Manhattan's Contested Judicial Race: Cannataro vs Kraus

There’s an interesting below-the-radar race in Manhattan for Civil Court judge in Manhattan taking place. Sign Up For Our Daily

There’s an interesting below-the-radar race in Manhattan for Civil Court judge in Manhattan taking place.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

Attorney Tony Cannataro has locked up the support of the Democratic establishment — Rep. Nadler, Council Speaker Quinn, Borough President Stringer and a bunch of clubs (Chelsea Reform Democratic Club, McManus Midtown Democratic Club, Barack Obama Democratic Club).

He’s going up against Sabrina Krauss, a housing judge who has Michael Oliva as her consultant. Oliva has a record of winning judicial races with female candidates. (Jerry Skurnik, another notable consultant, is also helping out.)

Financially, Cannatro has an advantage, with $78,176.52 compared to Kraus’ $68,998.29.

Beating a better-funded, better-supported judicial candidate “isn’t entirely impossible, just improbable,” wrote Frank Lombardi, who spotted this race back in June.

The biggest factor that may determine the race — that of the New York Times endorsement — is still up for grabs.

The candidates are going in for their endorsement interview on August 18, I’m told. As a rule of them, the impact of the Times endorsement is in direct proportion to how low-profile and indistinguishable the candidates remain.

Manhattan's Contested Judicial Race: Cannataro vs Kraus