Gladwell and Freakonomists in Smackdown!

If you can get past the teacherly, narcissistic tone, read the ongoing debate between Malcolm Gladwell and the authors of

If you can get past the teacherly, narcissistic tone, read the ongoing debate between Malcolm Gladwell and the authors of Freakonomics about why the crime rate dropped in the 1990’s in major cities (or in New York–that’s part of the debate actually).

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

To get you started: Gladwell buys James Q. Wilson and George Kelling’s “broken windows” theory (popularized in the Giuliani administration and, to an extent, by some of Gladwell’s early writing at the New Yorker); the Freakonomics guys think Roe v. Wade had a lot to do with it. (Fewer unwanted children = fewer criminals? Something like that.)

Gladwell starts it off here, and gets his response here. And you know, then they keep going back and forth all over the interwebs; find the rest yourselves.

(Via Matrix.)

– Tom McGeveran

Gladwell and Freakonomists in Smackdown!