Observer
  • Business
  • Art
  • Lifestyle
  • Culture
Newsletters
  • Business
    • Finance
    • Media
    • Technology
    • Policy
    • Wealth
    • Insights
    • Interviews
  • Arts
    • Art Fairs
    • Art Market
    • Art Reviews
    • Auctions
    • Galleries
    • Museums
    • Interviews
  • Culture
    • Theater
    • Opera
    • Dance
    • Film
    • Interviews
  • Lifestyle
    • Nightlife & Dining
    • Style
    • Travel
    • Gift Guides
    • Interviews
  • Power Index
    • Nightlife & Dining
    • Business of Art
    • A.I.
    • PR
  • About
    • About Observer
    • Advertise With Us
    • Reprints
Newsletters
Politics  •  National Politics

America’s Drug War Is Bad—And the Police Are the Problem

There are multiple recent examples of law enforcement sources misrepresenting evidence or making unsubstantiated claims about marijuana.

By Chris Roberts • 08/21/18 12:30pm
There are multiple recent examples of law enforcement sources misrepresenting evidence or making unsubstantiated claims around marijuana.
There are multiple recent examples of law enforcement sources misrepresenting evidence or making unsubstantiated claims about marijuana. ALFREDO ESTRELLA/AFP/Getty Images

Trooper Charles Loudermilk is the Kentucky State Police’s public-affairs officer. In this role, Trooper Charles Loudermilk is responsible for explaining the KSP’s mission and agenda: what it does, and why it does it.

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletter

Thank you for signing up!

By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.

See all of our newsletters

In other institutions, you could call someone in a role like Loudermilk a PR man. But here, this would not be quite accurate. Police in America don’t really have a PR problem. According to a Cato Institute poll conducted in late 2016, police in the United States enjoy broad popularity.

Americans like and trust the police. Americans believe what the police tell them. Police are a trusted source of information—they are the “authorities” whose word most American news outlets accept and repeat like gospel. Someone like Loudermilk is more of an oracle, a reassuring voice in a sea of confusion, dissension and fake news.

A 19yo that was high on Fentanyl. I asked him how he got started down the path he was on, he said he started out smoking marijuana with friends and they got him into pills. It’s sad to say 💯 percent of the people I arrest for drugs say they started with Marijuana#GateWayDrug

— Charlie Loudermilk (@TprCharlie) August 11, 2018

Which is why tweets like the one from Loudermilk above are part of a serious problem. Be it about marijuana, synthetic marijuana or opiates, American police can’t seem to stop spreading misinformation and outright untruths about drugs.

There are exceptions, but Loudermilk’s mendacious tweet is just the latest in a recent string of outright lies surrounding drugs peddled by cops, using either their official social-media accounts or their other accomplice for such subterfuge: an often gullible and pliant media.

Kentucky has a serious opiate-overdose problem. Kentucky’s fatal drug-overdose rate is twice the national average, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). And according to the Kentucky State Police, this is related to marijuana—because of the gateway-drug theory.

One problem here is that the gateway-drug theory can’t really be called a theory anymore, because it has been thoroughly debunked. “Most people” who use marijuana do not move onto other, heavier drugs, as NIDA explains.

This information is neither new or secret. It is available to Trooper Charles Loudermilk. It is also available to Mike Stuart, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia, and Stuart’s boss, Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Yet, here’s Stuart on Wednesday, repeating the gateway theory and going even further. And here’s the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Los Angeles field office, bizarrely claiming—both inaccurately—that marijuana is illegal in California and “very dangerous.”

With synthetic marijuana possibly to blame for several overdoses in New Haven, this is a good time to remember that #marijuana and #synthetics are very dangerous! #marijuana is illegal in #Cali. Don’t end up locked up! #JustSayNo to #pot #drugwar

— DEALosAngeles (@DEALOSANGELES) August 16, 2018

There are multiple recent examples of law enforcement sources misrepresenting evidence or making unsubstantiated claims regarding marijuana. In Arkansas earlier this month, police attributed a recent crime wave to a “lax attitude” towards cannabis.

The nonsense coming from police and law-enforcement experts is not limited to cannabis. In Massachusetts, several criminal-justice experts recently stated that opiates are giving criminals “superhuman strength,” allowing them to overpower police. According to doctors, common side effects from opiates include drowsiness and euphoria.

Why are they doing this? A glance at tactics employed during warfare ought to provide some insight.

Police often claim that bad laws are not their problem. They don’t make the laws, this line of reasoning goes—they merely enforce what’s on the books. If you don’t like a law, talk to your city councilmember, your state legislator, your member of Congress. Don’t talk to a cop, who is just there doing what they are told by someone else wearing a suit.

This is, of course, bullshit.

With “limited resources” at their disposal, law enforcement at all levels enjoy significant discretion when choosing what crimes to prioritize over others. This is why untested rape kits have gathered dust in evidence rooms for years—well beyond the statute of limitations for bringing the rapists to justice—while police regularly patrol low-income neighborhoods looking for outstanding warrants, people “loitering” or otherwise “acting suspiciously.”

America’s unpopular, unsuccessful and vastly expensive drug war unravels a little further every day. Nearly every time pollsters pop the question, support for marijuana legalization reaches another all-time high.

What police are doing poisons the debate and creates uncertainty and confusion where there should be none. In this context, what the cops are doing looks just like a disinformation campaign—a psy-ops strategy like those employed in warfare. It is a domestic version of the avalanche of “fake news” seen during the presidential election in 2016—and it’s paid for by our taxes, the tax dollars that, in President Donald Trump’s America, are not going towards, say, decent healthcare.

So helpful tip #1. DON'T SELL WEED OUT OF YOUR DORM/APARTMENT CUZ YOU'RE GONNA GET ROBBED. This is not debatable, it is inevitable.

— Lawrence Police (@LawrenceKS_PD) August 11, 2017

It bears mentioning that the respect Americans have for the police is not reciprocated. More than 80 percent of police say that the public has no understanding or appreciation for what they do. A similar number say that police departments are severely understaffed. The public shares neither view.

Police are playing us for fools. They are doing what they can to prolong the drug war, in its old-school unsustainable way, by telling us lies about it. In this, at least, police are the problem.

America’s Drug War Is Bad—And the Police Are the Problem
Filed Under: Social Media, Politics, National Politics, Charles Loudermilk, Mike Stuart, war on drugs, disinformation, Jeff Sessions, Police, marijuana, Donald Trump
  • SEE ALSO: Why Zohran Mamdani’s Victory Is Good for the Art World (But Some Are Still Panicking)
  • ARTS
    • Art Fairs
    • Art Market
    • Art Reviews
    • Auctions
    • Galleries
    • Museums
  • BUSINESS
    • Energy
    • Finance
    • Media
    • Policy
    • Technology
    • Climate
  • CULTURE
    • Books
    • Dance
    • Film
    • Opera
    • Theater
  • LIFESTYLE
    • Autos
    • Hotels
    • Nightlife & Dining
    • Restaurants
    • Style
    • Travel
  • WEALTH
    • Billionaires
    • Parties
    • Philanthropy
    • Real Estate
  • EXPERT INSIGHTS
    • A.I. Experts
    • Art Market Experts
    • Climate Experts
    • Finance Experts
  • POWER LISTS
    • PR Power List
    • Nightlife & Dining
    • Business of Art
    • A.I. Power List
  • INTERVIEWS
    • Art World
    • Business Leaders
    • Tastemakers
    • Entertainers
  • ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • CONTACT
  • NEWSLETTERS
  • RSS FEEDS
  • SITEMAP
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
  • REPRINTS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Settings
  • Do not sell my data
Powered by WordPress VIP

We noticed you're using an ad blocker.

We get it: you like to have control of your own internet experience.
But advertising revenue helps support our journalism.

To read our full stories, please turn off your ad blocker.
We'd really appreciate it.

How Do I Whitelist Observer?

How Do I Whitelist Observer?

Below are steps you can take in order to whitelist Observer.com on your browser:

For Adblock:

Click the AdBlock button on your browser and select Don't run on pages on this domain.

For Adblock Plus on Google Chrome:

Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Enabled on this site.

For Adblock Plus on Firefox:

Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Disable on Observer.com.

Then Reload the Page