<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; WHUH?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/whuh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Reuters and George Soros: Before and After</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/10/reuters-and-george-soros-before-and-after/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:09:34 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/10/reuters-and-george-soros-before-and-after/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=191262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Update 7:24pm: </strong>Reuters has reverted the post back to its original story (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">Who's behind the Wall Street protests?</a>), and added a different URL to host the updated one (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-soros-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">Soros: not a funder of Wall Street protests</a>). So it looks like they're running both pieces with no indication that the other one exists. Reuters Social Media Editor Anthony DeRosa said on Twitter that there was a "<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/AntDeRosa/status/124614990266241024">note added at bottom with link to original story, which should have been done in the first place</a>" but we don't see it at <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">this URL</a>. Or the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-soros-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">other one</a>. Got it? Yeah, we're confused, too. </em></p>
<p>Reuters caused a bit of a stir today when they published a story connecting George Soros to Occupy Wall Street. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23reutersscoops" target="_blank">This did not go over well</a>, because the connection was tenuous at best, and at its worst, patently questionable.</p>
<p>So: Reuters changed the story. Not "corrected," or "published a rebuttal to the original reporting," but "changed the story."</p>
<p>These are both <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013" target="_blank">at the same URL</a>, with no correction or note appended at the bottom.</p>
<p><strong>Before:<!--more--><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/reuters-before-e1318542862862.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-191263" title="reuters before" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/reuters-before-e1318542862862.png" alt="" width="600" height="449" /></a>After:</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/soros-after-e1318542915706.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-191264" title="Soros Reuters After" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/soros-after-e1318542915706.png" alt="" width="600" height="525" /></a></strong></p>
<p>The story's lede?</p>
<p><strong>Before:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Anti-Wall Street protesters say the rich are getting richer while average Americans suffer, but <strong>the group that started it all may have benefited indirectly from the largesse of one of the world's richest men</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>After:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>George Soros isn't a financial backer of the Wall Street protests, despite speculation by critics </strong>including radio host Rush Limbaugh that the billionaire investor has helped fuel the anti-capitalist movement.</p></blockquote>
<p>The first quote attributed to Soros' camp?</p>
<p><strong>Before (fourth paragraph):</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>"I can understand their sentiment," Soros told reporters</strong> last week at the United Nations about the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations, which are expected to spur solidarity marches globally on Saturday.<strong><br />
</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>After (third paragraph):</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Soros spokesman Michael Vachon said that Soros has not "funded the protests directly or indirectly." </strong>He added: "Assertions to the contrary are an attempt by those who oppose the protesters to cast doubt on the authenticity of the movement."</p></blockquote>
<p>And so on. The entire thing is utterly baffling, as Reuters seems to be answering a question nobody but their reporters—who don't fall under their labeling of "critics"—were asking.</p>
<p>Reuters finance blogger <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/10/13/on-george-soros-occupy-wall-street-and-reuters/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;dlvrit=60132" target="_blank">Felix Salmon has already weighed in on the mess</a>, noting that "Reuters cannot — <em>must</em> not — get a reputation as a right-wing media outlet." <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23reutersscoops" target="_blank">#ReutersScoops</a> has already become a mediapolitick Twitter comedy meme.</p>
<p>The new version—located at the same URL as the original version, with portions of the original's text intact—<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013" target="_blank">is right here</a>. But because the magic of Google Cache eventually goes away, we've screengrabbed the entire original story, right here:</p>
<p><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/who-s-behind-the-wall-st-protests-reuters-e1318543412613.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-191265" title="Who s behind the Wall St. protests    Reuters" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/who-s-behind-the-wall-st-protests-reuters-e1318543412613.png" alt="" width="599" height="2951" /></a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Update 7:24pm: </strong>Reuters has reverted the post back to its original story (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">Who's behind the Wall Street protests?</a>), and added a different URL to host the updated one (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-soros-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">Soros: not a funder of Wall Street protests</a>). So it looks like they're running both pieces with no indication that the other one exists. Reuters Social Media Editor Anthony DeRosa said on Twitter that there was a "<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/AntDeRosa/status/124614990266241024">note added at bottom with link to original story, which should have been done in the first place</a>" but we don't see it at <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">this URL</a>. Or the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-soros-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013">other one</a>. Got it? Yeah, we're confused, too. </em></p>
<p>Reuters caused a bit of a stir today when they published a story connecting George Soros to Occupy Wall Street. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23reutersscoops" target="_blank">This did not go over well</a>, because the connection was tenuous at best, and at its worst, patently questionable.</p>
<p>So: Reuters changed the story. Not "corrected," or "published a rebuttal to the original reporting," but "changed the story."</p>
<p>These are both <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013" target="_blank">at the same URL</a>, with no correction or note appended at the bottom.</p>
<p><strong>Before:<!--more--><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/reuters-before-e1318542862862.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-191263" title="reuters before" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/reuters-before-e1318542862862.png" alt="" width="600" height="449" /></a>After:</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/soros-after-e1318542915706.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-191264" title="Soros Reuters After" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/soros-after-e1318542915706.png" alt="" width="600" height="525" /></a></strong></p>
<p>The story's lede?</p>
<p><strong>Before:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Anti-Wall Street protesters say the rich are getting richer while average Americans suffer, but <strong>the group that started it all may have benefited indirectly from the largesse of one of the world's richest men</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>After:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>George Soros isn't a financial backer of the Wall Street protests, despite speculation by critics </strong>including radio host Rush Limbaugh that the billionaire investor has helped fuel the anti-capitalist movement.</p></blockquote>
<p>The first quote attributed to Soros' camp?</p>
<p><strong>Before (fourth paragraph):</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>"I can understand their sentiment," Soros told reporters</strong> last week at the United Nations about the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations, which are expected to spur solidarity marches globally on Saturday.<strong><br />
</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>After (third paragraph):</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Soros spokesman Michael Vachon said that Soros has not "funded the protests directly or indirectly." </strong>He added: "Assertions to the contrary are an attempt by those who oppose the protesters to cast doubt on the authenticity of the movement."</p></blockquote>
<p>And so on. The entire thing is utterly baffling, as Reuters seems to be answering a question nobody but their reporters—who don't fall under their labeling of "critics"—were asking.</p>
<p>Reuters finance blogger <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/10/13/on-george-soros-occupy-wall-street-and-reuters/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;dlvrit=60132" target="_blank">Felix Salmon has already weighed in on the mess</a>, noting that "Reuters cannot — <em>must</em> not — get a reputation as a right-wing media outlet." <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23reutersscoops" target="_blank">#ReutersScoops</a> has already become a mediapolitick Twitter comedy meme.</p>
<p>The new version—located at the same URL as the original version, with portions of the original's text intact—<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/us-wallstreet-protests-origins-idUSTRE79C1YN20111013" target="_blank">is right here</a>. But because the magic of Google Cache eventually goes away, we've screengrabbed the entire original story, right here:</p>
<p><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/who-s-behind-the-wall-st-protests-reuters-e1318543412613.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-191265" title="Who s behind the Wall St. protests    Reuters" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/who-s-behind-the-wall-st-protests-reuters-e1318543412613.png" alt="" width="599" height="2951" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/10/reuters-and-george-soros-before-and-after/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/reuters-before-e1318542862862.png?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/reuters-before-e1318542862862.png?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">reuters before</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/reuters-before-e1318542862862.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">reuters before</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/soros-after-e1318542915706.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Soros Reuters After</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/who-s-behind-the-wall-st-protests-reuters-e1318543412613.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Who s behind the Wall St. protests    Reuters</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
