To Oppose Paterson Cuts, W.F.P. Invokes Bush

Here’s some strategic language coming from progressives who oppose David Paterson’s request to cut state spending. Sign Up For Our

Here’s some strategic language coming from progressives who oppose David Paterson’s request to cut state spending.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

In a blog item posted just now on their web site, the Working Families Party calls it “Bush-enomics." The post is in response direct response to today’s column by Bill Hammond, who supports budget cuts.  

While the line is directed at Hammond, it could just as easily be applied to Paterson. The W.F.P. wrote, “Bill, you may want to slash New York’s health care and education spending for ideological reasons, but most New Yorkers don’t want to use the economic downturn as an excuse for more Bush-enomics.”

In an interview with me yesterday, the co-chair of the W.F.P. Bob Master, made the Newt Gingrich analogy.

To Oppose Paterson Cuts, W.F.P. Invokes Bush