Letters

Stirring the Pot

To the Editor:

Gabriel Sherman and Sheelah Kolhatkar’s well-written article on Bob Woodward [“Woodward Affair: A Paper Is Always the Last to Know!”, Off the Record, Dec. 12] quotes members of the Committee for the Preservation of Safe and Boring Journalism as saying they’re shocked—shocked!—that Mr. Woodward didn’t check in with his editor more often.

Personally, I want investigative reporters who don’t check in. I want them out there mucking around, developing sources and stirring the pot. I want what Tina Brown calls the “firecrackers”—the independent, daring, semi-maniacal, deeply driven, hard-drinking, oversexed, sleep-deprived reporters who usually get it right but occasionally get it wrong because if they didn’t—because if they checked in too often—we’d get nothing but cold spinach on the page. I want reporters who give their editors ulcers. That’s part of their job description.

Stan Pottinger

South Salem, N.Y.

Right on Point

To the Editor:

In theory, there could be a more dangerous site to operate a nuclear-power plant than Indian Point, but so far it hasn’t been built [“Travesty at Indian Point,” Editorial, Dec. 5]. Indian Point stands alone, by virtue of being in an area so densely populated—20 million people live in a 50-mile radius—and by having a fatally flawed evacuation plan and a history of uncontrolled radioactive leaks.

This Entergy-owned-and-operated plant sits a few miles from one of New York City’s reservoirs, making the present tritium leak—which has an undiscovered source and is migrating further out and deeper into groundwater—particularly ominous. Nearly 50 years ago, when this plant was first proposed, it seemed a fine idea—but with the growing threat to human health and safety, and with rising ecological costs to mine uranium, produce the nuclear-fuel cycle and deal with growing radioactive waste, Indian Point has become a brilliant mistake.

In 2003, Governor George Pataki commissioned James Lee Witt, the former FEMA director, to assess Indian Point’s emergency-evacuation plan. Mr. Witt’s detailed analysis criticized the plan as unworkable, but since then, neither Mr. Pataki nor FEMA has acted to protect the public any better—and Entergy has no will to care. When government agencies and elected officials do not protect us from a threat to our security and well-being—particularly when it involves the drinking-water supply—it is a public-health failure of the highest order. Mr. Pataki should put an out-of-business sign on Indian Point’s door before he leaves office and show that he cares about the public’s health and safety. If he doesn’t, our next Governor should make it one of his first acts.

Dan Doniger

Manhattan

Needing More Nabokov

To the Editor:

Re Ron Rosenbaum’s “Nabokov’s Laura Is Saved From Burning; Who Was This Woman?” [Edgy Enthusiast, Dec. 12]: Unbelievably brilliant column. Any chance that Mr. Rosenbaum could write about Nabokov every other week for a year?

Ted Warin

Omaha

Letters