Most political observers did not expect Corzine to discuss this controversial topic until the new state budget was approved. And, given that polls show that a strong majority of New Jerseyans do not like the idea of selling or leasing major state assets like the toll roads, several legislators in the Governor's own party did not want to discuss asset monetization until after November's mid-term elections.
Nonetheless, Corzinewants to get back into the policy-making and political mix much sooner than that. Yes, some folks think heis simply eagerto move beyond all the talkabout his accident and his personal life. That may be, butthe Governoralso wants to try to getlegislators and citizens tofocus onthe unpleasant but unavoidableissue of the state's long-term fiscal problems. And, he wants to explain to them that his asset monetization planwill not entail either selling or leasing the Turnpike or Parkway to private companies like some of governments have done with their toll roads. But if Corzine'splan isnot ascontroversial as first assumed, New Jerseyans do need topay attentionto what the Governor and legislators will do with the cash influx obtained from monetizing any state assets.
What does Corzine have in mind? Apparently the Governor will call for a new state agency or public corporationthat willhaveauthority over various assets. This new organization would try to borrow billions of dollars against anticipated toll revenues. According to Senator Ray Lesniak, an early advocate of asset monetization, tolls wouldno doubt increase annually so that prospective investors would receive a decent return on their money.
Based on what he said in his February Budget Address and recently, Corzine wants to use themoney gained from asset monetization to pay down the state's $30 billion debt. That debt, one of the largest in the nation, causes concern among prospective business investors about New Jersey's financial health and the likelihood that at some point the state will have to hike taxes to balance its budget and pay its bills. And the huge annual payment on the debt – closing in on $3 billion – is also a drain on state revenues that can could be used to increase existing state aid packages and expand existing programs or to create new ones.
Getting $15 billion through monitizing assets like the Turnpike and Parkway- that's the figure being bandied about – and using that money to pay down the state debt can reduce debt service payments by more than a billion dollars a year to about $1.5 billion. That's a more manageable figure in a state budget that tops $30 billion and wouldshow that New Jersey is makingserious progress onachieving whatCorzine calls "fiscal integrity." On these terms asset monetization seems to make good financial sense.
Those are good causes. But a more importantcause is "fiscal integrity." To make further progress on that goal, the Governor and legislature canuse anymoney freed up by paying down the state debt through an asset monetization plan to shore up thepublic worker pension and health insurance funds that areboth in need oflarger annualcontributions by the state to become solvent. There may be more politically popular ways to use that money, but this isa sensible one for lawmakers concerned about the state's long-term fiscalhealth.
David P. Rebovich, Ph.D.,is Managing Director ofthe Rider University Institute for New Jersey Politics (www.rider.edu/institute). He also writes a regular column, "On Politics," for NEW JERSEY LAWYER and monthly reports on New Jersey for CAMPAIGNS AND ELECTIONS Magazine.