt="Viola Davis (Getty Images)" width="209" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Best Actress</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p>In the past few weeks, this race--long led by Viola Davis--got a lot more interesting with Golden Globe wins for Meryl Streep and Michelle Williams. Ms. Williams's film may feel too slight, but she's gone on the PR offensive with an in-character <em>GQ </em>cover; Ms. Streep's film has its detractors, and she hasn't won an Oscar in many moviegoers' lifetimes (the Academy likes to nominate her and award a "buzzier" actress, generally speaking).</p>
<p><strong>Best Cinematography</strong></p>
<p><em>The Artist</em>'s black-and-white work is the category's greatest curio, but <em>Hugo</em>'s camerawork was widely praised for bringing richness to too-often misused 3-D technology. This is also the only place, realistically speaking, where the Academy could award <em>The Tree of Life </em>for its vision of the beginning and end of life--one accomplished largely through Emmanuel Lubezki's work behind the camera.</p>
<p><strong>Best Director</strong></p>
<p>Whether or not <em>The Artist </em>has Best Picture sewn up, Martin Scorsese--honored in 2007 for his work on <em>The Departed</em>--has shown surprising strength this season for his so-called "love letter" to the cinema of his youth. It's the exact same narrative that accounts for the success of <em>The Artist</em>, with the crucial different of Mr. Scorsese's fame and reputation.</p>
<p><strong>Best Makeup</strong></p>
<p>No widely-nominated films are in this ever-scattershot category--will <em>The Iron Lady </em>team win for making Meryl Streep into Margaret Thatcher? (And does that discount the actress's own skill?) Will the <em>Harry Potter </em>series take a phrryic victory lap here? Will <em>Albert Nobbs </em>win for what we assume is good... make...up? (Still isn't playing in New York.)</p>
<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong></p>
<p>In this category, Oscar has historically rewarded novelty and/or innovation (<em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em>, <em>Juno</em>, Matt Damon). While Woody Allen's <em>Midnight in Paris </em>would seem to be in pole position, <em>A Separation </em>and <em>Bridesmaids </em>have their supporters ﻿(for radically different reasons). One winner elsewhere that may have trouble here? <em>The Artist</em>, which lacks for obvious reasons sparkling repartee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/01/the-most-exciting-oscar-races/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/136910317.jpg?w=209&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Viola Davis (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Hugo Leads Oscar Race With 11 Nominations</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/01/hugo-leads-oscar-race-with-11-nominations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:23:25 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/01/hugo-leads-oscar-race-with-11-nominations/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=214601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_214624" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214624" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/hugo-leads-oscar-race-with-11-nominations/rooneymarabeautydwhezl6nhsdl/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214624" title="Academy Award Nominee Rooney Mara" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/rooneymarabeautydwhezl6nhsdl.jpg?w=199&h=300" alt="Academy Award Nominee Rooney Mara" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Academy Award Nominee Rooney Mara</p></div></p>
<p>This morning, thousands upon tens of New Yorkers are realizing they have to go see <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em>, as that film was announced as one of nine Oscar Best Picture nominees.</p>
<p>Big surprises of the morning included that film's nomination for Best Picture, the inclusion of Best Actor nominees Demian Bichir and Gary Oldman, and the breadth of the Best Picture category, which found room for movies as different as <em>War Horse</em> and <em>The Tree of Life </em>after speculation tended towards the notion that there would be fewer nominees about which voters felt more strongly.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/">predictions</a> we got right? That Rooney Mara would take the place of Tilda Swinton in the Best Actress race, and that Albert Brooks would fall out of Best Supporting Actor--as well as the first five of those nine nominees. We didn't speculate on Best Animated Feature, speculating to ourselves that the field was a bit fallow, and with nominees including <em>Chico and Rita </em>and <em>A Cat in Paris</em>, we may have been right.</p>
<p><em>Hugo </em>leads the race with 11 overall nominations, followed by heretofore perceived frontrunner <em>The Artist </em>with 10.</p>
<p>The nominations in top categories are below, and the <a href="http://oscar.go.com/nominees">full list of nominations</a> is here.</p>
<p>Best Picture</p>
<p><em>The Artist</em>; <em>The Descendants</em>; <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em>;<em> The Help</em>; <em>Hugo</em>; <em>Midnight in Paris</em>; <em>Moneyball</em>; <em>The Tree of Life</em>; <em>War Horse</em></p>
<p>Best Director</p>
<p>Woody Allen, <em>Midnight in Paris</em>; Michel Hazanavicius, <em>The Artist</em>; Terrence Malick, <em>The Tree of Life</em>; Alexander Payne, <em>The Descendants</em>; Martin Scorsese, <em>Hugo</em>;</p>
<p>Best Actor:</p>
<p>Demian Bichir, <em>A Better Life</em>; George Clooney, <em>The Descendants</em>, Jean DuJardin, <em>The Artist</em>; Gary Oldman, <em>Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</em>; Brad Pitt, <em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>Best Actress:</p>
<p>Glenn Close, <em>Albert Nobbs</em>; Viola Davis, <em>The Help</em><strong></strong>; Rooney Mara, <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo</em><strong></strong>; Meryl Streep, <em>The Iron Lady</em><strong></strong>; Michelle Williams, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em></p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor:</p>
<p>Kenneth Branagh, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em>; <em></em>Jonah Hill, <em>Moneyball</em>; Nick Nolte, <em>Warrior</em>; Christopher Plummer, <em>Beginners</em>; Max Von Sydow, <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em></p>
<p>Best Supporting Actress:</p>
<p>Bérénice Bejo, <em>The Artist</em>; Jessica Chastain, <em>The Help</em>; Melissa McCarthy, <em>Bridesmaids</em>; Octavia Spencer, <em>The Help</em>; Janet McTeer<em>, Albert Nobbs</em></p>
<p>Best Original Screenplay</p>
<p><em>The Artist</em>; <em>Bridesmaids</em>; <em>Margin Call</em>; <em>Midnight in Paris</em>; <em>A Separation</em></p>
<p>Best Adapted Screenplay</p>
<p><em>The Descendants</em>; <em>Hugo</em>; <em>The Ides of March</em>; <em>Moneyball</em>; <em>Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</em></p>
<p>Best Animated Feature</p>
<p><em>A Cat In Paris</em>; <em>Chico and Rita</em>; <em>Kung Fu Panda 2</em>; <em>Puss in Boots</em>; <em>Rango</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_214624" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214624" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/hugo-leads-oscar-race-with-11-nominations/rooneymarabeautydwhezl6nhsdl/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214624" title="Academy Award Nominee Rooney Mara" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/rooneymarabeautydwhezl6nhsdl.jpg?w=199&h=300" alt="Academy Award Nominee Rooney Mara" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Academy Award Nominee Rooney Mara</p></div></p>
<p>This morning, thousands upon tens of New Yorkers are realizing they have to go see <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em>, as that film was announced as one of nine Oscar Best Picture nominees.</p>
<p>Big surprises of the morning included that film's nomination for Best Picture, the inclusion of Best Actor nominees Demian Bichir and Gary Oldman, and the breadth of the Best Picture category, which found room for movies as different as <em>War Horse</em> and <em>The Tree of Life </em>after speculation tended towards the notion that there would be fewer nominees about which voters felt more strongly.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/">predictions</a> we got right? That Rooney Mara would take the place of Tilda Swinton in the Best Actress race, and that Albert Brooks would fall out of Best Supporting Actor--as well as the first five of those nine nominees. We didn't speculate on Best Animated Feature, speculating to ourselves that the field was a bit fallow, and with nominees including <em>Chico and Rita </em>and <em>A Cat in Paris</em>, we may have been right.</p>
<p><em>Hugo </em>leads the race with 11 overall nominations, followed by heretofore perceived frontrunner <em>The Artist </em>with 10.</p>
<p>The nominations in top categories are below, and the <a href="http://oscar.go.com/nominees">full list of nominations</a> is here.</p>
<p>Best Picture</p>
<p><em>The Artist</em>; <em>The Descendants</em>; <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em>;<em> The Help</em>; <em>Hugo</em>; <em>Midnight in Paris</em>; <em>Moneyball</em>; <em>The Tree of Life</em>; <em>War Horse</em></p>
<p>Best Director</p>
<p>Woody Allen, <em>Midnight in Paris</em>; Michel Hazanavicius, <em>The Artist</em>; Terrence Malick, <em>The Tree of Life</em>; Alexander Payne, <em>The Descendants</em>; Martin Scorsese, <em>Hugo</em>;</p>
<p>Best Actor:</p>
<p>Demian Bichir, <em>A Better Life</em>; George Clooney, <em>The Descendants</em>, Jean DuJardin, <em>The Artist</em>; Gary Oldman, <em>Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</em>; Brad Pitt, <em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>Best Actress:</p>
<p>Glenn Close, <em>Albert Nobbs</em>; Viola Davis, <em>The Help</em><strong></strong>; Rooney Mara, <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo</em><strong></strong>; Meryl Streep, <em>The Iron Lady</em><strong></strong>; Michelle Williams, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em></p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor:</p>
<p>Kenneth Branagh, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em>; <em></em>Jonah Hill, <em>Moneyball</em>; Nick Nolte, <em>Warrior</em>; Christopher Plummer, <em>Beginners</em>; Max Von Sydow, <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em></p>
<p>Best Supporting Actress:</p>
<p>Bérénice Bejo, <em>The Artist</em>; Jessica Chastain, <em>The Help</em>; Melissa McCarthy, <em>Bridesmaids</em>; Octavia Spencer, <em>The Help</em>; Janet McTeer<em>, Albert Nobbs</em></p>
<p>Best Original Screenplay</p>
<p><em>The Artist</em>; <em>Bridesmaids</em>; <em>Margin Call</em>; <em>Midnight in Paris</em>; <em>A Separation</em></p>
<p>Best Adapted Screenplay</p>
<p><em>The Descendants</em>; <em>Hugo</em>; <em>The Ides of March</em>; <em>Moneyball</em>; <em>Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</em></p>
<p>Best Animated Feature</p>
<p><em>A Cat In Paris</em>; <em>Chico and Rita</em>; <em>Kung Fu Panda 2</em>; <em>Puss in Boots</em>; <em>Rango</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/01/hugo-leads-oscar-race-with-11-nominations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/rooneymarabeautydwhezl6nhsdl.jpg?w=199&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Academy Award Nominee Rooney Mara</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>One &#8216;Newsweek&#8217; Oscar Panelist Won&#8217;t Be Nominated (Mathematically Speaking)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/01/one-newsweek-oscar-panelist-wont-be-nominated-mathematically-speaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:37:25 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/01/one-newsweek-oscar-panelist-wont-be-nominated-mathematically-speaking/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=214238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em></p>
<p><div id="attachment_214241" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 216px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214241" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/one-newsweek-oscar-panelist-wont-be-nominated-mathematically-speaking/69th-annual-golden-globe-awards-arrivals/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214241" title="Charlize Theron (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/137144676.jpg?w=206&h=300" alt="Charlize Theron (Getty Images)" width="206" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Charlize Theron (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Newsweek</em>'s current issue features its <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/01/22/newsweek-s-oscar-roundtable-reveals-actors-private-parts.html">annual pre-nominations "Oscar roundtable"</a>--and either it'll look dated when nominations are announced tomorrow, or we need to adjust <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/">our predictions</a>! The panelists are likely nominees George Clooney and Viola Davis (the working-it pair both recently appeared together on an <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/01/05/viola-davis-george-clooney-oscars/"><em>Entertainment Weekly </em>cover</a>, too), as well as Christopher Plummer, Tilda Swinton, Michael Fassbender, and Charlize Theron.</p>
<p>How good is <em>Newsweek </em>at choosing panelists who will be Oscar-nominated? Some years are great--<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/01/23/the-new-star-power.html">last year's panel </a>featured six eventual nominees  and both the Best Actor and Best Actress--and others less predictive. In the past ten Oscar panels (discounting the two panels speaking to five directors apiece, of whose number eight ended up nominated), 48 actors have been interviewed about their Oscar hopeful performances, with eight missing the mark. These "losers" include Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, and Naomi Watts, so their inclusion isn't exactly surprising.</p>
<p>The rate of an Oscar roundtabler getting an Oscar nomination, 40 of 48, is exactly a 5/6 probability--so one of the current panelists (sorry, Charlize! We really loved <em>Young Adult</em>) will probably have talked about the Oscars a bit presumptively.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></p>
<p><div id="attachment_214241" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 216px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214241" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/one-newsweek-oscar-panelist-wont-be-nominated-mathematically-speaking/69th-annual-golden-globe-awards-arrivals/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214241" title="Charlize Theron (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/137144676.jpg?w=206&h=300" alt="Charlize Theron (Getty Images)" width="206" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Charlize Theron (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Newsweek</em>'s current issue features its <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/01/22/newsweek-s-oscar-roundtable-reveals-actors-private-parts.html">annual pre-nominations "Oscar roundtable"</a>--and either it'll look dated when nominations are announced tomorrow, or we need to adjust <a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/">our predictions</a>! The panelists are likely nominees George Clooney and Viola Davis (the working-it pair both recently appeared together on an <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/01/05/viola-davis-george-clooney-oscars/"><em>Entertainment Weekly </em>cover</a>, too), as well as Christopher Plummer, Tilda Swinton, Michael Fassbender, and Charlize Theron.</p>
<p>How good is <em>Newsweek </em>at choosing panelists who will be Oscar-nominated? Some years are great--<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/01/23/the-new-star-power.html">last year's panel </a>featured six eventual nominees  and both the Best Actor and Best Actress--and others less predictive. In the past ten Oscar panels (discounting the two panels speaking to five directors apiece, of whose number eight ended up nominated), 48 actors have been interviewed about their Oscar hopeful performances, with eight missing the mark. These "losers" include Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, and Naomi Watts, so their inclusion isn't exactly surprising.</p>
<p>The rate of an Oscar roundtabler getting an Oscar nomination, 40 of 48, is exactly a 5/6 probability--so one of the current panelists (sorry, Charlize! We really loved <em>Young Adult</em>) will probably have talked about the Oscars a bit presumptively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/01/one-newsweek-oscar-panelist-wont-be-nominated-mathematically-speaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/137144676.jpg?w=206&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Charlize Theron (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>A Big Morning for &#8216;The Artist&#8217; and More Oscar Nomination Predictions</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:45:09 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=214170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_214171" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 211px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214171" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/15th-annual-hollywood-film-awards-gala-presented-by-starz-backstage/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214171" title="Michelle Williams--who will be nominated. Who else will join her? (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/130217520.jpg?w=201&h=300" alt="Michelle Williams--who will be nominated. Who else will join her? (Getty Images)" width="201" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Michelle Williams--who will be nominated. Who else will join her? (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Tomorrow morning will bring that early-morning announcement of this year's Oscar nominees--with the attention-desperate wrinkle that no one knows how many nominees there will be. Herewith, our predictions, for last-minute entries into your office pool (if yours is the sort of office at which Oscar nominations are the subject of a pool. Ours is not, which is why we're writing a blog post).</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture</strong></p>
<p><em>The Artist</em></p>
<p><em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p><em>The Help<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Hugo</em></p>
<p><em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p>We know any number of films between five and ten <em>can </em>be nominated for Best Picture, but with <em>The Artist </em>and <em>The Descendants </em>sucking up so much oxygen and so many first-place votes, it's easy to imagine no sixth choice gathering enough steam. The likely sixth entry, if there is one, would be <em>Moneyball</em>--but aren't many of those voters who love "adult dramas" more likely to vote in the buzzier <em>Descendants</em> first?<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Director</strong></p>
<p>Woody Allen, <em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p>David Fincher, <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo<br />
</em></p>
<p>Michel Hazanavicius, <em>The Artist</em><strong></strong></p>
<p>Alexander Payne, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>Martin Scorsese, <em>Hugo</em></p>
<p>Mr. Allen, Mr. Scorsese, and Mr. Hazanavicius are clear locks, and Mr. Payne will get in on the strength of his film's reputation. For the fifth spot, Mr. Fincher and Steven Spielberg seem the likeliest (<em>The Help</em>'s debut director, Tate Taylor, did not particularly distinguish himself), but the total fade of <em>War Horse</em>'s repute gives the advantage to Mr. Fincher for what would be his third nomination in four years.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Actor</strong></p>
<p>George Clooney, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>Jean DuJardin, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>Michael Fassbender, <em>Shame</em></p>
<p>Ryan Gosling, <em>The Ides of March<br />
</em></p>
<p>Brad Pitt, <em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>Leonardo DiCaprio has been nominated for all manner of precursor awards for his role in <em>J. Edgar</em>, but that movie's disappeared from theaters and from the minds of viewers who've seen many, many better movies by now (<em>J. Edgar </em>really is uniquely terrible). Anyone who loves biographical films about controversial figures gets to vote one in with Meryl Streep in Best Actress--and the surprise nominee might be Ryan Gosling, who does nothing too special in <em>The Ides of March </em>but who'd be a big enough star to stand alongside Mr. Clooney and Mr. Pitt.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Actress</strong></p>
<p>Glenn Close, <em>Albert Nobbs</em></p>
<p>Viola Davis, <em>The Help</em><strong></strong></p>
<p>Rooney Mara, <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo</em><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Meryl Streep, <em>The Iron Lady</em><strong></strong></p>
<p>Michelle Williams, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em></p>
<p>Ms. Streep, Ms. Davis, and Ms. Williams have all won early awards, and Ms. Close helped produce her own movie, in which she plays a traditionally bait-y role as a female impersonating a male. The notion that four people in Oscar-bait roles would be joined by Tilda Swinton in the avant-garde <em>We Need to Talk About Kevin </em>stretches credulity--silent for long stretches and chronologically disjointed, this doesn't seem like the sort of role that gets an actress to the Kodak. The narrative around Rooney Mara--plucked out of nowhere in the most extensive casting search since Scarlett O'Hara--seems to coalesce towards a surprise nomination.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong></p>
<p>Kenneth Branagh, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em></p>
<p>Armie Hammer, <em>J. Edgar<br />
</em></p>
<p>Jonah Hill, <em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>Nick Nolte, <em>Warrior<br />
</em></p>
<p>Christopher Plummer, <em>Beginners</em></p>
<p>Mr. Plummer is so far ahead here that the rest of the nominees seem plucked from thin air--an impersonation of Lawrence Olivier? Sure! A fairly quiet turn by a popular comic? Definitely! An attempt at a comeback in a movie no one saw? Okay! Armie Hammer's nomination seems the least likely, but the energy he brought to <em>J. Edgar </em>could make him the one element of the film they nominate.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong></p>
<p>Bérénice Bejo, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>Jessica Chastain, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>Melissa McCarthy, <em>Bridesmaids</em></p>
<p>Octavia Spencer, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>Shailene Woodley, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>Three movies with huge amounts of apparent support carry their supporting stars towards a nomination, with the addition of Melissa McCarthy, taking the spot that some believe might have gone to Janet McTeer in the little-seen <em>Albert Nobbs</em>. <em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong></p>
<p><em>50/50</em></p>
<p><em>The Artist<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Bridesmaids</em></p>
<p><em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p><em>Young Adult</em></p>
<p>This category seems fairly open--besides the two Best Picture nominees, the three other top entries are not traditionally Oscar-y comedies. The Writers' Guild of America nominated <em>Win Win</em>, a sort-of comedy also, here, but that movie seems even <em>less </em>up Oscar's alley than <em>Young Adult</em>, a movie in which past winner Diablo Cody deals with her relationship with fame.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong><em></em></p>
<p><em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p><em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo</em></p>
<p><em>The Help</em></p>
<p><em>Hugo</em></p>
<p><em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>This category, on the other hand, has the real heat--it's hard to imagine anything sneaking into a set of screenplays this popular. It's also one of the few categories with true suspense as to the winner--because the <em>real </em>speculation only begins on Tuesday.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_214171" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 211px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-214171" href="http://www.observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/15th-annual-hollywood-film-awards-gala-presented-by-starz-backstage/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-214171" title="Michelle Williams--who will be nominated. Who else will join her? (Getty Images)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/130217520.jpg?w=201&h=300" alt="Michelle Williams--who will be nominated. Who else will join her? (Getty Images)" width="201" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Michelle Williams--who will be nominated. Who else will join her? (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Tomorrow morning will bring that early-morning announcement of this year's Oscar nominees--with the attention-desperate wrinkle that no one knows how many nominees there will be. Herewith, our predictions, for last-minute entries into your office pool (if yours is the sort of office at which Oscar nominations are the subject of a pool. Ours is not, which is why we're writing a blog post).</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture</strong></p>
<p><em>The Artist</em></p>
<p><em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p><em>The Help<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Hugo</em></p>
<p><em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p>We know any number of films between five and ten <em>can </em>be nominated for Best Picture, but with <em>The Artist </em>and <em>The Descendants </em>sucking up so much oxygen and so many first-place votes, it's easy to imagine no sixth choice gathering enough steam. The likely sixth entry, if there is one, would be <em>Moneyball</em>--but aren't many of those voters who love "adult dramas" more likely to vote in the buzzier <em>Descendants</em> first?<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Director</strong></p>
<p>Woody Allen, <em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p>David Fincher, <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo<br />
</em></p>
<p>Michel Hazanavicius, <em>The Artist</em><strong></strong></p>
<p>Alexander Payne, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>Martin Scorsese, <em>Hugo</em></p>
<p>Mr. Allen, Mr. Scorsese, and Mr. Hazanavicius are clear locks, and Mr. Payne will get in on the strength of his film's reputation. For the fifth spot, Mr. Fincher and Steven Spielberg seem the likeliest (<em>The Help</em>'s debut director, Tate Taylor, did not particularly distinguish himself), but the total fade of <em>War Horse</em>'s repute gives the advantage to Mr. Fincher for what would be his third nomination in four years.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Actor</strong></p>
<p>George Clooney, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>Jean DuJardin, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>Michael Fassbender, <em>Shame</em></p>
<p>Ryan Gosling, <em>The Ides of March<br />
</em></p>
<p>Brad Pitt, <em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>Leonardo DiCaprio has been nominated for all manner of precursor awards for his role in <em>J. Edgar</em>, but that movie's disappeared from theaters and from the minds of viewers who've seen many, many better movies by now (<em>J. Edgar </em>really is uniquely terrible). Anyone who loves biographical films about controversial figures gets to vote one in with Meryl Streep in Best Actress--and the surprise nominee might be Ryan Gosling, who does nothing too special in <em>The Ides of March </em>but who'd be a big enough star to stand alongside Mr. Clooney and Mr. Pitt.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Actress</strong></p>
<p>Glenn Close, <em>Albert Nobbs</em></p>
<p>Viola Davis, <em>The Help</em><strong></strong></p>
<p>Rooney Mara, <em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo</em><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Meryl Streep, <em>The Iron Lady</em><strong></strong></p>
<p>Michelle Williams, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em></p>
<p>Ms. Streep, Ms. Davis, and Ms. Williams have all won early awards, and Ms. Close helped produce her own movie, in which she plays a traditionally bait-y role as a female impersonating a male. The notion that four people in Oscar-bait roles would be joined by Tilda Swinton in the avant-garde <em>We Need to Talk About Kevin </em>stretches credulity--silent for long stretches and chronologically disjointed, this doesn't seem like the sort of role that gets an actress to the Kodak. The narrative around Rooney Mara--plucked out of nowhere in the most extensive casting search since Scarlett O'Hara--seems to coalesce towards a surprise nomination.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong></p>
<p>Kenneth Branagh, <em>My Week With Marilyn</em></p>
<p>Armie Hammer, <em>J. Edgar<br />
</em></p>
<p>Jonah Hill, <em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>Nick Nolte, <em>Warrior<br />
</em></p>
<p>Christopher Plummer, <em>Beginners</em></p>
<p>Mr. Plummer is so far ahead here that the rest of the nominees seem plucked from thin air--an impersonation of Lawrence Olivier? Sure! A fairly quiet turn by a popular comic? Definitely! An attempt at a comeback in a movie no one saw? Okay! Armie Hammer's nomination seems the least likely, but the energy he brought to <em>J. Edgar </em>could make him the one element of the film they nominate.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong></p>
<p>Bérénice Bejo, <em>The Artist</em></p>
<p>Jessica Chastain, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>Melissa McCarthy, <em>Bridesmaids</em></p>
<p>Octavia Spencer, <em>The Help</em></p>
<p>Shailene Woodley, <em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p>Three movies with huge amounts of apparent support carry their supporting stars towards a nomination, with the addition of Melissa McCarthy, taking the spot that some believe might have gone to Janet McTeer in the little-seen <em>Albert Nobbs</em>. <em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong></p>
<p><em>50/50</em></p>
<p><em>The Artist<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Bridesmaids</em></p>
<p><em>Midnight in Paris</em></p>
<p><em>Young Adult</em></p>
<p>This category seems fairly open--besides the two Best Picture nominees, the three other top entries are not traditionally Oscar-y comedies. The Writers' Guild of America nominated <em>Win Win</em>, a sort-of comedy also, here, but that movie seems even <em>less </em>up Oscar's alley than <em>Young Adult</em>, a movie in which past winner Diablo Cody deals with her relationship with fame.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong><em></em></p>
<p><em>The Descendants</em></p>
<p><em>The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo</em></p>
<p><em>The Help</em></p>
<p><em>Hugo</em></p>
<p><em>Moneyball</em></p>
<p>This category, on the other hand, has the real heat--it's hard to imagine anything sneaking into a set of screenplays this popular. It's also one of the few categories with true suspense as to the winner--because the <em>real </em>speculation only begins on Tuesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/01/a-big-morning-for-the-artist-and-more-oscar-nomination-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/130217520.jpg?w=201&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Michelle Williams--who will be nominated. Who else will join her? (Getty Images)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
