Christine Quinn just announced she has “decided not to pursue a change in New York City’s term limit law. I will neither support legislation nor will I seek or support a new referendum eliminating or altering term limits.”
I’ve noted that although movement has been dying, it is technically still possible.
The full text of Quinn’s remarks:
After careful consideration and discussions with my colleagues in the Council, I have decided not to pursue a change in New York City’s term limit law. I will neither support legislation nor will I seek or support a new referendum eliminating or altering term limits.
Over the last two years, the City Council has pursued an agenda of reform and democratization. We have strengthened our lobbying and campaign finance laws, increased transparency in the budget process and improved our constituent services by implementing CouncilStat. I believe that overruling the will of New Yorkers – who have voted twice in favor of term limits – would be anti-democratic and anti-reform.
While our City is certainly doing well, we still face many challenges. On education, jobs, housing and health care, working New Yorkers need our help. That means the Council and the Administration must focus our attention on these critical issues and not be distracted by a political debate over term limits – a matter that has already been settled by the voters.
I look forward to working with my colleagues over the next two years to make New York and an even greater place to live.