Futher Evidence Apple’s Censors Are Complete Hypocrites

Four weeks after it was submitted to Apple, the November issue of Esquire still hasn’t been approved for the iPad.

Four weeks after it was submitted to Apple (AAPL), the November issue of Esquire still hasn’t been approved for the iPad. Mashable reports that the app was deemed too risque, and that Hearst has resubmitted a less sexual version.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

Meanwhile, British tabloid The Sun introduced page 360 for the iPad, displaying topless ladies on the tablet device from every conceivable angle.

Apple sparked a storm of complaints back in February when it removed dozens of low level apps for sexual content, but allowed major publishers like ESPN and Playboy to remain, despite instances of nudity.

“The difference is this is a well-known company with previously published material available broadly in a well-accepted format,” Philip W. Schiller, head of worldwide product marketing at Apple, told The New York Times about the February snafu.

That seems to be a way of saying that Apple’s bigger partners get preferential treatment. Not that Hearst is small potatoes, but earning the right to show 360 degrees of female nudity might just require a play as Apple-friendly as launching a new, tablet-only magazine.

Futher Evidence Apple’s Censors Are Complete Hypocrites