Prince, Gagosian Sued for Appropriating Famed Sid Vicious Photo

Unless Prince decides to give up appropriating art and Gagosian quits putting Prince’s work on display, it will only be a matter of time until the next lawsuit emerges.

This is not the photo of Sid Vicious under discussion. That one is protected by copyright.
This is not the photo of Sid Vicious under discussion. That one is protected by copyright.

Richard Prince and Gagosian Gallery have been hauled into court yet again for alleged copyright infringement.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

This time, the complaint, filed on June 3 in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, comes from British photographer Dennis Morris, who is known for his photographs of Bob Marley and the Sex Pistols, as Artnet News reported.

Prince, whose work centers on appropriation of art and images from popular culture, has been charged with using one of Morris’s photographs of the late Sex Pistols bass guitarist Sid Vicious—specifically a photo taken for the cover of a book on Vicious written by David Dalton—without his consent.

Morris claims Prince used his photograph of the musician on Instagram, as well as in an untitled collage that includes photographs of other notable faces. Prince also reportedly used several other photographs of the Sex Pistols in artwork included in his exhibit: “Richard Prince: Covering Pollock.”

Doug Linde, Morris’ attorney, told ANN that the charges are “straightforward.”

This isn’t the first time Prince or Gagosian have been in this position. Last year, Prince was under fire for appropriating Donald Graham’s famous photograph “Rastafarian Smoking a Joint.” The esteemed photographer responsible for snapping the original photograph sued not only Prince and the Gallery but Larry Gagosian personally. Experts argued that things looked to be in Graham’s favor as the infringement had potentially had an impact on Graham’s market, and Prince had used a significant amount of it.

Unless Prince decides to give up appropriating art and Gagosian quits putting said work on display, it seems likely that these lawsuits will continue. But Larry can probably afford them, too.

Prince, Gagosian Sued for Appropriating Famed Sid Vicious Photo