Champagne Spills Pulitzer Prize Award

There is no Pulitzer Prize for keeping a Pulitzer Prize win secret.

Champagne
Cheers

There is no Pulitzer Prize for keeping a Pulitzer Prize win secret.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

Winners of the most prestigious of all journalism accolades, which will be announced this afternoon during a press conference at Columbia University, are kept under wraps until they are announced. Except, apparently, for some prize-winning outlets, who are given an “informal heads-up” so that they can order congratulatory champagne. This morning, Politico’s Playbook lead with a scoop about the impending announcement:

Washington Post national reporter Wesley Lowery jubilantly told friends at a party this weekend that he and a Post team (or perhaps the paper institutionally) will win a Pulitzer Prize today; he worked on the team project “Fatal Force,” about deadly police shootings. Pulitzers (to be announced at 3 p.m.) used to be shrouded in secrecy. Lowery explained that Pulitzer sources gave an informal heads-up to some winning organizations so they can order champagne, and then editors told him. Lowery says the N.Y. Times also won.

According to Washingtoniansenior editor Andrew Beaujon, who saw a private Facebook invite, the theme of the party was “The Dance-Party & Beer Bong ‘Make America Bae Again’ #YOLOmageddon (2016)” and it was thrown by Daily Beast deputy social media editor Asawin Suebsaeng. There were a bunch of reporters there.

A Pulitzer spokesperson declined to comment on whether The Washington Post was going to win, but the Post’s refrigerator is presumably well-stocked with champagne.

Champagne Spills Pulitzer Prize Award