Axelrod Savings?

We were beginning to calculate what Freddy could do with the $50,000-a-month the departures of Axelrod and Clanton will save

We were beginning to calculate what Freddy could do with the $50,000-a-month the departures of Axelrod and Clanton will save him (maintain a quarter-share of a Gulfstream V; pay Kirk Kerkorian’s child-support) when we learned that the details of the Axelrod contract mean the campaign may not be saving that much after all.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

Traditionally, ad men like the Chicago-based Axelrod take a percentage of the total “buy,” the amount paid to television stations to show the ads. Increasingly, however, that’s seen as giving those admen — who often double as strategic advisors — an incentive to push candidates to spend too much money on TV. (See: Dean, Howard.) So campaigns are shifting toward a monthly fee, like Axelrod’s $35,000, in lieu of a percentage.

That was the arrangement Axelrod had with Freddy for the Democratic primary. In a sense, those retainers — by our count, Axelrod got something between $105,000 and $140,000 — were prepayments on ads that never got cut.

But now, Freddy will have to hire a new TV guru. And it may be harder to offer a monthly retainer for just a couple of months of work. So he may wind up paying a percentage of the buy and, in effect, paying twice for the same ads. The extra costs may be marginal, but in what is increasingly looking like a close race, small things may matter.

Alternately, the prospect of uncapped general election largesse may keep those primary costs down. But with spending limited in the primary (the cap is $5,728,000), this kind of stuff can matter in a close race.

Axelrod Savings?