Times Reporter Not Privy to Anonymous Source for Bathroom Story

With one attribution, James Barron turned a story about Port Authority bathrooms into whimsical Twitter fodder.

A woman outside a Port Authority bathroom had her dreams come true thanks to New York Times reporter James Barron.
New York Times reporter James Barron made a woman’s dream come true by using her as an anonymous source.

A story in Wednesday’s New York Times about bathroom renovations at the Port Authority Bus Terminal was sassy enough on its own, but one attribution made the in crowd pay attention to the outhouse.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

The article ostensibly focused on the Port Authority’s “restroom rehabilitation project,” which brought “new, modern men’s and women’s bathrooms” to the facility. The agency renovated lighting, ceiling and plumbing fixtures, among others.

The entire project will supposedly take three years, but phase one is already complete, prompting Times reporter James Barron to investigate.

Kicking off with a reference to John Oliver’s merciless take on the Port Authority, Mr. Barron notes that the $13 million the agency spent on renovating 16 bathrooms amounts to $812,500 per powder room–a figure sure to raise eyebrows.

After visiting the men’s room himself, and finding little of note, Mr. Barron stood outside the women’s room gathering quotes. New Jersey resident Agnes Januszek told him that although bus station bathrooms are “usually kind of gross, this is nice and clean.”

Mr. Barron’s second source also commented on the aesthetics, but it was the method of attribution that made headlines. The woman was credited as “a second person who checked out the women’s restroom—who asked not to be identified because she has always wanted to be an anonymous source.”

Such unique attribution caused media Twitter to explode, with some telling Times public editor Margaret Sullivan, usually critical of anonymous sources, to loosen up just this once:

https://twitter.com/saladinahmed/status/570603835665874945

See, even the Times knows that dreams shouldn’t be flushed down the toilet.

Times Reporter Not Privy to Anonymous Source for Bathroom Story