Sen. Allen submits resolution to place judicial pension question before voters

TRENTON — Sen. Diane Allen, (R-7), Edgewater Park, submitted today the upper-chamber version of the resolution to allow voters to

TRENTON — Sen. Diane Allen, (R-7), Edgewater Park, submitted today the upper-chamber version of the resolution to allow voters to decide whether to amend the New Jersey Constitution to apply pension and benefits reforms to members of the Judiciary.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

On the day that the state Supreme Court said it would hear the appeal of the pension/benefits reform measure as it applies to judges, Allen said in a release: “As I’ve said from the beginning, if the Court’s interpretation of the state Constitution prohibits the reforms we passed to save the pension system from applying to judges, then the Constitution needs to be changed.”

“It is not too much to ask that the Judiciary pays its fair share toward retirement benefits and healthcare costs just like every other public worker, especially since judges by far have the most lavish benefits of any other public employee.”

Allen’s resolution clarifies that pensions and benefits fall outside of the state Constitution’s prohibition on making Legislative changes to judicial salaries for sitting justices.

The Assembly version was introduced by GOP members as well today.

Earlier story:

GOP introduces referendum bill for constitutional amendment

 

Sen. Allen submits resolution to place judicial pension question before voters