Observer
  • Business
  • Art
  • Lifestyle
Newsletters
  • Business
    • Finance
    • Media
    • Technology
    • Policy
    • Wealth
    • Insights
    • Interviews
  • Art
    • Art Fairs
    • Art Market
    • Art Reviews
    • Auctions
    • Galleries
    • Museums
    • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
    • Nightlife & Dining
    • Style
    • Travel
    • Interviews
  • Power Lists
    • Nightlife & Dining
    • Art
    • A.I.
    • PR
  • About
    • About Observer
    • Advertise With Us
    • Reprints
Newsletters
Business  •  Digital Media

Attorneys Now Officially Allowed to Cyber-Stalk Jurors' Social Media Accounts

On the bright side, getting out of it should be easier than ever.

By Jordyn Taylor • 06/23/14 3:09pm
"Did you guyz find stuff on Twitter" (Wikipedia)
“Did you guyz find stuff on Twitter” (Wikipedia)

As if potential employers, college admissions offices and probing parents weren’t enough, now lawyers might also be scouring your every Facebook post.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

Thank you for signing up!

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

After two years of deliberation, the American Bar Association (ABA) has determined it’s ethical for attorneys to scan the social media profiles of jurors, as well as those under consideration for jury duty, the Associated Press reports. The decision grants attorneys permission to search for information that might reveal jurors’ or potential jurors’ biases, as well as root out instances of juror misconduct.

Jurors are generally forbidden from commenting on trials on social media (“omg this murder is dumb lolz #innocent” is a no-go). When jurors do make comments, it often results in mistrials and special hearings; now, rooting out those instances of misconduct should be significantly easier.

On the flip side, the ruling could totally work in favor of potential jurors. Don’t feel like doing jury duty for that murder trial? Send out a bunch of tweets describing your fascination with serial killers.

The ABA determined that social media profiles are really no different than “any other publicly available information,” according to one of the attorneys who helped draft the decision. They even ruled it was okay for lawyers to use sites like LinkedIn, where users can see who’s been viewing their profile.

Still, don’t think you’re going to get hordes of new lawyer Twitter followers out of this; jurors still shouldn’t friend or follow any of their targets. That would be an invasion of privacy according to the ABA, which apparently has no idea how Twitter actually works.

Attorneys Now Officially Allowed to Cyber-Stalk Jurors' Social Media Accounts
Filed Under: Social Media, Digital Media, Business, Jury duty, American Bar Association, Lawyers
  • SEE ALSO: The Bigger Economic Story Behind Higher Mortgage Rates
  • ART
  • BUSINESS
  • LIFESTYLE
  • POWER LISTS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • CONTACT
  • NEWSLETTERS
  • RSS FEEDS
  • SITEMAP
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
  • REPRINTS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Settings
  • Do not sell my data
Powered by WordPress VIP

We noticed you're using an ad blocker.

We get it: you like to have control of your own internet experience.
But advertising revenue helps support our journalism.

To read our full stories, please turn off your ad blocker.
We'd really appreciate it.

How Do I Whitelist Observer?

How Do I Whitelist Observer?

Below are steps you can take in order to whitelist Observer.com on your browser:

For Adblock:

Click the AdBlock button on your browser and select Don't run on pages on this domain.

For Adblock Plus on Google Chrome:

Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Enabled on this site.

For Adblock Plus on Firefox:

Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Disable on Observer.com.

Then Reload the Page